Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report Reference: R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Date: October 2020 © Commonwealth of Australia 2020 Published by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority ISBN 9780648753162 This document is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons By Attribution 4.0 International licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, any other material protected by a trademark, content supplied by third parties and any photographs. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised this publication may contain names and images of deceased persons. Disclaimer This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, and is subject to and issued in accordance with the agreement between Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority and BMT Pty Ltd. BMT Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for it in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. While all efforts have been made to verify facts, the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority takes no responsibility for the accuracy of information supplied in this publication. A catalogue record for this publication is available from the National Library of Australia This publication should be cited as: Jones, C. Toki, B. Heeley, B. Puk, L. Brassil, W. Richardson, D. 2020, Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre- remediation Monitoring Report. Prepared by BMT Pty Ltd for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville. Comments and questions regarding this document are welcome and should be addressed to: Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 280 Flinders Street (PO Box 1379) Townsville QLD 4810, Australia Phone: (07) 4750 0700 Fax: (07) 4772 6093 Email: info@gbrmpa.gov.au www.gbrmpa.gov.au Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report i Executive Summary G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Executive Summary Purpose and Approach The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (the Authority) proposes to remediate Douglas Shoal, which was damaged by the grounding of the bulk carrier Shen Neng 1 in 2010. The project aims to remediate areas damaged by the physical impact of the grounding and contaminated with antifoulant paints (AFPs), to support natural recovery of the shoal. Key challenges that may hinder natural recovery include AFP retarding colonisation, substrate instability, and continued physical damage from remobilisation of the rubble produced by the grounding. BMT developed an environmental monitoring program to assess the effectiveness of the remediation, and detect whether remediation activities cause unintended negative impacts to the shoal. This report describes the methodology and findings of the first two ‘baseline’ surveys carried out in spring 2019 and autumn 2020. The program is based around comparing changes in a range of biological, chemical, and physical response variables from locations (Figure 1) before and after remediation. The design will investigate changes at remediation and nearfield (not remediated) locations, against reference locations at nearby Haberfield Shoal (Figure 1), in a before-after, control-impact (BACI) framework. Figure 1 Monitoring Location Nomenclature Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report ii Executive Summary G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Advisian’s Site Assessment Report (Neale and Boylson 2019) described the spatial extent of physical and AFP contamination, and their Options Analysis Report (Advisian 2020 - produced after the inception of the monitoring program) describes likely forms of remediation. Key conclusions from these reports were that monitoring location mA was highly contaminated with AFP with less extensive physical damage, compared to monitoring locations mC and mE where there was more rubble and lower concentrations of contamination. Material removal has been the highest ranked remediation approach and methods of remediation will likely vary among locations. To meet the monitoring program objectives, the physical environment (waves, tides, currents, bathymetry), site logistics, habitat types, site remediation priorities, and previous spatial mapping by the Authority and its contractors were considered. The multiple environmental indicators were sampled were: • High resolution multibeam and sub bottom acoustic surveys to assess changes in seabed elevation and rugosity, and to estimate the volume of potentially contaminated material remediated. Baseline data was collected by Advisian at all Douglas Shoal locations prior to BMT’s environmental monitoring field campaigns. • Seabed mapping using underwater video to develop three-dimensional images of the seabed. This was done at two sites in each of the remediation locations during event 1. • Surveys of the seabed using towed underwater video transects, to quantify the cover of attached flora and fauna groups and bare substrate. A selection of 200 images were quantified from each location during each event (3,200 images over both events). • Surveys of fish communities using baited remote underwater video stations, to quantify patterns in their abundance, biomass and biodiversity. Three replicate deployments were made in each location during each event (48 deployments over both events). • Sampling of physio-chemical properties of the water column and sediments, targeting contaminants associated with antifoulant paints (AFPs) in all locations. Ten replicate sediment samples and five replicate water samples were collected from each location (plus QA/QC) during event 1. • Collection of fish, sea squirts (ascidians) and seaweed (macroalgae) samples to measure concentrations of contaminants in tissues. Five replicates from each group (fish, ascidians, and seaweed) were collected from all locations in both events. The existing and planned survey schedule will consist of two ‘before events’ (spring 2019, autumn 2020); during remediation (2021/2022); and two post-remediation ‘after’ events (in 2022 and/or 2023). The full complement of indicators will not be assessed in every monitoring event; some events (such as autumn 2020) are designed to account for seasonal variation in biological indicators, while other metrics such as bathymetry will not have a seasonal component and only change measurably before and after remediation. The timing and spatial extent of each indicator is show in in Table 1. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report iii Executive Summary G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Table 1 Indicators sampled each survey and location Indicator Treatment Event 1 Baseline 1 Event 2 Baseline 2 Event 3 During Event 4 Post- Remediation 1 Event 5 Post Remediation 2 Seabed volume removed: Acoustic and Diver surveys Impact (remediated) ✓ - - ✓- Nearfield (non- remediated) - - - - - Reference - - - - - Water quality Impact (remediated) ✓ - ✓ - ✓ Nearfield (non- remediated) ✓ - ✓ - ✓ Reference ✓ - ✓ - ✓ Sediment Quality Impact (remediated) ✓ - - - ✓ Nearfield (non- remediated) ✓ - - - ✓ Reference ✓ - - - ✓ Epibenthic Cover: Towed camera Impact (remediated) ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Nearfield (non- remediated) ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Reference ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Metal Burden: Fish and algal tissue collections Impact (remediated) ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Nearfield (non- remediated) ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Reference ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Fish (BRUVS) Impact (remediated) ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Nearfield (non- remediated) ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Reference ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Rubble and compaction Impact (remediated) ✓ - - - ✓ Nearfield (non- remediated) ✓ - - - ✓ Reference - - - - - Reef physical structure: Acoustic and 3D models Impact (remediated) ✓ - - - ✓ Nearfield (non- remediated) ✓ - - - ✓ Reference - - - - - Other (e.g. incidental Impact (remediated) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Nearfield (non- remediated) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Reference ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report iv Executive Summary G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Results and Analysis Benthic Communities and Bare Substrate Cover At all locations on Douglas Haberfield Shoals, the benthic community was comprised of low turf algae and fleshy macroalgae assemblages (typically >60% cover), with low hard and soft coral cover (typically <5%). There were seasonal changes in macroalgae groups, as well as an increase in bleached corals between survey events that was largely consistent among sites. These coral bleaching observations corresponded to widespread coral beaching reported throughout the Great Barrier Reef region in early 2020. While the dominant epibenthic cover constituents were macroalgae and turf, the degree of dominance varied among different locations (Figure 2). Locations that were very high in macroalgae had less turf and vice versa, and combined totals of these two epibenthic constituents typically made up 60% to 80% of benthic cover. Location mB, on the southeast extremity of the low-relief terrace, was dominated by turfing macroalgal substrates with relatively high coral cover, particularly tabulate Acropora (Figure 2). Locations mC and mE, (priority remediation areas) had high gravel and macroalgal cover. Location mA at the initial grounding site tended to be relatively mid-range for most cover constituents, with slightly higher hard coral cover than other grounding locations and more turf than macroalgae. Locations at Haberfield Shoal (mH and mI) basically encompassed the range of variation in major epibenthic constituents observed at Douglas Shoal; with mH having the highest cover of hard and soft coral, and mI having among the lowest (Figure 2). While temporal changes in cover were inconsistent at some locations, all locations experienced a major decline in the macroalgae Dictyopteris, and a marked increase in coral bleaching. The reduction in some macroalgae taxa coincided with increases in other cover types including gravel, sand, and turf algae, depending on what type of substrate remained below the reduced macroalgal canopy. For hard coral cover (one of the most important environmental indicators) there were significant differences among locations, with mB, mH, and mG having the highest cover (4-6%); locations mG and mA having moderate hard coral cover (~ 4%), and the remaining locations typically having cover at 2-3% or less. A similar pattern was present for total Acropora coral, except that location mB had ~4% cover while the remaining locations had less than 1.5% Acropora. Multivariate changes in benthic community (displaying relationships in the distribution and abundance of cover types in a two dimensional graph) showed that the direction of change between spring 2019 and autumn 2020 was highly consistent among locations, and that sites fell into one of two major groupings: one of low complexity and high macroalgal presence (mC, mE, mI); and a cluster of more complex habitats (mA, mB, mD, mG, and mH). One reference location was included in each cluster, suggesting that the reference locations are representative of the benthic communities at Douglas Shoal. Spatial pattens in hard coral cover thematically mapped for each photo analysis point (Figure 4) show that, with the exception of location mC, coral cover was relatively evenly distributed. At location mC, it was concentrated around the high-relief terrace at the northern boundary of the footprint. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report v Executive Summary G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 2 Mean (±SE) percent cover of major benthic categories in each monitoring location in events 1 and 2 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report vi Executive Summary G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 3 Two-dimensional nMDS ordination (stress = 0.10) of the location and event-averaged epibenthic data Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report viii Executive Summary G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Coral Bleaching Coral bleaching was virtually absent in 2019 and very extensive in 2020, with averages of up to 35% of hard corals, and up to 5% of soft corals, bleached at various locations (Figure 5). Locations mA, mB, and mG had formed a group with the highest proportion of bleached hard corals. Locations mB, mG, mD, and mH had mean proportions of bleached hard coral at approximately 20% and differences between these locations were not significant. The third group included low-cover locations mC, mE, and mI, which had rates of hard coral bleaching of approximately 10% of corals. This shows that, although there were differences among the proportions of hard corals bleached in different locations, these were inconsistent among treatments (remediation, nearfield, and reference areas). Importantly, reference location mH had a similar proportion of bleached hard coral to some other areas of high coral cover at Douglas Shoal (mB, mG, and mD), and reference location mI was not significantly different to Douglas Shoal remediation sites mC and mE. However, because there were significant differences in the proportion bleached hard corals between remediation location mA and both of the reference locations, there are potential implications for subsequent comparisons after remediation. Of potential concern for the monitoring program is the relatively high proportion of bleaching at location mA. Figure 5 Mean (±SE) proportion of hard corals bleached relative to total hard coral cover (above) and proportion of soft corals bleached relative to total soft coral cover (below) Overall, soft coral cover was far lower than hard coral cover and so too were the mean proportions of bleached soft coral in 2020, which varied from 1-5% of colonies (Figure 5). Differences in soft coral bleaching among locations are unlikely to present any challenges to understanding future putative remediation impact. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report ix Executive Summary G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 3D Models Six 3D models were generated at Douglas Shoal; two sites within each of the locations to be remediated. The models were used to produce orthomosaics (Figure 6) and oblique views for each site for qualitative visual comparisons after remediation. The sites were positioned in areas likely to be subject to various forms of remediation effort and encompass both vertically and biologically complex, as well as relatively simplified habitats. The 3D models of the remediation locations showed generally limited vertical relief (<1.5 m) with a mixture of macroalgae, turf, sand and coral cover. Figure 6 Orthomosaics of six 3D models produced within the grounding footprint Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report x Executive Summary G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Fish Communities BRUV deployments observed 146 fish taxa (including sharks) across the two sampling campaigns, with 68 of these taxa only observed once. A total of 4,327 fish were enumerated at the point of MaxN (maximum number of individuals in a video) for each species during each deployment; 1,677 in spring 2019 and 2,650 in autumn 2020. Fish communities were numerically dominated by the dart goby (Ptereleotris microlepis), and two small damselfish (Pomacentrus australis, Chromis nitida), which collectively comprised approximately 60% of individuals detected. These three species are site-attached (i.e. small home range). Sharks made up substantially more biomass than fish (noting only fish over 20 cm were measured). There were significant differences in mean biomass among locations, but no significant differences between events. There were no significant differences in mean fish abundance or species richness in time or space. Multivariate analyses showed that the direction of change in fish communities between the two survey events was largely consistent among all the locations (Figure 7). Major clusters of similarity formed three communities which varied between spring 2019 and autumn 2020, but generally consisted of: i) location mB as a discreet community; ii) the remaining Douglas Shoal locations; and iii) Haberfield Shoal locations. Increases in the abundance of several prevalent species, presumably due to recruitment, was the likely driver of this shift. Figure 7 Two-dimensional n-MDS ordination of the location averaged fish data for two survey events Water and Sediment Quality The antifoulant tributyltin (TBT) was detected in sediments at location mA at concentrations exceeding ecosystem protection guideline values. Elsewhere in the grounding footprint and adjacent areas, TBT was typically non-detected or occurred at lower concentrations than recorded at location mA. These results are consistent with previous studies that indicate that this area of the initial ship impact represents the most contaminated section of the grounding footprint. Clay and silt material, which represent key attachment particles for many contaminants, were most abundant at Location mA. Trace metals and metalloids were either not detected, or had concentrations less than default aquatic ecosystem protection guideline values, in both sediments and waters across all locations. A variety of Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report xi Executive Summary G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx herbicides and pesticides were detected in sediment at location mA, typically just above the laboratory detection limit. No herbicides, fungicides or pesticides were recorded at other locations. Overall, these results indicate that TBT represents the main contaminant of potential concern, and that location mA was the most contaminated area surveyed. Contaminants in Tissue Samples TBT, copper and zinc were detected in fish, macroalgae and ascidian samples. TBT was found exclusively in two fish species, the Venus tuskfish (Choerodon venustus) and iodine bream (Gymnocranius audleyi). Most TBT detections in macroalgae, ascidians and fish were recorded at location mA, consistent with patterns in sediment contamination. TBT was also detected at mD (one macroalgae sample), suggesting localised contamination at this location. TBT was detected in one fish sample from each of locations mB and mC. All samples had TBT concentrations less than the most conservative guideline value for the human consumption of seafood. Copper and zinc are naturally occurring substances, however there was some evidence of higher concentrations at location mA compared to other locations. Copper and zinc displayed complex patterns over time and among test species. Zinc and copper concentrations in all samples were less than the most conservative guideline value for the human consumption of seafood. Acoustic Assessment of Physical Habitat Acoustic and remotely sensed data show that monitoring locations typically had similar baseline levels of rugosity (the physical complexity of the seabed, similar to micro-topography) and depth, with reference locations at Haberfield Shoal being slightly deeper than Douglas Shoal locations. Locations mB and mA were the most rugose, and rugosity was very similar across the remaining acoustically assessed locations. Acoustic backscatter intensity was investigated from three frequencies, with the lowest frequency and false-colour composites of all frequencies likely to be the most informative future acoustic monitoring tools. Rubble substrate within and adjacent to the grounding footprint was typically highly reflective due to its coarse nature and lack of biological covering to impede acoustic return intensity. Conclusion and Recommendations The environmental baseline surveys undertaken have provided invaluable data to assess the effects of the anticipated remediation activities at Douglas Shoal. While locations were highly similar in the broad sense, the most different epibenthic communities existed at locations mB, on the south-eastern margin of the low-relief terrace at Douglas Shoal, and the location mH on the western (shallowest) side of Haberfield Shoal. These locations had slightly higher cover of hard and soft corals, respectively. Otherwise, there are very strong similarities in benthic community among the remaining Douglas and Haberfield Shoal locations. The monitoring program to date shows that the regional reference shoal, although slightly deeper, contains similar communities to those present on Douglas Shoal and should be a suitable point of control for broad-scale changes, such as macroalgal dieback and coral bleaching. Multivariate routines detected statistically significant differences in assemblage structure between sampling events, manifested as both declines (several fleshy macroalgae) and increases (turfing algae) in macroalgae, varying among groups. The very strong reduction in Dictyopteris, and to a lesser extent Asparagopsis, led to greater cover of other substrates obstructed by these algae. Where the sharpest declines occurred at sites Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report xii Executive Summary G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx mE and mC, increases in gravel cover co-occurred. The abundance of Dictyopteris over rubble substrates can be seen clearly in mosaics from these locations and it is likely that Dictyopteris is seasonal and opportunistic, particularly in areas of high rubble content. There was also a major increase in coral bleaching, which went from almost none in 2019 to between 10% and >30% of hard coral colonies 2020, noting that soft corals were less affected. It should also be noted that the prevalence of less severe bleaching was actually much higher than reported due to the necessary annotation convention of scoring bleaching as a binomial response (bleached or unbleached). Numerous colonies displaying signs of bleaching below the threshold for inclusion in the bleached coral category were annotated as unbleached. Although few recently dead corals were observed during annotation, there is great potential for a large decline in coral cover between survey events 2 (pre-remediation) and 3 (during remediation) resulting from the 2020 mass bleaching event. If the 2020 bleaching were to consistently translate into mortality across each of the monitoring locations, there is potential for bleaching mortality to confound putative remediation impacts at location mA, which had a higher proportion of bleached colonies than the reference location mH. Some of the inconsistency in the proportion of bleached corals among locations may be due to the interaction between TBT contamination and thermal bleaching. The impact of the 2020 bleaching event on the efficacy of the monitoring program to assess remediation will depend on whether the observed bleaching resulted in subsequent mortality, and whether or not this is consistent across locations. While average soft and hard coral cover was very low, the number of image replicates sufficiently reduced within-locational error for meaningful spatial and temporal comparisons among locations. Some epibenthic indicators have been relatively variable in space and time while others, particularly the cover of Acropora, soft coral, turf and Sargassum, have been relatively consistent within locations between the first two sampling events. While rubble is clearly a strong indicator of physical damage in the grounding footprint based on imagery and acoustics, obstruction of the visual signal by temporally changing macroalgae such as Dictyopteris may render this visual signal harder to detect at certain times. While changes in epibenthic cover represent some of the most promising indicators for changes relating to future remediation, indicator selection and interpretation will require careful consideration due to the aforementioned interactions between cover types, such as canopy obstruction. Multiple lines of evidence, interactions and factor co-variability will assist with understanding the nature of changes and potential causes. Potential improvements to reduce variability and increase monitoring efficacy include replacing one of the 2019 transect lines at Haberfield Shoal, and ensuring even coverage of each location is attained. Point clouds derived from 3D models showing the elevation of the mosaic sites may be an important assessment tool, given the relatively low rugosity measurements from the acoustic DEM for each of the Douglas Shoal monitoring locations. Common areas before and after remediation could be queried similarly to the acoustic DEM to provide fine-scale assessments of changes in rugosity. This would require models to be spatially registered, which may present some logistical challenges. Much like epibenthic communities, fish communities exhibited a consistent shift between the two survey events, largely related to the greater abundance of a few common species. While several of these species were always below the threshold of inclusion for length analyses, qualitatively many of the damselfish and wrasse observations consisted of a greater proportion of juveniles. This is consistent with more juvenile fish Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report xiii Executive Summary G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx being present at the start of the year (autumn), compared to spring when juvenile abundance is lower through subsequent growth and attrition. Most of location-based univariate fish community metrics such as fish biomass, abundance, and diversity were either non-significant, or in some cases difficult to evaluate due to missing values (no large fish observed). Treatment-based community metrics permitted improved replication and showed an overall increase in fish richness. Univariate metrics of fish abundance, richness, and diversity will require a pooling from statistical and logical perspectives. While the spatial and temporal design of the monitoring program is well-suited to investigations of physical habitat and sessile biota, BRUV sites and locations are not sufficiently distant to be considered truly independent for many fish and elasmobranchs. This monitoring program required a design that was spatially consistent across the different environmental indicators (biota, epibenthos, physical structure); therefore fish with home-ranges that encompass multiple locations or treatment areas within Douglas Shoal will require some form of sensible pooling. One approach may be to use metrics such as B20 biomass, the presence of elasmobranchs, and certain univariate diversity metrics, for shoal-based comparisons to examine the effect of remediation on species of fisheries significance (Douglas vs Haberfield Shoal). Conversely, multivariate indicators, fish species or species groups, such as those with a high site attachment and affinity for complex habitats, will be examined among locations to examine fine-scale changes in the fish community. The assessment of biotic contamination showed that AFP contaminants were present in fish, macroalgae and ascidians, but at concentrations well below safe consumption guidelines. For ascidians and algae, the highest concentrations of contaminants were found in location mA, which is consistent with the highest concentrations of sediment contamination. These data suggest that contamination is entering the food chain, particularly in sessile taxa near the initial grounding site. Dictyopteris was initially chosen as the macroalgal candidate for biotic contamination, due to its dominance in the disturbance footprint. The almost complete loss of Dictyopteris in autumn 2020 meant that a new candidate was required. Dictyota was selected and will be continued for use in monitoring after remediation. The main differences in events (and candidate taxa) were consistently higher zinc concentrations, and occasionally higher concentrations of copper and TBT. It is likely that some of the differences in zinc between events (and species) relate to baseline zinc concentrations in algal taxa. Venus tuskfish and iodine bream are key fish taxa that had detectable concentrations of TBT in their musculature. Bioaccumulation of TBT may be occurring in these species which feed primarily on benthic invertebrates; this would allow direct access to contamination within the surrounding sediment matrix as well as any contaminated tissue. Some propensity to bioaccumulate may also be related to the size of home ranges. The water quality assessment showed that there was no evidence of contamination in the water column above the grounding footprint under pre-remediation conditions. Sediment quality results were consistent with Haberfield Shoal being a true reference area, without any significant anthropogenic contamination. Like previous studies, the present study identified the highest levels of contamination in location mA, and lesser concentrations of COPCs in locations mC and mE. COPCs were not detected above guideline levels in any of the nearfield locations. Only four of an additional suite of 87 pesticides, herbicides and fungicides were detected, and these detection were entirely in samples from location mA. Concentrations for these detections were typically just above LOR. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report xiv Executive Summary G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Given the low prevalence and concentration of these additional contaminants, their removal from the program may be warranted, with their analysis budget diverted to increased replication of primary COPCs for better resolution of changes in TBT and metal concentrations. The combination of sediment contamination data from this study and from the comprehensive previous mapping by Advisian (Neale and Boylson 2019) sets a strong baseline for subsequent comparisons. A power analysis that considers existing data and likely remediation actions will be undertaken to adequately inform the level of replication required for different putative effect sizes prior to re-sampling. The initial acoustic data provides a comprehensive baseline over the entire remediation area to compare subsequent backscatter signal, rugosity and elevation changes. Running the multibeam survey in multifrequency mode had consequences for ping-rate, where fewer soundings are available for the DEM. A coarser DEM has been the cost of attaining more backscatter data, which appears to be highly effective in showing horizontal extent of unconsolidated material. Post-remediation monitoring will assess temporal differences in backscatter intensity via raster calculations for the various frequencies and combinations of frequencies. Sub-bottom profiling did not provide a reliable estimate of the depth of unconsolidated material, thought to be due to the composition of the underlying matrix and the sub-bottom depth range. While the SBP survey could be repeated under different setting with the aim of providing greater clarity in the upper subsurface layer, there would be no baseline information to make comparisons against. Therefore, this is not recommended unless a useable baseline can be achieved. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report xv Glossary G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Glossary Abbreviation Meaning 3D Three dimensional AFP Antifouling paint Ag Silver AIC Akaike Information Criterion ANZFA Australia New Zealand Food Authority ANOSIM A two-way crossed analysis of similarity ANZECC Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council ANZG Australian and New Zealand Guidelines ARMCANZ Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand As Arsenic B20 Biomass of species exceeding 20 cm in length Ba Barium BACI Before-After / Control-Impact BRUV Baited Remote Underwater Video CCA Crustose coralline algae Cd Cadmium cm Centimetre Co Cobalt COPC contaminants of potential concern Cr Chromium CRM Certified Reference Material Cu Copper dGPS Differential Geographic Positioning System DGV Default Guideline Value g Grams GBRMPA Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority GLM/ GLMM Generalised Linear Model / Generalised Linear Mixed Model GPS Geographic Positioning System GV Guideline Value ha Hectares HD High Definition kg Kilograms kHz Kilohertz L Litres LAT Lowest Astronomical Tide LOR Limit of Reporting Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report xvi Glossary G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Abbreviation Meaning m Metre MaxN Maximum Number of fish sighted for a given species during a baited video deployment MBES Multibeam Echo Sounder mg Milligrams mm Millimetres Mn Manganese mp Megapixels MSL Mean Sea Level ng Nanogram ng Sn Nanograms of Tin Ni Nickel nMDS Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling NMI National Measurement Institute OP Organophosphorus Pesticide Pb Lead PERMANOVA Permutational multivariate analysis of variance PSD Particle Size Distribution PVC Polyvinyl chloride QA/QC Quality Assurance / Quality Control RMS Root mean square RPD Relative Percent Differences RSD Relative Standard Deviation RTK GPS Real-Time Kinetic Global Positioning System SAP Sampling Analysis Plan Sb Antimony SBP Sub-Bottom Profiling Se Selenium SE Standard Error SIMPER Similarity Percentage routine in the statistics package Primer-e SQDGV Sediment Quality Default Guideline Value TBT Tributyltin TC Tropical Cyclones TDS Total Dissolved Solids TSS Total Suspended Solids UTM Universal Transverse Mercator V Vanadium WGS84 World Geographic System 1994 WHO World Health Organisation Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report xvii Glossary G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Abbreviation Meaning Zn Zinc μm Micrometre Technical terms Meaning Abiotic Non-living Abundance The number of individuals observed within a replicate Ascidians A marine filter-feeding invertebrate, a sea-squirt Assemblages groups of animals or plants Bathymetric describing the depth of a waterway Benthic Pertaining to the sea floor Contaminants Polluting substance Crustose coralline algae Algae that is predominately composed of calcium Epibenthic living on the surface of the sea floor Epifauna animals living on the surface of other living organisms Event Used throughout this report to indicate survey event Gravel In this report, a benthic class consisting of coarse gravel to cobble Georeferenced Points or features referenced to geographic co-ordinates Heterogeneity A measure of difference Heteroscedacity Unequal variation of a variable across comparison groups Macroalgal assemblage Clumps of various species of macroalgae MaxN Maximum number of individuals of the same species observed in a single photo/video frame Mulitvariate Statistics using multiple variables at once Nomenclature A naming convention Non-normality Data that does not have a normal distribution eg. a large amount of zero counts within a dataset, skew, or truncation Organotins A class of chemical generally used as pesticides and biocides Orthomosaic A large image created by combining smaller images Rubble In the context of this report, sediment believed to be generated by the grounding incident. Sediments that are coarse, angular, and devoid of biological coverings Rugosity The physical complexity of the seabed, similar to micro-topography Pavement Consolidated reef substratum without biological coverings Prevalence The number of times a taxon is recorded by a replicate; a measure of presence or absence that does not consider abundance Taxa Plural of taxon: a group of related organisms Turbidity A measure of the clarity of water Univariate Statistics using a single variable Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report xviii Contents G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Contents Executive Summary i Glossary xv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Project Background 1 1.2 Known Grounding Impacts and Remediation Areas 1 2 Monitoring Program Design and Approach 6 2.1 Assumptions and Limitations 6 2.2 Monitoring Objectives and Null Hypotheses 7 2.3 Environmental Conditions Considered in the Program Design 7 2.4 Indicator Summary 8 2.5 Monitoring Program Design 11 2.5.1 Spatial Design 11 2.5.2 Survey Frequency 12 2.5.3 Replication and Analyses 15 3 Status of Monitoring to Date 17 4 Detailed Methods 19 4.1 Field Sampling 19 4.1.1 Epibenthic Cover 19 4.1.2 Fish Communities 21 4.1.3 Tissue Sampling for Contaminants - Fish 23 4.1.4 Tissue Sampling for Contaminants – Invertebrates and Algae 24 4.1.5 Water Sampling 27 4.1.6 Sediment Quality 28 4.1.7 3D Modelling 31 4.1.8 Acoustic Data Collection 34 4.2 Data Analyses 36 4.2.1 Epibenthic Cover 36 4.2.2 Spatial Patterns 42 4.2.3 QAQC 43 4.2.4 Fish Communities 45 4.2.5 Contaminant Concentrations 50 4.2.6 Rugosity and Depth 50 5 Key Findings 52 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report xix Contents G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 5.1 Epibenthic Cover 52 5.1.1 General Patterns 52 5.1.2 Univariate Patterns 52 5.1.3 Multivariate Analyses 57 5.1.4 Spatial Patterns in Epibenthos 60 5.1.5 Coral Bleaching 71 5.2 3D Modelling 77 5.3 Fish Communities 90 5.3.1 General Patterns 90 5.3.2 Univariate Patterns 92 5.3.3 Multivariate Patterns 96 5.4 Biotic Contaminant Concentrations 102 5.5 Water Quality 108 5.5.1 Water Data Quality Summary 111 5.6 Sediment Quality 111 5.6.1 Sediment Data Quality Summary 116 5.7 Acoustic Assessment of Physical Habitat 125 5.8 Opportunistic Observations 132 6 Conclusions 134 6.1 Epibenthic Cover 134 6.2 3D modelling 136 6.3 Fish Communities 136 6.4 Biotic Contaminant Concentrations 137 6.5 Water and Sediment Quality 138 6.6 Physical Habitat Assessment 138 7 References 139 Appendix A Photo Plates A-1 Appendix B Statistical Outputs B-1 Appendix C Tabulated Biota Contamination Results C-1 Appendix D Laboratory Results and QA/QC D-1 Appendix E BRUV Habitat Images and Tabulated Data E-1 List of Figures Figure 1 Monitoring Location Nomenclature i Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report xx Contents G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 2 Mean (±SE) percent cover of major benthic categories in each monitoring location in events 1 and 2 v Figure 3 Two-dimensional nMDS ordination (stress = 0.10) of the location and event- averaged epibenthic data vi Figure 4 Hard Coral Cover Before Remediation vii Figure 5 Mean (±SE) proportion of hard corals bleached relative to total hard coral cover (above) and proportion of soft corals bleached relative to total soft coral cover (below) viii Figure 6 Orthomosaics of six 3D models produced within the grounding footprint ix Figure 7 Two-dimensional n-MDS ordination of the location averaged fish data for two survey events x Figure 1-1 Locality Plan 2 Figure 1-2 Priority Remediation Areas based on Costen et al. (2017) 3 Figure 1-3 Revised Priority Areas for Remediation (Neale and Boylson 2019) 5 Figure 2-1 Monitoring Location Nomenclature 13 Figure 2-2 Conceptual schematic of spatial replication within a survey (indicators without spatial replication are not shown, such as broad coverage multibeam sonar) 16 Figure 4-1 Towed camera array in operation at Douglas Shoal 19 Figure 4-2 Towed Camera Transect Imagery 20 Figure 4-3 Synchronisation of cameras prior to the deployment of a stereo BRUV 21 Figure 4-4 Stereo BRUV being deployed at Douglas Shoal 21 Figure 4-5 BRUV Sites within Locations 22 Figure 4-6 Line fishing to collect reef fish samples for tissue analysis 23 Figure 4-7 Commercial diver and attendant preparing to collect algae and ascidians 24 Figure 4-8 Biota Tissue Sample Locations 26 Figure 4-9 Collecting a water sample at Douglas Shoal using a van Dorn sampler 27 Figure 4-10 Measuring in-situ water quality at Douglas Shoal 28 Figure 4-11 Sediment Quality Sampling Sites and Locations 30 Figure 4-12 Processing a sediment sample collected from the sea floor 31 Figure 4-13 Diver collecting mosaic imagery at Douglas Shoal (site mE) 32 Figure 4-14 3D Model Sites 33 Figure 4-15 Acoustic Survey Area 35 Figure 4-16 Examples of benthic classification conventions 38 Figure 4-17 Schematic diagram of the relationships between a selection of key cover categories 39 Figure 4-18 Frequency distributions of cover for key epibenthic classes 41 Figure 4-19 Epibenthic QA/QC results for subjective classifications 44 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report xxi Contents G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 4-20 Example total length measurements for fish with convex (above) and forked tails (below) 46 Figure 4-21 RMS error for each rig (aqua, blue, pink) as a function of range (distance from BRUV, above) and total length (below) 49 Figure 5-1 Mean (± SE) epibenthic cover between events by location 55 Figure 5-2 Mean (± SE) epibenthic cover between events by treatment 56 Figure 5-3 Dendrogram for hierarchical clustering of benthic assemblage data averaged within eight locations sampled at two times (group-average linking of Bray- Curtis similarities, fourth root-transformed abundance data). The locations/time groupings correspond to the division line fixed at 70% similarity level 57 Figure 5-4 Two-dimensional nMDS ordination (stress = 0.10) of the location and event- averaged epibenthic data 58 Figure 5-5 Shade plot showing square root transformed abundance of the fourteen most abundant benthic categories based on location and time averaged data 59 Figure 5-6 Hard Coral Cover Before Remediation 62 Figure 5-7 Soft Coral Cover Before Remediation 63 Figure 5-8 Gravel Cover Before Remediation 64 Figure 5-9 Macroalgae Cover Before Remediation 65 Figure 5-10 Dictyopteris Cover Before Remediation 66 Figure 5-11 Sargassum Cover Across Locations Before Remediation 67 Figure 5-12 Turf Cover Before Remediation 68 Figure 5-13 Abiotic Cover Before Remediation 69 Figure 5-14 Acropora Cover Before Remediation 70 Figure 5-15 Mean (±SE) proportion of hard corals bleached relative to total hard coral cover (above left) and relative to total seafloor cover (above right); proportion of soft corals bleached relative to total soft coral cover (below left) and relative to total seafloor cover (below right) 71 Figure 5-16 Bleached Hard Coral Cover Before Remediation 74 Figure 5-17 Proportion of Bleached Hard Corals Before Remediation 75 Figure 5-18 Proportion of Bleached Soft Corals Before Remediation 76 Figure 5-19 Orthomosaic of site AMOS1 78 Figure 5-20 Oblique view of the 3D model of site AMOS1 79 Figure 5-21 Orthomosaic of site AMOS2 80 Figure 5-22 Oblique view of the 3D model of site AMOS2 81 Figure 5-23 Orthomosaic of site CMOS1 82 Figure 5-24 Oblique view of the 3D model of site CMOS1 83 Figure 5-25 Orthomosaic of site CMOS2 84 Figure 5-26 Oblique view of the 3D model of site CMOS2 85 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report xxii Contents G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-27 Orthomosaic of site EMOS1 86 Figure 5-28 Oblique view of the 3D model of site EMOS1 87 Figure 5-29 Orthomosaic of site EMOS2 88 Figure 5-30 Oblique view of the 3D model of site EMOS2 89 Figure 5-31 Sample BRUV video captures of the most abundant taxa 91 Figure 5-32 Mean (± SE) abundance, richness, diversity and biomass for fish (and C. venustus abundance) between survey events by location 93 Figure 5-33 Mean (± SE) abundance (total and C. venustus), biomass richness, diversity and biomass (for fish and elasmobranchs) between events by treatment 94 Figure 5-34 Dendrogram of hierarchical clustering of fish assemblage data, averaged within each location for both survey events 97 Figure 5-35 Two-dimensional n-MDS ordination of the location averaged fish data for two survey times. Data are denoted by location with temporal trajectories also shown 98 Figure 5-36 Shade plot showing fourth root transformed abundance (data averaged within location for each survey time) of the twenty most abundant fish species overall 99 Figure 5-37 Mean (SE) TBT, zinc, and copper concentration in ascidians, algae and fish 107 Figure 5-38 Average PSD distributions across monitoring locations 112 Figure 5-39 Median and interquartile ranges for key contaminants based on location 114 Figure 5-40 Median and interquartile ranges for key contaminants based on Treatment 115 Figure 5-41 Total Copper in Spring 2019 Sediment Samples 118 Figure 5-42 Total Nickel in Spring 2019 Sediment Samples 119 Figure 5-43 Total Zinc in Spring 2019 Sediment Samples 120 Figure 5-44 Total Tributyltin in Spring 2019 Sediment Samples 121 Figure 5-45 Total Propiconazole in Spring 2019 Sediment Samples 122 Figure 5-46 Total Diuron in Spring 2019 Sediment Samples 123 Figure 5-47 Douglas Shoal Bathymetry (50 cm) 127 Figure 5-48 Backscatter – 170 kHz frequency 128 Figure 5-49 Backscatter – 300 kHz frequency 129 Figure 5-50 Backscatter – 400 kHz frequency 130 Figure 5-51 Backscatter – RGB false colour combined frequencies (170 kHz, 300 kHz, 400 kHz) 131 Figure A-1 Algae and ascidian samples from site mA A-2 Figure A-2 Algae and ascidian samples from site mB A-3 Figure A-3 Algae and ascidian samples from site mC A-4 Figure A-4 Algae and ascidian samples from site mD A-5 Figure A-5 Algae and ascidian samples from site mE A-6 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report xxiii Contents G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-6 Algae and ascidian samples from site mG A-7 Figure A-7 Algae and ascidian samples from site mH A-8 Figure A-8 Algae and ascidian samples from site mI A-9 Figure A-9 Fish samples from site mA and mB A-11 Figure A-10 Fish samples from site mC and mD A-12 Figure A-11 Fish samples from site mE and mG A-13 Figure A-12 Fish samples from site mH and mI A-14 Figure A-13 Sediment samples from site mA A-16 Figure A-14 Sediment samples from site mB A-17 Figure A-15 Sediment samples from site mC A-18 Figure A-16 Sediment samples from site mA A-19 Figure A-17 Sediment samples from site mE A-20 Figure A-18 Sediment samples from site mG A-21 Figure A-19 Sediment samples from site mH A-22 Figure A-20 Sediment samples from site mI A-23 Figure A-21 Spring 2019 BRUV habitat images at locations mA, mB, mC, and mD A-25 Figure A-22 Spring 2019 BRUV habitat images at locations mE, mG, mH, and mI A-26 Figure A-23 Autumn 2020 BRUV habitat images at locations mA, mB, mC, and mD A-27 Figure A-24 Autumn 2020 BRUV habitat images at locations mE, mG, mH, and mI A-28 Figure A-25 Algae and ascidian samples from site mA A-30 Figure A-26 Algae and ascidian samples from site mB A-31 Figure A-27 Algae and ascidian samples from site mC A-32 Figure A-28 Algae and ascidian samples from site mD A-33 Figure A-29 Algae and ascidian samples from site mE A-34 Figure A-30 Algae and ascidian samples from site mG A-35 Figure A-31 Algae and ascidian samples from site mH A-36 Figure A-32 Algae and ascidian samples from site mI A-37 Figure A-33 Fish samples from site mA and mB A-39 Figure A-34 Fish samples from site mC and mD A-40 Figure A-35 Fish samples from site mE and mG A-41 Figure A-36 Fish samples from site mH and mI A-42 Figure E-1 Event 1 (spring 2019) BRUV Habitat Images, locations mA, mB, mC, and mD E-2 Figure E-2 Event 1 (spring 2019) BRUV Habitat Images, locations mE, mG, mH, and mI E-3 Figure E-3 Event 2 (autumn 2020) BRUV habitat images, locations mA, mB, mC, and mD E-4 Figure E-4 Event 2 (autumn 2020) BRUV habitat images, locations mE, mG, mH, and mI E-5 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report xxiv Contents G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx List of Tables Table 1 Indicators sampled each survey and location iii Table 2-1 Summary of Indicators and Relevant Impact Hypotheses 10 Table 2-2 Indicators Sampled Each Survey and Location 14 Table 3-1 Trip and Activity Summaries 17 Table 3-2 Indicators and Survey Progress to Date 18 Table 4-1 Sediment Quality Parameters 29 Table 4-2 BRUV unit start and final measurement error estimates 48 Table 5-1 Summary analysis of deviance table for generalized linear models. Significance codes: 0 = ***, 0.001 =**, 0.01 = *, 0.05 =. 53 Table 5-2 Bray Curtis similarity index between survey events within each location, and main contributing to differences between survey events from SIMPER 59 Table 5-3 Multivariate dispersion among samples within locations on each sampling Event 60 Table 5-4 Differences in the proportion of bleached hard coral based on Kruskall- Wallace rankings. Significant differences (p<0.05) are shown in yellow 72 Table 5-5 Differences in the proportion of bleached soft coral based on Kruskall-Wallace rankings. Significant differences (p<0.05) are shown in yellow 73 Table 5-6 Top 10 most abundant and prevalent fish species observed in the monitoring program. Species present in both lists are highlighted 90 Table 5-7 Biomass of fish (>20cm) in each survey period per site (kg) 92 Table 5-8 Summary analysis of deviance table for generalized linear models of fish diversity metrics. Significance codes: 0 = ***, 0.001 =**, 0.01 = *, 0.05 =. 95 Table 5-9 Average length of common genera at each site (mm). Highlights indicate the largest value for all events combined 95 Table 5-10 Pairwise comparison test results between location pairs (significant tests highlighted) 96 Table 5-11 Multivariate dispersion within locations on each survey event 98 Table 5-12 SIMPER summary listing fish species contributing the most to the dissimilarity between survey times 99 Table 5-13 SIMPER summary listing fish species contributing the most to the dissimilarity between locations 100 Table 5-14 Length and Weight of Fish Samples (Photographs provided in Appendix A). Pink highlighted cells indicate the presence of TBT. 103 Table 5-15 Summary analysis of deviance table for generalized linear models of biotic contamination. Significance codes: 0 = ***, 0.001 =**, 0.01 = *, 0.05 =. 108 Table 5-16 Detections above LOR for dissolved parameters in water quality sampling (shown in pink); Guidelines are based on ANZG (2018) 99% species protection. ANZECC (2000) guideline values shown in yellow: Antimony and Arsenic are low reliability ANZECC; Barium is the recreational limit. 109 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report xxv Contents G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Table 5-17 Rugosity and Depth of Locations 125 Table 5-18 Summary of opportunistic observations during field surveys 132 Table C-1 Laboratory results for metal and organotin burden in biotic samples C-2 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 1 Introduction G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 1 Introduction 1.1 Project Background In April 2010, the bulk carrier Shen Neng 1 grounded on Douglas Shoal in the Capricorn Bunker region of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (Figure 1-1). The carrier remained on the reef for 10 days before it was salvaged, producing the largest grounding scar (42 ha) in the marine park to date. The grounding footprint of the Shen Neng 1 over Douglas Shoal is shown in Figure 1-2. The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) established the Douglas Shoal Remediation Project (the project) in late 2016 with funds from a court settlement associated with the grounding incident. The primary desired outcome for the project is that remediation activities support natural recovery at Douglas Shoal, with the project being comprised of three work streams: • Stream 1: Planning and Project Management services for the project (Advisian) including targeted fieldwork at Douglas Shoal; desktop investigations; production of a remediation options assessment; and engaging and managing a remediation contractor. • Stream 2: Remediation and compliance monitoring. • Stream 3: Physical, chemical and biological environmental monitoring of remediation works at Douglas Shoal. BMT was engaged by GBRMPA to conduct Stream 3 (Environmental Monitoring). The planned environmental monitoring program is comprised of five survey campaigns. Two pre-remediation survey campaigns have been completed to date, consisting of Baseline Survey 1 in spring 2019 and Baseline survey 2 in Autumn 2020. This document details the methodologies, results, and conclusions of these pre-remediation field campaigns. 1.2 Known Grounding Impacts and Remediation Areas GBRMPA identified three key concerns for the ongoing natural recovery in the grounding footprint at Douglas Shoal: • Antifouling paint (AFP) – GBRMPA has estimated that up to 20 tonnes of AFP may have been dislodged from the vessel during the grounding incident. The AFP contains a range of chemicals, most notably the biocide Tributyltin (TBT). • Unconsolidated reef fragments (rubble) – the vessel grounding broke up the reef pavement, creating large quantities of unconsolidated reef fragments of various sizes (gravel, cobble to boulders). Movement of rubble fragments by waves and currents is thought to cause physical impacts to sessile biota and limit recruitment success. • Compaction – where the vessel hull contacted the seabed, it physically removed attached biota and compacted the reef substrate. As a result, sections of the grounding footprint were ground flat and have low rugosity. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 4 Introduction G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Costen et al. (2017) reviewed existing information to develop a map of the grounding footprint and damaged areas. Four ‘priority remediation areas’ were defined based on the type and magnitude of physical damage and contamination (Areas A, C, E and F). These areas and potential areas of concern outside of the footprint (dashed lines) are shown in Figure 1-2. Advisian undertook systematic surveys of sediment contamination and physical damage at the four the priority remediation areas as a part of Stream 1 (Neale and Boylson 2019). Sediment quality analyses focussed on the main contaminants of potential concern (COPC), namely organotins and a suite of metals/metalloids. The organotin tributyltin (TBT) was the main tested COPC to exceed default sediment guideline values (ANZG 2018), with the highest concentrations located at area A and progressively lower concentrations in areas C and E/F. Outside of the ship’s path, TBT was detected west of the priority remediation areas (typically below guideline levels), and no TBT was detected east of the priority remediation areas. Visual and acoustic surveys (Neale and Boylson 2019) focused largely on the presence of rubble as an indicator of physical damage. Unconsolidated rubble appeared to have moved in a westerly direction since the grounding incident and has affected habitat on the shoal beyond the grounding footprint and filled natural depressions within, and west of, the original priority remediation areas. Updated priority areas for remediation from Neale and Boylson (2019) are shown in Figure 1-3. Modelling of tidal vectors and velocities across the shoal shows that flood and ebb tide vectors run essentially east-west at similar velocities (BMT 2019). Spatial patterns in contaminants and rubble movement suggest a net unidirectional (westerly) movement. This indicates that prevailing south-east to easterly sea states were likely more influential than bi-directional tidal currents in redistributing rubble and contaminants from the grounding footprint. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 5 Introduction G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 1-3 Revised Priority Areas for Remediation (Neale and Boylson 2019) Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 6 Monitoring Program Design and Approach G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 2 Monitoring Program Design and Approach 2.1 Assumptions and Limitations The process of developing the monitoring program (i.e. developing objectives, indicator selection, survey design and analyses) considered what was known about the objectives and characteristics of the remediation program. At the time of monitoring program development, the following was known: • The harmful processes associated with ship grounding, i.e. contamination by AFPs, compaction and rubble formation (see Section 1.2). Indicator selection was informed by this information; • The location of impacted areas and GBRMPA’s broad ‘priority’ remediation areas, which informed the selection of monitoring locations. There were, however, many aspects of the remediation program that were undefined at the time of monitoring program development (i.e. remediation methodology, specific locations/sites to be remediated, remediation targets etc.). This presents a risk of misallocation of sampling effort during environmental monitoring, particularly during the present pre-remediation baseline surveys (e.g. sampling conducted in areas that end up not being remediated, or insufficient sampling effort in areas ultimately targeted during remediation etc.). In lieu of specific information on remediation targets and strategies, the following assumptions were adopted in the development of the monitoring plan: • Remediation will occur at one or more of the priority remediation areas (A, C, E/F); • Remediation activities may consist of substrate removal (e.g. dredging or vacuuming), substrate capping (e.g. cementation), stabilisation through re-profiling, or augmentation such as the placement of materials to increase rugosity and promote natural recolonization; • Area A has the highest levels of AFP contamination, with the largest proportion of samples exceeding default sediment quality guideline values in ANZG (2018). Area A is therefore most likely to be targeted for contaminant management, such as substrate removal or capping; • Areas C and E/F have lower levels of contamination and are more likely to undergo remediation activities designed to stabilise rubble and/or increase rugosity (i.e. benthic structural complexity); • Remediation activities will be confined to the priority areas within the grounding footprint. High- impact areas within the priority areas defined by Costen et al. (2017) have the highest likelihood of being remediated. The grounding footprint is extensive and the types and magnitude of impact (contamination, physical disturbance) vary across multiple spatial scales. For example, spatial patterns in AFP contamination are variable at scales measured in centimetres to 100s of metres, which would require very high levels of sampling effort to provide precise estimates of concentrations across the entire grounding footprint. The monitoring program was designed to provide broad spatial coverage across the priority remediation areas as practicably as possible given the assumptions, logistical constraints (discussed in Section 2.3) and scope of the project. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 7 Monitoring Program Design and Approach G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 2.2 Monitoring Objectives and Null Hypotheses The broad aim of the Stream 3 Environmental Monitoring Program is to: “Assess the extent to which the remediation project has been effective at supporting natural recovery, including considering whether the project’s activities have negatively impacted natural recovery on Douglas Shoal.” The key goals of the remediation works will be to protect and enhance environmental values at the grounding site, while not causing unintended negative consequences outside the direct remediation footprint. Based on this, the specific objectives of the Stream 3 Environmental Monitoring Program are to: • Measure sediment AFP contamination levels before and after remediation to assess the effectiveness of remediation works; • Measure the cover of epibenthic biota and abiotic benthic substrates (sand, gravel, pavement) before and after remediation to assess their response to the remediation activities; • Undertake seafloor mapping using acoustic techniques before and after remediation to assess the effectiveness of remediation works at addressing loose rubble, substrate compaction and loss of rugosity. The impact hypotheses to be tested are: (1) The bed profile/rugosity and spatial extent of unconsolidated sediment in the remediation areas will not change between the baseline and post remediation survey events. (2) There will be no differences in AFP derived sediment contamination between the baseline and post remediation survey events, and this will be consistent between test and reference locations. (3) There will be no differences in epibenthic and reef fish communities between the baseline and post remediation survey events, and this will be consistent between test and reference locations. (4) There will be no differences in concentrations of COPCs in the tissues of fish, invertebrates and macroalgae between the baseline and post remediation survey events, and this will be consistent between test and reference locations. 2.3 Environmental Conditions Considered in the Program Design Douglas Shoal is exposed to prevailing weather conditions, which has implications for both the monitoring design (e.g. site selection) and the ability to conduct safe and informative monitoring. Effective environmental monitoring and interpretation relies on an understanding of natural gradients, confounding processes, as well as the intensity, duration, and geographical extent of the putative anthropogenic impacts to be assessed. Since the grounding, there have been numerous storms and four tropical cyclones (TCs) in proximity to the site (TC Anthony, Yasi, Marcia, Debbie). These systems and south-easterly trade conditions have mobilised some contamination beyond the original impact site. Although remediation will only occur within high-impact areas (e.g. priority remediation areas), the selection Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 8 Monitoring Program Design and Approach G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx of reference locations for comparison relies on an understanding of the existing disturbance regime. This historic and ongoing disturbance has been considered in the design of the monitoring program to reduce potential confounding by these other processes. The extent of present contamination has been mapped by Advisian (Neale and Boylson 2019) and spring tidal current vectors have been modelled across the shoal by BMT (2019). The present design considers ebb and flood tide movement on the lower terrace, and the potential for tides and sea-state to remobilise sediment onto adjacent high-quality habitats on the upper terrace. Understanding the potential extent of the remediation impacts (e.g. direct impacts and plume impacts) is of similar importance, in contextualising the potential degree of spatial remediation impact, within the larger historic impact. Douglas Shoal also supports a variety of benthic assemblages, each with differing sensitivities to light limitation, suspended sediments and contaminants. The low-relief terrace typically has less living coral than the slightly raised area to the south-east of the grounding site, and the shallower high-relief terrace north of the grounding site. Further east in deeper waters of the shoal, the reef becomes less contiguous, with unconsolidated sediments increasingly more common. Thus depth, wave and current exposure, contact with unconsolidated sediment, and the existing mosaic of disturbance (both natural and anthropogenic) were key considerations for site selection. Further, the exposure of the shoal, together with its tidal environment, limits diver-based sampling to neap tide periods only. Therefore, field assessment blocks (within each survey campaign) have been designed to be achieved within five to seven day periods, to fit within the tide-restricted operational windows. Some study components (water quality and biota assessments) were performed without divers and were less tide constrained. 2.4 Indicator Summary Monitoring indicators were selected to encompass both stressors and ecosystem receptors in accordance with the SMART framework of UNDP (2009) and the national water quality management framework (ANZG 2018). Table 2-1 presents the selected indicators. Indicator selection considered the monitoring objectives, impact hypotheses, and expected types of remediation activities. Detailed sampling and analysis methods are presented in section 4, with the overall approach summarised below. To measure spatially explicit physical changes in Douglas Shoal, acoustic (multibeam and sub- bottom) sampling methods were used to rapidly acquire detailed topographical and habitat maps across the entire low-relief terrace to define areas of reef, rubble and sand habitats, as well as habitat rugosity. Three dimensional mosaics of the seafloor in representative parts of the remediation areas were produced, providing easily relatable stakeholder engagement and monitoring tools. Spatially explicit data were complemented by site-based monitoring of epibenthic communities (underwater video transects), water and sediment quality, fish communities (baited remote underwater videos), and AFP markers in fish and invertebrate tissue. Water quality and tissue contamination bio-markers were measured and compared against relevant guideline values. Changes in benthic communities, fish communities (BRUV data), and sediment quality will be assessed in a before-after / control-impact (BACI) framework. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 9 Monitoring Program Design and Approach G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx For AFP markers in biota tissue, note that marine organisms can accumulate AFP derived chemicals from water, sediment and food. It is important to understand the occurrence of these chemicals in the tissues of biota, especially species consumed by humans, and representative sessile biota mostly likely to be exposed to contamination, namely ascidians (the most abundant sessile filter-feeders) and macroalgae (the dominant biota group on Douglas Shoal). Each indicator will have different response rates (to remediation or other temporal effects), and therefore it is not necessary to sample every indicator on each survey. Likewise, it will not be necessary to monitor every indicator at every location. Table 2-2 illustrates which indicators are designated for sampling during each survey event, and at which locations. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 10 Monitoring Program Design and Approach G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Table 2-1 Summary of Indicators and Relevant Impact Hypotheses Indicator Class Indicator Methods and Measured Parameters Relevant impact hypothesis (Section 2.2) Stressor (physical and chemical) Seabed volume removed (proxy for volume of contaminated material removed) • High intensity multibeam imagery, change in seafloor elevation • Output specifications from remediation contactor (1) No change in physical (2) No change in contaminants Stressor (physical) Rubble and compaction • High intensity multibeam imagery • Sub-bottom acoustic (rubble depth) (1) No change in physical Stressor (physical) Reef physical structure • High intensity multibeam imagery • 3D mapping and 3D image orthomosaics (1) No change in physical Stressor (physio- chemical) Water quality parameters • Physio-chemical stressors (in situ) - pH, TDS, turbidity, temperature, dissolved oxygen • Physio-chemical stressors (analytical) – TSS • Toxicants - trace metals/metalloids, TBT and other organotins (2) No change in contaminants Stressor (physio- chemical) Sediment quality parameters • Physical - Particle size distribution • Toxicants - trace metals/metalloids, pyrethroids, phenoxy acid herbicides, multiresidue screen (75 pesticides incl’ 21 OPs + atrazine, simazine), TBT and other organotins (2) No change in contaminants Ecosystem receptor Epibenthic assemblage structure • Photo-quadrat analysis for epibenthic biota (3) No change in biological communities Ecosystem receptor Fish assemblage structure • Baited remote underwater video (BRUV) (3) No change in biological communities Ecosystem receptor Biomarker • Tissue analysis – fish, algae, and invertebrates (metals, mercury + optional subset of additional contaminants) (4) No change in tissue concentrations No class Other • Opportunistic observations • Other works related impacts All Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 11 Monitoring Program Design and Approach G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 2.5 Monitoring Program Design The broad monitoring design adopts a BACI (before-after-control-impact) type design, with the inclusion of multiple surveys both before and after the remediation, together with multiple tiers of reference locations (nearfield reference locations and far-field reference locations). 2.5.1 Spatial Design Apart from acoustic assessments of the seafloor, the current monitoring program is largely contained within dedicated monitoring locations. Monitoring locations differ to the priority remediation areas (Costen et al. 2017) and these differences relate to the need for Stream 3 monitoring to: • Capture putative changes occurring inside and outside of the grounding footprint, • Effectively and practically sample within realistic weather/tide windows, • Effectively monitor a range of possible remediation scenarios, • Consider the present distribution of contaminants and likelihood of remobilisation by remediation activities. The arrangement of monitoring locations at Douglas Shoal and the far-field reference reef, Haberfield Shoal, is shown in Figure 2-1. Stream 3 monitoring locations are prefixed with a lower- case m to prevent confusion with priority remediation areas, as some of the locations are similar but subtly different, while others occupy completely new areas. Locations mA, mC, and mE cover similar areas to priority remediation areas A, C, and E, while locations mB and mD are completely different to priority remediation areas B and D, the latter areas being unlikely to receive further remediation effort. Locations at Haberfield Shoal serve as regional references. Priority remediation areas E and F are considered collectively in this monitoring program as location mE, given the similar nature of impact, proximity and adjacency. There are eight survey locations, which fall into one of three groups, considered as treatments in subsequent statistical analyses: • Locations to be remediated – aligning with three (3) priority remediation area locations at Douglas Shoal as shown in Figure 2-1 (i.e. locations mA, mC, and mE). • Nearfield locations not to be remediated – Three (3) locations positioned beyond the vessel grounding footprint and not within the Priority Remediation Areas (i.e. mB, mD, and mG). These locations will not be directly affected by remediation works, but they encompass likely flood and ebb-tide impacts from remediation Area A, and ebb tide impacts from Areas C, E and F. ○ While the nearfield test location east of Area A is situated on slightly shallower, high-quality habitat, this location was chosen because it was unlikely to contain any existing contamination (based on data available at the time). Higher coral cover and less contaminated sediment will serve well to assess the potential for ebb-tide impacts from remediation at Area A. Although its habitat differs slightly from locations on the low relief terrace, the BACI design is capable of handling existing variability between locations, and Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 12 Monitoring Program Design and Approach G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx it is likely that nearfield test locations will not be pooled given different exposures to remediation impacts. ○ The nearfield test location mD between Area A and Area C will serve as a location on the low-relief terrace with potential to be affected by flood-tide plumes from Area A, and ebb- tide plumes from remediation works at Area C. ○ The nearfield test location mG east of Areas E and F will examine ebb tide impacts from remediation works at area E/F. • Far-field reference locations - Two (2) regionally relevant reference locations were located at Haberfield Shoal due to its similarities with Douglas Shoal including depth, geomorphology, apparent habitat similarity and size, and marine park zoning. 2.5.2 Survey Frequency The planned survey schedule, where practicable (weather permitting safe operations etc.), is outlined as follows: (1) Baseline # 1 before remediation (completed Spring 2019) - full survey, all indicators (with the exception of acoustic-based data and some sediment data already collected through Stream 1). (2) Baseline # 2 before remediation (completed in Autumn 2020) to ensure baseline data incorporates some intra-annual variation for biological indicators) - reduced survey, biological indicators and incidental observations only. (3) During remediation (2021/2022, timing to be informed by remediation schedule) - reduced survey, water quality and incidental observations only. (4) Post-remediation # 1 (2022 or 2023) - (early to mid 2022 or 2023- depending on remediation timing, to ensure post-remediation data incorporates some intra-annual variation for biological indicators) - reduced survey, biological indicators and incidental observations only. (5) Post-remediation # 2 (mid to late 2022, suitable weather windows most likely August to October) - full survey, all indicators. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 14 Monitoring Program Design and Approach G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Table 2-2 Indicators Sampled Each Survey and Location Indicator Treatment Survey 1 Baseline 1 Survey 2 Baseline 2 Survey 3 During Survey 4 Post- Remediation 1 Survey 5 Post Remediation 2 Seabed volume removed Impact (remediated) ✓ - - ✓- Nearfield (non- remediated) - - - - - Reference - - - - - Water quality Impact (remediated) ✓ - ✓ - ✓ Nearfield (non- remediated) ✓ - ✓ - ✓ Reference ✓ - ✓ - ✓ Sediment Quality Impact (remediated) ✓ - - - ✓ Nearfield (non- remediated) ✓ - - - ✓ Reference ✓ - - - ✓ Epibenthic Cover Impact (remediated) ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Nearfield (non- remediated) ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Reference ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Metal Burden Impact (remediated) ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Nearfield (non- remediated) ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Reference ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Fish (BRUVS) Impact (remediated) ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Nearfield (non- remediated) ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Reference ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Rubble and compaction Impact (remediated) ✓ - - - ✓ Nearfield (non- remediated) ✓ - - - ✓ Reference - - - - - Reef physical structure Impact (remediated) ✓ - - - ✓ Nearfield (non- remediated) ✓ - - - ✓ Reference - - - - - Other (e.g. incidental Impact (remediated) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Nearfield (non- remediated) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Reference ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 15 Monitoring Program Design and Approach G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 2.5.3 Replication and Analyses The level of replication for each of the site-based indicators to be monitored is illustrated in Figure 2-2. For statistical analyses, comparisons among locations and treatments (i.e. remediation vs reference) were typically examined using generalised linear modelling (GLM) within a BACI framework (as appropriate to the structure of the data). Non-detects were considered as zeros. Datasets heavily skewed, and/or with large numbers of zero counts have been modelled using truncated Poisson, negative binomial, and beta-binomial GLM approaches in R. Water quality samples and biotic contamination is assessed against the relevant Queensland water quality guidelines, ANZG (2018) and ANZFAC (2016). The level of compliance to guidelines is compared qualitatively among sites. Due to the movement of water across the site, movement of biota, limited sample sizes, and uncertainties regarding biological accumulation and degradation of contaminants in tissues, these indicators are not suitable for the BACI statistical framework. The deployment of BRUV replicates are not recommended within 200 m of each other (Langlois et al., 2018), to avoid sampling overlap, therefore three replicates were placed within the boundaries of each site for simultaneous hour-long deployments. Unlike the majority of BRUV studies which attempt to understand the effects of extractive industries (fishing) on fish communities (while controlling for the influence of habitat), this program seeks to understand how changes in habitat (remediation) affect fish utilisation. Therefore, key response species for this assessment include site-attached and habitat dependent species, rather than species which are specifically targeted by fishers. Given the relatively small size of the test locations, non- independence (due to fish movement within the locations) is a key concern. Strategies to combat non-independence issues include short simultaneous baited deployments and a focus on site- attached species. Multivariate analyses of community composition were performed on BRUV data using PRIMER 7. The remaining site-based indicators are assessed within the BACI framework. For epibenthic assemblages (coral and algal cover), the unit of replication is the photo-quadrat. Covering approximately 6m2 (2 x 3 m), each photo-quadrat has 25-point identifications. With 200 randomly selected photos from each location, this result in 5,000-point identifications per location, per event. Changes in percent cover metrics are analysed through time using generalised linear modelling with Poisson and Beta families as appropriate to the error structure of the data. Given its appropriateness in handling zero counts, threshold exceedance, strong performance in unbalanced designs and low-levels of replication, binomial regression will be used to answer questions regarding the spatiotemporal sediment contamination after remediation. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 16 Monitoring Program Design and Approach G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 2-2 Conceptual schematic of spatial replication within a survey (indicators without spatial replication are not shown, such as broad coverage multibeam sonar) Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 17 Status of Monitoring to Date G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 3 Status of Monitoring to Date This report was prepared after the completion of the planned baseline monitoring phase of the monitoring program (i.e. on completion of the second baseline survey). We provide here a summary of the monitoring program activities completed to date. Additional details including daily field activities, personnel details, the full spatial extent of towed camera work, and lessons learnt are described in Jones and Brassil (2019, 2020). All surveys where baiting methods were used (fishing for tissue analysis, BRUVs), were temporally separated from diver-based survey activities to reduce the chance of interactions between diving personnel and sharks. Therefore, the spring 2019 and autumn 2020 surveys (Baseline Surveys 1 and 2) were split into two campaigns: surface-based and diver-based sampling trips. In 2020, some of the remaining surface work was completed after diving had ceased on the second trip. Field trip and activity summaries for all monitoring trips conducted to date are listed in Table 3-1. Table 3-1 Trip and Activity Summaries Survey Type Dates Activities Vessel Baseline 1 Surface 2-10 October 2019 Mobilisation to Gladstone and Shoals Towed video camera BRUV deployments Water Quality Fish tissue collection Demobilisation Wild Blue Baseline 1 Dive 2-10 November 2019 Mobilisation to Gladstone and Shoals Sediment quality collections Macroalgae and ascidian collections 3D mosaic imagery collection Demobilisation Adori Baseline 2 Surface 9-14 April 2020 Mobilisation to Gladstone and Shoals Towed video camera BRUV deployments Fish tissue collection Demobilisation Wild Blue Baseline 2 Dive/ Surface 16-21 April 2020 Mobilisation to Gladstone and Shoals Macroalgae and ascidian collections BRUV deployments Fish tissue collection Demobilisation Wild Blue Progress against the entire program is shown in Table 3-1. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 18 Status of Monitoring to Date G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Table 3-2 Indicators and Survey Progress to Date Indicator Location Survey 1 Baseline 1 Survey 2 Baseline 2 Survey 3 During Survey 4 Post- Remediation 1 Survey 5 Post Remediation 2 Seabed volume removed Remediation ✓ - - ✓- Nearfield - - - - - Reference - - - - - Water quality Remediation ✓ - ✓ - ✓ Nearfield ✓ - ✓ - ✓ Reference ✓ - ✓ - ✓ Sediment Quality Remediation ✓ - - - ✓ Nearfield ✓ - - - ✓ Reference ✓ - - - ✓ Epibenthic Cover Remediation ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Nearfield ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Reference ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Metal Burden Remediation ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Nearfield ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Reference ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Fish (BRUVS) Remediation ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Nearfield ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Reference ✓ ✓ - ✓ ✓ Rubble and compaction Remediation ✓ - - - ✓ Nearfield ✓ - - - ✓ Reference - - - - - Reef physical structure Remediation ✓ - - - ✓ Nearfield ✓ - - - ✓ Reference - - - - - Other (e.g. incidental Remediation ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Nearfield ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Reference ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 19 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 4 Detailed Methods 4.1 Field Sampling 4.1.1 Epibenthic Cover Changes in benthic cover are one of the most important response variables in the monitoring program following SMART criteria. This is due to the likelihood of a strong measurable response and the high degree of relevance to all other remediation objectives. Healthy benthic substrates, with high rugosity and living coral cover are likely to be one of the best predictors of diversity and abundance for the macroinvertebrate and fish communities they support. Downward facing images (photo quadrats) were collected from locations along camera transects running east-west into the prevailing current. Two-hundred images were randomly selected for each site from the series of images collected during the tow. The positions of these images from survey events to date are shown in Figure 4-2. Imagery of the seafloor was collected via remote downward-facing cameras collecting 12 mp still imagery on one second intervals, guided by forward facing cameras (Figure 4-1). Each image covered at least 6 m2 (2 x 3 m). The camera array was towed above the seafloor by a 25 kg winged downrigger to reduce layback behind the vessel. Imagery was time-synchronised and positioned using an onboard dGPS with sub-metre accuracy. This produced an estimated final accuracy of within 5 m for tows with the current and within 15 m for tows against the current due to camera layback. Figure 4-1 Towed camera array in operation at Douglas Shoal Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 21 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 4.1.2 Fish Communities Three baited remote underwater video cameras (stereo BRUVs) capturing 1080 p HD video, were deployed for a 1 hour period at three sites simultaneously within each location. Cameras were separated by 70 cm and baited with 1 kg of pilchards. The stereo-camera unit was mounted to a 25 kg flat-based steel frame with surface floats (Figure 4-3, Figure 4-4). The arrangement of sites where BRUVs were deployed within each location is shown in Figure 4-2. BRUV sites were arranged to provide maximum distance between replicates within each location. Figure 4-3 Synchronisation of cameras prior to the deployment of a stereo BRUV Figure 4-4 Stereo BRUV being deployed at Douglas Shoal Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 23 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 4.1.3 Tissue Sampling for Contaminants - Fish Five fish samples were analysed from each location during each baseline survey. Fish were collected with hook and line (Figure 4-6), brought to the surface, pithed and placed individually into fish tubs. Samples consisted of a limited number of common recreationally caught species including tuskfish (largely C. venustus), collared sea bream (G. audleyi), serranids, red-throated emperor (L. miniatus) and lutjanids. Fish tissue sub-samples of 200-250 g were taken from fillets and placed into labelled ziplock bags. Sub-sampling was done by a deckhand or scientist using at least one nitrile glove worn for handing the fillet, while the knife hand was gloved or un-gloved depending on operator preference. Sub-samples were taken with a stainless-steel filleting knife. The filleting area, knife and fish tubs were washed with Decon-90 and rinsed with seawater between subsampling individual fish. Figure 4-6 Line fishing to collect reef fish samples for tissue analysis All samples were assigned an identification label (site, species etc.), photographed, weighed to the nearest gram and their total length measured. Tissue samples were logged using standardised pro-forma, collecting the following information: • Project name and number • The name of the sample collector • Date and time of sampling • Field sample number • Location (waypoint number) • Length and weight • Specimen observations, injuries, and general comments pertaining to the sample. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 24 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Samples were frozen and transported by BMT to the National Measurement Institute (NMI) for analysis. During transport, samples will be stored on ice until delivered to the laboratory. Muscle tissue samples were analysed for concentrations of copper, zinc, and TBT. Photos of all captured fish are shown in Appendix A. 4.1.4 Tissue Sampling for Contaminants – Invertebrates and Algae Divers collected ascidians and macroalgae haphazardly from within each of the monitoring locations (Figure 4-7). Five invertebrate and five macroalgae samples were analysed from each location. Sub-sampling of macroalgae from larger specimens was done using nitrile gloves. The work area was washed with Decon-90 and rinsed with seawater between sub-sampling. During event 1 in spring 2019, all macroalgal specimens were Dictyopteris sp., selected due to a potential association between Dictyopteris sp. and rubble associated with the grounding footprint. However, due to the virtual absence of this taxon during autumn 2020, specimens of Dictyota sp. were collected instead. Dictyota sp. is intended to be collected in all subsequent events. Holothurians were originally intended to be the invertebrate taxon selected to investigate bioaccumulation, due to their habit of feeding of sediment and relative abundance elsewhere in the region. However, due to the relative absence of holothurians at all locations except mI, holothurians were abandoned in favour of ascidians. Large ascidians resembling Polycarpa spp. were selected due to their abundance at all locations, sessile nature, and potential to accumulate metals and TBT through filter feeding. As much algae and other sessile fauna were removed from the ascidian as possible on the deck prior to bagging each sample, but significant amounts of biotic coverings often remained firmly attached to samples. Figure 4-7 Commercial diver and attendant preparing to collect algae and ascidians All samples were assigned an identification label (site, species etc.) and photographed. The following information was collected for each tissue sample: • Project name and number Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 25 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx • The name of the sample collector • Date and time of sampling • Field sample number. Samples were frozen and transported by BMT to the National Measurement Institute (NMI) for analysis. During transport, samples were stored on ice until delivered to the laboratory, for analysis of copper, zinc, and TBT concentrations. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 27 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 4.1.5 Water Sampling At each location, five water samples were collected for laboratory analysis using a van Dorn sampler (Figure 4-9). For each sample, the sampler was cast haphazardly while drifting through the location and lowered to 1 m above the seafloor before being triggered. The water samples were taken by a scientist wearing protective gloves, while a dedicated water sampler handling syringes, water, and bottles wore nitrile gloves. Nitrile glove changes occurred between locations. The sampling apparatus was initially washed in Decon-90 then triple rinsed between replicates. Dissolved metal samples were filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane. The time, date, sample number and location were recorded before refrigeration and storage of the sample. QA/QC samples consisted of the following: • A rinsate blank; • A field blank; • Lab duplicates at 10% of locations (4 replicates); and • Lab triplicates at 5% of locations (2 replicates). At each sampling position, in-situ water quality measurements were also collected using a YSI Pro DSS water quality meter, which was lowered to a similar depth (approximately 1 m above the seafloor) while collecting a profile of water quality data (Figure 4-10). The data collected included pH, electrical conductivity, salinity, turbidity, temperature and dissolved oxygen. Figure 4-9 Collecting a water sample at Douglas Shoal using a van Dorn sampler Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 28 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 4-10 Measuring in-situ water quality at Douglas Shoal 4.1.6 Sediment Quality Contaminants of Potential Concern Contaminants of potential concern (COPC) were based on previous assessments (summarised in Costen et al., 2017), the ship’s antifouling history, and the relatively pristine surrounding High Ecological Value environment. Known contaminants include copper oxide, zinc oxide, and TBT. Suspected or possible other COPCs include pesticides and herbicides listed in Table 4-1, as these had not been tested in any of the previous assessments, and antifouling paints can contain herbicides and pesticides. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 29 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Table 4-1 Sediment Quality Parameters Parameter LOR (mg/kg if unspecified) Metals Total metals: Sb, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Co, Pb, Mn, Ni, Se, Ag, V, Zn, Ba Cd, Se, Ag, Ba: 0.1 Co-: 0.5 Mn: 10 V: 2 Al: 50 Others: 1 Physical Particle Sizing (sieve and hydrometer) 1% Organics Synthetic Pyrethroids 0.05 Phenoxy Acid Herbicides 0.02 Multiresidue Screen (75 pesticides including 21 Organophosphates + (Atrazine, Simazine) 0.001-1.0 Organotin (TBT) 0.5 µg Sn /kg Sampling Sites Ten replicate sediment samples were collected within each of the locations shown in Figure 4-11. Site locations were haphazardly sampled by divers drifting through the site in areas of unconsolidated sediment that were targeted based on satellite imagery. It should be noted that sediment was unavailable in large enough quantities over much of Haberfield Shoal, apart from in a slightly deeper trench at the southern boundary of each location, where all samples were taken (Figure 4-11). Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 31 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Collection Methodology During spring 2019, two samples at Haberfield Shoal were collected with a large stainless steel Van Veen grab; however, this methodology was abandoned due to difficulties with currents and waves reducing the efficacy of complete grab closure. An appropriately sized sediment patch was located using the vessel sounder, surface visibility, and drop camera. The location was marked with an RTK GPS, the grab was deployed and emptied into a 50 L plastic tub. Only samples where the grab had fully closed were accepted. All remaining samples were collected by divers. The diver’s path was traced utilising a tethered GPS1 on the diver’s float. At the point of sample collection, the diver notified the dive supervisor using a combination of radio communications and lines signals. The tether was shortened, and the time of sample was recorded for positioning against the tethered GPS, giving an expected position within 10 m of true position due to tether lay-back. Each sample was photographed approximately 1 m from the substrate, with a 50 cm scale bar in view. Samples were collected by divers using a hand trowel and placed into a PVC collection tube. The penetration depth was made against a steel rod or trowel depending on sediment depth. Upon surfacing, the sample was emptied into a stainless-steel container (Figure 4-12), photographed, logged, homogenised, and divided into jars. Figure 4-12 Processing a sediment sample collected from the sea floor 4.1.7 3D Modelling 3D models were generated inside the test locations, at areas of the highest level of impact to provide a visual comparison of changes in seafloor that may occur before and after remediation. The collection of these data required relatively calm currents, good visibility, and low to moderate 1 Using a helix antenna and waterproof housing 40.8% of hand-held GPS positions were within 0.5 m of true position, 18.6% were within 0.5-1 m, 21.3% were within 1-2 m, and 19.3% were within 2-3.05 m of true position (cm-precision fixed RTK) under dynamic conditions and clear skies in August 2019. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 32 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx algal canopies. Six 3D models and orthomosaics were generated; two in each remediation site (Figure 4-14). Models were 10x10 m and have been located over four tiles from the 5 m reference grid. The same locations will be visited before and after the remediation process. The centroid of the site was marked using an RTK GPS and shot line, with the shot deployed within 1 m of the position. A diver descended the shot line and placed a series of markers. Tiles marked the north, south, east and western extremities of the site. These were positioned using a compass bearing and a 7 m line from the site centroid. Approximately 800 photos were taken by a diver using paired wide-angle still cameras (Figure 4-13). Photos and positions were built into 3D models using techniques involving: • Batch processing of photos to remove poorly focused images; • Colour correction to bring up red tones and reduce green and blue levels; • Removal of lens vignetting to homogenise lighting across the field of view; • Photogrammetry using tie points at precisely known locations; and • Generation of 3D models and orthomosaics from aligned imagery with Agisoft Photoscan. Within Agisoft Photoscan medium accuracy settings were used to align photos, build the dense point cloud and construct the model. Medium accuracy was selected as a compromise between analysis time and model quality. Figure 4-13 Diver collecting mosaic imagery at Douglas Shoal (site mE) Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 34 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 4.1.8 Acoustic Data Collection Multibeam and sub-bottom profiling (SBP) datasets were collected as a part of the Stream 1 field data collection campaigns (Neale and Boylson 2019). Acoustic datasets were required for both the Stream 1 and 3 scopes of work; therefore, this component was removed from the Stream 3 pre-remediation scope and it will be repeated after remediation works as a part of Stream 3 monitoring. While SBP is frequently used to determine and characterise geological strata in upper seafloor strata, the data acquired were not sufficient to determine the depth of sand or gravel above the underlying consolidated reef. Therefore, the SBP results are not presented in this document, but they can be accessed in greater detail in Neale and Boylson (2019) and similarly, this report summarises these collection methodologies and data relevant to monitoring physical habitat. Sonar data were collected from May 22-23, 2019 over an area inclusive of the entire ship grounding footprint and all the monitoring locations at Douglas Shoal (Figure 4-15). No acoustic data were collected at Haberfield Shoal. Hardware components of the sonar survey system included: • R2Sonic 2022 Multibeam Echo Sounder (MBES) operating in multi-frequency mode providing bathymetry and backscatter data • Innomar SES-2000 Sub-Bottom Profiler • Applanix POS MV Wavemaster providing positioning, motion, and heading data • SonTek Castaway CTD providing sound velocity through the water column. Multibeam data were collected at three frequencies (170kHz, 300kHz, and 400kHz) resulting in a 0.5 m sounding density. Positioning and sound velocity data were applied, and anomalous data were removed using filters and manual checks. Bathymetry data were gridded at a 0.5m bin size using a weighted moving average algorithm and exported for use (Neale and Boylson 2019). The QPS FMGT software package was used for backscatter data processing. The MBES was operated in a multi-frequency manner to provide data from three different frequencies so these could be used to create composite false-colour images to provide information on subtle changes to substrate and sediment types across the survey. Bathymetry data were applied to allow correction of the seabed intensity data for the slope differences across the survey areas, for each frequency. Absorption values were set for each of the frequencies and pixel size and processing parameters set to generate the backscatter data products (Neale and Boylson 2019). Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 36 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 4.2 Data Analyses 4.2.1 Epibenthic Cover Point Count Methods Random selections of 200 downward facing images were used for analysis from each location. The selected subset of photos was processed using point-count methodologies to determine major cover metrics. Existing automated annotation software (CORALNET) was used to classify a 25-point stratified scatter within each image frame. The cover of major benthic categories and coral genera was quantified for each frame. Classes consisted of 34 hard coral genera (including bleached and unbleached variants where applicable), 14 soft coral genera (as above), five other fauna classifications, nine genera of macroalgae, macroalgal assemblage, turf, crustose coralline algae (CCA), sand, pavement and gravel (detailed further below). Fully automated approaches have provided comparable results to human expert classifications for coral substrates, while algal substrates typically required semi-automated annotation as per Beijbom et al. (2015). Within CORALNET the level of automated assistance was set based on estimates of the machine accuracy (Cohen’s kappa) for major functional groups of benthos. This estimate is progressively updated with more training (manual classification) as the project progresses. Beijbom et al. (2015) show that a 5% reduction in accuracy does not have a significant impact on the cover estimates of functional groups, therefore, the level of automation was set throughout the project to ensure at least 95% automation accuracy. Hard coral cover is the highest priority response variable because its vulnerability to project impacts and because it is a building block of habitat supporting the rest of the reef ecosystem. Confidence limits suitable for fully automated classification were rarely achieved in the first and second baseline surveys, apart for some extremely homogeneous substrates such as sand. Machine accuracy never exceeded 95% for any coral taxa; therefore, all annotations were done by ecologists. However, machine-learned cover suggestions were frequently correct, making manual annotation substantially faster. Classification Conventions The classification of macroalgal assemblage, algal turf, pavement, sand, gravel, and bleached coral has an element of subjectivity, particularly where classification points fall on the border between two similar cover types, or in substrates transitioning from class to another. Photo acquisition height allowed a relatively large field of view (6 m2 minimum); enabling greater coverage of the shoal at the cost of finer details in benthos. The consequence of this was that small clumps of mixed macroalgal assemblage occurring in patches less than 10 cm frequently could not be distinguished into individual macroalgal taxa. The macroalgal assemblage class was used where macroalgae appeared to be in multi-species clusters or where it was too small to allow identification. The term ‘rubble’, in the context of this project, pertains to incident-derived sediments, and in many cases this could not be determined from towed camera imagery. Therefore, the benthic class ‘gravel’ was used to classify sediments into particle sizes that approximated coarse gravel and cobble, while ‘sand’ was used to classify substrates that varied from medium sands to fine gravel. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 37 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx The following class definitions and examples (Figure 4-16) were used to better define substrates with elements of subjectivity: • Turf: algal coatings varying from half to 2 cm thick, usually light in colour with poorly defined edges, sometimes mixed with other substrates. • Ascidians: although ascidians were often covered in turfing or macroalgae, only animals with visible siphons were classed as ascidians, otherwise upper biotic coverings were classified. • Macroalgal assemblage: macroalgal clumps dark in colour (red, green, or brown) with insufficient morphology for identification to genus. Moderate to well-defined edges. • Pavement: consolidated reef substratum without any visible turf, macroalgae, or other biota. Often seen on the margin of, or near unconsolidated mobile substrates such as sand or rubble. Large cobble or boulders with thin turf layers were typically classed as turf. • CCA: crustose coralline algae consisting of pink lithified surfaces. • Sand: unconsolidated material varying from coarse sand to very fine gravel (0.5 – 5 mm. Very thin dustings of sand where the substrate beneath was visible and dominant were classified as the underlying substrate. • Gravel: unconsolidated calcium carbonate pieces varying from medium gravel to small cobble material (10-100 mm). • Bleached Coral: While the level of bleaching is typically recorded as a categorical variable, coral bleaching was considered dichotomously, with bleaching in the level 1 category (Seibeck et al. 2006) considered bleached and categories 2-6 considered unbleached. A schematic diagram of the relationships among various benthic cover attributes is presented in Figure 4-17. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 38 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 4-16 Examples of benthic classification conventions Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 39 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 4-17 Schematic diagram of the relationships between a selection of key cover categories Univariate Analysis Each photo quadrat served as a unit of replication for use in BACI analyses. Univariate cover metrics (hard coral, soft coral, Acropora, turf, macroalgae, Sargassum, Dictyopteris, rubble and bare substrate) were analysed using the generalised linear mixed model package (glmmTMB) in R (Brooks et al. 2017). Frequency distributions for each variable were generated (Figure 4-18); response variables with a strong zero-bias were analysed using error structures belonging to a truncated Poisson or negative-binomial distribution, depending on the level of dispersion. Zero-inflated count data were used and the choice of family in modelling was based on frequency distributions, the level of overdispersion, and the best model performance based on the Akaike Information Criterion Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 40 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx (AIC). Response variables including total macroalgae and turf were analysed using the beta- binomial regression family with zero-one inflated percent cover data. Sampling event and treatment were considered random factors and location was treated as a fixed factor. The employed methods are resilient to many of the issues affecting this dataset including non-normality (strong zero-bias), heteroscedacity (differing levels of variation associated with treatments), and unforeseen design imbalance2. For the proportions of bleached hard and soft corals, images without coral were included as zero counts of bleaching. The vast number of zero values (particularly in 2019) created issues with glm model convergence due to the zero-inflation estimate approaching zero and due to a near- zero dispersion estimate. Differences in the proportions of bleached corals at locations in 2020 were investigated with a simple Kruskal-Wallis test and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests in R. The BACI framework will be used subsequently to interrogate the interaction between treatment (remediation, nearfield and control) and survey event (effectively before and after remediation). A significant interaction in these terms, specifically a reduction sensitive receptor cover at test sites relative to controls, would be interpreted as an impact potentially related to remediation, or vice versa for increases in the cover of sensitive receptors. In the present study, changes among locations and survey events were the primary interest. Multiple comparisons among sites and events were investigated with the enmeans package, and graphs were produced with ggplot2 in R. 2 There is the potential for different levels of replication between “test” (remediation and nearfield) and reference locations depending on the nature of remediation and the types of future comparison being made. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 41 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 4-18 Frequency distributions of cover for key epibenthic classes Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 42 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Multivariate Analyses Patterns in benthic assemblages were examined using multivariate procedures described by Clarke (1993). All multivariate analyses were done using the software package Primer Version 6. For all analyses, raw data were initially transformed (Log [x +1]) to weight less abundant benthic classes, and similarity matrices were generated using the Bray-Curtis measure of association. This measure performs consistently well in analyses of ecological data sets (Faith et al. 1987; Clarke 1993). Similarity matrices were generated from: (i) non-averaged data (i.e. samples not averaged at the location level) and (ii) data averaged by location and time period. Site Averaged Data Spatial and temporal variation in the assemblages were presented graphically using non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) ordinations and cluster analysis (Clarke 1993; Clarke and Ainsworth 1993). Major groupings produced by cluster analysis (group average linking, 70% Bray Curtis similarity) were superimposed on the ordination. Arrows linking were superimposed on the ordination to illustrate the temporal trajectory and magnitude of variation (distance) in benthic assemblages within sites. SIMPROF permutation tests (Clarke et al. 2008) were conducted to identify statistically significant evidence of underlying structure among groups produced by cluster analysis. A stress value was presented for the ordination as a measure of how well it satisfied all the conditions of its rank similarity matrix. This value is not indicative of any measure of environmental stress, rather, a value of <0.1 indicates that the ordination has represented accurately the relationships among the samples, but values closer to 0.2 indicate that the ordination may have misrepresented the data in high dimensional space. Non-averaged Data High heterogeneity in assemblage structure can be a symptom of ecosystem stress (Warwick and Clarke 1993). Multivariate dispersion was therefore examined to explore within-location variability in assemblages, specifically whether there was any evidence of higher dispersion at remediation locations. The dispersion sequence was calculated to determine multivariate dispersion within locations at each time (see Warwick and Clarke 1993). The analysis was calculated from the similarity matrix generated using non-averaged data, and specifically considers dispersion (variability in assemblages) among replicate transects within locations. A two-way crossed analysis of similarity (ANOSIM - Clarke 1993) was used to assess variation in assemblages among locations and sampling episodes. SIMPER was undertaken to assess benthic classes contributing most to differences between sampling episodes within locations. 4.2.2 Spatial Patterns Georeferenced cover metrics were projected as points and as gridded interpolations to show the cover of coral and other major benthic cover categories spatially. These were used to prepare thematic cover maps for key epibenthic indicators in each location. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 43 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 4.2.3 QAQC Epibenthic identifications were performed by three ecologists with differing levels of identification experience. QA/QC procedures were designed to compare observer 1 (the most experienced observer) with the other ecologists and ensure all three observers were adhering to identification conventions described in the section above. Subsets of 20 images from a range of locations were enumerated by two combinations of observers (image pair 1 vs 2, and image pair 1 v3). The results were compared, particularly for classifications with elements of subjectivity, such as differences between bleached and un- bleached corals; and between turf and macroalgal assemblage. Figure 4-19 shows the improvement in classification consistency between pairs of observers. After the second QA/QC results were deemed sufficiently similar for observers to complete annotation of the remaining image set. It should be noted that any difficult or obscured identifications were left for observer 1 and identification consensus communication between observers continued for the duration of annotation. Also, once sufficiently trained, annotation suggestions from CORALNET provided a useful tool for maintaining consensus identifications though continuous training of the image set. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 44 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 4-19 Epibenthic QA/QC results for subjective classifications Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 45 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 4.2.4 Fish Communities EventMeasure was used to calibrate imagery, enumerate communities, and measure fish. Only the first 30 minutes of footage was analysed from each deployment. Simultaneous short deployments within each location were designed to reduce the incidence of recording the same individuals in different replicate units. Fish larger than 20 cm total length (Figure 4-20) were measured from the point of MaxN (the point in time when the largest number of individuals for a given species were observed). Biomass for each individual was calculated using published length to weight relationships from Fishbase and published literature values. Where relationships were missing for certain species, congener relationships were used instead. Elasmobranch biomass was separated from teleost (bony fish) biomass, given the relative scarcity of elasmobranchs and very large impact of a single elasmobranch observation on biomass overall. The following metrics were derived from the dataset for analysis: • Richness • Diversity (Simpson’s D) • Abundance (the sum of the highest number of fish observed for each species [maxN)) • MaxN of key taxa including tuskfish (Choerodon venustus), collared sea bream (Gymnocranius audleyi), species of unicornfish (Naso spp), and red-throated emperor (Lethrinus miniatus) • Biomass of prominent taxa including C. venustus and elasmobranchs • And the biomass of fish greater than 20 cm (B20). Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 46 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 4-20 Example total length measurements for fish with convex (above) and forked tails (below) Univariate Analyses Each BRUV deployment served as a unit of replication for use in BACI analyses. Univariate metrics (B20 biomass, abundance, richness, Simpson’s diversity) were analysed using the generalised linear mixed model package (glmmTMB) in R (Brooks et al. 2017). Frequency distributions for each variable were generated; response variables with a strong zero- bias were analysed using error structures belonging to a truncated Poisson or negative-binomial distribution, depending on the level of dispersion. Zero-inflated count data were used and the choice of family in modelling was based on frequency distributions, the level of overdispersion, and the best model performance based on the AIC. Simpson’s diversity was analysed with the gamma distributed regression family. Sampling event and treatment were considered random factors and location was treated as a fixed factor. The BACI framework will be used subsequently to interrogate the interaction between treatment (remediation, nearfield and control) and survey event (effectively before and after remediation). A significant interaction in these terms, specifically a reduction sensitive receptor cover at test sites relative to controls, would be interpreted as an impact potentially related to remediation, or vice versa for increases in the cover of sensitive receptors. In the present study, changes among locations and survey events were the primary interest. Multiple comparisons among sites and events were investigated with the enmeans package, and graphs were produced with ggplot2 in R. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 47 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Multivariate Analyses All multivariate routines were conducted using the PRIMER v7 software. For all analyses, raw data were initially transformed (fourth root) and similarity matrices were generated using the Bray- Curtis measure of similarity. Similarity matrices were generated from: (i) non-averaged data (i.e. data not averaged at the location level) and (ii) data averaged by location . Site Averaged Data Spatial and temporal variation in the assemblages was presented graphically using nMDS ordination and cluster analysis. Major groupings produced by cluster analysis (50-55% Bray Curtis similarity) were superimposed on the ordination. Arrows linking locations across time trajectories (i.e. survey 1 to survey 2) were superimposed on the ordination to illustrate the temporal trends and magnitude of variation (distance) in fish assemblages within sites. Non-averaged Data High heterogeneity in assemblage structure can be a symptom of ecosystem stress (Warwick and Clarke 1993). Multivariate dispersion was therefore examined to explore within-location variability in assemblages, specifically whether there was any evidence of higher dispersion for the various factors (i.e. survey times, locations treatments). The dispersion sequence was calculated to determine multivariate dispersion within locations at each time. The analysis was calculated from the similarity matrix generated using non-averaged data (i.e. full replicated dataset). A two-way crossed analysis of similarity (ANOSIM was used to assess variation in assemblages among locations and survey times. SIMPER was undertaken to assess the fish species contributing most to differences between surveys and within locations. Identification Conventions Fish that were too distant to be accurately identified were not included until their identity could be confirmed. Frame grabs of some distant fish were taken into Adobe Photohop for colour correction and enhancement to assist with identification. Small juvenile Choerodon and Lethrinus that were unable to be identified were classified as sp. of their respective genera. It is likely that Lethrinus rubrioperculatus and L. ravus were both present but could not be distinguished, therefore all individuals were typed as Lethrinus rubrioperculatus. Similarly, most small blue pomacentrids with or without white markings were considered all as Pomacentrus australis, and while the species displays significant phenotypic variability, it is likely that this taxon contained other pomacentrid species. All cardinalfish (apogonids) were typed as Apogon sp due to their small size and usual distance from the camera. QAQC All BRUV analyses and identifications were performed by marine ecologists with PhD qualifications in the field of coral reef fish ecology. Tentative or uncertain identifications were cross referenced between both ecologists so that there was consensus in identification. Length measurement accuracy was assessed by analysing measurement error of a 37 cm calibration device. This was expressed as a percentage of the total length based on 10 measurements at the point of initial calibration and at the end of the campaign. These varied between 0.8 and 2% initially and increased to between 2.1 to 4.4% by the end of each campaign. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 48 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Table 4-2 BRUV unit start and final measurement error estimates Rig Initial Error (average % of 37cm length) Final Error (average % of 37 cm length) Event 1 (2019) 1 1.48 2.86 2 0.81 3.96 3 2.03 4.42 Event 2 (2020) 1 1.04 2.10 2 0.91 4.25 3 1.17 3.33 Root mean square (RMS) error was estimated for each of the length measurements made with EventMeasure. These are shown in Figure 4-21 in relation to the range (distance of target to camera) and fish total length. These figures show that measurement error was relatively unaffected by range, while greatly affected by fish length. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 49 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 4-21 RMS error for each rig (aqua, blue, pink) as a function of range (distance from BRUV, above) and total length (below) Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 50 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 4.2.5 Contaminant Concentrations Biotic Tissue Mean (± SE) concentrations of TBT, copper and zinc in tissue samples from ascidians, macroalgae and fish were calculated and graphed in R. Each tissue sample served as a unit of replication for use in separate BACI analyses for each response variable. Concentrations of copper and zinc were analysed using the generalised linear mixed model package (glmmTMB) in R (Brooks et al. 2017). Frequency distributions for each variable were generated for each response variable which were then analysed with the gamma distributed generalised linear models. Sampling event and treatment were considered random factors and location was treated as a fixed factor. Sediment The percentile distribution for metals/ metalloids and other parameters were visually inspected on box and whisker plots to observe the percentiles and standard deviations of the compounds. Concentrations of metals/ metalloids were compared to screening levels in ANZG (2018). Particle size percentages were also visually inspected for comparisons between sites. QA/QC assessments of field and laboratory procedures were made following the methods outlined in NAGD (2009), with fine-scale spatial replication (duplicate samples) taken at 10% of sites and sample triplication (testing for laboratory variation) at 5% of sites. Relative percent differences (RPD) for duplicates and relative standard deviation (RSD) for assessments were made against criteria based on mean concentrations and the limit of reporting (LOR), detailed further in section 5.6.1. Additional assessments of reported lab concentrations were made by submitting certified reference materials (CRM) for marine sediments including MESS-4 and PACs-3 (Marine Sediment Reference Material for Trace Metals and other Constituents) and SOPH-1 (Marine Sediment Certified Reference Material for the Determination of Butyltin Compounds). RPD calculations were also made between certified concentrations and laboratory results of CRMs. Water Water contaminants were visually inspected against levels of reporting, Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for high ecological conservation in marine water (99% species protection) (ANZG 2009) and the tributyltin oxide chemical assessment by the World Health Organisation (WHO 1999). 4.2.6 Rugosity and Depth Multibeam survey data were adjusted to the Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT) based on tidal planes for Tyron Island tide station (1.63m below Mean Sea Level [MSL]). Horizontal data were referenced to UTM Zone 56S, WGS84. Depths at Haberfield Shoal were gathered by querying the GBR 30m digital elevation model provided by Geoscience Australia (2017). A 1.6 m offset was applied to bring the GBR 30 m depths from MSL to LAT. Rugosity measurements were made by dividing contoured surface area from the 0.5 m digital elevation model by the horizontal planar surface area of each location using 12D. This was only done for locations at Douglas Shoal. While a division by planar surface would take better Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 51 Detailed Methods G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx consideration of sloped versus flat areas of interest, the primary comparison of interest will be changes in rugosity within locations, making slope bias of lesser importance. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 52 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 5 Key Findings 5.1 Epibenthic Cover 5.1.1 General Patterns In each event 1,600 images were analysed giving 3,200 images across both survey events. The dominant epibenthic cover forms across the locations were macroalgae and turf; however, the degree of dominance varied substantially among different locations (Figure 5-1). Most locations typically were comprised 20-60% total macroalgae, and 20-80% turf (Figure 5-1). Locations that were very high in macroalgae had less turf and vice versa, while combined totals of the two cover forms of cover typically made up 60% to greater than 80%. Location mB was situated on the southeast extremity of the low-relief terrace and was dominated by turfing algal substrates with relatively high coral cover, particularly tabulate Acropora (Figure 5-1). Locations mC and mE, within priority remediation areas had high gravel and macroalgal cover. Location mA at the initial grounding site tended to be relatively mid-range for most cover forms with slightly higher hard coral cover than other grounding locations and more turf than macroalgae. Locations at Haberfield Shoal (mH and mI) basically encompassed the range of variation in major cover forms observed at Douglas Shoal; with mH having the highest cover of hard and soft coral, and mI having among the lowest (Figure 5-1). Site conditions including swell, waves, visibility, and tides during collection made some of the imagery unusable, leading to less spread of data over locations mE and mD in 2019 and some loss of representation centrally at location mC in 2020 (Figure 5-6 to Figure 5-14). 5.1.2 Univariate Patterns All major cover type varied between survey events and locations, but there were significant interactions between survey event and location for each cover type (Table 5-1), meaning that temporal changes were inconsistent at some locations. The overall effect of survey event was significant for most cover types, with the exceptions being hard coral, soft coral, gravel, total Acropora and Sargassum. Interactions for between location and survey event were not significant for Dictyopteris, Acropora, hard coral, or turf, while significant interactions were present for the remaining cover types. For hard coral cover, there were significant differences among locations, with mB, mH, and mG having the highest cover (4-6%), locations mG and mA having moderate hard coral cover (~ 4%), and the remaining locations typically having cover at 2-3% or less. A similar pattern was present for total Acropora, except that location mB had ~4% cover while the remaining locations had less than 1.5% Acropora. Other univariate metrics that changed little overall between survey events included Sargassum and gravel (Table 5-1). While there was no significant overall effect of event for gravel, there was a significant interaction between location and event, with locations mA, mE, and mC showing increases in gravel between 2019 and 2020. Similarly, for the cover of Sargassum, cover increased at location mI, but fell at mE. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 53 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Table 5-1 Summary analysis of deviance table for generalized linear models. Significance codes: 0 = ***, 0.001 =**, 0.01 = *, 0.05 =. Response Parameter Chi Sq df P>Chi Hard coral Location 60.551 7 1.172e-10 *** Event 2.2981 1 0.129 Location*Event 5.6990 7 0.575 Acropora Location 89.573 7 1.005e-12 *** Event 0.302 1 0.058 Location*Event 3.300 7 0.856 Soft coral Location 137.088 7 <2.2e-16 *** Event 0.520 1 0.471 Location*Event 67.7089 7 0.022 * Macroalgae Location 226.731 7 <2.2e-16 *** Event 11.990 1 0.0005348 *** Location*Event 21.436 7 0.0031756 ** Dictyopteris Location 137.0513 7 < 2.2e-16 *** Event 22.8910 1 1.715e-06 *** Location*Event 9.1086 7 0.245 Sargassum Location 184.3767 7 <2e-16 *** Event 0.3291 1 0.56617 Location*Event 16.0887 7 0.02432 * Turf Location 296.5883 7 < 2.2e-16 *** Event 7.5381 1 0.006041 ** Location*Event 11.9335 7 0.102766 Abiotic Location 148.540 7 <2.2e-16 *** Event 5.501 1 0.019 * Location*Event 34.811 7 1.214e-05 *** Gravel Location 70.397 7 1.228e-12 *** Event 1.502 1 0.22 Location*Event 47.610 7 4.243e-08 *** Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 54 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Significant effects of location, event, and the interaction between these two factors occurred for total macroalgae and total abiotic cover. These interactions were driven largely by major increases in abiotic substrates (sand, pavement, and gravel) at mC and mD compared to relatively unchanging abiotic cover at other locations. Similarly, reductions in total macroalgae occurred at locations mD, mG, and mC while macroalgal cover remained steady at other locations (Table 5-1). The biggest changes in cover between events manifested as major reductions in total macroalgae and Dictyopteris and increases in coral bleaching for hard and soft corals. Bleached soft coral cover occurred at similar percentages across all locations within event two, with exception of location mH where it was substantially higher. Changes in bleached coral cover and the proportions of corals bleached are discussed further in section 5.1.5. Dictyopteris cover decreased across all locations to near zero values in the 2020 survey. Similarly, the cover of Dictyopteris fell drastically at all locations, particularly at mE and mC where it made a major contribution to total cover in 2019. These reductions in Dictyoperis appear to be commensurate with increases in gravel and turf which both increased in locations mE and mC. Patterns in these univariate cover metrics based on treatment means are shown in Figure 5-2. Treatment mean cover plots are less complicated, but it should be noted that treatment comparisons as they are currently defined may not eventually be made, depending on the nature of remediation activities and observed plume effects. Figure 5-2 does show that biological indicators with relative stasis between survey events include Acropora, total soft coral, turfing algae, and Sargassum. The detailed statistical outputs from these univariate analyses of benthic cover are provided in Appendix B. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 55 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-1 Mean (± SE) epibenthic cover between events by location Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 56 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-2 Mean (± SE) epibenthic cover between events by treatment Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 57 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 5.1.3 Multivariate Analyses Multivariate analyses showed that the directional change in benthic community was largely consistent among all the locations, with two major clusters of similarity forming in 2020 around locations with relatively high and low coral cover. Community change was consistently driven by the losses of some macroalgae and the onset of coral bleaching. A two-way ANOSIM showed that there were significant differences among locations (Global R = 0.266, p<0.001)3 and events (Global R = 0.171, p<0.001). Based on cluster analysis (Figure 5- 3) and nMDS ordination (Figure 5-4), three assemblage groups (A, B, and C) were identified at the 70% Bray Curtis similarity level. SIMPROF permutation tests indicate that the three groups were distinct (Pi >1.5, p <0.001). Groups A and B were comprised of locations sampled in Autumn 2020 (event 2), and Group A was comprised of all locations sampled in Spring 2019 (event 1). Within group B, assemblages at near-field locations were more similar to each other than those at other locations, however this grouping was not observed in Spring 2019. Other locations did not group by treatment. Figure 5-3 Dendrogram for hierarchical clustering of benthic assemblage data averaged within eight locations sampled at two times (group-average linking of Bray-Curtis similarities, fourth root-transformed abundance data). The locations/time groupings correspond to the division line fixed at 70% similarity level 3 Pairwise tests indicated that there were significant (p<0.001) differences between all site pairs Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 58 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx The nMDS (Figure 5-4) shows the trajectory and magnitude (distance) of temporal variability of benthic assemblages within locations. Temporal patterns in assemblages were consistent in terms of the direction of change, but differed in terms of magnitide. The largest temporal change was observed within remediation locations mC (Bray Curtis similarity = 65%) and mE (Bray Curtis similarity = 67%), which was slightly less than the Bray Curtis similarity values (71-76%) within other locations (Table 5-2). The shade plot (Figure 5-5) shows that the numerically dominant benthic classes contributing most to differences among locations and over time. There was a reduction in cover of the brown alga brown alga Dictyopteris and red alga Asparagopsis, and increases in bleached Acropora and turf algae, at most locations. Remediation locations C and to a lesser extent E had reduced cover of coralline algae (CCA), healthy Acropora and the soft corals Sarcophyton, Sinularia and Lobphytum. SIMPER analysis on the full data set (non-averaged data) shows that changes in various macroalgae groups and non-biotic substrates, were the primary drivers of temporal changes in communities within each location (Table 5-2). Multivariate disperson (MVDISP) tests were undertaken to examine variation in assemblages within locations at each time, and the resulting dispersion sequence is presented in Table 5-3. There was no evidence that multivariate dispersion among transects within locations differed consistently among treatments. Figure 5-4 Two-dimensional nMDS ordination (stress = 0.10) of the location and event- averaged epibenthic data Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 59 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Table 5-2 Bray Curtis similarity index between survey events within each location, and main contributing to differences between survey events from SIMPER Group 1 Group 2 Location x time averaged data Non-averaged data mA_2019 mA_2020 71.57 Macroalgae assem. (8% ↓), Sand (7% ↑) 51.87 mC_2019 mC_2020 65.40 Dictyopteris (10% ↓) 45.8 mE_2019 mE_2020 66.64 Dictyopteris (9% ↓), Gravel (7% ↓) 52.96 mB_2019 mB_2020 75.98 Macroalgae assem. (6% ↑), Sand (6% ↓) 51.94 mG_2019 mG_2020 71.42 Sand (6% ↓), Sargassum (4% ↓) 45.43 mD_2019 mD_2020 72.10 Sand (6% ↓), Pavement (5% ↓) 45.41 mH_2019 mH_2020 72.05 Sand (4% ↑), Dictyopteris (4% ↑), Sargassum (4% ↓) 48.87 mI_2019 mI_2020 71.07 Sand (6% ↓), Sargassum (6% ↓) 36.90 Figure 5-5 Shade plot showing square root transformed abundance of the fourteen most abundant benthic categories based on location and time averaged data Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 60 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Table 5-3 Multivariate dispersion among samples within locations on each sampling Event Location Event Dispersion Reference m_I Autumn 2020 0.297 Remediation m_C Autumn 2020 0.796 Remediation m_C Spring 2019 0.82 Remediation m_E Autumn 2020 0.858 Reference m_H Autumn 2020 0.941 Nearfield m_G Spring 2019 0.951 Nearfield m_D Autumn 2020 0.96 Nearfield m_D Spring 2019 1.001 Nearfield m_G Autumn 2020 1.011 Reference m_I Spring 2019 1.031 Remediation m_E Spring 2019 1.12 Nearfield m_B Spring 2019 1.169 Reference m_H Spring 2019 1.207 Remediation m_A Spring 2019 1.225 Remediation m_A Autumn 2020 1.25 Nearfield m_B Autumn 2020 1.365 5.1.4 Spatial Patterns in Epibenthos Thematically mapped cover for hard, coral, soft coral, gravel, macroalgae, Dictyopteris, Sargassum, turf, abiotic cover, Acropora, and bleached hard coral are shown in Figure 5-6 to Figure 5-16. Distinct spatial patterns were evident in some cover categories, between and within locations. Hard coral cover was typically low overall, with the highest cover points present at locations mH, mB (particularly along the south-eastern margin), and occasionally in mG (Figure 5-6). Low hard coral cover was seen across the majority of mC, mE, and mI, although some higher levels of cover were present along the eastern margin of mE. It should also be noted that a transect line at site mI was taken in the sand channel section of mI in 2019, where there was very little hard coral cover. There was an area of higher coral cover at the margin of the high-relief terrace on location mC but cover here was not as high as the south-east margin in location mB. The distribution of soft coral cover mimicked that of hard corals, generally at lower cover. Soft coral cover was highest at locations mB and mH with sporadic sparse cover observed at remaining locations (Figure 5-7). Gravel cover was highest across the remediation locations (mA, mC and mE) with some low percentages observed in the other nearfield locations, while very little gravel was observed at Haberfield Shoal (reference locations) (Figure 5-8). Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 61 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Macroalgal cover was relatively high across all locations apart from mB and the south-eastern portion of mA (Figure 5-9). Places with the highest macroalgal cover included location mI, parts of locations mE and mC, as well as the northern part of mA. Macroalgal cover was significantly different between the locations, the events and the interaction between location and event (Table 5-1). The cover of Dictyopteris was highest in 2019 (event 1), with relatively high cover at remediation locations and some scattered, lower cover across other locations (Figure 5-10). The 2020 event saw a major reduction in Dictyopteris cover to almost zero, particularly in areas where there had been a large physical disturbance from the ship grounding. There was low to moderate Sargassum cover across the majority of the locations, excluding mB and mD which very low cover, with fairly minimal spatial changes between events (Figure 5-11). Similarly, turfing algal cover appeared to vary minimally on a spatial scale within locations, with mB having the highest percent cover (Figure 5-12). Temporal changes in abiotic cover were relatively inconsistent among sites with increases at locations mC and mD, and a decrease at location mI observed (Figure 5-13). Increases at remediation locations appear greatest in areas where the ship sat for long periods and may coincide with the loss of Dictyopteris in these areas. Conversely, the reduction in abiotic cover at location mI (and the reference treatment as a whole) likely relate to the inclusion of a transect line over the sand trench in 2019. The cover of Acropora was highest in locations mB and mA at Douglas Shoal, with sporadic sparse cover present at remaining locations (Figure 5-14). While the spatial distribution of Acropora was relatively unchanged between survey events, bleached coral showed a major increase in extent in 2020 (Figure 5-16). Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 71 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 5.1.5 Coral Bleaching Coral bleaching was virtually absent in 2019 and very extensive in 2020, with up to 35% of hard corals, and up to 5% of soft corals, bleached at various locations (Figure 5-15). Figure 5-15 shows the mean proportion of coral bleaching against respective hard or soft coral cover (left hand side), and as a percentage of total seafloor cover (right hand side). This is an important distinction for assessing the overall changes in cover that may relate to monitoring program, because high mean proportions of bleaching do not necessarily translate to high bleaching cover overall. For example, the highest proportion of bleached hard corals occurred at location mA, but the highest (seafloor) cover of bleached corals occurred at location mB (Figure 5-15, Figure 5-1). Figure 5-15 Mean (±SE) proportion of hard corals bleached relative to total hard coral cover (above left) and relative to total seafloor cover (above right); proportion of soft corals bleached relative to total soft coral cover (below left) and relative to total seafloor cover (below right) Rankings of the proportions of bleached hard coral differed significantly among locations in 2020 (p<0.01), and essentially formed three groupings of similarity at the 0.05 significance level (Table 5-4). Locations mA, mB, and mG had the highest proportion of bleached hard corals and differences among these locations were not significant (Table 5-4). Locations mB, mG, mD, and mH had mean proportions of bleached hard coral at approximately 20% and differences between these locations were not significant. The third group included low-cover locations mC, mE, and mI, which had rates of hard coral bleaching of approximately 10% of corals. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 72 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx This shows that although there were differences among the proportions of hard corals bleached in different locations, these were inconsistent among treatments. Importantly, reference location mH had a similar proportion of bleached hard coral to some other areas of high coral cover at Douglas Shoal including nearfield locations mB, mG, and mD, and reference location mI was not significantly different to Douglas Shoal remediation sites mC and mE. However, because there were significant differences in the proportion bleached hard corals between remediation location mA and both of the reference locations, there are potential implications for subsequent comparisons after remediation. Of potential concern for the monitoring program is the relatively high proportion of bleaching at location mA. If the 2020 bleaching resulted in subsequent mortality, there is a chance that bleaching impacts could mask or confound the putative remediation impact on hard corals at location mA. Table 5-4 Differences in the proportion of bleached hard coral based on Kruskall- Wallace rankings. Significant differences (p<0.05) are shown in yellow Treatment Location Remediation Nearfield Remediation Nearfield Remediation Nearfield Reference mA mB mC mD mE mG mH Nearfield mB 0.152 Remediation mC 0.000 0.000 Nearfield mD 0.000 0.004 0.022 Remediation mE 0.000 0.000 0.364 0.171 Nearfield mG 0.097 0.911 0.000 0.008 0.000 Reference mH 0.004 0.095 0.000 0.196 0.006 0.136 Reference mI 0.000 0.000 0.682 0.005 0.180 0.000 0.000 Soft coral cover overall was far lower than hard coral cover and so too were the mean proportions of bleached soft coral in 2020, which varied from 1-5% of colonies (Figure 5-15). The proportions of bleached soft coral differed significantly among locations in 2020 (p<0.01) and formed two groups of similarity at the 0.05 significance level (Table 5-5). Locations mE and mH, had the highest proportion of bleached soft corals at approximately 5% of total soft coral cover (Figure 5-15), and differences between these two locations were not significant (Table 5-5). The remaining locations had mean proportions of bleached soft coral varying from 0-2% (Figure 5-15) and differences among these locations were not significant. This shows that the differences among the proportions of soft coral bleaching were relatively minor in scale and were inconsistent among treatments. Differences in soft coral bleaching among locations are unlikely to present any challenges to understanding future putative remediation impact. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 73 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Table 5-5 Differences in the proportion of bleached soft coral based on Kruskall- Wallace rankings. Significant differences (p<0.05) are shown in yellow Treatment Location Remediation Nearfield Remediation Nearfield Remediation Nearfield Reference mA mB mC mD mE mG mH Nearfield mB 0.406 Remediation mC 0.406 1.000 Nearfield mD 1.000 0.406 0.406 Remediation mE 0.044 0.006 0.006 0.044 Nearfield mG 0.406 0.121 0.121 0.406 0.270 Reference mH 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.121 0.005 Reference mI 0.712 0.659 0.659 0.712 0.020 0.270 0.000 Mapping showing the percent cover of bleached hard corals as percentage of total seafloor cover is shown in Figure 5-16. The relative proportions of hard and soft coral bleaching as a proportion total hard and soft coral, respectively, are shown in in Figure 5-17 and Figure 5-18. Each of these figures shows that bleaching overall or as a proportion of coral cover appeared evenly distributed across each of the locations, but also shows that bleaching was proportionally higher at mA. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 77 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 5.2 3D Modelling Six 3D models were generated at Douglas Shoal; two sites within each of the locations to be remediated. The models were used to produce orthomosaics and oblique views for each site (Figure 5-19 to Figure 5-30) for qualitative visual comparisons after remediation. The sites were positioned in areas likely to be subject to various forms of remediation effort and encompass both vertically and biologically complex, as well as relatively simplified habitats. The 3D models of the remediation locations showed generally limited vertical relief (<1.5 m) with a mixture of macroalgae, turf, sand and coral cover. Both models collected in mA had sand channels and melon holes within the area which are the major vertical relief features for this location (Figure 5-20 and Figure 5-22). The orthomosaics of mA show the varied cover of corals and algae (Figure 5-19 and Figure 5-21). Estimates of vertical relief at AMOS1 and AMOS2 were approximately 1.0 and 1.1 m, respectively. The vertical relief and epibenthic cover varied greatly between the two models developed at mC. Site CMOS1 (Figure 5-24) was located near the base of the high relief terrace and had the highest vertical relief compared to all of the other models (1.25 m change in bed elevation). The model shows unconsolidated sand and rubble material within groove formation at the base of the terrace. The second model (CMOS2, Figure 5-26) was comparatively flat due to the absence of spur and groove formation, with an estimated change in elevation of 0.2 m. This location was deliberately selected in an area of unconsolidated sediment likely to undergo some form of physical remediation. The orthomosaics showed the cover type varied substantially between the two models with a range of substrates present in CMOS1, including sand, rubble, coral, turfing algae and macroalgae (Figure 5-20) and sand, rubble and Dictyopteris dominating the site CMOS2 (Figure 5-22). Both 3D models at location mE had moderate to limited vertical relief; site EMOS1 had a difference in bed elevation of 0.7 m owing to the presence of a filled sediment channel running through the site (Figure 5-25 and Figure 5-27). Site EMOS2 was situated directly beneath a part of the grounding footprint where the Shen Neng 1 rested prior to salvage. Vertical relief here was the lowest of any of the 3D sites, estimated to be 0.3 m across the site. Similar to location mC, sites at mE were chosen to represent more complex (EMOS1) and highly simplified, unconsolidated habitat (EMOS2). The orthomosaics of EMOS2 show cover was dominated by sand and macroalgae, predominately Dictyopteris (Figure 5-24 and Figure 5-29). Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 78 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-19 Orthomosaic of site AMOS1 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 79 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-20 Oblique view of the 3D model of site AMOS1 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 80 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-21 Orthomosaic of site AMOS2 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 81 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-22 Oblique view of the 3D model of site AMOS2 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 82 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-23 Orthomosaic of site CMOS1 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 83 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-24 Oblique view of the 3D model of site CMOS1 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 84 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-25 Orthomosaic of site CMOS2 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 85 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-26 Oblique view of the 3D model of site CMOS2 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 86 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-27 Orthomosaic of site EMOS1 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 87 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-28 Oblique view of the 3D model of site EMOS1 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 88 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-29 Orthomosaic of site EMOS2 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 89 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-30 Oblique view of the 3D model of site EMOS2 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 90 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 5.3 Fish Communities 5.3.1 General Patterns BRUV deployments observed 146 fish taxa across the two sampling campaigns, with 68 of these taxa only observed once. A total of 4,327 fish were enumerated at the point of MaxN for each species during each deployment; 1,677 in spring 2019 and 2,650 in autumn 2020. Of the 146 taxa, the most abundant (sum of MaxN observations) and prevalent (sum of presence within each replicate) taxa are listed in Table 5-6. Screen grabs of habitat from each deployment are provided in Appendix E. Table 5-6 Top 10 most abundant and prevalent fish species observed in the monitoring program. Species present in both lists are highlighted Rank Abundance Total Abundance Rank Prevalence Prevalence Ptereleotris microlepis 745 Pomacentrus australis 47 Pomacentrus australis 743 Choerodon venustus 46 Chromis nitida 535 Halichoeres nebulosus 40 Apogon spp. 203 Pseudolabrus guentheri 38 Siganus canaliculatus 174 Coris pictoides 38 Pseudolabrus guentheri 168 Chromis nitida 34 Halichoeres nebulosus 140 Labroides dimidiatus 34 Pterocaesio chrysozona 134 Thalassoma lunare 27 Choerodon venustus 102 Ptereleotris microlepis 26 Lethrinus miniatus 100 Lethrinus miniatus 26 The most abundant species (shown in Figure 5-31) were not always the most prevalent. Species that were in the top 10 most abundant and prevalent taxa included Ptereleotris microlepis, Pomacentrus australis, Chromis nitida, Pseudolabrus guentheri, Halichoeres nebulosus, Choerodon venustus, and Lethrinus miniatus. Ptereleotris microlepis is a free-swimming dart-goby that formed frequent large schools at 26 of the 48 deployments. Pomacentrus australis and Chromis nitida are small damselfish that were common and abundant, and relatively site-attached, present at 47 and 34 deployments, respectively. Pomacentrus australis was observed on every deployment except one. Pseudolabrus guentheri, and Halichoeres nebulosus are two small species of wrasse that were common in areas of dense macroalgae; a maximum of 13 and 20 individuals respectively, were recorded. However, 2-4 individuals were typically present. Choerodon venustus, and Lethrinus miniatus are larger species both commonly sought after by recreational fishers and both had the same prevalence (26 of 48 deployments) and similar total abundances (Table 5-6). Elasmobranchs (sharks and rays) were observed relatively infrequently, with observations at 6/8 locations during 2019 and at 2/8 locations in 2020. Species of interest included Galeocerdo cuvier (tiger sharks), Sphyrna lewini (scalloped hammerhead sharks) Pastinachus ater (cow-tailed rays), and Nebrius ferrugineus (tawny nurse sharks). Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 91 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-31 Sample BRUV video captures of the most abundant taxa Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 92 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 5.3.2 Univariate Patterns Changes in treatment-level fish B20 biomass, richness and abundance reflected fish communities that became smaller in size, more rich, and more numerous between spring 2019 and Autumn 2020. Location-based differences were far more variable and without significant differences. The B20 biomass totals for locations were typically similar among sampling events or declined slightly (Table 5-7, Figure 5-32). Location-based B20 biomass could not be statistically assessed among locations and events due to the absence of fish greater than 20 cm in length at some deployments in location mA. However, B20 biomass was higher in the nearfield treatment than it was in remediation and reference areas, and there were no changes between events (Figure 5-33, Table 5-15). Table 5-7 Biomass of fish (>20cm) in each survey period per site (kg) Location Event 1 Event 2 Fish Elasmobranch Fish Elasmobranch mA 19.59 399.18 19.79 0.00 mB 85.39 0.00 70.46 0.00 mC 33.74 165.18 27.05 0.00 mD 63.83 139.95 49.97 0.00 mE 55.52 4.28 12.66 457.01 mG 22.88 0.00 22.51 0.00 mH 50.28 9.30 30.96 344.60 mI 4.36 5.56 11.29 0.00 While fish B20 biomass was unchanging or decreasing (non-significantly) between events, treatment-level abundance and richness increased significantly overall between surveys (Figure 5-32, Figure 5-33, Table 5-8). Although there were significant changes between events, treatments themselves did not consistently differ, nor were there interactions between treatments and events. While there was no evidence that univariate fish community descriptors varied among locations and events, there were differences among treatments. Fish communities tended to be richer and more abundant in event 2, while there was a (non- significant) trend down in size. These changes are consistent with more juvenile fish in autumn 2020 compared to spring 2019. This was also reflected anecdotally during line fishing where fishing felt ‘leaner’ during the second survey, with smaller and fewer fish captured. Location-based averages in Table 5-8 for some of the more common large genera (Choerodon, Gymnocranius, Lethrinus, and Naso) show that genera such as Lethrinus and Naso had larger fish on average in 2019 than 2020. Differences in Simpson’s diversity, and the abundance of C. venustus were not significant among treatments or sampling events. Differences in elasmobranch biomass among treatments and events were not compared statistically due to a lack of data but means are presented visually in Figure 5-33. The detailed statistical outputs from these univariate analyses of fish communities are provided in Appendix B. Full tabulated MaxN observations and biomass estimates are provided in Appendix E. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 93 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-32 Mean (± SE) abundance, richness, diversity and biomass for fish (and C. venustus abundance) between survey events by location Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 94 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-33 Mean (± SE) abundance (total and C. venustus), biomass richness, diversity and biomass (for fish and elasmobranchs) between events by treatment Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 95 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Table 5-8 Summary analysis of deviance table for generalized linear models of fish diversity metrics. Significance codes: 0 = ***, 0.001 =**, 0.01 = *, 0.05 =. (Refer Appendix B for detailed statistical outputs from these analyses) Table 5-9 Average length of common genera at each site (mm). Highlights indicate the largest value for all events combined Location Event 1 Event 2 Choerodon Gymnocranius Lethrinus Naso Choerodon Gymnocranius Lethrinus Naso mA 298 252 0 337 387 293 0 169 mB 287 282 301 352 332 293 0 317 mC 251 268 347 0 173 213 127 0 mD 216 278 245 502 284 321 123 182 mE 419 315 305 0 247 304 257 0 mG 299 280 362 505 363 322 204 0 mH 330 0 199 187 282 0 183 189 mI 240 0 162 0 302 0 143 0 mA 298 252 0 337 387 293 0 169 Response Parameter Chi Sq df P>Chi B20 Biomass Treatment 6.8277 2 0.033 * Event 0.5702 1 0.450 Treatment*Event 0.8546 2 0.653 Richness Location 1.6181 2 0.44528 Event 4.8805 1 0.02716 * Location*Event 3.1487 2 0.20714 Abundance Location 3.846 2 0.146 Event 4.808 1 0.028 * Location*Event 0.110 2 0.946 Simpsons Diversity Location 0.633 2 0.7286 Event 1.696 1 0.1928 Location*Event 3.510 2 0.1729 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 96 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 5.3.3 Multivariate Patterns Multivariate analyses showed that the direction of change in fish communities between the two survey events was largely consistent among all the locations. Major clusters of similarity formed three communities which varied between spring 2019 and autumn 2020, but generally consisted of location mB as a discreet community, the remaining Douglas Shoal locations, and thirdly, Haberfield Shoal locations. Increases in the abundance of several prevalent species, presumably due to recruitment, was the likely driver of this shift. The differences in fish communities analysed with a two-way ANOSIM indicated significant that locations (Global R = 0.338, p = 0.001) and survey events (Global R = 0.237, p = 0.001) differed significantly. Pairwise comparisons of fish communities between locations showed that not all location pairs were significantly different (Table 5-10). Rather, Haberfield Shoal reference locations (mH and mI) were both significantly different to half of the Douglas Shoal locations, including mA (p = 0.01), mB (p < 0.03) and mC (p < 0.02). Differences were also detected when comparing some Douglas Shoal locations, namely location mC with each of mA and mB (p < 0.02), and when comparing mB to mG (p < 0.02). Table 5-10 Pairwise comparison test results between location pairs (significant tests highlighted) Pairwise comparison R Statistic Significance level (%) mA, mB 0.352 8 mA, mC 0.444 2 mA, mD 0.259 10 mA, mE 0.148 22 mA, mG 0.204 16 mA, mH 0.63 1 mA, mI 0.574 1 mB, mC 0.667 1 mB, mD 0.148 28 mB, mE 0.204 20 mB, mG 0.537 2 mB, mH 0.519 3 mB, mI 0.852 1 mC, mD 0.204 15 mC, mE -0.074 69 mC, mG 0.259 12 mC, mH 0.519 2 mC, mI 0.537 1 mD, mE -0.056 56 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 97 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Overall, three broad groupings were identified, as illustrated by both cluster analysis and n-MDS ordination (see Figure 5-34 and Figure 5-35). These groupings were comprised of: (1) Haberfield Shoal (reference locations), including both survey events (2) Douglas Shoal locations during the first survey event (Spring 2019) (3) Douglas Shoal locations during the second survey (Autumn 2020). Additionally, location mB appeared very different to other fish communities; it was dissimilar to other Douglas Shoal locations during both survey events but it changed direction in community spaces in the same way that other locations did. With the exception of the different communities at mB, the above-mentioned groups were distinct at a 55% similarity level (sharing roughly half of species 4). All locations displayed a temporal shift between the two survey events. This temporal change followed a comparable trend at all locations in terms of the direction of change (see trajectories trending towards bottom-left of nMDS ordination at Figure 5-35). The magnitude of this change was variable between locations and appeared similar overall between treatments. Figure 5-34 Dendrogram of hierarchical clustering of fish assemblage data, averaged within each location for both survey events 4 Within the Bray-Curtis similarity matrix, the abundance and distribution of taxa between two groups can vary between 0 and 100% similarity, with the latter representing the same number of individuals from the same array of species at two sites. Zero (0%) similarity (or 100% dissimilarity) represents no shared species Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 98 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-35 Two-dimensional n-MDS ordination of the location averaged fish data for two survey times. Data are denoted by location with temporal trajectories also shown At every location, the first survey (Spring 2019) was characterised by a higher degree of multivariate dispersion as compared to the second survey (Autumn 2020) (Table 5-11). This indicates that, within each location, fish records (i.e. taxa/abundance) were less variable during the second survey. Dispersion trends were not evident between locations or treatments. Table 5-11 Multivariate dispersion within locations on each survey event Location Survey Dispersion Remediation mA 1. Spring 2019 2. Autumn 2020 1.374 0.830 Remediation mC 1. Spring 2019 2. Autumn 2020 0.939 0.884 Remediation mE 1. Spring 2019 2. Autumn 2020 1.660 0.762 Nearfield mB 1. Spring 2019 2. Autumn 2020 1.769 1.211 Nearfield mD 1. Spring 2019 2. Autumn 2020 1.306 0.952 Nearfield mG 1. Spring 2019 2. Autumn 2020 0.898 0.259 Reference mH 1. Spring 2019 2. Autumn 2020 1.401 0.816 Reference mI 1. Spring 2019 2. Autumn 2020 0.612 0.327 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 99 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx The overall differences in the fish communities between the two survey times were strongly driven by higher average abundances of the following species during the second (Autumn 2020) survey: Chromis nitida, Scolopsis monogramma, Apogon sp, Ptereleotris microlepis; as well as changes in the presence of species of Parapercis (Table 5-12, Figure 5-36). In terms of differences between locations, Figure 5-36 illustrates how the average abundances of the 20 most common species varied between locations for the two surveys. Pomacentrus australis was highly abundant across all locations. Chromis nitida was likewise widespread, but more abundant during the second survey. Location mA was differentiated by the highest abundances of Chromis nitida and Ptereleotris microlepis during the second survey. The apparent outlying nature of location mB was in part due to higher abundances of Plectropomus leopardus. Reference locations at Haberfield shoal tended to have higher abundances of Acanthurus grammoptilus, Apogon sp, Choerodon venustus, Siganus canaliculatus and Halichoeres nebulosus. Proportional contributions of these, and the less common species also contributing to differences between locations are listed in Table 5-13. Figure 5-36 Shade plot showing fourth root transformed abundance (data averaged within location for each survey time) of the twenty most abundant fish species overall Table 5-12 SIMPER summary listing fish species contributing the most to the dissimilarity between survey times Test Dissimilarity Species contributing most to dissimilarity (% contribution, listed next to survey when most abundant) Survey 1 (Spring 2019) vs Survey 2 (Autumn 2020) 45.38 ↑ Survey 1: Parapercis sp (3%, absent survey 2) ↑ Survey 2: Chromis nitida (5%), Parapercis stricticeps (4%, absent survey 1), Scolopsis monogramma (3%), Apogon sp (3%), Ptereleotris microlepis (3%) Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 100 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Table 5-13 SIMPER summary listing fish species contributing the most to the dissimilarity between locations Test Loc Dissimilarity Species contributing most to dissimilarity (% contribution, listed next to location where most abundant) mA, mB 52.65 ↑ mA: Ptereleotris microlepis (7%), Chromis nitida (4%), Parapercis clathrata (3%) ↑ mB: Acanthurus grammoptilus (4%, absent at mA) mA, mC 48.20 ↑ mA: Ptereleotris microlepis (10%), Lethrinus miniatus (4%), Naso unicornis (3% and absent at mC), Scolopsis monogramma (3%) mB, mC 59.08 ↑ mB: Acanthurus grammoptilus (4%, absent at mC), Naso tonganus (3%, absent at mC) ↑ mC: Lethrinus miniatus (3%) mA, mD 45.86 ↑ mA: Ptereleotris microlepis (5%), Chromis nitida (5%), Scolopsis monogramma (4%) ↑ mD: Leptojulis cyanopleura (4%), Gymnocranius audleyi (3%) mB, mD 49.93 ↑ mB: Acanthurus grammoptilus (3%) ↑ mD: Leptojulis cyanopleura (4%) mC, mD 44.29 ↑ mC: Chromis nitida (5%), Leptojulis cyanopleura (4%), Lethrinus miniatus (3%) ↑ mD: Ptereleotris microlepis (5%), Gymnocranius audleyi (4%) mA, mE 44.89 ↑ mA: Ptereleotris microlepis (7%), Parapercis clathrata (5%), Naso unicornis (4%, absent at mE), Scolopsis monogramma (3%), Apogon sp (3%) mB, mE 53.51 ↑ mB: Naso tonganus (4%, absent at mE), Acanthurus grammoptilus (4%), Plectropomus leopardus (3%, absent at mE) ↑ mE: Pseudolabrus guentheri (3%) mC, mE 36.49 ↑ mC: Lethrinus miniatus (4%) ↑ mE: Ptereleotris microlepis (5%), Pseudolabrus guentheri (4%), Parapercis clathrata (3%) mD, mE 41.76 ↑ mD: Leptojulis cyanopleura (5%), Sufflamen chrysopterum (4%), Gymnocranius audleyi (4%) ↑ mE: Chromis nitida (4%), Pseudolabrus guentheri (4%) mA mG 38.46 ↑ mA: Ptereleotris microlepis (6%), Scolopsis monogramma (4%), Parapercis clathrata (3%, absent at mG) ↑ mG: Caesio chrysozona (4%, absent at mA), Apogon sp (4%), Parapercis stricticeps (3%, absent at mA) mB, mG 54.93 ↑ mB: Acanthurus grammoptilus (4%, absent at mG) ↑ mG: Ptereleotris microlepis (5%), Pseudolabrus guentheri (4%), Caesio chrysozona (3%, absent at mB), Coris pictoides (3%) mC, mG 38.99 ↑ mC: Carangoides fulvoguttatus (3%, absent at mG) ↑ mG: Ptereleotris microlepis (10%), Caesio chrysozona (5%, absent mC), Pseudochromis fuscus (5%), Pseudolabrus guentheri (4%) mD, mG 39.03 ↑ mD: Gymnocranius audleyi (3%), Plectropomus leopardus (3%) ↑ mG: Pseudolabrus guentheri (5%), Ptereleotris microlepis (5%), Caesio chrysozona (4%, absent at mD), Chromis nitida (4%) mE, mG 35.47 ↑ mE: Siganus canaliculatus (3%) Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 101 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Test Loc Dissimilarity Species contributing most to dissimilarity (% contribution, listed next to location where most abundant) ↑ mG: Ptereleotris microlepis (7%), Caesio chrysozona (5%, absent at mE), Stethojulis strigiventer (3%), Choerodon schoenleinii (3%) mA, mH 53.93 ↑ mA: Ptereleotris microlepis (6%), Parapercis clathrata (3%) ↑ mH: Acanthurus grammoptilus (5%, absent mA), Parupeneus barberinoides (3%, absent mA), Lethrinus miniatus (3%) mB, mH 53.74 ↑ mB: Gymnocranius audleyi (4%, absent at mH) ↑ mH: Pentapodus paradiseus (5%, absent mB), Pseudolabrus guentheri (4%), Parupeneus barberinoides (4%, absent mB) mC, mH 49.20 ↑ mH: Acanthurus grammoptilus (6%, absent at mC), Pentapodus paradiseus (5%), Chaetodontoplus meredithi (4%), Pseudolabrus guentheri (3%), Parupeneus spilurus (3%, absent at mC) mD, mH 53.18 ↑ mD: Gymnocranius audleyi (5%, absent at mH), Halichoeres nebulosus (4%) ↑ mH: Pentapodus paradiseus (4%), Pseudolabrus guentheri (4%), Acanthurus grammoptilus (4%), Chaetodontoplus meredithi (4%) mE, mH 48.12 ↑ mH: Pentapodus paradiseus (6%, absent at mE), Acanthurus grammoptilus (5%), Chaetodontoplus meredithi (4%), Lethrinus miniatus (3%), Parupeneus spilurus (3%, absent at mE) mG, mH 43.35 ↑ mG: Ptereleotris microlepis (7%) ↑ mH: Acanthurus grammoptilus (6%, absent at mG), Pentapodus paradiseus (6%, absent at mG), Parupeneus barberinoides (4%), Parupeneus spilurus (3%, absent at mG), Sufflamen chrysopterum (3%, absent at mG) mA, mI 54.99 ↑ mA: Chromis nitida (5%), Ptereleotris microlepis (5%) ↑ mI: Siganus canaliculatus (7%, absent at mA), Lethrinus miniatus (5%), Parupeneus barberinoides (4%, absent at mA), Rhinecanthus rectangulus (3%, absent at mA) mB, mI 65.57 ↑ mB: Gymnocranius audleyi (4%, absent at mI) ↑ mI: Siganus canaliculatus (5%), Lethrinus miniatus (5%), Pentapodus paradiseus (4%, absent mB) mC, mI 45.04 ↑ mC: Chromis nitida (5%), Leptojulis cyanopleura (3%, absent at mI) ↑ mI: Siganus canaliculatus (7%), Pentapodus paradiseus (6%), Rhinecanthus rectangulus (5%, absent at mC), Ptereleotris microlepis (4%) mD, mI 49.36 ↑ mD: Gymnocranius audleyi (6%, absent at mI) ↑ mI: Siganus canaliculatus (8%), Lethrinus miniatus (6%), Pentapodus paradiseus (5%), Rhinecanthus rectangulus (4%, absent at mD) mE, mI 48.75 ↑ mE: Chromis nitida (5%) ↑ mI: Siganus canaliculatus (7%), Pentapodus paradiseus (6%, absent mE) Lethrinus_miniatus (6%), Rhinecanthus rectangulus (4%, absent mE) mG, mI 45.41 ↑ mG: Chromis nitida (5%), Ptereleotris microlepis (4%) ↑ mI: Siganus canaliculatus (8%), Pentapodus paradiseus (6%, absent at mG), Lethrinus miniatus (5%) mH, mI 41.13 ↑ mH: Acanthurus grammoptilus (6%), Chromis nitida (5%) ↑ mI: Siganus canaliculatus (5%), Halichoeres nebulosus (5%), Ptereleotris microlepis (4%), Rhinecanthus rectangulus (4%, absent at mH) Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 102 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 5.4 Biotic Contaminant Concentrations TBT, copper, and zinc were found in all three forms of biota (fish, macroalgae, and ascidians). Copper and zinc are naturally occurring and their presence in biota was not unexpected; however, there was some evidence of higher concentrations at mA compared to other locations. Although TBT was only found in fish in 2019, it was found in fish, ascidians and macroalgae in 2020. Detailed tabulated results are listed in Appendix C and photographs of the biota sampled are provided in Appendix A. Key findings from the biotic contamination assessment are as follows: • TBT was below LOR in all tissue samples from algae and ascidians in 2019. However, TBT was present in four macroalgae samples from mA, one macroalgae sample from mD, and from two ascidian samples in mA during 2020. Concentrations ranged from 1.2 – 37 ng/g, which was below the most conservative human health guideline for consumption of 240 ng/g (WHO 1999). It should be noted that the species of macroalgae differed between 2019 (Dictyopteris sp.) compared to 2020 (Dictyota sp.) due to availability. • In 2020, one macroalgae sample with high TBT (37 ng/g) from location mA also had detectable concentrations of monobutyltin (8.3 ng/g) and dibutyltin (20 ng/g). • In 2019, four fish samples had TBT concentrations above the 1 ng/g limit of reaction (LOR) (Table 5-14). These included two Choerodon venustus and two Gymnocranius audleyi (iodine bream). Two TBT-positive fish were collected from location mA, one from location mB, and once from mC. All concentrations were below the most conservative 240 ng/g WHO (1999) guideline. • In 2020, two TBT-positive C. venustus were collected from location mA (Table 5-14). Both concentrations (1.5 and 1.2 ng/g) were below the 240 ng/g WHO (1999) guideline. • The concentration of copper in fish tissue was elevated at location mA, and this location experienced a large increase in concentration between events Figure 5-37, Table 5-15). A similar pattern in copper concentration was evident in macroalgae and ascidians. • Concentrations of zinc in fish tissue declined between sampling events overall and locations mG and mH had lower concentrations of zinc between events (Figure 5-37, Table 5-15). Conversely, concentrations of zinc in algae tended to increase overall, with all locations except mD having significantly higher concentrations in 2020 compared to 2019. Concentrations of zinc in ascidians were relatively static except for a significant increase at location mA in 2020. • Instances of TBT concentration were too scarce for meaningful linear modelling; however, it is notable that all records of TBT concentration from sessile biota have come from locations mA and mD. • Zinc and copper concentrations in all biota were less than the most conservative ANZFA (2002) concentration guidelines of 160 and 80 mg/kg, respectively. Note that detailed outputs from statistical analyses of biota contamination are provided in Appendix B. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 103 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Table 5-14 Length and Weight of Fish Samples (Photographs provided in Appendix A). Pink highlighted cells indicate the presence of TBT. Sample Name Date Scientific Name Common Name Length (mm) Weight (g) A1-FIS-1019 6/10/2019 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 380 590 A2-FIS-1019 6/10/2019 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 400 820 A3-FIS-1019 6/10/2019 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 380 740 A4-FIS-1019 6/10/2019 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 340 590 A5-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 470 1680 B1-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 410 1190 B2-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 390 860 B3-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Gymnocranius audleyi Iodine bream 340 540 B4-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Gymnocranius audleyi Iodine bream 330 560 B5-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Gymnocranius audleyi Iodine bream 320 660 C1-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 380 950 C2-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 320 600 C3-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 340 730 C4-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 450 1330 C5-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Gymnocranius audleyi Iodine bream 290 410 D1-FIS-1019 6/10/2019 Lutjanus adetii Hussar 330 490 D2-FIS-1019 6/10/2019 Lutjanus sebae Red emperor 520 2250 D3-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Lutjanus adetii Hussar 350 540 D4-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 490 1470 D5-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Lutjanus adetii Hussar 300 390 E1-FIS-1019 6/10/2019 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 410 980 E2-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 420 1130 E3-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 400 800 E4-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 380 900 E5-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 440 1300 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 104 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Sample Name Date Scientific Name Common Name Length (mm) Weight (g) G1-FIS-1019 6/10/2019 Lutjanus adetii Hussar 340 350 G2-FIS-1019 6/10/2019 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 500 1670 G3-FIS-1019 6/10/2019 Lutjanus adetii Hussar 340 400 G4-FIS-1019 6/10/2019 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 450 1170 G5-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 500 1780 H1-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 300 450 H2-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 290 350 H3-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Lutjanus sebae Red emperor 710 6400 H4-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 320 560 H5-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 420 1060 I1-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Epinephelus undulostriatus Maori rock cod 380 810 I2-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 320 600 I3-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 330 670 I4-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Epinephelus quoyanus Wire-netting cod 370 700 I5-FIS-1019 7/10/2019 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 320 520 A1-FIS-0420 11/04/2020 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 310 550 A2-FIS-0420 13/04/2020 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 400 1010 A3-FIS-0420 19/04/2020 Echeneis naucrates Remora 900 3100 A4-FIS-0420 19/04/2020 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 410 1030 A5-FIS-0420 19/04/2020 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 420 1100 B1-FIS-0420 11/04/2020 Gymnocranius audleyi Iodine bream 320 450 B2-FIS-0420 11/04/2020 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 520 1845 B3-FIS-0420 11/04/2020 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 400 1100 B4-FIS-0420 11/04/2020 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 420 1100 B5-FIS-0420 11/04/2020 Gymnocranius audleyi Iodine bream 300 350 C1-FIS-0420 19/04/2020 Echeneis naucrates Remora 800 2600 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 105 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Sample Name Date Scientific Name Common Name Length (mm) Weight (g) C2-FIS-0420 20/04/2020 Echeneis naucrates Remora 780 1500 C3-FIS-0420 20/04/2020 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 430 1100 C4-FIS-0420 20/04/2020 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 420 1300 C5-FIS-0420 20/04/2020 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 400 900 D1-FIS-0420 19/04/2020 Gymnocranius audleyi Iodine bream 350 630 D2-FIS-0420 20/04/2020 Lutjanus adetii Hussar 310 450 D3-FIS-0420 20/04/2020 Lutjanus adetii Hussar 370 630 D4-FIS-0420 20/04/2020 Lutjanus adetii Hussar 340 585 D5-FIS-0420 20/04/2020 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 350 800 E1-FIS-0420 19/04/2020 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 350 750 E2-FIS-0420 19/04/2020 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 340 610 E3-FIS-0420 19/04/2020 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 410 900 E4-FIS-0420 19/04/2020 Gymnocranius audleyi Iodine bream 320 505 E5-FIS-0420 20/04/2020 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 380 880 G1-FIS-0420 20/04/2020 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 420 1300 G2-FIS-0420 20/04/2020 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 450 1200 G3-FIS-0420 20/04/2020 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 400 940 G4-FIS-0420 20/04/2020 Gymnocranius audleyi Iodine bream 365 680 G5-FIS-0420 20/04/2020 Lutjanus adetii Hussar 360 660 H1-FIS-0420 12/04/2020 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 260 300 H2-FIS-0420 12/04/2020 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 260 280 H3-FIS-0420 12/04/2020 Epinephelus quoyanus Wire-netting cod 390 750 H4-FIS-0420 12/04/2020 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 280 320 H5-FIS-0420 12/04/2020 Lethrinus miniatus Red throated emperor 270 310 I1-FIS-0420 12/04/2020 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 300 470 I2-FIS-0420 12/04/2020 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 320 500 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 106 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Sample Name Date Scientific Name Common Name Length (mm) Weight (g) I3-FIS-0420 12/04/2020 Lethrinus ravus Drab emperor 200 105 I4-FIS-0420 12/04/2020 Echeneis naucrates Remora 605 620 I5-FIS-0420 12/04/2020 Choerodon venustus Venus tuskfish 420 1630 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 107 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-37 Mean (SE) TBT, zinc, and copper concentration in ascidians, algae and fish Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 108 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Table 5-15 Summary analysis of deviance table for generalized linear models of biotic contamination. Significance codes: 0 = ***, 0.001 =**, 0.01 = *, 0.05 =. (Refer to Appendix B for detailed statistical analysis outputs). 5.5 Water Quality Five water quality samples were collected for laboratory analysis at a depth of 1 m above the seafloor at each of the eight monitoring locations. Key findings of water quality analyses are as follows (noting copies of detailed laboratory testing results are provided at Appendix D): • Most parameters were below the laboratory limit of reporting (LOR) in water samples (Table 5-16) • Total suspended solids (TSS) were below the LOR in five of the eight samples, the exceptions being location mC, mE and mG. Response Parameter Chi Sq df P>Chi Fish Copper Location 36.6468 7 5.471e-06 *** Event 3.2172 1 0.07287 Location*Event 24.5271 7 0.00092 *** Fish Zinc Location 19.728 7 0.006188 ** Event 20.959 1 4.693e-06 *** Location*Event 16.894 7 0.018094 * Ascidian Copper Location 98.963 7 < 2.2e-16 *** Event 11.867 1 0.0005713 *** Location*Event 16.685 7 0.0195415 * Ascidian Zinc Location 41.5254 7 6.417e-07 *** Event 1.2114 1 0.27106 Location*Event 16.1641 7 0.02366 * Algae Copper Location 72.3952 2 4.841e-13 *** Event 3.2037 1 0.07347 Location*Event 38.6519 7 2.277e-06 *** Algae Zinc Location 27.372 0.0002856 *** Event 48.201 3.848e-12 *** Location*Event 17.524 0.0143148 * Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 109 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Table 5-16 Detections above LOR for dissolved parameters in water quality sampling (shown in pink); Guidelines are based on ANZG (2018) 99% species protection. ANZECC (2000) guideline values shown in yellow: Antimony and Arsenic are low reliability ANZECC; Barium is the recreational limit. Analyte grouping/Analyte TSS Mercury_Disolved Aluminium Antimony Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Copper Iron Lead Nickel Zinc Tributyltin Unit mg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L ngSn/L Limit of reporting 1 0.04 5 0.5 0.5 1 0.2 0.5 1 5 0.2 0.5 5 2 Location Treatment Site event ANZG Guideline (99%) 0.1 270 4.5 1000 0.7 0.14 0.3 2.2 7 7 0.4 C1WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Test mC Spring_2019 3 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.6 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 C2WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Test mC Spring_2019 <1 0.16 <5 <0.5 1.9 3 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 C3WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Test mC Spring_2019 2 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.9 3 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 C4WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Test mC Spring_2019 2 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.6 3 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 C5WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Test mC Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.8 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 D1WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Nearfield mD Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.8 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 D2WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Nearfield mD Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.8 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 D3WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Nearfield mD Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 2 3 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 D4WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Nearfield mD Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 2 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 0.6 <5 <2 D5WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Nearfield mD Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.6 3 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 E1WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Test mE Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.5 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 E2WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Test mE Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.6 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 E3WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Test mE Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.6 3 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 E4WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Test mE Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.6 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 E5WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Test mE Spring_2019 1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.5 3 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 G1WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Nearfield mG Spring_2019 2 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.6 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 G2WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Nearfield mG Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.5 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 G3WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Nearfield mG Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.5 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 G4WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Nearfield mG Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.4 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 G5WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Nearfield mG Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.3 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 A1WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Test mA Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.5 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 A2WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Test mA Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.6 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 A3WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Test mA Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.7 3 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 A4WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Test mA Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.5 3 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 A5WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Test mA Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.6 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 B1WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Nearfield mB Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.6 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 B2WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Nearfield mB Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.4 3 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 B3WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Nearfield mB Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.8 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 B4WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Nearfield mB Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.4 3 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 B5WAT-1019 Douglas_Shoal Nearfield mB Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.4 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 H1WAT-1019 Haberfield_Shoal Reference mH Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.6 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 H2WAT-1019 Haberfield_Shoal Reference mH Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.6 3 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 H3WAT-1019 Haberfield_Shoal Reference mH Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.6 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 H4WAT-1019 Haberfield_Shoal Reference mH Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.4 3 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 H5WAT-1019 Haberfield_Shoal Reference mH Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.7 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 I1WAT-1019 Haberfield_Shoal Reference mI Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.6 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 I2WAT-1019 Haberfield_Shoal Reference mI Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.7 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 I3WAT-1019 Haberfield_Shoal Reference mI Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.7 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 0.3 <0.5 <5 <2 I4WAT-1019 Haberfield_Shoal Reference mI Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.7 4 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 I5WAT-1019 Haberfield_Shoal Reference mI Spring_2019 <1 <0.04 <5 <0.5 1.6 3 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <5 <0.2 <0.5 <5 <2 FB01-1019 ---- Field Blank na <0.04 25 <0.5 1.7 5 <0.2 <0.5 <1 na 0.3 0.7 8 na TB01-1019 ---- Trip Blank na <0.04 41 <0.5 1.7 6 <0.2 <0.5 <1 na 0.6 0.8 7 na R01-1019 ---- Rinse Blank na <0.04 <5 <0.2 <0.2 1.2 <0.05 <0.2 1.9 na 0.3 <0.5 6 na Client sample ID (1st): Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 111 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx  Most metals/metalloids had concentrations less than the LOR, the exceptions being: ○ Lead was less than the LOR (0.2 µg/L) or near the LOR (Haberfield Shoal location mI = 0.3 µg/L). Lead concentrations were therefore an order of magnitude below the ANZG (2018) default guideline value for 99% species protection level (99%DGV) of 2.2 µg/L. ○ Nickel was less than the LOR (0.5 µg/L) or near the LOR (Douglas Shoal location mD = 0.6 µg/L). Nickel concentrations were therefore an order of magnitude below the ANZG (2018) 99%DGV of 7 µg/L. ○ Mercury was less than the LOR (0.04 µg/L) for all samples except one from Douglas Shoal location mC (0.16 µg/L). Mercury concentrations were therefore below the ANZG (2018) 99%DGV of 0.1 µg/L5 in most cases. ○ Arsenic and barium were detected at low concentrations in all samples, as is typical of Australian marine waters. Concentrations were below ANZG (2018) 99%DGVs6.  No metals/metalloids exceeded ANZG (2018) 99%DGVs. Furthermore, none of the metals/metalloids considered as contaminants of potential concern in sediments (i.e. copper, zinc, nickel) were recorded at elevated concentrations in water samples taken approximately 1 m above the seafloor at Douglas Shoal. 5.5.1 Water Data Quality Summary  Relative percent differences (RPD) for arsenic QA/QC samples were acceptable and between 0 and 17%.  RPD for barium QA/QC samples were between 0% and 28.5%; below the 50% threshold.  Two field blanks and rinsate samples appeared to be contaminated with aluminium, copper, lead, nickel and zinc. There were slightly lower concentrations of these parameters in the rinsate sample compared to the field blanks.  In the absence of a trip blank, it is not possible to determine whether contamination was introduced during the field sampling or via the laboratory-supplied rinsate solution. Laboratory tests of similar rinsate solution used during laboratory QA/QC were uncontaminated.  For the purposes of this assessment, it should be assumed that field blanks and rinsate samples are anomalous for most metals/metalloids. Primary samples, by contrast, had concentrations consistent with clean seawater. 5.6 Sediment Quality The key findings of sediment quality analyses are as follows, noting that copies of the full laboratory testing reports are available in Appendix D and photographs of the sediments samples are provided at Appendix A. 5 Note DGV refers to inorganic Hg, whereas the measurements are reported as organic + inorganic Hg (i.e. this represents a conservative comparison to DGV) 6 Note DGV refers to As III, whereas the measurements are reported for all forms of As (i.e. this represents a conservative comparison to DGV) Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 112 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx • Particle size distribution (PSD) results suggest that average proportions of different sediment classes were similar among locations (Figure 5-38). Exceptions to this were higher silt fractions in locations mA, mB and mD, and the proportion of gravel fractions was higher at Douglas Shoal locations than Haberfield Shoal, especially at location mC (Figure 5-38). Figure 5-38 Average PSD distributions across monitoring locations • Most metals/metalloids had concentrations less than ANZG (2018) sediment quality default guideline value (SQDGV). Antimony, cadmium, cobalt, lead, silver and mercury all had concentrations less than the LOR. Detected metals/metalloids with concentrations less than the SQDGV were arsenic, chromium and nickel. • Selenium, vanadium and manganese were detected but there are no SQDGV for these. One reference site sample had a manganese concentration of >250 mg/kg, which was higher than recorded at other reference locations and Douglas Shoal (range = 11 to 33 mg/kg) and is considered to represent an outlier. • Constituents with higher concentrations at Douglas Shoal (i.e. nearfield and remediation treatments) than Haberfield Shoal reference locations included copper, zinc, TBT, and nickel (Figure 5-35 and Figure 5-36). ○ copper – all samples had concentrations less than SQDGV of 65 mg/kg. The highest concentrations were recorded at Douglas Shoal ‘remediation’ location mA (median = 4.2 mg/kg) and mC (median = 1.3 mg/kg). ○ zinc – all samples had concentrations less than SQDGV of 200 mg/kg. The highest concentrations were recorded at Douglas Shoal ‘remediation’ locations mA (median = 3.5 mg/kg), mC (1.9 mg/kg) and mE (1.1 mg/kg). Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 113 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx ○ TBT - Douglas Shoal remediation treatment location mA had concentrations greater than ANZG (2018) Guideline Value – High (GV-High) of 70 µg/kg dry weight. Location mC had one sample greater than GV-High, and two samples between SQDGV and GV-High. TBT was detected at two sites below the SQDGV at location mE, and undetected elsewhere. ○ nickel – all samples had concentrations less than SQDGV of 21 mg/kg, there were four detects in location mA, eight detects in mC and nine detects in area mE. In nearfield locations, there were three detects in mB, one detect in location mD, and two detects in location mG. At Haberfield shoal there two detects at location mH and one detect at location mI. • Four of the 87 analysed pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides were detected, as follows: ○ Dimethoate (OP pesticide) and benomyl (carbamate fungicide) at one site from a QC spatial replicate sample at Douglas Shoal location mA (sample A14-SED-1019). ○ Propriconazole (fungicide) was recorded in two QC spatial replicate samples (A13-SED-1019 and A14-SED-1019) at location mA and four primary samples at location mA (A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A7-SED-1019, A8-SED-1019). ○ Diuron (herbicide) was recorded in three primary samples (A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A10- SED-1019) at location mA, and one of three QC triplicate samples (A11-SED-1019). • The detections of herbicides and pesticides were typically just above the LOR, except for one sample of diuron (0.149 mg/Kg) and one sample of benomyl (0.031 mg/kg). • All detections of fungicides, herbicides and pesticides occurred in location mA. The spatial distribution of propiconazole and diuron are shown in Figure 5-45 and Figure 5-46. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 114 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-39 Median and interquartile ranges for key contaminants based on location Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 115 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure 5-40 Median and interquartile ranges for key contaminants based on Treatment Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 116 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 5.6.1 Sediment Data Quality Summary The following summarises the sediment quality data: • QC samples were assessed using RPD for duplicates and relative standard deviation (RSD) for triplicates, with exceedances based on the following criteria: ○ Where mean concentrations are <5 times LOR, RPD should be <100% ○ Where mean concentrations are 5-10 times LOR, RPD should be <75% ○ Where mean concentrations are >10 times LOR – RPD should be <50% ○ RSD for triplicates should be <50%. • For duplicate QC samples (homogenised in the field examining laboratory variation), there were RPD exceedances for: ○ Cadmium at site I1SED-1019 (RPD 120%, RSD 87%) ○ Chromium at site A4SED-1019 (RPD 126%, RSD 68%) ○ Manganese at site A4SED-1019 (RSD 60%) ○ TBT at site A4SED-1019 (RPD 110%, RSD 55%) ○ Diuron at site A4SED-1019 (RPD 105%, RSD 73%) ○ Diuron at site A4SED-1019 (RPD 105%, RSD 73%). • There was no significant laboratory variation in QC samples taken from primary sites B7SED- 1019, B8SED-1019 or D10SED-1019. • For spatial replicates examining fine scale variability in contaminant concentrations, there were the following RPD exceedances: ○ Zinc site A10SED-1019 (RPD 55%, RSD 28%) ○ TBT at site A10SED-1019 (RPD 82-163%, RSD 108%) ○ Dimethoate at site A10SED-1019 (RPD 111%, RSD 79%) ○ Benomyl at site A10SED-1019 (RPD 170%, RSD 137%) ○ Diuron at site A10SED-1019 (RPD 193%, RSD 165%) ○ Manganese at site B10SED-1019 (RPD 82%, RSD 55%). • There was no significant spatial variation in spatial replicates taken from primary sites G10 SED- 1019, E10 SED-1019, C10 SED-1019, I9 SED-1019, or H3 SED-1019. • RPD estimates for certified reference material (CRM) showed the following exceedances: ○ For the MESS-4 CRM: – Aluminium (RPD = 158%) – Antimony (RPD = 124%) – Chromium (RPD = 131%) Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 117 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx – Selenium (RPD = 73%) – Vanadium (RPD = 125%) – Barium (RPD = 109%). ○ For the PACS3-CRM: – Aluminium (RPD = 143%) – Iron (RPD = 52%) – Antimony (RPD = 136%) – Chromium (RPD = 76%) – Manganese (RPD = 67%) – Vanadium (RPD = 75%). • TBT was not exceeded for the SOPH1-CRM TBT: 67% of the TBT reference concentration was resolved with and acceptable RPD of 39%. • Laboratory QA/QC outlined: ○ There were no method blank value outliers ○ There were no duplicate outliers ○ There were no laboratory control outliers ○ Matrix spikes were outside acceptability criteria for mercury, bioresmethrin, picloram, and thiodicarb ○ Recovery of the TBT surrogate triproptylin was 150% (above 130%) ○ For samples placed on hold pending preliminary results, there were hold time exceedances for moisture content analyses, and assays for fungicides, herbicides and pesticides, varying between 2 and 15 days (Appendix D). Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 125 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 5.7 Acoustic Assessment of Physical Habitat Acoustic and remotely sensed data show that monitoring locations typically had similar baseline levels of rugosity and depth, with reference locations at Haberfield Shoal being slightly deeper than Douglas Shoal locations. Locations mB and mA were the most rugose and rugosity was very similar across the remaining acoustically assessed locations. Acoustic backscatter intensity was investigated from three frequencies, with the lowest frequency and false-colour composites of all frequencies likely to be the most informative future acoustic monitoring tools. Rubble substrate within and adjacent to the grounding footprint was typically highly reflective due to its coarse nature and lack of biological covering to impede acoustic return intensity. Haberfield Shoal reference locations were deeper than the Douglas Shoal locations (Table 5-17). The average depth (LAT) of locations at Douglas Shoal was approximately 12 m, with mD being slightly deeper at 13 m. Both reference locations at Haberfield Shoal (mH and mI) were deeper than the Douglas Shoal locations. The high-resolution bathymetry of Douglas Shoal can be seen in Figure 5-43. This figure shows highly similar depths and vertical relief at locations at mC, mE, mD, and mG, with locations mA and mB being slightly deeper due to their position closer to the reef edge. On Douglas Shoal, the location with the deepest bathymetry was mB, which also had the greatest depth range. The Douglas Shoal location with the shallowest maximum depth was mC. Location mC is situated at the northern extremity of the ship grounding footprint, at the junction of the low- and high-relief terraces. Rugosity calculations suggested that there was very little roughness across all remediation and nearfield locations (Table 5-17). Locations mA and mB had the greatest rugosity. Rugosity has previously been found to be significantly correlated with coral cover (Fuad 2010) and therefore fish abundance and richness (Harborne et al. 2011). Table 5-17 Rugosity and Depth of Locations Site Rugosity Mean depth (m LAT) Minimum depth (m LAT) Maximum depth (m LAT) Depth range (m) mA 1.0159108 -12.4 -14.8 -11.1 3.7 mB 1.017219033 -12.8 -17.9 -10.8 7.1 mC 1.007246443 -12.6 -13.9 -9.6 4.3 mD 1.007095253 -13.2 -14.3 -12.1 2.2 mE 1.006861809 -12.7 -13.8 -11.3 2.5 mG 1.008780507 -12.9 -14.1 -11.9 2.2 mH N/A -18.4 -20.1 -16.3 3.8 mI N/A -15.7 -16.9 -15.1 1.8 Acoustic backscatter intensities of 170 kHz, 300 kHz and 400 kHz frequencies at Douglas Shoal (Neale and Boylson 2019) are shown in Figure 5-48 to Figure 5-51. The individual backscatter frequencies and the false-colour image (Figure 5-51) of all three frequencies show the prevalence of Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 126 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx unconsolidated substrates in the grounding footprint, (sand and gravel) which appear brighter in each extent. Over soft sediment habitats such as estuaries, fine sediment fractions (muds) tend to absorb more of the acoustic backscatter and appear darker compared to consolidated substrates. There is some evidence of this at the far southern and northern acoustic survey extents at Douglas Shoal, where what is presumably fine sediment in deeper off-shoal waters appears very dark. However, within the grounding footprint, the opposite pattern is present, where unconsolidated substrate appears brigher than the surrounding reef matrix. This is likely to be the result of high acoustic reflection over unconsolidated substrates, and dampening of the backscatter signal due to more extensive macroalgal cover on consolidated substrate. Of the three frequencies generated, the lowest wavelength (170 kHz) appears to show the greatest two dimensional extent of high-intensity backscatter within and around the grounding footprint (Figure 5-48). The frequency also appears to have the least amount of along-along track anomaly, with more pronounced horizontal striping visible in Figure 5-49 and Figure 5-50. It is likely that the lower frequency wavelength is less prone to motion artefacts and has slightly improved penetration for substrate detection compared to the higher wavelengths. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 132 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 5.8 Opportunistic Observations In the field, opportunistic observations of interest were largely confined to sightings of tiger sharks, green sea turtles, sea snakes and dolphins (Table 5-18). Seabirds and other vessels/users observed were also recorded. Table 5-18 Summary of opportunistic observations during field surveys Observation Type Baseline Survey 1 (2019) Baseline Survey 2 (2020) Trip 1 (Oct) Trip 2 (Nov) Trip 1 (Apr) Trip 2 (Apr-May) Marine Fauna Tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier) Single surface observation at site mA Multiple surface sightings of a large tiger shark at site mA 9 sightings, including 2 in water sightings Green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas) Multiple sightings at Douglas Shoal and Haberfield Shoal, also North West Island 3 sightings Occasional sightings (all sites), hatchlings observed when moored at NW Island 4 sightings (site mE) Sea snake (assumed mostly Olive sea snake, Aipysurus laevis) 30+ sightings, at all locations Occasional sightings (all sites) 10+ (locations mA, mE, mC Manta ray (Mobula. alfredi) 2 sightings Spinner dolphin (Stenella longirostris) 2 sightings: bow riding between North West Island and Douglas Shoal 1 sighting, bow riding between Douglas Shoal during transit to Yeppoon Small pod observed bow riding between North West Island and Douglas Shoal on two mornings 3 sightings Dolphin (other) Pod of 6 Fish (other) Small marlin seen breaching approximately 5 times at site mA Seabirds Noddy Terns (Anous minutus) Common Common Common Common Wedge tailed shearwater (Puffinus pacificus) - Common Common Common Other Trichodesmium (“sea sawdust” – cyanobacteria) Visible at both Douglas Shoal and Haberfield Shoal Very thick at both Douglas Shoal and Haberfield Shoal Other vessel/user Single vessel – small, privately- owned recreational fishing vessel Vessel chartered by Advisian was performing ADCP servicing at Douglas Shoal First 4 days coincided with Easter weekend. There were five recreational trailer boats Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 133 Key Findings G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Observation Type Baseline Survey 1 (2019) Baseline Survey 2 (2020) fishing at Douglas Shoal each of these days. No vessels observed at Haberfield Shoal. During the Baseline survey 2 (April 2020) there were several apparent distinctions as compared to the Baseline survey 1 in October/November 2019. These are summarised as here: • Line fishing during Autumn 2020 was more difficult compared to Spring 2019. This may have been due to the predominant north-westerly winds that were blowing for the majority of the April 2020 survey, noting that such conditions are anecdotally regarded as unfavourable for fishing by some commercial and charter operators. • Coral bleaching was observed commonly by diving personnel at both Douglas Shoal and Haberfield Shoal during Autumn 2020. This is in alignment with an anticipated coral bleaching event on the Great Barrier Reef following heat stress over the 2019/20 summer (GBRMPA 2020). • Compared to Spring 2019, visibility was notably poorer in April 2020. Whereas during the October 2019 trip the corals and sand patches were clearly visible from the surface, during April 2020, clear benthic features were rarely visible from the surface even at the lowest tides and under calm conditions. This was also noted on both the BRUV and towed camera footage when reviewed on board. Reduced visibility may have been due to a different current and tidal regime during this period, seasonal changes, or due to elevated sea states in the lead up to the trip. • In April 2020, green sea turtle hatchlings were attracted to the back of the vessel when moored for the night at North West Island. All exterior lighting was switched off to allow the hatchlings to disperse. • The first 4 days of Baseline survey 2 coincided with Easter weekend. There were five recreational trailer boats fishing at Douglas Shoal each day. No vessels were noted at Haberfield Shoal. • Tiger sharks were observed more frequently in the field during the Autumn 2020 survey. Tiger sharks were sighted on both diving days during the second trip of Autumn 2020. On the first day (17 April 2020) a large (approximately 4m) tiger shark was seen while travelling between Haberfield Shoal and Douglas Shoal. The shark was 10 m from the boat in deep water between the shoals. It was not seen again while at Douglas Shoal that day. On the second diving day (18 April 2020) all dives were conducted at Douglas Shoal apart from the first. After a diver was exiting the water at Douglas Shoal site mD, a tiger shark was sighted approx. 10 m away from the vessel. A further two sightings were recorded from the surface at site mC. No sharks were sighted during the dive at location mC, although 7-8 remoras were swimming around the diver for the majority of the dive. A shark was observed three times while the survey vessel transited from site mE to site mG. At site mG. a diver reported two in-water tiger sharks observations (one 2 m and one 4m long) where approaches by these sharks were made from the edge of visibility to within 1.5 m away from the diver. The approaches were close but were not described as aggressive. BMT’s shark management procedures, as per the project-specific safety plan, were implemented for all diving operations. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 134 Conclusions G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 6 Conclusions 6.1 Epibenthic Cover Douglas and Haberfield Shoal sampling locations had similar benthic cover features, despite differences in disturbance history. At all locations and both sampling episodes, the benthic assemblage was comprised of low ‘turf’ algae and mixed fleshy macroalgae assemblages (typically >60% cover), with a low cover (typically <5%) of hard and soft corals. These results and cover estimates are consistent with the results of Neale and Boylson (2019) who found an overall average of 3.8% and 2.0% hard and soft coral cover, respectively, on Douglas Shoal. Other epibenthic macroinvertebrates (sponges, echinoderms, ascidians, bryozoans etc.) and crustose coralline algae also had <1% cover. Small (nominally <50 mm) invertebrates that could not be resolved in towed camera imagery, would occur in association with the turf and mixed algae assemblages, and on pavement, sand and gravel substrates. While locations were highly similar in the broad sense, the most different epibenthic communities existed at locations mB, on the south-eastern margin of the low-relief terrace at Douglas Shoal, and the location mH on the western (shallowest) side of Haberfield Shoal. These locations had slightly higher cover of hard and soft corals, respectively. Otherwise there are very strong similarities in benthic community among the remaining Douglas and Haberfield Shoal locations. The monitoring program to date shows that the regional reference shoal, although slightly deeper, contains similar communities to those present on Douglas Shoal and should be a suitable point of control for broad- scale changes such as macroalgal dieback and coral bleaching. Multivariate routines detected statistically significant differences in assemblage structure between sampling events, manifested as both declines (several fleshy macroalgae) and increases (turfs) in macroalgae, varying among groups. Many macroalgae groups in the GBR region are strongly seasonal. Sargassum for example has peak abundance and reproductivity activity during summer (Vuki and Price 1994, Diaz-Pulido and McCook 2005), but in the present study showed no clear trends in Sargassum between spring 2019 and autumn 2020. The very strong reduction in Dictyopteris and to a lesser extent Asparagopsis led to greater cover of other substrates obstructed by these algae. The sharpest declines occurred at sites mE and mC, where increases in gravel cover co-occurred. The abundance of Dictyopteris over rubble substrates can be seen clearly in image mosaics from these locations and it is likely that Dictyopteris is seasonal and opportunistic, particularly in areas of high rubble content. There was also a major increase in the occurrence bleached of corals, which went from almost none in 2019 to between 10% and >30% of hard coral colonies 2020. Soft corals were less affected, and the proportions of bleached soft corals varied from ~0% in 2019 to 5% in 2020. It should also be noted that the prevalence of less severe bleaching was actually much higher than reported due to the annotation convention of scoring bleaching as a binomial response (bleached or unbleached). Numerous colonies displaying signs of bleaching below the threshold for inclusion in the bleached coral category were annotated as unbleached. Although few recently dead corals were observed during annotation, there is great potential for a large decline in coral cover between survey events 2 and 3 resulting from the 2020 mass bleaching event. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 135 Conclusions G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx If the 2020 bleaching were to consistently translate into mortality across each of the monitoring locations, there is potential for bleaching mortality to confound putative remediation impacts at location mA, which had a higher proportion of bleached colonies than the reference location mH. While the overall magnitude of changes in percent cover are small due to the very low baseline hard coral cover (~1-6% mean total benthic cover across locations), any potential reduction in hard coral cover, particularly one that manifests inconsistently across the remediation and control locations has potential to confound future impact assessment. The impact of the 2020 bleaching event on the efficacy of the monitoring program to assess remediation will depend on whether the observed bleaching resulted in subsequent mortality, and whether or not this was consistent across locations. Some of the inconsistency in the proportion of bleached corals among locations may be due to the interaction between TBT contamination and thermal bleaching. Sediment contaminated with TBT from groundings elsewhere on the GBR has been shown to exhibit a range of coral impacts including mortality and bleaching (Smith et al. 2003). The second highest proportion of bleached corals was observed at location mB, where TBT was absent, and the proportion of bleaching was ~10% lower than it was at the adjacent and heavily contaminated location mA. If bleaching mortality affects all locations similarly, other consequences for the monitoring program might be that one of the key sensitive receptors could become even more difficult to detect. Conversely, from the perspective of the remediation contractor, on-ground works could appear less damaging, if the epibenthic community contains fewer corals. While average soft and hard coral cover was very low, the number of image replicates sufficiently reduced within-locational error for meaningful spatial and temporal comparisons among locations. Some epibenthic indicators have been relatively variable in space and time while others, particularly the cover of Acropora, soft coral, turf and Sargassum, have been relatively consistent within locations between the first two sampling events. While the presence of rubble is clearly a strong indicator of physical damage in the grounding footprint based on imagery and acoustics, obstruction of the visual signal by temporally changing macroalgae such as Dictyopteris may render this visual signal harder to detect at certain times. Changes in epibenthic cover represent some of the most promising indicators for changes relating to future remediation. However, indicator selection and interpretation will require careful consideration due to the aforementioned interactions between cover types, such as canopy obstruction. Multiple lines of evidence, interactions and factor co-variability will assist with understanding the nature of changes and potential causes. Potential improvements to reduce variability and increase monitoring efficacy include replacing one of the 2019 transect lines (over sand) at Haberfield Shoal, and ensuring even coverage of each location is attained. Site conditions including swell, waves, visibility and tides during collection made some of the imagery unusable, particularly in 2019, leading to less spread of data over some of the locations (mE and mD). Maintaining similar transect cover to what was collected in 2020 will reduce variation associated with transect placement in the future and will provide more change detection capability. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 136 Conclusions G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 6.2 3D modelling Orthomosaics provide a detailed view of the benthos at two sites in each of the locations to be remediated. One of the most interesting aspects of the 3D models used to make the orthomosaics is the ability for the user to view the surface from a range of different angles and perspectives, making them ideal interactive platforms. While colour and contrast of benthic images could be improved by adding strobe or video light, differential light fields in overlapping terrain can interfere with the photo matching ability and are not recommended. Red filtering can improve colour tonality but further reduces available light and can come at the cost of pixel clarity. In 2019 imagery was collected without red-filtering or the inclusion of additional light, relying on Photoshop to improve colour and tone. Subsequent imagery collection will be done similarly to provide the most consistent conditions for comparison before and after remediation. Point clouds showing the elevation of the mosaic sites may be an important assessment tool, given the relatively low rugosity measurements from the acoustic DEM for each of the Douglas Shoal monitoring locations. Common areas before and after remediation could be queried similarly to the acoustic DEM to provide fine-scale assessments of changes in rugosity. This would require models to be spatially registered. Tiles visible at the cardinal margins (N, E, S, W) of orthomosaics represent a 7 m distance from the site centroid and the area covered by this box is approximately 100 m2; with excess imagery available beyond these markers. While the site centroid has been marked with a shot line from the surface with sub-meter accuracy, cardinal tiles were aligned by divers using compass bearings and are considered indicative. Bringing orthomosaics into GIS for spatial comparisons may be challenging due to a lack of additional precise points for image orientation. Images themselves can be used for rectification; commonalities among images together with site centroids will be used to rectify models. If images can be successfully registered, changes in raster intensity and elevation between events can be attempted. While the deployment of markers would greatly assist in geolocation, markers were not deployed to prevent interference with remediation activities and maintain the anonymity of the mosaic sites. 6.3 Fish Communities Much like epibenthic communities, fish communities exhibited a consistent shift between the two survey events, largely related to the greater abundance of a few common species. While several of these species were always less than 20 cm in total length, and therefore, not included in length analyses, qualitatively many of the damselfish and wrasse observations consisted of a greater proportion of juveniles in 2020. This is consistent with more juvenile fish being present at the start of the year (autumn), compared to spring when juvenile abundance is lower through subsequent growth and attrition. Most of location-based univariate community metrics such as biomass, abundance, and diversity of fish were either non-significant, or in some cases difficult to evaluate due to missing values (no large fish observed). Treatment-based community metrics permitted improved replication and showed an overall increase in richness. Univariate metrics of fish abundance, richness, and diversity will require Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 137 Conclusions G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx a pooling from statistical and logical perspectives. While the spatial and temporal design of the monitoring program is well-suited to investigations of physical habitat and sessile biota, BRUV sites and locations are not sufficiently distant to be considered truly independent for many fish and elasmobranchs. This monitoring program required a design that was spatially consistent across the different receptors (biota, epibenthos, physical structure); therefore fish with home-ranges that encompass multiple locations or treatment areas within Douglas Shoal will require some form of sensible pooling. The campaign in the present monitoring program differs from most typical BRUV investigations, which are targeted towards understanding the impact of fishing or reserves on the biomass of target species. While the impact of remediation on target species is an important consideration, other indicators are perhaps of greater relevance to understanding remediation efficacy or smaller scale spatial changes, at least in the short-term. A sensible dichotomy and the analysis framework beyond remediation works will apply metrics (such as B20 biomass, the presence of elasmobranchs, and certain univariate diversity metrics) for shoal- based comparisons to examine the effect of remediation on species of fisheries significance (i.e. Douglas vs Haberfield Shoal). Conversely, multivariate indicators, as well as species or species groups with high site attachment and affinity for complex habitats, will be examined among locations to examine fine-scale changes in fish community. 6.4 Biotic Contaminant Concentrations The assessment of biotic contamination showed that COPCs were present in fish, macroalgae and ascidians, but at concentrations well below safe consumption guidelines. For ascidians and algae, the highest concentrations of contaminants were found in location mA, which is consistent with the highest concentrations of sediment contamination shown in this study and in Neale and Boylson (2019). These data suggest that contamination is entering the food chain, particularly in sessile taxa near the initial grounding site. Dictyopteris was initially chosen as the macroalgal candidate for biotic contamination, due to its dominance in the disturbance footprint. The almost complete loss of Dictyopteris in autumn 2020 meant that a new candidate was required. Dictyota was selected and will be continued for use in monitoring after remediation. The main differences in events (and candidate taxa) were consistently higher zinc concentrations, and occasionally higher concentrations of copper and TBT. It is likely that some of the differences in zinc between events (and species) relate to baseline zinc concentrations in algal taxa. Zinc was higher at every location in 2020, but also highest in location mA. One of the differences between the macroalgae species is that Dictyopteris was collected from large, mature specimens, while samples of Dictyota tended to be lower and more prostrate. This lower growth form may have allowed contaminated particles, or small fauna, to become entrapped in its lower canopy, rather than being bioaccumulation within the algal tissue. Alternatively, considering the cover of Dictyota was less temporally variable than Dictyopteris, longer-lived specimens may have more opportunity for bioaccumulation. Choerodon venustus and Gymnocranius audleyi are key fish taxa that had detectable concentrations of TBT in their musculature. Bioaccumulation of TBT may be occurring in these species which feed primarily on benthic invertebrates; this would allow direct access to contamination within the Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 138 Conclusions G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx surrounding sediment matrix as well as any contaminated tissue. Interestingly, Lethrinus miniatus was also collected in reasonable quantities, but no TBT contamination was detected. This may be the result of differences in home ranges. While specific information is lacking for the above species, tagging work on Lethrinus nebulosus suggests they have home ranges exceeding 8 km2 (Pillans et al., 2014). Species of Choerodon have substantially smaller home ranges, sometimes in the order of hundreds of metres (Kawabata et al., 2008; Fairclough et al., 2011). 6.5 Water and Sediment Quality The water quality assessment showed that there was no evidence of contamination in the water column above the grounding footprint under pre-remediation conditions. While there was an issue with QA/QC rinsate samples, these do not affect the validity of the environmental samples. Sediment quality results show that concentrations of COPCs at Haberfield Shoal were consistent with the shoal being a true reference area, without any significant anthropogenic contamination. Like previous studies (Costen 2017; Neale and Boylson 2019) the present study identified the highest levels of contamination in location mA (e.g. TBT, nickel, copper, zinc), and lesser concentrations of COPCs in locations mC and mE. COPCs were not detected above guideline levels in any of the nearfield locations. Only four of the 87 pesticide, herbicide and fungicide analytes were detected, and these detections were entirely from samples collected in area mA. Concentrations were typically just above LOR. Given the low prevalence and concentration of these additional contaminants, their removal from the program may be warranted, with their analysis budget diverted to increased replication of primary COPCs for better resolution of changes in TBT and metal concentrations. The combination of sediment contamination data from this study and from the comprehensive mapping of Neale and Boylson (2019) sets a strong baseline for subsequent comparisons. A power analysis that considers existing data and likely remediation actions will be undertaken to adequately inform the level of replication required for different putative effect sizes prior to re-sampling. 6.6 Physical Habitat Assessment The initial acoustic data provides a comprehensive baseline over the entire remediation area to compare subsequent backscatter signal, rugosity and elevation changes. Running the multibeam survey in multifrequency mode had consequences for ping-rate, where fewer soundings are available for the DEM. A coarser DEM has been the cost of attaining more backscatter data, which appears to be highly effective in showing horizontal extent of unconsolidated material. Post-remediation monitoring will assess temporal differences in backscatter intensity via raster calculations for the various frequencies and combinations of frequencies. Sub-bottom profiling did not provide a reliable estimate of the depth of unconsolidated material, thought to be due to the composition of the underlying matrix and the sub-bottom depth range (Neale and Boylson 2019). While the SBP survey could be repeated under different setting with the aim of providing greater clarity in the upper subsurface layer, there would be no baseline information to make comparisons against. Therefore, this is not recommended unless a useable baseline can be achieved. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 139 References G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 7 References Advisian 2020, Douglas Shoal remediation project: options analysis executive summary. Prepared by Advisian Pty Ltd for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville, Australia. ANZECC & ARMCANZ (2000), Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality, Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra. ANZFA (2002) Australia New Zealand Food Authority. The 20th Australian Total Diet Survey: A total diet survey of pesticide residues and contaminants. https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/publications/documents/Final_20th_Total_Diet_Survey.pdf ANZG (2018) Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. Australian and New Zealand Governments and Australian state and territory governments, Canberra ACT, Australia. https://www.waterquality.gov.au/anz-guidelines. Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (2016). Schedule 19 – Maximum levels of contaminants and natural toxicants. Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality (2018). Australian and New Zealand Governments and Australian state and territory governments, Canberra ACT, Australia. Available at www.waterquality.gov.au/anz-guidelines Beijbom O, Edmunds PJ, Roelfsema C, Smith J, Kline DI, Neal B, Dunlap MJ, Moriarty V, Fan T-Y, Tan C-J, Chan S, Treibitz T, Gamst A, Mitchell BG, Kriegman D (2015) Towards automated annotation of benthic survey images: variability of human experts and operational modes of automation". PLOS One, July 2015. BMT (2019) Douglas Shoal Remediation Project: Hydrodynamic Model Calibration. Report prepared for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville. Brooks ME, Kristensen K, van Benthem KJ, Magnusson A, Berg CW, Nielsen A, Skaug HJ, Machler M, Bolker BM (2017) glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modelling. The R Journal 9 (2): 378-400. Brown KT, Bender-Champ D, Kubicek A, van der Zande R, Achlatis M, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Dove SG (2018) The dynamics of coral-algal interactions in space and time on the Southern Great Barrier Reef. Frontiers in Marine Science 5. 24 May 2018 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00181 Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in assemblage structure. Australian Journal of Ecology, 18: 117-143. Clarke KR, Ainsworth M (1993) A method of linking multivariate assemblage structure to environmental variables. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 46: 213-226. Clarke KR, Somerfield PJ, Gorley RN (2008) Testing of null hypotheses in exploratory assemblage analyses: similarity profiles and biota-environment linkage. Journal of Exploratory Marine Biology and Ecology, 366: 56−69. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 140 References G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Costen A, Ims S, Blount C (2017). Douglas Shoal Preliminary Site Assessment Report. Document R.1.59918002, Version 1. Report prepared by Cardno Ltd. for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville. Diaz-Pulido G, McCook LJ (2005) Effects of nutrient enhancement of the fecundity of a coral reef macroalga. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 317:13-24 Faith DP, Minchin RM, Belbin L. (1987) Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Plant Ecology, 69: 57-68. Fairclough D, Edmonds J, Lenanton RC, Jackson G, Keay I, Crisafulli B, Newman S (2011). Rapid and cost-effective assessment of connectivity among assemblages of Choerodon rubescens (Labridae), using laser ablation ICP-MS of sagittal otoliths. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology – Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 403: 46-53. 10.1016/j.jembe.2011.04.005. Faud MAZ (2010). Coral Reef Rugosity and Coral Biodiversity. Masters Thesis, International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation Enschede, The Netherlands. Geoscience Australia (2017). High-resolution depth model for the Great Barrier Reef - 30 m. Available at: https://researchdata.edu.au/high-resolution-depth-30-m/1278835 GBRMPA (2020) Statement: coral bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef (26/03/20). Accesed online 15/5/2020 at: http://www.gbrmpa.gov.au/news-room/latest-news/latest-news/coral- bleaching/2020/statement-coral-bleaching-on-the-great-barrier- reef#:~:text=The%20Great%20Barrier%20Reef%20remains,resultant%20bleaching%20that%20is %20occurring. Harborne AR, Mumby PJ, Ferrari R (2011). The effectiveness of different meso-scale rugosity metrics for predicting intra-habitat variation in coral-reef fish assemblages. Environmental Biology of Fish 94: 431-442. Jones CM, Brassil W, (2019) Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Environmental Monitoring: Baseline Survey 1 – Preliminary Fieldwork Report. Report prepared for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville. Jones CM, Brassil W, (2020) Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Environmental Monitoring: Baseline Survey 2 – Preliminary Fieldwork Report. Report prepared for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville. Kawabata Y, Okuyama J, Asami K, Yoseda K, Arai N (2008) The post-release process of establishing stable home ranges and diel movement patterns of hatchery-reared black-spot tuskfish Choerodon schoenleinii. Journal of Fish Biology 73:1770–1782 Lambshead PJD, Piatt HM, Shaw KM (1983) The detection of differences among assemblages of marine benthic species based on an assessment of dominance and diversity. Journal of Natural History, 17: 859-974. Langlois T, Williams J, Monk J, Bouchet P, Currey L, Goetze J, Harasti D, Huveneers C, Ierodiaconou D, Malcolm H, Whitmore S (2018). Marine sampling field manual for benthic stereo BRUVS (Baited Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report 141 References G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Remote Underwater Videos). In: Field Manuals for Marine Sampling to Monitor Australian Waters, Przeslawski R, Foster S (Eds). National Environmental Science Programme (NESP). pp.82-104. NAGD (2009) National Assessment Guidelines for Dredging. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2009. Neale SJ and Boylson BD (2019) Douglas Shoal remediation project: Site assessment report, Prepared by Advisian Pty Ltd for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville. Neale SJ, Boylson BD (2019) Douglas Shoal remediation project: Site assessment report, Prepared by Advisian Pty Ltd for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville. Pillans RD, Bearham D, Boomer A, Downie R, Patterson TA, Thomson DP, et al. (2014) Multi Year Observations Reveal Variability in Residence of a Tropical Demersal Fish, Lethrinus nebulosus: Implications for Spatial Management. PLoS ONE 9(9): e105507. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105507 Price IR (1989) Seaweed phenology in a tropical Australian locality (Townsville, North Queensland). Botanica Marina, 32:399-406. Siebeck U, Marshall N, Klüter A, Hoegh-Guldberg O (2006). Monitoring coral bleaching using a colour reference card. Coral Reefs. 25: 453-460. Simpson SL, Batley GE, Chariton AA (2013). Revision of the ANZECC/ARMCANZ Sediment Quality Guidelines. CSIRO Land and Water Science Report 08/07. CSIRO Land and Water. Smith LD, Negri A, Philipp E, Webster N, Heyward AJ (2003). The effects of antifoulant-paint- contaminated sediments on coral recruits and branchlets. Marine Biology. 143. 651-657. 10.1007/s00227-003-1107-7. Vuki VC, Price IR (1994) Seasonal changes in the Sargassum populations on a fringing coral reef, Magnetic Island, Great Barrier Reef region, Australia. Aquatic Botany, 48:153-166 Warwick RM, Clarke KR (1993). Increased variability as a symptom of stress in marine assemblages. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 172:215-226. WHO (1999) World Heath Organisation. Tributyltin Oxide. Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 14 (CICAD, 14, p 4). Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-1 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Appendix A Photo Plates A.1 Spring 2019 A.1.1 Algae and Ascidian Samples Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-2 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-1 Algae and ascidian samples from site mA Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-3 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-2 Algae and ascidian samples from site mB Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-4 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-3 Algae and ascidian samples from site mC Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-5 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-4 Algae and ascidian samples from site mD Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-6 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-5 Algae and ascidian samples from site mE Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-7 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-6 Algae and ascidian samples from site mG Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-8 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-7 Algae and ascidian samples from site mH Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-9 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-8 Algae and ascidian samples from site mI Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-10 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx A.1.2 Fish Samples Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-11 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-9 Fish samples from site mA and mB Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-12 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-10 Fish samples from site mC and mD Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-13 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-11 Fish samples from site mE and mG Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-14 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-12 Fish samples from site mH and mI Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-15 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx A.1.3 Sediment Samples Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-16 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-13 Sediment samples from site mA Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-17 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-14 Sediment samples from site mB Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-18 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-15 Sediment samples from site mC Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-19 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-16 Sediment samples from site mA Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-20 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-17 Sediment samples from site mE Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-21 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-18 Sediment samples from site mG Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-22 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-19 Sediment samples from site mH Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-23 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-20 Sediment samples from site mI Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-24 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx A.1.4 BRUV Habitat Images Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-25 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-21 Spring 2019 BRUV habitat images at locations mA, mB, mC, and mD Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-26 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-22 Spring 2019 BRUV habitat images at locations mE, mG, mH, and mI Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-27 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-23 Autumn 2020 BRUV habitat images at locations mA, mB, mC, and mD Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-28 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-24 Autumn 2020 BRUV habitat images at locations mE, mG, mH, and mI Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-29 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx A.2 Autumn 2020 A.2.1 Algae and Ascidian Samples Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-30 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-25 Algae and ascidian samples from site mA Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-31 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-26 Algae and ascidian samples from site mB Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-32 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-27 Algae and ascidian samples from site mC Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-33 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-28 Algae and ascidian samples from site mD Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-34 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-29 Algae and ascidian samples from site mE Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-35 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-30 Algae and ascidian samples from site mG Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-36 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-31 Algae and ascidian samples from site mH Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-37 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-32 Algae and ascidian samples from site mI Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-38 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx A.2.2 Fish Samples Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-39 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-33 Fish samples from site mA and mB Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-40 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-34 Fish samples from site mC and mD Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-41 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-35 Fish samples from site mE and mG Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report A-42 Photo Plates G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure A-36 Fish samples from site mH and mI Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-1 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Appendix B Statistical Outputs B.1 Generalised Linear Modelling B.1.1 Benthic Cover Analyses > mod_Acropora <- glmmTMB(Total_Acropora ~ Location * Event + (1|Treatment), zi =~Location + Event, family=nbinom1(), data=ccover) > summary(mod_Acropora) Family: nbinom1 ( log ) Formula: Total_Acropora ~ Location * Event + (1 | Treatment) Zero inflation: ~Location + Event Data: ccover AIC BIC logLik deviance df.resid 5675.2 5839.1 -2810.6 5621.2 3173 Random effects: Conditional model: Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Treatment (Intercept) 3.108e-10 1.763e-05 Number of obs: 3200, groups: Treatment, 3 Overdispersion parameter for nbinom1 family (): 1.26 Conditional model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 1.710709 0.090396 18.925 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_B 0.432581 0.106758 4.052 5.08e-05 *** Locationm_C 0.036833 0.174235 0.211 0.833 Locationm_D 0.044424 0.132751 0.335 0.738 Locationm_E -0.191141 0.192098 -0.995 0.320 Locationm_G -0.106448 0.139519 -0.763 0.445 Locationm_H -0.072074 0.208624 -0.345 0.730 Locationm_I -0.001408 0.209468 -0.007 0.995 EventSpring_2019 -0.037468 0.126693 -0.296 0.767 Locationm_B:EventSpring_2019 0.028531 0.149645 0.191 0.849 Locationm_C:EventSpring_2019 0.137337 0.247280 0.555 0.579 Locationm_D:EventSpring_2019 0.028339 0.232085 0.122 0.903 Locationm_E:EventSpring_2019 0.340030 0.244207 1.392 0.164 Locationm_G:EventSpring_2019 0.142980 0.193223 0.740 0.459 Locationm_H:EventSpring_2019 0.171716 0.258023 0.666 0.506 Locationm_I:EventSpring_2019 -0.105962 0.289756 -0.366 0.715 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 Zero-inflation model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 0.96060 0.12469 7.704 1.32e-14 *** Locationm_B -0.66050 0.15316 -4.312 1.62e-05 *** Locationm_C 1.38786 0.21331 6.506 7.70e-11 *** Locationm_D 0.80033 0.18408 4.348 1.38e-05 *** Locationm_E 1.08427 0.19793 5.478 4.30e-08 *** Locationm_G 0.31512 0.16918 1.863 0.0625 . Locationm_H 1.22662 0.20481 5.989 2.11e-09 *** Locationm_I 1.62003 0.23105 7.012 2.35e-12 *** EventSpring_2019 0.01057 0.09821 0.108 0.9143 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > Anova(mod_Acropora) Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II Wald chisquare tests) Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-2 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Response: Total_Acropora Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq) Location 70.8277 7 1.005e-12 *** Event 0.3018 1 0.5828 Location:Event 3.2990 7 0.8560 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > emmeans(mod_Acropora, pairwise ~ Event | Location) $emmeans Location = m_A: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.71 0.0904 3173 1.53 1.89 Spring_2019 1.67 0.0893 3173 1.50 1.85 Location = m_B: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 2.14 0.0569 3173 2.03 2.25 Spring_2019 2.13 0.0558 3173 2.02 2.24 Location = m_C: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.75 0.1492 3173 1.46 2.04 Spring_2019 1.85 0.1515 3173 1.55 2.14 Location = m_D: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.76 0.0975 3173 1.56 1.95 Spring_2019 1.75 0.1685 3173 1.42 2.08 Location = m_E: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.52 0.1697 3173 1.19 1.85 Spring_2019 1.82 0.1224 3173 1.58 2.06 Location = m_G: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.60 0.1066 3173 1.40 1.81 Spring_2019 1.71 0.1005 3173 1.51 1.91 Location = m_H: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.64 0.1881 3173 1.27 2.01 Spring_2019 1.77 0.1238 3173 1.53 2.02 Location = m_I: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.71 0.1891 3173 1.34 2.08 Spring_2019 1.57 0.1803 3173 1.21 1.92 Results are given on the log (not the response) scale. Confidence level used: 0.95 $contrasts Location = m_A: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.03747 0.1267 3173 0.296 0.7674 Location = m_B: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.00894 0.0797 3173 0.112 0.9107 Location = m_C: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.09987 0.2124 3173 -0.470 0.6383 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-3 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Location = m_D: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.00913 0.1946 3173 0.047 0.9626 Location = m_E: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.30256 0.2089 3173 -1.448 0.1476 Location = m_G: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.10551 0.1460 3173 -0.722 0.4701 Location = m_H: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.13425 0.2249 3173 -0.597 0.5506 Location = m_I: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.14343 0.2607 3173 0.550 0.5822 Results are given on the log (not the response) scale. > mod_Gravel <-glmmTMB(Rubble ~ Location * Event + (1|Treatment), zi=~Location + Event, family=truncated_poisson(), data=ccover) > summary(mod_Gravel) Family: truncated_poisson ( log ) Formula: Rubble ~ Location * Event + (1 | Treatment) Zero inflation: ~Location + Event Data: ccover AIC BIC logLik deviance df.resid 20498.0 20655.9 -10223.0 20446.0 3174 Random effects: Conditional model: Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Treatment (Intercept) 8.777e-11 9.368e-06 Number of obs: 3200, groups: Treatment, 3 Conditional model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 2.96227 0.02558 115.79 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_B -0.82897 0.05737 -14.45 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_C 0.39149 0.03083 12.70 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_D -0.55148 0.05284 -10.44 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_E 0.48327 0.03016 16.02 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_G -0.75778 0.06584 -11.51 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_H -1.59600 0.26180 -6.10 1.09e-09 *** Locationm_I -1.06644 0.22602 -4.72 2.38e-06 *** EventSpring_2019 -0.11369 0.04087 -2.78 0.00541 ** Locationm_B:EventSpring_2019 -0.09887 0.10223 -0.97 0.33345 Locationm_C:EventSpring_2019 -0.48734 0.05180 -9.41 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_D:EventSpring_2019 0.17700 0.07188 2.46 0.01380 * Locationm_E:EventSpring_2019 -0.10798 0.04729 -2.28 0.02243 * Locationm_G:EventSpring_2019 0.18744 0.09722 1.93 0.05386 . Locationm_H:EventSpring_2019 1.30229 0.27006 4.82 1.42e-06 *** Locationm_I:EventSpring_2019 -0.41587 0.56889 -0.73 0.46477 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 Zero-inflation model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 0.58912 0.11441 5.149 2.62e-07 *** Locationm_B 0.90566 0.16936 5.347 8.92e-08 *** Locationm_C -0.73432 0.14554 -5.045 4.53e-07 *** Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-4 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Locationm_D 0.38313 0.15544 2.465 0.0137 * Locationm_E -1.20790 0.14808 -8.157 3.43e-16 *** Locationm_G 1.17406 0.17959 6.538 6.25e-11 *** Locationm_H 1.96398 0.22559 8.706 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_I 3.93369 0.51352 7.660 1.86e-14 *** EventSpring_2019 0.15014 0.09016 1.665 0.0958 . --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > Anova(mod_Gravel) Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II Wald chisquare tests) Response: Rubble Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq) Location 2071.4 7 < 2.2e-16 *** Event 274.7 1 < 2.2e-16 *** Location:Event 204.3 7 < 2.2e-16 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > emmeans(mod_Gravel, pairwise ~ Event | Location) $emmeans Location = m_A: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 2.96 0.0256 3174 2.912 3.01 Spring_2019 2.85 0.0319 3174 2.786 2.91 Location = m_B: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 2.13 0.0513 3174 2.033 2.23 Spring_2019 1.92 0.0784 3174 1.767 2.07 Location = m_C: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 3.35 0.0172 3174 3.320 3.39 Spring_2019 2.75 0.0268 3174 2.700 2.81 Location = m_D: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 2.41 0.0462 3174 2.320 2.50 Spring_2019 2.47 0.0369 3174 2.402 2.55 Location = m_E: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 3.45 0.0160 3174 3.414 3.48 Spring_2019 3.22 0.0176 3174 3.189 3.26 Location = m_G: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 2.20 0.0607 3174 2.086 2.32 Spring_2019 2.28 0.0640 3174 2.153 2.40 Location = m_H: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.37 0.2605 3174 0.855 1.88 Spring_2019 2.55 0.0581 3174 2.441 2.67 Location = m_I: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.90 0.2246 3174 1.456 2.34 Spring_2019 1.37 0.5211 3174 0.345 2.39 Results are given on the log (not the response) scale. Confidence level used: 0.95 $contrasts Location = m_A: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-5 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.1137 0.0409 3174 2.782 0.0054 Location = m_B: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.2126 0.0937 3174 2.269 0.0234 Location = m_C: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.6010 0.0318 3174 18.888 <.0001 Location = m_D: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.0633 0.0591 3174 -1.071 0.2844 Location = m_E: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.2217 0.0238 3174 9.317 <.0001 Location = m_G: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.0737 0.0882 3174 -0.836 0.4032 Location = m_H: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -1.1886 0.2669 3174 -4.453 <.0001 Location = m_I: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.5296 0.5674 3174 0.933 0.3507 Results are given on the log (not the response) scale. > Mod_Dictyopteris <- glmmTMB(Dioptr ~ Location * Event + (1|Treatment), zi=~Lo cation + Event, family=nbinom2(), data=ccover) > summary(Mod_Dictyopteris) Family: nbinom2 ( log ) Formula: Dioptr ~ Location * Event + (1 | Treatment) Zero inflation: ~Location + Event Data: ccover AIC BIC logLik deviance df.resid 7202.7 7366.6 -3574.4 7148.7 3173 Random effects: Conditional model: Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Treatment (Intercept) 2.25e-10 1.5e-05 Number of obs: 3200, groups: Treatment, 3 Overdispersion parameter for nbinom2 family (): 2.12 Conditional model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 1.882e+00 4.584e-01 4.105 4.04e-05 *** Locationm_B -6.312e-01 1.015e+00 -0.622 0.53384 Locationm_C -1.916e+01 1.605e+03 -0.012 0.99048 Locationm_D -5.725e-01 7.698e-01 -0.744 0.45705 Locationm_E -2.640e+00 9.840e-01 -2.683 0.00730 ** Locationm_G -5.411e-01 6.775e-01 -0.799 0.42454 Locationm_H -9.361e-01 1.101e+00 -0.850 0.39520 Locationm_I -7.315e-01 1.035e+00 -0.707 0.47981 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-6 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx EventSpring_2019 8.550e-01 4.694e-01 1.821 0.06854 . Locationm_B:EventSpring_2019 -3.304e+01 4.607e+05 0.000 0.99994 Locationm_C:EventSpring_2019 1.961e+01 1.605e+03 0.012 0.99025 Locationm_D:EventSpring_2019 7.126e-01 7.812e-01 0.912 0.36169 Locationm_E:EventSpring_2019 2.845e+00 9.904e-01 2.872 0.00408 ** Locationm_G:EventSpring_2019 1.510e-01 6.915e-01 0.218 0.82709 Locationm_H:EventSpring_2019 6.567e-01 1.108e+00 0.593 0.55334 Locationm_I:EventSpring_2019 3.029e-01 1.043e+00 0.290 0.77156 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 Zero-inflation model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 5.3609 0.4192 12.788 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_B -0.2042 1.1012 -0.185 0.85285 Locationm_C -2.6389 0.2529 -10.434 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_D -0.3844 0.2148 -1.790 0.07344 . Locationm_E -2.5495 0.2494 -10.221 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_G -0.2980 0.2173 -1.371 0.17023 Locationm_H -1.1644 0.2123 -5.485 4.13e-08 *** Locationm_I -0.6799 0.2131 -3.191 0.00142 ** EventSpring_2019 -4.4104 0.3972 -11.104 < 2e-16 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > Anova(Mod_Dictyopteris) Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II Wald chisquare tests) Response: Dioptr Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq) Location 137.0513 7 < 2.2e-16 *** Event 22.8910 1 1.715e-06 *** Location:Event 9.1086 7 0.245 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > emmeans(Mod_Dictyopteris, pairwise ~ Event | Location) $emmeans Location = m_A: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 2.079 6.60e-01 3173 0.786 3.373 Spring_2019 2.659 1.07e-01 3173 2.449 2.869 Location = m_B: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 2.550 1.95e-01 3173 2.168 2.932 Spring_2019 -18.180 1.49e+03 3173 -2941.515 2905.156 Location = m_C: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 -2.433 1.03e+00 3173 -4.460 -0.407 Spring_2019 3.142 4.68e-02 3173 3.050 3.234 Location = m_D: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 0.601 9.43e-01 3173 -1.248 2.450 Spring_2019 2.906 8.02e-02 3173 2.749 3.063 Location = m_E: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 2.938 1.46e-01 3173 2.652 3.223 Spring_2019 2.923 5.48e-02 3173 2.815 3.030 Location = m_G: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 2.556 2.14e-01 3173 2.137 2.976 Spring_2019 2.285 1.30e-01 3173 2.030 2.539 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-7 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Location = m_H: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 2.595 3.09e-01 3173 1.990 3.200 Spring_2019 2.522 8.81e-02 3173 2.349 2.695 Location = m_I: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 -0.332 1.13e+00 3173 -2.553 1.889 Spring_2019 2.314 1.16e-01 3173 2.086 2.543 Results are given on the log (not the response) scale. Confidence level used: 0.95 $contrasts Location = m_A: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.5797 0.668 3173 -0.868 0.3853 Location = m_B: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 20.7300 1490.956 3173 0.014 0.9889 Location = m_C: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -5.5749 1.034 3173 -5.391 <.0001 Location = m_D: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -2.3051 0.946 3173 -2.437 0.0148 Location = m_E: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.0148 0.155 3173 0.096 0.9238 Location = m_G: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.2716 0.249 3173 1.089 0.2763 Location = m_H: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.0727 0.321 3173 0.227 0.8206 Location = m_I: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -2.6465 1.134 3173 -2.333 0.0197 Results are given on the log (not the response) scale. > mod_Sargassum <-glmmTMB(Sarg ~ Location * Event + (1|Treatment), zi=~Location + Event, family=nbinom2(), data=ccover) > summary(mod_Sargassum) Family: nbinom2 ( log ) Formula: Sarg ~ Location * Event + (1 | Treatment) Zero inflation: ~Location + Event Data: ccover AIC BIC logLik deviance df.resid 10781.7 10945.7 -5363.9 10727.7 3173 Random effects: Conditional model: Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-8 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Treatment (Intercept) 5.643e-15 7.512e-08 Number of obs: 3200, groups: Treatment, 3 Overdispersion parameter for nbinom2 family (): 2.38 Conditional model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 1.8009 0.1716 10.495 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_B -0.5358 0.8895 -0.602 0.546936 Locationm_C 0.7124 0.1854 3.843 0.000122 *** Locationm_D -0.4992 0.4183 -1.193 0.232681 Locationm_E 0.4402 0.1892 2.327 0.019956 * Locationm_G 0.5641 0.1895 2.976 0.002916 ** Locationm_H 0.7555 0.1808 4.178 2.94e-05 *** Locationm_I 1.2787 0.1796 7.120 1.08e-12 *** EventSpring_2019 0.4039 0.2238 1.805 0.071145 . Locationm_B:EventSpring_2019 -15.8997 1409.0555 -0.011 0.990997 Locationm_C:EventSpring_2019 -0.3645 0.2448 -1.489 0.136421 Locationm_D:EventSpring_2019 -0.6898 1.0581 -0.652 0.514423 Locationm_E:EventSpring_2019 -0.1327 0.2483 -0.535 0.592970 Locationm_G:EventSpring_2019 -0.7651 0.3172 -2.412 0.015844 * Locationm_H:EventSpring_2019 -0.3407 0.2388 -1.427 0.153691 Locationm_I:EventSpring_2019 -0.5478 0.2369 -2.312 0.020771 * --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 Zero-inflation model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 1.78846 0.16228 11.021 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_B 3.38303 1.02887 3.288 0.00101 ** Locationm_C -2.07312 0.18720 -11.074 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_D 2.07737 0.45336 4.582 4.60e-06 *** Locationm_E -1.83936 0.18755 -9.807 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_G -0.82858 0.19725 -4.201 2.66e-05 *** Locationm_H -3.00536 0.19533 -15.386 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_I -3.31367 0.20042 -16.534 < 2e-16 *** EventSpring_2019 0.39368 0.09508 4.140 3.47e-05 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > Anova(mod_Sargassum) Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II Wald chisquare tests) Response: Sarg Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq) Location 184.3767 7 < 2e-16 *** Event 0.3291 1 0.56617 Location:Event 16.0887 7 0.02432 * --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > emmeans(mod_Sargassum, pairwise ~ Event | Location) $emmeans Location = m_A: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.80 1.72e-01 3173 1.464 2.14 Spring_2019 2.20 1.44e-01 3173 1.923 2.49 Location = m_B: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.27 8.73e-01 3173 -0.446 2.98 Spring_2019 -14.23 1.41e+03 3173 -2776.982 2748.52 Location = m_C: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 2.51 7.03e-02 3173 2.375 2.65 Spring_2019 2.55 6.99e-02 3173 2.416 2.69 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-9 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Location = m_D: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.30 3.82e-01 3173 0.554 2.05 Spring_2019 1.02 9.70e-01 3173 -0.886 2.92 Location = m_E: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 2.24 7.99e-02 3173 2.084 2.40 Spring_2019 2.51 7.22e-02 3173 2.371 2.65 Location = m_G: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 2.36 8.05e-02 3173 2.207 2.52 Spring_2019 2.00 2.10e-01 3173 1.592 2.42 Location = m_H: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 2.56 5.72e-02 3173 2.444 2.67 Spring_2019 2.62 6.06e-02 3173 2.501 2.74 Location = m_I: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 3.08 5.31e-02 3173 2.975 3.18 Spring_2019 2.94 5.67e-02 3173 2.825 3.05 Results are given on the log (not the response) scale. Confidence level used: 0.95 $contrasts Location = m_A: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.4039 2.24e-01 3173 -1.805 0.0712 Location = m_B: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 15.4958 1.41e+03 3173 0.011 0.9912 Location = m_C: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.0394 9.91e-02 3173 -0.397 0.6910 Location = m_D: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.2859 1.03e+00 3173 0.276 0.7822 Location = m_E: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.2712 1.08e-01 3173 -2.519 0.0118 Location = m_G: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.3612 2.25e-01 3173 1.608 0.1080 Location = m_H: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.0632 8.32e-02 3173 -0.760 0.4475 Location = m_I: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.1439 7.77e-02 3173 1.852 0.0641 Results are given on the log (not the response) scale. Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-10 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx > mod_Turf <-glmmTMB(Turf_pc ~ Location * Event + (1|Treatment), zi=~Location + Event, family=betabinomial(), data=ccover_select) > summary(mod_Turf) Family: betabinomial ( logit ) Formula: Turf_pc ~ Location * Event + (1 | Treatment) Zero inflation: ~Location + Event Data: ccover_select AIC BIC logLik deviance df.resid -4236.4 -4072.5 2145.2 -4290.4 3173 Random effects: Conditional model: Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Treatment (Intercept) 7.386e-12 2.718e-06 Number of obs: 3200, groups: Treatment, 3 Overdispersion parameter for betabinomial family (): 7.6e+05 Conditional model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 0.17044 0.14193 1.201 0.229809 Locationm_B 0.77886 0.21213 3.672 0.000241 *** Locationm_C -0.81105 0.20559 -3.945 7.98e-05 *** Locationm_D -0.50915 0.20180 -2.523 0.011636 * Locationm_E -0.86322 0.20650 -4.180 2.91e-05 *** Locationm_G -0.71090 0.20406 -3.484 0.000494 *** Locationm_H -0.87713 0.20676 -4.242 2.21e-05 *** Locationm_I -1.15962 0.21319 -5.439 5.35e-08 *** EventSpring_2019 -0.03749 0.20058 -0.187 0.851729 Locationm_B:EventSpring_2019 0.29766 0.30551 0.974 0.329904 Locationm_C:EventSpring_2019 -0.40312 0.29798 -1.353 0.176114 Locationm_D:EventSpring_2019 -0.03013 0.28574 -0.105 0.916027 Locationm_E:EventSpring_2019 -0.62768 0.30571 -2.053 0.040053 * Locationm_G:EventSpring_2019 -0.35242 0.29390 -1.199 0.230486 Locationm_H:EventSpring_2019 -0.03073 0.29324 -0.105 0.916538 Locationm_I:EventSpring_2019 -0.32454 0.31007 -1.047 0.295256 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 Zero-inflation model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) -12.696 38.103 -0.333 0.739 Locationm_B -1.246 78.099 -0.016 0.987 Locationm_C -1.246 78.099 -0.016 0.987 Locationm_D -1.246 78.099 -0.016 0.987 Locationm_E -1.246 78.099 -0.016 0.987 Locationm_G -1.246 78.099 -0.016 0.987 Locationm_H -1.246 78.099 -0.016 0.987 Locationm_I -1.246 78.099 -0.016 0.987 EventSpring_2019 -1.618 57.211 -0.028 0.977 > Anova(mod_Turf) Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II Wald chisquare tests) Response: Turf_pc Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq) Location 296.5883 7 < 2.2e-16 *** Event 7.5381 1 0.006041 ** Location:Event 11.9335 7 0.102766 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > emmeans(mod_Turf, pairwise ~ Event | Location) $emmeans Location = m_A: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-11 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Event 2 - Autumn 2020 0.170 0.142 3173 -0.108 0.4487 Spring_2019 0.133 0.142 3173 -0.145 0.4108 Location = m_B: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 0.949 0.158 3173 0.640 1.2584 Spring_2019 1.209 0.168 3173 0.880 1.5390 Location = m_C: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 -0.641 0.149 3173 -0.932 -0.3490 Spring_2019 -1.081 0.163 3173 -1.400 -0.7624 Location = m_D: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 -0.339 0.143 3173 -0.620 -0.0574 Spring_2019 -0.406 0.144 3173 -0.689 -0.1233 Location = m_E: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 -0.693 0.150 3173 -0.987 -0.3987 Spring_2019 -1.358 0.175 3173 -1.702 -1.0143 Location = m_G: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 -0.540 0.147 3173 -0.828 -0.2530 Spring_2019 -0.930 0.157 3173 -1.238 -0.6225 Location = m_H: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 -0.707 0.150 3173 -1.001 -0.4119 Spring_2019 -0.775 0.152 3173 -1.073 -0.4766 Location = m_I: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 -0.989 0.159 3173 -1.301 -0.6773 Spring_2019 -1.351 0.175 3173 -1.694 -1.0082 Results are given on the logit (not the response) scale. Confidence level used: 0.95 $contrasts Location = m_A: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.0375 0.201 3173 0.187 0.8517 Location = m_B: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.2602 0.230 3173 -1.129 0.2590 Location = m_C: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.4406 0.220 3173 1.999 0.0456 Location = m_D: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.0676 0.204 3173 0.332 0.7397 Location = m_E: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.6652 0.231 3173 2.883 0.0040 Location = m_G: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.3899 0.215 3173 1.815 0.0696 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-12 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Location = m_H: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.0682 0.214 3173 0.319 0.7498 Location = m_I: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.3620 0.236 3173 1.531 0.1258 Results are given on the log odds ratio (not the response) scale. > mod_Hardcoral <-glmmTMB(Total_hardcoral ~ Location * Event + (1|Treatment), z i=~Location + Event, family=nbinom1(), data=ccover) > summary(mod_Hardcoral) Family: nbinom1 ( log ) Formula: Total_hardcoral ~ Location * Event + (1 | Treatment) Zero inflation: ~Location + Event Data: ccover AIC BIC logLik deviance df.resid 11885.6 12049.5 -5915.8 11831.6 3173 Random effects: Conditional model: Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Treatment (Intercept) 4.752e-10 2.18e-05 Number of obs: 3200, groups: Treatment, 3 Overdispersion parameter for nbinom1 family (): 2.07 Conditional model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 1.906405 0.067866 28.091 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_B 0.350868 0.083351 4.209 2.56e-05 *** Locationm_C -0.069487 0.124352 -0.559 0.5763 Locationm_D -0.024294 0.095551 -0.254 0.7993 Locationm_E -0.105821 0.116414 -0.909 0.3633 Locationm_G 0.209676 0.088278 2.375 0.0175 * Locationm_H 0.162502 0.090237 1.801 0.0717 . Locationm_I -0.060101 0.132593 -0.453 0.6503 EventSpring_2019 0.065381 0.093455 0.700 0.4842 Locationm_B:EventSpring_2019 -0.142658 0.116936 -1.220 0.2225 Locationm_C:EventSpring_2019 0.121759 0.176948 0.688 0.4914 Locationm_D:EventSpring_2019 -0.010386 0.145975 -0.071 0.9433 Locationm_E:EventSpring_2019 0.107640 0.157644 0.683 0.4947 Locationm_G:EventSpring_2019 -0.003876 0.124742 -0.031 0.9752 Locationm_H:EventSpring_2019 0.046519 0.122545 0.380 0.7042 Locationm_I:EventSpring_2019 -0.014478 0.169925 -0.085 0.9321 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 Zero-inflation model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) -0.13430 0.11013 -1.219 0.22267 Locationm_B -0.61687 0.14873 -4.148 3.36e-05 *** Locationm_C 1.43416 0.16287 8.806 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_D 0.45199 0.14664 3.082 0.00205 ** Locationm_E 0.90805 0.15182 5.981 2.21e-09 *** Locationm_G -0.01155 0.14442 -0.080 0.93627 Locationm_H -0.29270 0.14589 -2.006 0.04482 * Locationm_I 1.09718 0.15525 7.067 1.58e-12 *** EventSpring_2019 0.11099 0.07663 1.448 0.14752 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > Anova(mod_Hardcoral) Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II Wald chisquare tests) Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-13 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Response: Total_hardcoral Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq) Location 60.5511 7 1.172e-10 *** Event 2.2981 1 0.1295 Location:Event 5.6990 7 0.5753 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > emmeans(mod_Hardcoral, pairwise ~ Event | Location) $emmeans Location = m_A: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.91 0.0679 3173 1.77 2.04 Spring_2019 1.97 0.0647 3173 1.84 2.10 Location = m_B: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 2.26 0.0486 3173 2.16 2.35 Spring_2019 2.18 0.0510 3173 2.08 2.28 Location = m_C: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.84 0.1044 3173 1.63 2.04 Spring_2019 2.02 0.1085 3173 1.81 2.24 Location = m_D: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.88 0.0676 3173 1.75 2.01 Spring_2019 1.94 0.0899 3173 1.76 2.11 Location = m_E: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.80 0.0948 3173 1.61 1.99 Spring_2019 1.97 0.0851 3173 1.81 2.14 Location = m_G: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 2.12 0.0567 3173 2.00 2.23 Spring_2019 2.18 0.0603 3173 2.06 2.30 Location = m_H: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 2.07 0.0597 3173 1.95 2.19 Spring_2019 2.18 0.0525 3173 2.08 2.28 Location = m_I: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.85 0.1140 3173 1.62 2.07 Spring_2019 1.90 0.0852 3173 1.73 2.06 Results are given on the log (not the response) scale. Confidence level used: 0.95 $contrasts Location = m_A: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.0654 0.0935 3173 -0.700 0.4842 Location = m_B: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.0773 0.0703 3173 1.099 0.2719 Location = m_C: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.1871 0.1503 3173 -1.245 0.2132 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-14 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Location = m_D: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.0550 0.1122 3173 -0.490 0.6242 Location = m_E: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.1730 0.1270 3173 -1.362 0.1733 Location = m_G: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.0615 0.0827 3173 -0.744 0.4569 Location = m_H: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.1119 0.0793 3173 -1.411 0.1584 Location = m_I: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.0509 0.1420 3173 -0.358 0.7200 Results are given on the log (not the response) scale. > mod_Softcoral <-glmmTMB(Total_Softcoral ~ Location * Event + (1|Treatment), z i=~Location + Event, family=nbinom1(), data=ccover) > summary(mod_Softcoral) Family: nbinom1 ( log ) Formula: Total_Softcoral ~ Location * Event + (1 | Treatment) Zero inflation: ~Location + Event Data: ccover AIC BIC logLik deviance df.resid 7683.5 7847.5 -3814.8 7629.5 3173 Random effects: Conditional model: Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Treatment (Intercept) 2.293e-10 1.514e-05 Number of obs: 3200, groups: Treatment, 3 Overdispersion parameter for nbinom1 family (): 1.73 Conditional model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 1.6495794 0.1467004 11.245 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_B 0.3006617 0.1577229 1.906 0.0566 . Locationm_C -0.3555186 0.3690494 -0.963 0.3354 Locationm_D -0.0002263 0.1953661 -0.001 0.9991 Locationm_E 0.0231291 0.1850837 0.125 0.9006 Locationm_G 0.0141104 0.1953438 0.072 0.9424 Locationm_H 0.6644300 0.1533469 4.333 1.47e-05 *** Locationm_I -0.2339539 0.2668054 -0.877 0.3806 EventSpring_2019 -0.0738561 0.1942515 -0.380 0.7038 Locationm_B:EventSpring_2019 0.0002391 0.2153168 0.001 0.9991 Locationm_C:EventSpring_2019 0.7079859 0.4078396 1.736 0.0826 . Locationm_D:EventSpring_2019 0.1561020 0.2664731 0.586 0.5580 Locationm_E:EventSpring_2019 -0.0096304 0.2558346 -0.038 0.9700 Locationm_G:EventSpring_2019 0.4805859 0.2526287 1.902 0.0571 . Locationm_H:EventSpring_2019 0.0596197 0.2052456 0.290 0.7714 Locationm_I:EventSpring_2019 0.6748410 0.3084034 2.188 0.0287 * --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 Zero-inflation model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 1.612242 0.148012 10.893 <2e-16 *** Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-15 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Locationm_B -1.629570 0.174226 -9.353 <2e-16 *** Locationm_C 0.571272 0.230513 2.478 0.0132 * Locationm_D -0.005136 0.198214 -0.026 0.9793 Locationm_E -0.325743 0.190006 -1.714 0.0865 . Locationm_G -0.096745 0.194331 -0.498 0.6186 Locationm_H -2.105531 0.174809 -12.045 <2e-16 *** Locationm_I -0.039365 0.200115 -0.197 0.8441 EventSpring_2019 0.034335 0.090635 0.379 0.7048 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > Anova(mod_Softcoral) Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II Wald chisquare tests) Response: Total_Softcoral Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq) Location 137.0880 7 <2e-16 *** Event 0.5207 1 0.4705 Location:Event 16.3385 7 0.0222 * --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > emmeans(mod_Softcoral, pairwise ~ Event | Location) $emmeans Location = m_A: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.65 0.1467 3173 1.362 1.94 Spring_2019 1.58 0.1288 3173 1.323 1.83 Location = m_B: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.95 0.0582 3173 1.836 2.06 Spring_2019 1.88 0.0730 3173 1.734 2.02 Location = m_C: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.29 0.3389 3173 0.630 1.96 Spring_2019 1.93 0.1224 3173 1.688 2.17 Location = m_D: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.65 0.1293 3173 1.396 1.90 Spring_2019 1.73 0.1300 3173 1.477 1.99 Location = m_E: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.67 0.1131 3173 1.451 1.89 Spring_2019 1.59 0.1238 3173 1.346 1.83 Location = m_G: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.66 0.1292 3173 1.410 1.92 Spring_2019 2.07 0.0976 3173 1.879 2.26 Location = m_H: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 2.31 0.0448 3173 2.226 2.40 Spring_2019 2.30 0.0489 3173 2.204 2.40 Location = m_I: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 1.42 0.2231 3173 0.978 1.85 Spring_2019 2.02 0.0903 3173 1.840 2.19 Results are given on the log (not the response) scale. Confidence level used: 0.95 $contrasts Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-16 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Location = m_A: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.0739 0.1943 3173 0.380 0.7038 Location = m_B: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.0736 0.0931 3173 0.791 0.4292 Location = m_C: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.6341 0.3596 3173 -1.764 0.0779 Location = m_D: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.0822 0.1827 3173 -0.450 0.6527 Location = m_E: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.0835 0.1669 3173 0.500 0.6170 Location = m_G: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.4067 0.1617 3173 -2.515 0.0120 Location = m_H: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.0142 0.0663 3173 0.215 0.8300 Location = m_I: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.6010 0.2405 3173 -2.499 0.0125 Results are given on the log (not the response) scale. > mod_Macroalgae <-glmmTMB(Macroalgae_pc ~ Location * Event + (1|Treatment), zi =~Location + Event, family=betabinomial(), data=ccover_select) > summary(mod_Macroalgae) Family: betabinomial ( logit ) Formula: Macroalgae_pc ~ Location * Event + (1 | Treatment) Zero inflation: ~Location + Event Data: ccover_select AIC BIC logLik deviance df.resid 2817.3 2981.3 -1381.7 2763.3 3173 Random effects: Conditional model: Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Treatment (Intercept) 4.007e-09 6.33e-05 Number of obs: 3200, groups: Treatment, 3 Overdispersion parameter for betabinomial family (): 3.63e+05 Conditional model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) -1.09211 0.16303 -6.699 2.10e-11 *** Locationm_B -1.67610 0.34138 -4.910 9.12e-07 *** Locationm_C 0.63308 0.21829 2.900 0.003730 ** Locationm_D -0.02169 0.23120 -0.094 0.925238 Locationm_E 0.56639 0.21908 2.585 0.009728 ** Locationm_G 0.72069 0.21743 3.315 0.000918 *** Locationm_H 0.64416 0.21818 2.953 0.003152 ** Locationm_I 1.43377 0.21719 6.602 4.07e-11 *** EventSpring_2019 0.09889 0.22789 0.434 0.664315 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-17 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Locationm_B:EventSpring_2019 -0.16278 0.48692 -0.334 0.738145 Locationm_C:EventSpring_2019 0.75364 0.30625 2.461 0.013859 * Locationm_D:EventSpring_2019 0.61315 0.31563 1.943 0.052060 . Locationm_E:EventSpring_2019 -0.05687 0.30747 -0.185 0.853270 Locationm_G:EventSpring_2019 0.32670 0.30437 1.073 0.283118 Locationm_H:EventSpring_2019 -0.07763 0.30639 -0.253 0.799985 Locationm_I:EventSpring_2019 -0.26998 0.30441 -0.887 0.375147 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 Zero-inflation model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) -12.153 29.511 -0.412 0.680 Locationm_B -1.296 62.155 -0.021 0.983 Locationm_C -1.296 62.155 -0.021 0.983 Locationm_D -1.296 62.155 -0.021 0.983 Locationm_E -1.296 62.155 -0.021 0.983 Locationm_G -1.296 62.155 -0.021 0.983 Locationm_H -1.296 62.155 -0.021 0.983 Locationm_I -1.296 62.155 -0.021 0.983 EventSpring_2019 -1.948 51.057 -0.038 0.970 > Anova(mod_Macroalgae) Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II Wald chisquare tests) Response: Macroalgae_pc Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq) Location 226.731 7 < 2.2e-16 *** Event 11.990 1 0.0005348 *** Location:Event 21.436 7 0.0031756 ** --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > emmeans(mod_Macroalgae, pairwise ~ Event | Location) $emmeans Location = m_A: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 -1.0921 0.163 3173 -1.4118 -0.7724 Spring_2019 -0.9932 0.159 3173 -1.3054 -0.6810 Location = m_B: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 -2.7682 0.300 3173 -3.3563 -2.1801 Spring_2019 -2.8321 0.309 3173 -3.4371 -2.2271 Location = m_C: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 -0.4590 0.145 3173 -0.7436 -0.1744 Spring_2019 0.3935 0.144 3173 0.1108 0.6762 Location = m_D: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 -1.1138 0.164 3173 -1.4352 -0.7924 Spring_2019 -0.4018 0.144 3173 -0.6847 -0.1189 Location = m_E: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 -0.5257 0.146 3173 -0.8126 -0.2388 Spring_2019 -0.4837 0.146 3173 -0.7691 -0.1983 Location = m_G: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 -0.3714 0.144 3173 -0.6535 -0.0893 Spring_2019 0.0542 0.141 3173 -0.2232 0.3316 Location = m_H: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 -0.4479 0.145 3173 -0.7322 -0.1637 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-18 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Spring_2019 -0.4267 0.145 3173 -0.7103 -0.1431 Location = m_I: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 0.3417 0.143 3173 0.0603 0.6230 Spring_2019 0.1706 0.142 3173 -0.1077 0.4489 Results are given on the logit (not the response) scale. Confidence level used: 0.95 $contrasts Location = m_A: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.0989 0.228 3173 -0.434 0.6643 Location = m_B: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.0639 0.430 3173 0.148 0.8820 Location = m_C: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.8525 0.205 3173 -4.167 <.0001 Location = m_D: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.7120 0.218 3173 -3.261 0.0011 Location = m_E: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.0420 0.206 3173 -0.204 0.8387 Location = m_G: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.4256 0.202 3173 -2.109 0.0350 Location = m_H: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.0213 0.205 3173 -0.104 0.9173 Location = m_I: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.1711 0.202 3173 0.848 0.3967 Results are given on the log odds ratio (not the response) scale. > mod_Abiotic <-glmmTMB(Total_Abiotic ~ Location * Event + (1|Treatment), zi=~L ocation + Event, family=nbinom1(), data=ccover) > summary(mod_Abiotic) Family: nbinom1 ( log ) Formula: Total_Abiotic ~ Location * Event + (1 | Treatment) Zero inflation: ~Location + Event Data: ccover AIC BIC logLik deviance df.resid 22052.0 22215.9 -10999.0 21998.0 3173 Random effects: Conditional model: Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Treatment (Intercept) 3.006e-10 1.734e-05 Number of obs: 3200, groups: Treatment, 3 Overdispersion parameter for nbinom1 family (): 19 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-19 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Conditional model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 3.11271 0.07420 41.95 < 2e-16 *** Locationm_B -0.09308 0.11675 -0.80 0.42531 Locationm_C 0.23166 0.09533 2.43 0.01510 * Locationm_D 0.50765 0.09209 5.51 3.54e-08 *** Locationm_E 0.29492 0.09459 3.12 0.00182 ** Locationm_G 0.09509 0.10575 0.90 0.36855 Locationm_H -0.17463 0.11535 -1.51 0.13004 Locationm_I -0.19348 0.09670 -2.00 0.04542 * EventSpring_2019 0.02112 0.10809 0.20 0.84511 Locationm_B:EventSpring_2019 -0.27442 0.17482 -1.57 0.11648 Locationm_C:EventSpring_2019 -0.48421 0.15098 -3.21 0.00134 ** Locationm_D:EventSpring_2019 -0.33153 0.14210 -2.33 0.01965 * Locationm_E:EventSpring_2019 0.09747 0.13489 0.72 0.46995 Locationm_G:EventSpring_2019 -0.18227 0.15445 -1.18 0.23793 Locationm_H:EventSpring_2019 0.05646 0.15660 0.36 0.71845 Locationm_I:EventSpring_2019 0.11741 0.14952 0.79 0.43229 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 Zero-inflation model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) -0.83402 0.12062 -6.915 4.69e-12 *** Locationm_B 0.48137 0.15744 3.057 0.002232 ** Locationm_C -0.50117 0.17171 -2.919 0.003515 ** Locationm_D 0.05799 0.15421 0.376 0.706905 Locationm_E -0.74321 0.17023 -4.366 1.27e-05 *** Locationm_G 0.15847 0.15562 1.018 0.308544 Locationm_H -0.37105 0.17150 -2.164 0.030496 * Locationm_I -1.18578 0.20720 -5.723 1.05e-08 *** EventSpring_2019 0.32533 0.08594 3.786 0.000153 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > Anova(mod_Abiotic) Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II Wald chisquare tests) Response: Total_Abiotic Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq) Location 148.540 7 < 2.2e-16 *** Event 5.501 1 0.01901 * Location:Event 34.811 7 1.214e-05 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > emmeans(mod_Abiotic, pairwise ~ Event | Location) $emmeans Location = m_A: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 3.11 0.0742 3173 2.97 3.26 Spring_2019 3.13 0.0801 3173 2.98 3.29 Location = m_B: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 3.02 0.0910 3173 2.84 3.20 Spring_2019 2.77 0.1067 3173 2.56 2.98 Location = m_C: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 3.34 0.0610 3173 3.22 3.46 Spring_2019 2.88 0.0880 3173 2.71 3.05 Location = m_D: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 3.62 0.0557 3173 3.51 3.73 Spring_2019 3.31 0.0745 3173 3.16 3.46 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-20 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Location = m_E: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 3.41 0.0598 3173 3.29 3.52 Spring_2019 3.53 0.0555 3173 3.42 3.64 Location = m_G: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 3.21 0.0763 3173 3.06 3.36 Spring_2019 3.05 0.0816 3173 2.89 3.21 Location = m_H: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 2.94 0.0891 3173 2.76 3.11 Spring_2019 3.02 0.0743 3173 2.87 3.16 Location = m_I: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Event 2 - Autumn 2020 2.92 0.0638 3173 2.79 3.04 Spring_2019 3.06 0.0839 3173 2.89 3.22 Results are given on the log (not the response) scale. Confidence level used: 0.95 $contrasts Location = m_A: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.0211 0.1081 3173 -0.195 0.8451 Location = m_B: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.2533 0.1380 3173 1.835 0.0665 Location = m_C: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.4631 0.1059 3173 4.372 <.0001 Location = m_D: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.3104 0.0924 3173 3.360 0.0008 Location = m_E: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.1186 0.0808 3173 -1.467 0.1424 Location = m_G: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 0.1612 0.1107 3173 1.456 0.1454 Location = m_H: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.0776 0.1139 3173 -0.681 0.4959 Location = m_I: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Event 2 - Autumn 2020 - Spring_2019 -0.1385 0.1039 3173 -1.333 0.1825 Results are given on the log (not the response) scale. . Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-21 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx B.1.2 Fish Biomass and Diversity Metrics > mod_B20_2 <- glm(sumWeight ~ Treatment * Event, family=Gamma(), data=Weight_s um) > summary(mod_B20_2) Call: glm(formula = sumWeight ~ Treatment * Event, family = Gamma(), data = Weight_sum) Deviance Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -1.9777 -1.0653 -0.2768 0.4249 1.4890 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) 4.863e-05 3.677e-05 1.323 0.194 TreatmentReference 2.901e-05 1.046e-04 0.277 0.783 TreatmentRemediation -1.769e-05 7.622e-05 -0.232 0.818 Event 3.669e-06 2.419e-05 0.152 0.880 TreatmentReference:Event 2.851e-05 7.143e-05 0.399 0.692 TreatmentRemediation:Event 4.808e-05 5.590e-05 0.860 0.395 (Dispersion parameter for Gamma family taken to be 0.8412942) Null deviance: 49.225 on 45 degrees of freedom Residual deviance: 42.164 on 40 degrees of freedom AIC: 966.9 Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 6 > Anova(mod_B20_2) Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II tests) Response: sumWeight LR Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq) Treatment 6.8277 2 0.03291 * Event 0.5702 1 0.45016 Treatment:Event 0.8546 2 0.65227 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > emmeans(mod_B20_2, pairwise ~ Treatment | Event) $emmeans Event = 1: Treatment emmean SE df asymp.LCL asymp.UCL Nearfield 5.23e-05 1.60e-05 Inf 2.10e-05 8.36e-05 Reference 1.10e-04 4.11e-05 Inf 2.92e-05 1.90e-04 Remediation 8.27e-05 2.53e-05 Inf 3.31e-05 1.32e-04 Event = 2: Treatment emmean SE df asymp.LCL asymp.UCL Nearfield 5.60e-05 1.81e-05 Inf 2.04e-05 9.15e-05 Reference 1.42e-04 5.32e-05 Inf 3.78e-05 2.46e-04 Remediation 1.34e-04 4.36e-05 Inf 4.90e-05 2.20e-04 Results are given on the inverse (not the response) scale. Confidence level used: 0.95 $contrasts Event = 1: contrast estimate SE df z.ratio p.value Nearfield - Reference -5.75e-05 4.41e-05 Inf -1.304 0.3929 Nearfield - Remediation -3.04e-05 2.99e-05 Inf -1.016 0.5667 Reference - Remediation 2.71e-05 4.83e-05 Inf 0.562 0.8402 Event = 2: contrast estimate SE df z.ratio p.value Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-22 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Nearfield - Reference -8.60e-05 5.62e-05 Inf -1.531 0.2762 Nearfield - Remediation -7.85e-05 4.72e-05 Inf -1.662 0.2200 Reference - Remediation 7.56e-06 6.88e-05 Inf 0.110 0.9934 Note: contrasts are still on the inverse scale P value adjustment: tukey method for comparing a family of 3 estimates > mod_Richness2 <- glmmTMB(Richness ~ Treatment * Event, data=Diversity, famil y=truncated_poisson()) > summary(mod_Richness2) Family: truncated_poisson ( log ) Formula: Richness ~ Treatment * Event Data: Diversity AIC BIC logLik deviance df.resid 290.3 301.5 -139.1 278.3 42 Conditional model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 2.6819 0.1782 15.048 <2e-16 *** TreatmentReference -0.2163 0.2827 -0.765 0.444 TreatmentRemediation 0.1517 0.2524 0.601 0.548 Event 0.1513 0.1102 1.373 0.170 TreatmentReference:Event 0.1763 0.1724 1.023 0.306 TreatmentRemediation:Event -0.1323 0.1576 -0.839 0.401 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > Anova(mod_Richness2) Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II Wald chisquare tests) Response: Richness Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq) Treatment 1.6181 2 0.44528 Event 4.8805 1 0.02716 * Treatment:Event 3.1487 2 0.20714 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > emmeans(mod_Richness2, pairwise ~ Treatment | Event) $emmeans Event = 1: Treatment emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Nearfield 2.83 0.0808 42 2.67 3.00 Reference 2.79 0.1010 42 2.59 3.00 Remediation 2.85 0.0801 42 2.69 3.01 Event = 2: Treatment emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Nearfield 2.98 0.0750 42 2.83 3.14 Reference 3.12 0.0857 42 2.95 3.29 Remediation 2.87 0.0793 42 2.71 3.03 Results are given on the log (not the response) scale. Confidence level used: 0.95 $contrasts Event = 1: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Nearfield - Reference 0.0400 0.129 42 0.309 0.9487 Nearfield - Remediation -0.0194 0.114 42 -0.171 0.9841 Reference - Remediation -0.0594 0.129 42 -0.461 0.8898 Event = 2: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Nearfield - Reference -0.1363 0.114 42 -1.197 0.4615 Nearfield - Remediation 0.1129 0.109 42 1.034 0.5596 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-23 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Reference - Remediation 0.2492 0.117 42 2.134 0.0952 Results are given on the log (not the response) scale. P value adjustment: tukey method for comparing a family of 3 estimates > > mod_Abundance3 <- glmmTMB(Abundance ~ Treatment * Event, data=Diversity, fami ly=nbinom1()) > summary(mod_Abundance3) Family: nbinom1 ( log ) Formula: Abundance ~ Treatment * Event Data: Diversity AIC BIC logLik deviance df.resid 513.0 526.1 -249.5 499.0 41 Overdispersion parameter for nbinom1 family (): 26.2 Conditional model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 3.91557 0.42093 9.302 <2e-16 *** TreatmentReference 0.18722 0.61577 0.304 0.761 TreatmentRemediation 0.08619 0.58437 0.147 0.883 Event 0.30572 0.25526 1.198 0.231 TreatmentReference:Event 0.09631 0.37282 0.258 0.796 TreatmentRemediation:Event -0.01964 0.35679 -0.055 0.956 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > Anova(mod_Abundance3) Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II Wald chisquare tests) Response: Abundance Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq) Treatment 3.8466 2 0.14612 Event 4.8080 1 0.02833 * Treatment:Event 0.1100 2 0.94649 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > emmeans(mod_Abundance3, pairwise ~ Treatment | Event) $emmeans Event = 1: Treatment emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Nearfield 4.22 0.195 41 3.83 4.62 Reference 4.50 0.210 41 4.08 4.93 Remediation 4.29 0.190 41 3.90 4.67 Event = 2: Treatment emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Nearfield 4.53 0.171 41 4.18 4.87 Reference 4.91 0.176 41 4.55 5.26 Remediation 4.57 0.168 41 4.24 4.91 Results are given on the log (not the response) scale. Confidence level used: 0.95 $contrasts Event = 1: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Nearfield - Reference -0.2835 0.283 41 -1.002 0.5800 Nearfield - Remediation -0.0665 0.267 41 -0.249 0.9664 Reference - Remediation 0.2170 0.280 41 0.776 0.7200 Event = 2: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Nearfield - Reference -0.3798 0.243 41 -1.563 0.2729 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-24 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Nearfield - Remediation -0.0469 0.236 41 -0.198 0.9785 Reference - Remediation 0.3329 0.241 41 1.383 0.3593 Results are given on the log (not the response) scale. P value adjustment: tukey method for comparing a family of 3 estimates > > mod_SimpsonD3 <- glmmTMB(SimpsonD ~ Treatment * Event, data=Diversity, family =gaussian()) > summary(mod_SimpsonD3) Family: gaussian ( identity ) Formula: SimpsonD ~ Treatment * Event Data: Diversity AIC BIC logLik deviance df.resid 134.4 147.5 -60.2 120.4 41 Dispersion estimate for gaussian family (sigma^2): 0.719 Conditional model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 3.5195 0.6321 5.568 2.58e-08 *** TreatmentReference -0.9985 0.9995 -0.999 0.318 TreatmentRemediation 0.6830 0.8940 0.764 0.445 Event 0.4030 0.3998 1.008 0.313 TreatmentReference:Event 0.5688 0.6321 0.900 0.368 TreatmentRemediation:Event -0.6036 0.5654 -1.068 0.286 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > Anova(mod_SimpsonD3) Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II Wald chisquare tests) Response: SimpsonD Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq) Treatment 0.6333 2 0.7286 Event 1.6963 1 0.1928 Treatment:Event 3.5106 2 0.1729 > emmeans(mod_SimpsonD3, pairwise ~ Treatment | Event) $emmeans Event = 1: Treatment emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Nearfield 3.92 0.283 41 3.35 4.49 Reference 3.49 0.346 41 2.79 4.19 Remediation 4.00 0.283 41 3.43 4.57 Event = 2: Treatment emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Nearfield 4.33 0.283 41 3.75 4.90 Reference 4.46 0.346 41 3.77 5.16 Remediation 3.80 0.283 41 3.23 4.37 Confidence level used: 0.95 $contrasts Event = 1: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Nearfield - Reference 0.4297 0.447 41 0.961 0.6052 Nearfield - Remediation -0.0794 0.400 41 -0.199 0.9785 Reference - Remediation -0.5091 0.447 41 -1.139 0.4960 Event = 2: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value Nearfield - Reference -0.1391 0.447 41 -0.311 0.9481 Nearfield - Remediation 0.5242 0.400 41 1.311 0.3972 Reference - Remediation 0.6633 0.447 41 1.484 0.3090 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-25 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx P value adjustment: tukey method for comparing a family of 3 estimates B.1.3 Biotic Contamination > mod_FishCopper <- glmmTMB(Copper ~ Location * Event + (1|Treatment), family=G amma(), data=Fish_con) > summary(mod_FishCopper) Family: Gamma ( inverse ) Formula: Copper ~ Location * Event + (1 | Treatment) Data: Fish_con AIC BIC logLik deviance df.resid -117.1 -74.2 76.5 -153.1 62 Random effects: Conditional model: Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Treatment (Intercept) 5.618e-10 2.37e-05 Number of obs: 80, groups: Treatment, 3 Dispersion estimate for Gamma family (sigma^2): 0.146 Conditional model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 7.0478 1.5262 4.618 3.87e-06 *** Locationm_B 0.4781 2.5765 0.186 0.852779 Locationm_C -0.8684 2.4525 -0.354 0.723267 Locationm_D -2.1479 2.1252 -1.011 0.312168 Locationm_E -1.3866 2.5618 -0.541 0.588325 Locationm_G -7.8166 2.1690 -3.604 0.000314 *** Locationm_H -1.5078 2.1402 -0.705 0.481101 Locationm_I -5.3117 1.8631 -2.851 0.004358 ** Event -2.6619 0.8045 -3.309 0.000938 *** Locationm_B:Event 0.8830 1.4383 0.614 0.539277 Locationm_C:Event 1.6908 1.4004 1.207 0.227292 Locationm_D:Event 1.7941 1.1887 1.509 0.131206 Locationm_E:Event 2.4354 1.5161 1.606 0.108199 Locationm_G:Event 6.4246 1.4963 4.294 1.76e-05 *** Locationm_H:Event 1.2885 1.1750 1.097 0.272818 Locationm_I:Event 3.5299 1.0937 3.227 0.001249 ** --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > Anova(mod_FishCopper) Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II Wald chisquare tests) Response: Copper Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq) Location 36.6468 7 5.471e-06 *** Event 3.2172 1 0.07287 . Location:Event 24.5271 7 0.00092 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > emmeans(mod_FishCopper, pairwise ~ Event | Location) $emmeans Location = m_A: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 4.39 0.749 62 2.89 5.88 2 1.72 0.294 62 1.14 2.31 Location = m_B: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 5.75 0.981 62 3.79 7.71 2 3.97 0.677 62 2.61 5.32 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-26 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Location = m_C: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 5.21 0.889 62 3.43 6.99 2 4.24 0.723 62 2.79 5.68 Location = m_D: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 4.03 0.688 62 2.66 5.41 2 3.16 0.540 62 2.08 4.24 Location = m_E: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 5.43 0.928 62 3.58 7.29 2 5.21 0.889 62 3.43 6.99 Location = m_G: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 2.99 0.511 62 1.97 4.02 2 6.76 1.153 62 4.45 9.06 Location = m_H: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 4.17 0.711 62 2.74 5.59 2 2.79 0.477 62 1.84 3.75 Location = m_I: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 2.60 0.445 62 1.72 3.49 2 3.47 0.593 62 2.29 4.66 Results are given on the inverse (not the response) scale. Confidence level used: 0.95 $contrasts Location = m_A: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 2.662 0.805 62 3.309 0.0016 Location = m_B: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 1.779 1.192 62 1.492 0.1408 Location = m_C: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 0.971 1.146 62 0.847 0.4001 Location = m_D: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 0.868 0.875 62 0.992 0.3252 Location = m_E: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 0.226 1.285 62 0.176 0.8607 Location = m_G: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 -3.763 1.262 62 -2.982 0.0041 Location = m_H: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 1.373 0.856 62 1.604 0.1139 Location = m_I: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 -0.868 0.741 62 -1.172 0.2459 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-27 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Note: contrasts are still on the inverse scale > > mod_FishZinc <- glmmTMB(Zinc ~ Location * Event + (1|Treatment), family=Gamma (), data=Fish_con) > summary(mod_FishZinc) Family: Gamma ( inverse ) Formula: Zinc ~ Location * Event + (1 | Treatment) Data: Fish_con AIC BIC logLik deviance df.resid 205.3 248.2 -84.7 169.3 62 Random effects: Conditional model: Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Treatment (Intercept) 1.334e-12 1.155e-06 Number of obs: 80, groups: Treatment, 3 Dispersion estimate for Gamma family (sigma^2): 0.0356 Conditional model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 0.187293 0.044001 4.257 2.08e-05 *** Locationm_B 0.030425 0.070312 0.433 0.6652 Locationm_C -0.006359 0.059993 -0.106 0.9156 Locationm_D -0.112463 0.062544 -1.798 0.0722 . Locationm_E 0.121980 0.068081 1.792 0.0732 . Locationm_G -0.034515 0.067619 -0.510 0.6098 Locationm_H -0.048940 0.066040 -0.741 0.4587 Locationm_I 0.040426 0.065998 0.613 0.5402 Event 0.037933 0.029215 1.298 0.1941 Locationm_B:Event 0.022127 0.047057 0.470 0.6382 Locationm_C:Event -0.008782 0.039681 -0.221 0.8248 Locationm_D:Event 0.091319 0.044048 2.073 0.0382 * Locationm_E:Event -0.066306 0.043225 -1.534 0.1250 Locationm_G:Event 0.059290 0.046431 1.277 0.2016 Locationm_H:Event 0.061810 0.045484 1.359 0.1742 Locationm_I:Event -0.010549 0.043407 -0.243 0.8080 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > Anova(mod_FishZinc) Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II Wald chisquare tests) Response: Zinc Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq) Location 19.728 7 0.006188 ** Event 20.959 1 4.693e-06 *** Location:Event 16.894 7 0.018094 * --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > emmeans(mod_FishZinc, pairwise ~ Event | Location) $emmeans Location = m_A: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.225 0.0190 62 0.187 0.263 2 0.263 0.0222 62 0.219 0.308 Location = m_B: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.278 0.0234 62 0.231 0.325 2 0.338 0.0285 62 0.281 0.395 Location = m_C: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-28 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 1 0.210 0.0177 62 0.175 0.246 2 0.239 0.0202 62 0.199 0.280 Location = m_D: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.204 0.0172 62 0.170 0.238 2 0.333 0.0281 62 0.277 0.390 Location = m_E: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.281 0.0237 62 0.234 0.328 2 0.253 0.0213 62 0.210 0.295 Location = m_G: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.250 0.0211 62 0.208 0.292 2 0.347 0.0293 62 0.289 0.406 Location = m_H: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.238 0.0201 62 0.198 0.278 2 0.338 0.0285 62 0.281 0.395 Location = m_I: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.255 0.0215 62 0.212 0.298 2 0.282 0.0238 62 0.235 0.330 Results are given on the inverse (not the response) scale. Confidence level used: 0.95 $contrasts Location = m_A: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 -0.0379 0.0292 62 -1.298 0.1990 Location = m_B: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 -0.0601 0.0369 62 -1.628 0.1086 Location = m_C: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 -0.0292 0.0269 62 -1.086 0.2819 Location = m_D: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 -0.1293 0.0330 62 -3.921 0.0002 Location = m_E: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 0.0284 0.0319 62 0.891 0.3766 Location = m_G: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 -0.0972 0.0361 62 -2.694 0.0091 Location = m_H: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 -0.0997 0.0349 62 -2.861 0.0057 Location = m_I: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 -0.0274 0.0321 62 -0.853 0.3969 Note: contrasts are still on the inverse scale Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-29 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx > > mod_AscidianCopper <- glmmTMB(Copper ~ Location * Event + (1|Treatment), fami ly=Gamma(), data=Ascidian_con) > summary(mod_AscidianCopper) Family: Gamma ( inverse ) Formula: Copper ~ Location * Event + (1 | Treatment) Data: Ascidian_con AIC BIC logLik deviance df.resid 172.6 215.5 -68.3 136.6 62 Random effects: Conditional model: Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Treatment (Intercept) 7.027e-12 2.651e-06 Number of obs: 80, groups: Treatment, 3 Dispersion estimate for Gamma family (sigma^2): 0.181 Conditional model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 1.6099 0.3308 4.867 1.13e-06 *** Locationm_B -1.1815 0.4415 -2.676 0.007449 ** Locationm_C -0.1757 0.5225 -0.336 0.736655 Locationm_D -0.6075 0.4864 -1.249 0.211725 Locationm_E -0.8388 0.4325 -1.939 0.052473 . Locationm_G -0.3650 0.4990 -0.732 0.464424 Locationm_H -0.6125 0.5537 -1.106 0.268626 Locationm_I -0.4282 0.5045 -0.849 0.396003 Event -0.7434 0.1666 -4.462 8.14e-06 *** Locationm_B:Event 0.9544 0.2623 3.638 0.000274 *** Locationm_C:Event 0.3275 0.2802 1.169 0.242529 Locationm_D:Event 0.6045 0.2717 2.225 0.026113 * Locationm_E:Event 0.6452 0.2370 2.722 0.006479 ** Locationm_G:Event 0.4296 0.2702 1.590 0.111869 Locationm_H:Event 0.7812 0.3292 2.373 0.017640 * Locationm_I:Event 0.4998 0.2778 1.799 0.071986 . --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > Anova(mod_AscidianCopper) Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II Wald chisquare tests) Response: Copper Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq) Location 98.963 7 < 2.2e-16 *** Event 11.867 1 0.0005713 *** Location:Event 16.685 7 0.0195415 * --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > emmeans(mod_AscidianCopper, pairwise ~ Event | Location) $emmeans Location = m_A: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.867 0.1650 62 0.5367 1.196 2 0.123 0.0234 62 0.0763 0.170 Location = m_B: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.639 0.1217 62 0.3960 0.883 2 0.850 0.1619 62 0.5267 1.174 Location = m_C: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 1.018 0.1939 62 0.6307 1.406 2 0.602 0.1147 62 0.3731 0.832 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-30 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Location = m_D: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.864 0.1644 62 0.5349 1.192 2 0.725 0.1380 62 0.4488 1.000 Location = m_E: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.673 0.1281 62 0.4168 0.929 2 0.575 0.1094 62 0.3560 0.793 Location = m_G: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.931 0.1773 62 0.5767 1.285 2 0.617 0.1175 62 0.3823 0.852 Location = m_H: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 1.035 0.1971 62 0.6412 1.429 2 1.073 0.2043 62 0.6646 1.481 Location = m_I: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.938 0.1786 62 0.5810 1.295 2 0.694 0.1322 62 0.4301 0.959 Results are given on the inverse (not the response) scale. Confidence level used: 0.95 $contrasts Location = m_A: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 0.7434 0.167 62 4.462 <.0001 Location = m_B: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 -0.2110 0.203 62 -1.041 0.3018 Location = m_C: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 0.4159 0.225 62 1.846 0.0696 Location = m_D: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 0.1389 0.215 62 0.647 0.5199 Location = m_E: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 0.0982 0.169 62 0.583 0.5620 Location = m_G: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 0.3138 0.213 62 1.475 0.1452 Location = m_H: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 -0.0378 0.284 62 -0.133 0.8946 Location = m_I: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 0.2436 0.222 62 1.096 0.2772 Note: contrasts are still on the inverse scale > Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-31 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx > mod_AscidianZinc <- glmmTMB(Zinc ~ Location * Event + (1|Treatment), family=G amma(), data=Ascidian_con) > summary(mod_AscidianZinc) Family: Gamma ( inverse ) Formula: Zinc ~ Location * Event + (1 | Treatment) Data: Ascidian_con AIC BIC logLik deviance df.resid 152.2 195.1 -58.1 116.2 62 Random effects: Conditional model: Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Treatment (Intercept) 2.673e-12 1.635e-06 Number of obs: 80, groups: Treatment, 3 Dispersion estimate for Gamma family (sigma^2): 0.0712 Conditional model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 0.63691 0.11575 5.503 3.74e-08 *** Locationm_B -0.31030 0.17121 -1.812 0.06993 . Locationm_C -0.29961 0.17071 -1.755 0.07926 . Locationm_D -0.11554 0.17244 -0.670 0.50282 Locationm_E -0.23439 0.17644 -1.328 0.18405 Locationm_G 0.28804 0.21979 1.311 0.19001 Locationm_H -0.01982 0.20335 -0.097 0.92235 Locationm_I 0.23174 0.21297 1.088 0.27655 Event -0.17395 0.06512 -2.671 0.00756 ** Locationm_B:Event 0.29377 0.10791 2.722 0.00648 ** Locationm_C:Event 0.28307 0.10712 2.643 0.00823 ** Locationm_D:Event 0.13849 0.10243 1.352 0.17638 Locationm_E:Event 0.25358 0.10975 2.311 0.02086 * Locationm_G:Event -0.01679 0.12698 -0.132 0.89480 Locationm_H:Event 0.18186 0.12453 1.460 0.14419 Locationm_I:Event 0.00558 0.12350 0.045 0.96396 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > Anova(mod_AscidianZinc) Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II Wald chisquare tests) Response: Zinc Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq) Location 41.5254 7 6.417e-07 *** Event 1.2114 1 0.27106 Location:Event 16.1641 7 0.02366 * --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > emmeans(mod_AscidianZinc, pairwise ~ Event | Location) $emmeans Location = m_A: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.463 0.0552 62 0.353 0.573 2 0.289 0.0345 62 0.220 0.358 Location = m_B: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.446 0.0533 62 0.340 0.553 2 0.566 0.0676 62 0.431 0.701 Location = m_C: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.446 0.0533 62 0.340 0.553 2 0.556 0.0663 62 0.423 0.688 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-32 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Location = m_D: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.486 0.0580 62 0.370 0.602 2 0.450 0.0538 62 0.343 0.558 Location = m_E: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.482 0.0575 62 0.367 0.597 2 0.562 0.0670 62 0.428 0.696 Location = m_G: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.734 0.0876 62 0.559 0.909 2 0.543 0.0649 62 0.414 0.673 Location = m_H: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.625 0.0746 62 0.476 0.774 2 0.633 0.0755 62 0.482 0.784 Location = m_I: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.700 0.0836 62 0.533 0.867 2 0.532 0.0635 62 0.405 0.659 Results are given on the inverse (not the response) scale. Confidence level used: 0.95 $contrasts Location = m_A: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 0.17395 0.0651 62 2.671 0.0096 Location = m_B: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 -0.11982 0.0860 62 -1.393 0.1687 Location = m_C: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 -0.10913 0.0850 62 -1.283 0.2042 Location = m_D: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 0.03546 0.0791 62 0.448 0.6554 Location = m_E: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 -0.07964 0.0883 62 -0.901 0.3708 Location = m_G: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 0.19074 0.1090 62 1.750 0.0851 Location = m_H: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 -0.00791 0.1061 62 -0.075 0.9408 Location = m_I: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 0.16837 0.1049 62 1.604 0.1137 Note: contrasts are still on the inverse scale > > mod_AlgCopper <- glmmTMB(Copper ~ Location * Event + (1|Treatment), family=Ga mma(), data=Alg_con) Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-33 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx > summary(mod_AlgCopper) Family: Gamma ( inverse ) Formula: Copper ~ Location * Event + (1 | Treatment) Data: Alg_con AIC BIC logLik deviance df.resid 115.4 158.3 -39.7 79.4 62 Random effects: Conditional model: Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Treatment (Intercept) 8.825e-12 2.971e-06 Number of obs: 80, groups: Treatment, 3 Dispersion estimate for Gamma family (sigma^2): 0.466 Conditional model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 5.8139 1.8184 3.197 0.001387 ** Locationm_B 3.5363 3.5060 1.009 0.313138 Locationm_C -1.4884 2.3726 -0.627 0.530447 Locationm_D -2.7065 2.2876 -1.183 0.236768 Locationm_E -0.5303 2.7387 -0.194 0.846479 Locationm_G 4.3007 4.0586 1.060 0.289302 Locationm_H -6.4649 1.8578 -3.480 0.000501 *** Locationm_I -0.5796 2.9612 -0.196 0.844828 Event -2.8377 0.9099 -3.119 0.001816 ** Locationm_B:Event -1.6106 1.7574 -0.916 0.359442 Locationm_C:Event 0.9874 1.1983 0.824 0.409905 Locationm_D:Event 1.9137 1.1919 1.606 0.108345 Locationm_E:Event 0.8435 1.4120 0.597 0.550235 Locationm_G:Event -1.3945 2.0760 -0.672 0.501754 Locationm_H:Event 3.7353 0.9776 3.821 0.000133 *** Locationm_I:Event 1.2799 1.5835 0.808 0.418946 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > Anova(mod_AlgCopper) Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II Wald chisquare tests) Response: Copper Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq) Location 72.3952 7 4.841e-13 *** Event 3.2037 1 0.07347 . Location:Event 38.6519 7 2.277e-06 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > emmeans(mod_AlgCopper, pairwise ~ Event | Location) $emmeans Location = m_A: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 2.976 0.9090 62 1.159 4.793 2 0.139 0.0423 62 0.054 0.223 Location = m_B: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 4.902 1.4972 62 1.909 7.895 2 0.454 0.1386 62 0.177 0.731 Location = m_C: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 2.475 0.7560 62 0.964 3.986 2 0.625 0.1909 62 0.243 1.007 Location = m_D: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-34 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx 1 2.183 0.6669 62 0.850 3.516 2 1.259 0.3847 62 0.491 2.028 Location = m_E: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 3.289 1.0047 62 1.281 5.298 2 1.295 0.3956 62 0.504 2.086 Location = m_G: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 5.882 1.7966 62 2.291 9.474 2 1.650 0.5040 62 0.643 2.658 Location = m_H: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 0.247 0.0753 62 0.096 0.397 2 1.144 0.3495 62 0.446 1.843 Location = m_I: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 3.676 1.1229 62 1.432 5.921 2 2.119 0.6471 62 0.825 3.412 Results are given on the inverse (not the response) scale. Confidence level used: 0.95 $contrasts Location = m_A: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 2.838 0.910 62 3.119 0.0028 Location = m_B: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 4.448 1.504 62 2.958 0.0044 Location = m_C: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 1.850 0.780 62 2.373 0.0208 Location = m_D: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 0.924 0.770 62 1.200 0.2346 Location = m_E: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 1.994 1.080 62 1.847 0.0695 Location = m_G: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 4.232 1.866 62 2.268 0.0268 Location = m_H: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 -0.898 0.357 62 -2.511 0.0147 Location = m_I: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 1.558 1.296 62 1.202 0.2339 Note: contrasts are still on the inverse scale > > mod_AlgZinc <- glmmTMB(Zinc ~ Location * Event + (1|Treatment), family=Gamma( ), data=Alg_con) > summary(mod_AlgZinc) Family: Gamma ( inverse ) Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-35 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Formula: Zinc ~ Location * Event + (1 | Treatment) Data: Alg_con AIC BIC logLik deviance df.resid 106.8 149.7 -35.4 70.8 62 Random effects: Conditional model: Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Treatment (Intercept) 1.302e-11 3.608e-06 Number of obs: 80, groups: Treatment, 3 Dispersion estimate for Gamma family (sigma^2): 0.176 Conditional model: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 1.9119 0.4361 4.384 1.17e-05 *** Locationm_B -0.3109 0.6059 -0.513 0.607885 Locationm_C 1.0543 0.8506 1.239 0.215161 Locationm_D -0.6319 0.5990 -1.055 0.291394 Locationm_E 2.9074 1.1503 2.528 0.011485 * Locationm_G 2.1295 1.0400 2.048 0.040591 * Locationm_H 1.8511 0.9533 1.942 0.052149 . Locationm_I -0.1139 0.6434 -0.177 0.859487 Event -0.7651 0.2267 -3.375 0.000738 *** Locationm_B:Event 0.2487 0.3227 0.771 0.440915 Locationm_C:Event -0.2999 0.4507 -0.665 0.505795 Locationm_D:Event 0.5097 0.3304 1.543 0.122841 Locationm_E:Event -1.2452 0.5928 -2.100 0.035696 * Locationm_G:Event -0.8010 0.5441 -1.472 0.140945 Locationm_H:Event -0.7658 0.4940 -1.550 0.121072 Locationm_I:Event 0.1866 0.3438 0.543 0.587214 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > Anova(mod_AlgZinc) Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II Wald chisquare tests) Response: Zinc Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq) Location 27.372 7 0.0002856 *** Event 48.201 1 3.848e-12 *** Location:Event 17.524 7 0.0143148 * --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > emmeans(mod_AlgZinc, pairwise ~ Event | Location) $emmeans Location = m_A: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 1.147 0.2151 62 0.717 1.577 2 0.382 0.0716 62 0.239 0.525 Location = m_B: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 1.085 0.2034 62 0.678 1.491 2 0.568 0.1066 62 0.355 0.781 Location = m_C: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 1.901 0.3566 62 1.188 2.614 2 0.836 0.1568 62 0.523 1.150 Location = m_D: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 1.025 0.1922 62 0.640 1.409 2 0.769 0.1443 62 0.481 1.058 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report B-36 Statistical Outputs G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Location = m_E: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 2.809 0.5269 62 1.756 3.862 2 0.799 0.1498 62 0.499 1.098 Location = m_G: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 2.475 0.4643 62 1.547 3.403 2 0.909 0.1705 62 0.568 1.250 Location = m_H: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 2.232 0.4187 62 1.395 3.069 2 0.701 0.1315 62 0.438 0.964 Location = m_I: Event emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL 1 1.220 0.2287 62 0.762 1.677 2 0.641 0.1202 62 0.401 0.881 Results are given on the inverse (not the response) scale. Confidence level used: 0.95 $contrasts Location = m_A: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 0.765 0.227 62 3.375 0.0013 Location = m_B: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 0.516 0.230 62 2.249 0.0281 Location = m_C: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 1.065 0.390 62 2.734 0.0081 Location = m_D: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 0.255 0.240 62 1.063 0.2921 Location = m_E: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 2.010 0.548 62 3.670 0.0005 Location = m_G: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 1.566 0.495 62 3.166 0.0024 Location = m_H: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 1.531 0.439 62 3.488 0.0009 Location = m_I: contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value 1 - 2 0.578 0.258 62 2.239 0.0288 Note: contrasts are still on the inverse scale Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report C-1 Tabulated Biota Contamination Results G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Appendix C Tabulated Biota Contamination Results C.1 Tabulated Biotic Contamination Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report C-2 Tabulated Biota Contamination Results G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Table C-1 Laboratory results for metal and organotin burden in biotic samples Organotins Total Recoverable Trace Elements by ICP Moisture Content Monobutyltin as Sn Dibutyltin as Sn Tributyltin as Sn Surrogate: Tripropyltin Copper Zinc Moisture Sample Type Site Year ng/g ng/g ng/g %REC mg/kg mg/kg % A1-FIS-0420 Fish M_A 2020 <1 <1 1.5 70 0.14 4.1 76.9 A2-FIS-0420 Fish M_A 2020 <1 <1 <1 71 0.11 4.1 75.4 A3-FIS-0420 Fish M_A 2020 <1 <1 <1 70 1.4 4.3 75.7 A4-FIS-0420 Fish M_A 2020 <1 <1 <1 75 0.73 3.4 75.9 A5-FIS-0420 Fish M_A 2020 <1 <1 <1 63 0.52 3.1 77.1 B1-FIS-0420 Fish M_B 2020 <1 <1 1.2 81 0.13 3 75.9 B2-FIS-0420 Fish M_B 2020 <1 <1 <1 76 0.25 2.8 75.4 B3-FIS-0420 Fish M_B 2020 <1 <1 <1 60 0.19 3 68.5 B4-FIS-0420 Fish M_B 2020 <1 <1 <1 93 0.3 3.4 76.2 B5-FIS-0420 Fish M_B 2020 <1 <1 <1 68 0.39 2.6 75 C1-FIS-0420 Fish M_C 2020 <1 <1 <1 79 0.2 4.1 75.8 C2-FIS-0420 Fish M_C 2020 <1 <1 <1 74 0.47 6.4 78.6 C3-FIS-0420 Fish M_C 2020 <1 <1 <1 73 0.15 3.1 75.8 C4-FIS-0420 Fish M_C 2020 <1 <1 <1 67 0.16 4.1 74.9 C5-FIS-0420 Fish M_C 2020 <1 <1 <1 78 0.2 3.2 75.8 D1-FIS-0420 Fish M_D 2020 <1 <1 <1 81 0.24 2.7 77.1 D2-FIS-0420 Fish M_D 2020 <1 <1 <1 80 0.27 3.4 77.1 D3-FIS-0420 Fish M_D 2020 <1 <1 <1 79 0.48 3.2 77.9 D4-FIS-0420 Fish M_D 2020 <1 <1 <1 87 0.44 2.6 78.3 D5-FIS-0420 Fish M_D 2020 <1 <1 <1 101 0.15 3.1 77.2 E1-FIS-0420 Fish M_E 2020 <1 <1 <1 79 0.22 3 74 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report C-3 Tabulated Biota Contamination Results G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Organotins Total Recoverable Trace Elements by ICP Moisture Content Monobutyltin as Sn Dibutyltin as Sn Tributyltin as Sn Surrogate: Tripropyltin Copper Zinc Moisture E2-FIS-0420 Fish M_E 2020 <1 <1 <1 74 0.23 6.6 75.7 E3-FIS-0420 Fish M_E 2020 <1 <1 <1 75 0.19 4.4 75.4 E4-FIS-0420 Fish M_E 2020 <1 <1 <1 84 0.2 2.6 77.7 E5-FIS-0420 Fish M_E 2020 <1 <1 <1 82 0.12 3.2 76.3 G1-FIS-0420 Fish M_G 2020 <1 <1 <1 82 0.11 3 77.2 G2-FIS-0420 Fish M_G 2020 <1 <1 <1 81 0.21 2.7 76.8 G3-FIS-0420 Fish M_G 2020 <1 <1 <1 76 0.14 2.9 75.4 G4-FIS-0420 Fish M_G 2020 <1 <1 <1 84 0.13 2.9 76.5 G5-FIS-0420 Fish M_G 2020 <1 <1 <1 73 0.15 2.9 77.1 H1-FIS-0420 Fish M_H 2020 <1 <1 <1 62 0.4 3.5 78.2 H2-FIS-0420 Fish M_H 2020 <1 <1 <1 70 0.4 2.7 78.3 H3-FIS-0420 Fish M_H 2020 <1 <1 <1 72 0.25 3.3 78.3 H4-FIS-0420 Fish M_H 2020 <1 <1 <1 69 0.32 2.9 76.8 H5-FIS-0420 Fish M_H 2020 <1 <1 <1 102 0.42 2.4 80.2 I1-FIS-0420 Fish M_I 2020 <1 <1 <1 92 0.28 3.4 76.2 I2-FIS-0420 Fish M_I 2020 <1 <1 <1 82 0.25 4.2 75.6 I3-FIS-0420 Fish M_I 2020 <1 <1 <1 58 0.28 2.9 76.5 I4-FIS-0420 Fish M_I 2020 <1 <1 <1 63 0.48 4.5 75.6 I5-FIS-0420 Fish M_I 2020 <1 <1 <1 69 0.15 2.7 78 A1-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_A 2020 <1 <1 <1 101 2.2 3.8 82.7 A2-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_A 2020 <1 <1 <1 81 2.4 1.9 84.8 A3-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_A 2020 <1 <1 2.4 90 3.3 3 77.4 A4-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_A 2020 <1 1 4.2 96 30 5.5 81.9 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report C-4 Tabulated Biota Contamination Results G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Organotins Total Recoverable Trace Elements by ICP Moisture Content Monobutyltin as Sn Dibutyltin as Sn Tributyltin as Sn Surrogate: Tripropyltin Copper Zinc Moisture A5-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_A 2020 <1 <1 <1 98 2.7 3.1 74.5 B1-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_B 2020 <1 <1 <1 86 1 2.1 84.1 B2-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_B 2020 <1 <1 <1 92 0.82 0.93 90.5 B3-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_B 2020 <1 <1 <1 100 0.76 1.6 80.6 B4-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_B 2020 <1 <1 <1 91 1.3 1.5 84.9 B5-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_B 2020 <1 <1 <1 99 2 2.7 77.5 C1-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_C 2020 <1 <1 1 79 1.5 2 83.7 C2-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_C 2020 <1 <1 <1 93 2.2 1.7 79.6 C3-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_C 2020 <1 <1 <1 108 1.4 1.6 83 C4-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_C 2020 <1 <1 <1 97 1.2 1.5 80.5 C5-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_C 2020 <1 <1 <1 97 2 2.2 79.4 D1-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_D 2020 <1 <1 <1 104 1.4 1.7 81.1 D2-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_D 2020 <1 <1 <1 108 1.2 1.8 76.7 D3-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_D 2020 <1 <1 <1 91 1.3 1.9 81.2 D4-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_D 2020 <1 <1 <1 79 1.4 2.7 77.9 D5-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_D 2020 <1 <1 <1 87 1.6 3 73.9 E1-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_E 2020 <1 <1 <1 95 1.9 2.2 65.5 E2-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_E 2020 <1 <1 <1 98 2 1.8 78.3 E3-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_E 2020 <1 <1 <1 89 1.6 1.6 69.5 E4-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_E 2020 <1 <1 <1 115 1.2 1.5 83.9 E5-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_E 2020 <1 <1 <1 100 2 1.8 74.9 G1-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_G 2020 <1 <1 <1 83 1.8 2.1 81.3 G2-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_G 2020 <1 <1 <1 97 1.2 1.8 83.5 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report C-5 Tabulated Biota Contamination Results G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Organotins Total Recoverable Trace Elements by ICP Moisture Content Monobutyltin as Sn Dibutyltin as Sn Tributyltin as Sn Surrogate: Tripropyltin Copper Zinc Moisture G3-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_G 2020 <1 <1 <1 96 1 1.6 81.3 G4-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_G 2020 <1 <1 <1 104 2.4 1.8 81.1 G5-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_G 2020 <1 <1 <1 108 1.7 1.9 77.9 H1-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_H 2020 <1 <1 <1 105 0.95 1.4 81.2 H2-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_H 2020 <1 <1 <1 139 0.75 1.2 84.7 H3-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_H 2020 <1 <1 <1 115 1.3 2.2 63.4 H4-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_H 2020 <1 <1 <1 74 0.89 1.3 84 H5-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_H 2020 <1 <1 <1 127 0.77 1.8 83.6 I1-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_I 2020 <1 <1 <1 109 2.1 2.8 75.4 I2-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_I 2020 <1 <1 <1 107 1.4 1.3 79.7 I6-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_I 2020 <1 <1 <1 112 1.1 1.6 80.6 I7-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_I 2020 <1 <1 <1 112 1.3 2.1 75.2 I8-CUC-0420 Ascidian M_I 2020 <1 <1 <1 104 1.3 1.6 78 A1-ALG-0420 Algae M_A 2020 <1 <1 1.4 102 2.9 2.8 74.1 A2-ALG-0420 Algae M_A 2020 8.3 20 37 91 11 3.4 78.8 A3-ALG-0420 Algae M_A 2020 <1 <1 3.4 126 15 2.8 81.1 A4-ALG-0420 Algae M_A 2020 <1 <1 1.2 126 4.9 2.2 74.8 A5-ALG-0420 Algae M_A 2020 <1 <1 <1 128 2.3 1.9 78.2 B1-ALG-0420 Algae M_B 2020 <1 <1 <1 123 7.7 2 81 B2-ALG-0420 Algae M_B 2020 <1 <1 <1 66 1.5 1.8 78.4 B3-ALG-0420 Algae M_B 2020 <1 <1 <1 99 0.57 2 76.7 B4-ALG-0420 Algae M_B 2020 <1 <1 <1 88 0.8 1.9 79.9 B5-ALG-0420 Algae M_B 2020 <1 <1 <1 95 0.45 1.1 79.1 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report C-6 Tabulated Biota Contamination Results G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Organotins Total Recoverable Trace Elements by ICP Moisture Content Monobutyltin as Sn Dibutyltin as Sn Tributyltin as Sn Surrogate: Tripropyltin Copper Zinc Moisture C1-ALG-0420 Algae M_C 2020 <1 <1 <1 84 2 1.4 79 C2-ALG-0420 Algae M_C 2020 <1 <1 <1 100 1.8 1.2 73.7 C3-ALG-0420 Algae M_C 2020 <1 <1 <1 91 1.9 1.2 83.1 C4-ALG-0420 Algae M_C 2020 <1 <1 <1 104 1.2 1.2 68.6 C5-ALG-0420 Algae M_C 2020 <1 <1 <1 114 1.1 0.98 76.8 D1-ALG-0420 Algae M_D 2020 <1 <1 <1 95 0.72 1.5 80.8 D2-ALG-0420 Algae M_D 2020 <1 <1 1.4 92 0.94 1.1 77.2 D3-ALG-0420 Algae M_D 2020 <1 <1 <1 112 0.56 1.1 82.5 D4-ALG-0420 Algae M_D 2020 <1 <1 <1 89 0.93 1.3 79.5 D5-ALG-0420 Algae M_D 2020 <1 <1 <1 108 0.82 1.5 82 E1-ALG-0420 Algae M_E 2020 <1 <1 <1 97 0.38 0.96 82.6 E2-ALG-0420 Algae M_E 2020 <1 <1 <1 93 0.88 1.4 74.1 E3-ALG-0420 Algae M_E 2020 <1 <1 <1 74 1.4 1.4 70.8 E4-ALG-0420 Algae M_E 2020 <1 <1 <1 97 0.49 1 78.5 E5-ALG-0420 Algae M_E 2020 <1 <1 <1 93 0.71 1.5 73.6 G1-ALG-0420 Algae M_G 2020 <1 <1 <1 95 0.47 1.1 78 G2-ALG-0420 Algae M_G 2020 <1 <1 <1 98 0.6 1 76 G3-ALG-0420 Algae M_G 2020 <1 <1 <1 104 0.94 1.3 77 G4-ALG-0420 Algae M_G 2020 <1 <1 <1 101 0.67 1.1 77 G5-ALG-0420 Algae M_G 2020 <1 <1 <1 103 0.35 1 76.5 H1-ALG-0420 Algae M_H 2020 <1 <1 <1 113 1.4 0.93 81.9 H2-ALG-0420 Algae M_H 2020 <1 <1 <1 71 0.71 1.5 79.7 H3-ALG-0420 Algae M_H 2020 <1 <1 <1 113 0.8 2 81.3 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report C-7 Tabulated Biota Contamination Results G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Organotins Total Recoverable Trace Elements by ICP Moisture Content Monobutyltin as Sn Dibutyltin as Sn Tributyltin as Sn Surrogate: Tripropyltin Copper Zinc Moisture H4-ALG-0420 Algae M_H 2020 <1 <1 <1 101 0.76 1.5 82.4 H5-ALG-0420 Algae M_H 2020 <1 <1 <1 93 0.7 1.2 82.8 I1-ALG-0420 Algae M_I 2020 <1 <1 <1 144 0.33 1.3 83.8 I2-ALG-0420 Algae M_I 2020 <1 <1 <1 97 0.57 1.7 76.6 I3-ALG-0420 Algae M_I 2020 <1 <1 <1 90 0.49 1.4 83 I6-ALG-0420 Algae M_I 2020 <1 <1 <1 89 0.48 1.8 79.7 I7-ALG-0420 Algae M_I 2020 <1 <1 <1 91 0.49 1.6 73.3 D1-ALG-1019 Algae M_D 2019 <1 <1 <1 62 1.6 2.3 86.9 D2-ALG-1019 Algae M_D 2019 <1 <1 <1 97 0.14 0.62 90.1 D3-ALG-1019 Algae M_D 2019 <1 <1 <1 92 0.13 0.44 87.7 D4-ALG-1019 Algae M_D 2019 <1 <1 <1 62 0.21 0.42 86.7 D5-ALG-1019 Algae M_D 2019 <1 <1 <1 84 0.21 1.1 81.8 D1-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_D 2019 <1 <1 <1 76 2 3.1 80.6 D2-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_D 2019 <1 <1 <1 72 1 1.8 83.4 D3-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_D 2019 <1 <1 <1 91 0.4 0.99 81.3 D4-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_D 2019 <1 <1 <1 94 0.89 2 85 D5-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_D 2019 <1 <1 <1 93 1.5 2.4 75 A1-ALG-1019 Algae M_A 2019 <1 <1 <1 77 0.49 1.3 88.3 A2-ALG-1019 Algae M_A 2019 <1 <1 <1 95 0.26 0.44 87.2 A3-ALG-1019 Algae M_A 2019 <1 <1 <1 93 0.44 1.7 86.1 A4-ALG-1019 Algae M_A 2019 <1 <1 <1 73 0.3 0.24 87.4 A5-ALG-1019 Algae M_A 2019 <1 <1 <1 72 0.19 0.68 85.2 A1-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_A 2019 <1 <1 <1 130 1.6 2.8 78.9 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report C-8 Tabulated Biota Contamination Results G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Organotins Total Recoverable Trace Elements by ICP Moisture Content Monobutyltin as Sn Dibutyltin as Sn Tributyltin as Sn Surrogate: Tripropyltin Copper Zinc Moisture A2-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_A 2019 <1 <1 <1 71 2 3.2 80.9 A3-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_A 2019 <1 <1 <1 92 0.38 1.6 82.8 A4-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_A 2019 <1 <1 <1 96 0.59 1.7 80.7 A5-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_A 2019 <1 <1 <1 75 1.2 1.5 74.5 B1-ALG-1019 Algae M_B 2019 <1 <1 <1 84 0.13 0.45 86.7 B2-ALG-1019 Algae M_B 2019 <1 <1 <1 94 0.22 0.54 86.8 B3-ALG-1019 Algae M_B 2019 <1 <1 <1 69 0.26 1.7 84.5 B4-ALG-1019 Algae M_B 2019 <1 <1 <1 85 0.3 1.7 84.3 B5-ALG-1019 Algae M_B 2019 <1 <1 <1 72 0.11 0.22 85.9 B1-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_B 2019 <1 <1 <1 92 2.6 1.9 80.1 B2-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_B 2019 <1 <1 <1 80 0.94 2.1 78.5 B3-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_B 2019 <1 <1 <1 71 1.3 1.9 81.8 B4-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_B 2019 <1 <1 <1 70 0.98 3 78.6 B5-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_B 2019 <1 <1 <1 63 2 2.3 81.3 E1-ALG-1019 Algae M_E 2019 <1 <1 <1 92 0.49 0.56 88.2 E2-ALG-1019 Algae M_E 2019 <1 <1 <1 92 0.22 0.21 86.4 E3-ALG-1019 Algae M_E 2019 <1 <1 <1 78 0.35 0.29 87.8 E4-ALG-1019 Algae M_E 2019 <1 <1 <1 73 0.18 0.34 83.8 E5-ALG-1019 Algae M_E 2019 <1 <1 <1 86 0.28 0.38 85 E1-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_E 2019 <1 <1 <1 101 1.2 1.6 81.7 E2-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_E 2019 <1 <1 <1 147 1.4 2.5 78.9 E3-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_E 2019 <1 <1 <1 101 2.5 0.97 82.3 E4-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_E 2019 <1 <1 <1 112 0.53 1.6 85.3 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report C-9 Tabulated Biota Contamination Results G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Organotins Total Recoverable Trace Elements by ICP Moisture Content Monobutyltin as Sn Dibutyltin as Sn Tributyltin as Sn Surrogate: Tripropyltin Copper Zinc Moisture E5-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_E 2019 <1 <1 <1 135 1.8 3.7 81.5 C1-ALG-1019 Algae M_C 2019 <1 <1 <1 120 0.92 0.78 85.2 C2-ALG-1019 Algae M_C 2019 <1 <1 <1 103 0.24 0.64 84.8 C3-ALG-1019 Algae M_C 2019 <1 <1 <1 100 0.24 0.83 85.8 C4-ALG-1019 Algae M_C 2019 <1 <1 <1 106 0.51 0.28 86.9 C5-ALG-1019 Algae M_C 2019 <1 <1 <1 109 0.11 0.1 89.3 C1-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_C 2019 <1 <1 <1 143 0.58 3 83.6 C2-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_C 2019 <1 <1 <1 103 0.97 2.2 76.6 C3-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_C 2019 <1 <1 <1 86 1.4 1.4 80.6 C4-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_C 2019 <1 <1 <1 105 1.1 1.9 73.4 C5-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_C 2019 <1 <1 <1 86 0.86 2.7 77.1 I1-ALG-1019 Algae M_I 2019 <1 <1 <1 81 0.38 0.71 83.3 I2-ALG-1019 Algae M_I 2019 <1 <1 <1 97 0.27 0.67 84.4 I3-ALG-1019 Algae M_I 2019 <1 <1 <1 121 0.23 0.33 84.1 I4-ALG-1019 Algae M_I 2019 <1 <1 <1 96 0.17 0.79 82.7 I5-ALG-1019 Algae M_I 2019 <1 <1 <1 103 0.31 1.6 83.1 I1-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_I 2019 <1 <1 <1 103 1.5 1.6 76.8 I2-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_I 2019 <1 <1 <1 125 0.75 1.4 64.8 I3-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_I 2019 <1 <1 <1 88 0.88 1.5 79.3 I4-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_I 2019 <1 <1 <1 94 0.7 0.94 70.7 I5-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_I 2019 <1 <1 <1 94 1.5 1.7 79 H1-ALG-1019 Algae M_H 2019 <1 <1 <1 77 0.57 0.72 80 H2-ALG-1019 Algae M_H 2019 <1 <1 <1 99 0.33 0.48 83.2 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report C-10 Tabulated Biota Contamination Results G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Organotins Total Recoverable Trace Elements by ICP Moisture Content Monobutyltin as Sn Dibutyltin as Sn Tributyltin as Sn Surrogate: Tripropyltin Copper Zinc Moisture H3-ALG-1019 Algae M_H 2019 <1 <1 <1 89 19 0.35 86.7 H4-ALG-1019 Algae M_H 2019 <1 <1 <1 77 0.19 0.25 86.8 H5-ALG-1019 Algae M_H 2019 <1 <1 <1 77 0.19 0.44 86.4 H1-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_H 2019 <1 <1 <1 133 0.81 1.5 82 H2-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_H 2019 <1 <1 <1 135 0.9 2.2 76.4 H3-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_H 2019 <1 <1 <1 140 0.92 1.4 75.6 H4-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_H 2019 <1 <1 <1 137 1.3 1.1 82.2 H5-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_H 2019 <1 <1 <1 147 0.9 1.8 80.9 G1-ALG-1019 Algae M_G 2019 <1 <1 <1 130 0.25 0.56 78.8 G2-ALG-1019 Algae M_G 2019 <1 <1 <1 112 0.19 0.67 78.7 G3-ALG-1019 Algae M_G 2019 <1 <1 <1 107 0.13 0.23 87.6 G4-ALG-1019 Algae M_G 2019 <1 <1 <1 90 0.13 0.26 88.2 G5-ALG-1019 Algae M_G 2019 <1 <1 <1 87 0.15 0.3 85.3 G1-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_G 2019 <1 <1 <1 128 1.2 1.5 79.2 G2-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_G 2019 <1 <1 <1 148 0.78 1.6 72.8 G3-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_G 2019 <1 <1 <1 145 1.5 1.7 86.1 G4-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_G 2019 <1 <1 <1 148 0.91 1.1 74.1 G5-CUC-1019 Ascidian M_G 2019 <1 <1 <1 134 0.98 0.91 82.2 A1FIS-1019 Fish m_A 2019 <1 <1 2.2 68 0.21 4.3 77.3 A2FIS-1019 Fish m_A 2019 <1 <1 <1 55 0.22 6.1 77.9 A3FIS-1019 Fish m_A 2019 <1 <1 <1 65 0.38 5.3 76.7 A4FIS-1019 Fish m_A 2019 <1 <1 1.5 55 0.16 3.6 77.4 A5FIS-1019 Fish m_A 2019 <1 <1 <1 68 0.17 2.9 77.9 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report C-11 Tabulated Biota Contamination Results G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Organotins Total Recoverable Trace Elements by ICP Moisture Content Monobutyltin as Sn Dibutyltin as Sn Tributyltin as Sn Surrogate: Tripropyltin Copper Zinc Moisture B1FIS-1019 Fish m_B 2019 <1 <1 <1 60 0.19 3.2 78.2 B2FIS-1019 Fish m_B 2019 <1 <1 <1 64 0.21 5.1 77.5 B3FIS-1019 Fish m_B 2019 <1 <1 <1 62 0.16 3.4 77 B4FIS-1019 Fish m_B 2019 <1 <1 <1 61 0.15 3.1 76.6 B5FIS-1019 Fish m_B 2019 <1 <1 3.1 65 0.16 3.2 76.3 C1FIS-1019 Fish m_C 2019 <1 <1 <1 52 0.16 4.5 77.4 C2FIS-1019 Fish m_C 2019 <1 <1 <1 54 0.2 4.7 77.3 C3FIS-1019 Fish m_C 2019 <1 <1 <1 52 0.2 5.3 76.7 C4FIS-1019 Fish m_C 2019 <1 <1 <1 53 0.23 4.2 77.9 C5FIS-1019 Fish m_C 2019 <1 <1 2.3 56 0.17 5.1 76.6 D1FIS-1019 Fish m_D 2019 <1 <1 <1 48 0.33 4.6 76.8 D2FIS-1019 Fish m_D 2019 <1 <1 <1 64 0.26 5.8 76.6 D3FIS-1019 Fish m_D 2019 <1 <1 <1 50 0.19 4.6 77.1 D4FIS-1019 Fish m_D 2019 <1 <1 <1 56 0.22 3.9 78.4 D5FIS-1019 Fish m_D 2019 <1 <1 <1 44 0.24 5.6 77.4 E1FIS-1019 Fish m_E 2019 <1 <1 <1 60 0.2 3.8 76.2 E2FIS-1019 Fish m_E 2019 <1 <1 <1 50 0.19 3.6 78.4 E3FIS-1019 Fish m_E 2019 <1 <1 <1 52 0.2 3.4 78.9 E4FIS-1019 Fish m_E 2019 <1 <1 <1 60 0.19 3.5 77.9 E5FIS-1019 Fish m_E 2019 <1 <1 <1 53 0.14 3.5 79.6 G1FIS-1019 Fish m_G 2019 <1 <1 <1 53 0.27 6.8 75.3 G2FIS-1019 Fish m_G 2019 <1 <1 <1 64 0.47 3.5 77.7 G3FIS-1019 Fish m_G 2019 <1 <1 <1 57 0.4 2.9 78.2 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report C-12 Tabulated Biota Contamination Results G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre-Remediation_Monitoring.docx Organotins Total Recoverable Trace Elements by ICP Moisture Content Monobutyltin as Sn Dibutyltin as Sn Tributyltin as Sn Surrogate: Tripropyltin Copper Zinc Moisture G4FIS-1019 Fish m_G 2019 <1 <1 <1 58 0.18 2.9 77.3 G5FIS-1019 Fish m_G 2019 <1 <1 <1 54 0.35 3.9 77.9 H1FIS-1019 Fish m_H 2019 <1 <1 <1 40 0.22 5.1 76.5 H2FIS-1019 Fish m_H 2019 <1 <1 <1 55 0.2 4.5 77.8 H3FIS-1019 Fish m_H 2019 <1 <1 <1 56 0.19 4.4 74.3 H4FIS-1019 Fish m_H 2019 <1 <1 <1 62 0.31 4 76.1 H5FIS-1019 Fish m_H 2019 <1 <1 <1 48 0.28 3 77.6 I1FIS-1019 Fish m_I 2019 <1 <1 <1 41 0.28 4.4 78.1 I2FIS-1019 Fish m_I 2019 <1 <1 <1 52 1 3.4 77.9 I3FIS-1019 Fish m_I 2019 <1 <1 <1 52 0.24 3.4 78.5 I4FIS-1019 Fish m_I 2019 <1 <1 <1 54 0.18 4.5 79.5 I5FIS-1019 Fish m_I 2019 <1 <1 <1 51 0.22 3.9 78.4 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report D-1 Laboratory Results and QA/QC G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Appendix D Laboratory Results and QA/QC D.1 Laboratory Results 0 0.00 True Environmental CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Work Order : Page : 1 of 20EB1926789 :: LaboratoryClient BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Environmental Division Brisbane : :ContactContact MS BETH TOKI Customer Services EB :: AddressAddress PO BOX 203 SPRING HILL BRISBANE QLD 4004 2 Byth Street Stafford QLD Australia 4053 :Telephone 07 3831 6744 :Telephone +61-7-3243 7222 :Project B23282 Douglas Shoal Date Samples Received : 10-Oct-2019 10:40 :Order number B23282 Date Analysis Commenced : 10-Oct-2019 :C-O-C number ---- Issue Date : 25-Oct-2019 15:52 Sampler : WILLIS BRASSIL Site : ---- Quote number : BN/165/18 B 58:No. of samples received 58:No. of samples analysed This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full. This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information: l General Comments l Analytical Results l Surrogate Control Limits Additional information pertinent to this report will be found in the following separate attachments: Quality Control Report, QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with Quality Review and Sample Receipt Notification. Signatories This document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11. Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition Ben Felgendrejeris Senior Acid Sulfate Soil Chemist Brisbane Acid Sulphate Soils, Stafford, QLD Diana Mesa 2IC Organic Chemist Brisbane Organics, Stafford, QLD Franco Lentini LCMS Coordinator Sydney Organics, Smithfield, NSW Kim McCabe Senior Inorganic Chemist Brisbane Inorganics, Stafford, QLD Sarah Ashworth Laboratory Manager - Brisbane Brisbane Organics, Stafford, QLD R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R 2 of 20:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD General Comments The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis. Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference. When sampling time information is not provided by the client, sampling dates are shown without a time component. In these instances, the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes. Where a result is required to meet compliance limits the associated uncertainty must be considered. Refer to the ALS Contact for details. CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society. LOR = Limit of reporting ^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reporting ø = ALS is not NATA accredited for these tests. ~ = Indicates an estimated value. Key : EP234: Poor matrix spike recovery for particular compounds due to matrix interferences.l EG035T LL (Total Mercury - Low Level): Positive mercury results have been confirmed by re-extraction and re-analysis.l Specialised organic analysis will be conducted by ALS Environmental, Sydney, NATA accreditation no. 825, Site No. 10911 (Micro site no. 14913).l It is recognised that EG093-T (Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICP-MS) is less than EG093-F (Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICP-MS) for some samples. However, the difference is within experimental variation of the methods. l EG020-T (Total Metals by ICP-MS): Sample EB1926789 – 001 (I1SED-1019) shows poor duplicate results due to sample heterogeneity. Confirmed by visual inspection.l EG035T-LL result less than EG035F-LL result. However, the difference is within experimental variation of methods, confirmed by re-extraction and re-analysisl EG035F-LL (Dissolved Mercury Low Level): Positive mercury result has been confirmed by re-extraction and re-analysis.l EG093: Samples containing high levels of sulfate may precipitate barium under the acidic conditions of this method and may therefore bias results low.l 3 of 20:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results ----I2SED-1019I12SED-1019I11SED-1019I1SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) ----07-Oct-2019 00:0005-Oct-2019 00:0005-Oct-2019 00:0005-Oct-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time --------EB1926789-004EB1926789-003EB1926789-002EB1926789-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result ---- EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) 24.9 15.2 15.0 23.0 ----%1.0----Moisture Content EA150: Particle Sizing 98 ---- ---- 99 ----%1----+75µm 98 ---- ---- 99 ----%1----+150µm 98 ---- ---- 98 ----%1----+300µm 98 ---- ---- 97 ----%1----+425µm 93 ---- ---- 89 ----%1----+600µm 37 ---- ---- 26 ----%1----+1180µm 6 ---- ---- 1 ----%1----+2.36mm 2 ---- ---- <1 ----%1----+4.75mm <1 ---- ---- <1 ----%1----+9.5mm <1 ---- ---- <1 ----%1----+19.0mm <1 ---- ---- <1 ----%1----+37.5mm <1 ---- ---- <1 ----%1----+75.0mm EA150: Soil Classification based on Particle Size 2 ---- ---- <1 ----%1----Clay (<2 µm) <1 ---- ---- 1 ----%1----Silt (2-60 µm) 83 ---- ---- 90 ----%1----Sand (0.06-2.00 mm) 15 ---- ---- 9 ----%1----Gravel (>2mm) <1 ---- ---- <1 ----%1----Cobbles (>6cm) EA152: Soil Particle Density 2.60 ---- ---- 2.57 ----g/cm30.01----Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES 220Aluminium 260 220 260 ----mg/kg507429-90-5 250Iron 250 220 240 ----mg/kg507439-89-6 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS <0.50Antimony <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 ----mg/kg0.507440-36-0 1.56Arsenic 1.33 1.67 1.33 ----mg/kg1.007440-38-2 <0.1Cadmium <0.1 0.2 <0.1 ----mg/kg0.17440-43-9 7.2Chromium 6.7 6.6 6.1 ----mg/kg1.07440-47-3 <1.0Copper <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ----mg/kg1.07440-50-8 <0.5Cobalt <0.5 0.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.57440-48-4 <1.0Lead <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ----mg/kg1.07439-92-1 19Manganese 18 18 19 ----mg/kg107439-96-5 4 of 20:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results ----I2SED-1019I12SED-1019I11SED-1019I1SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) ----07-Oct-2019 00:0005-Oct-2019 00:0005-Oct-2019 00:0005-Oct-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time --------EB1926789-004EB1926789-003EB1926789-002EB1926789-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result ---- EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS - Continued <1.0Nickel <1.0 1.1 <1.0 ----mg/kg1.07440-02-0 0.1Selenium 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 ----mg/kg0.17782-49-2 <0.1Silver <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 ----mg/kg0.17440-22-4 <2.0Vanadium <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 ----mg/kg2.07440-62-2 <1.0Zinc <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ----mg/kg1.07440-66-6 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS 6.6Barium 5.6 6.0 5.9 ----mg/kg0.17440-39-3 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS <0.01Mercury <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 ----mg/kg0.017439-97-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds <1Monobutyltin <1 <1 <1 ----µgSn/kg178763-54-9 <1Dibutyltin <1 <1 <1 ----µgSn/kg11002-53-5 <0.5Tributyltin <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ----µgSn/kg0.556573-85-4 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids <0.05Bioresmethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ----mg/kg0.0528434-01-07 <0.05Bifenthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ----mg/kg0.0582657-04-3 <0.05Phenothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ----mg/kg0.0526002-80-2 <0.05Lambda-cyhalothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ----mg/kg0.0568085-85-8 <0.05Permethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ----mg/kg0.0552645-53-1 <0.05Cyfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ----mg/kg0.0568359-37-5 <0.05Cypermethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ----mg/kg0.0552315-07-8 <0.05Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ----mg/kg0.0551630-58-1/66230- 04- <0.05Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ----mg/kg0.0562229-77-0/66841- 25- <0.05Allethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ----mg/kg0.05584-79-2 <0.05Transfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ----mg/kg0.05118712-89-3 <0.05Tetramethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ----mg/kg0.057696-12-0 <0.05Tau-fluvalinate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ----mg/kg0.05102851-06-9 EP094B: Synergist <0.05Piperonyl Butoxide <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ----mg/kg0.0563993-73-7 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS <0.024-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ----mg/kg0.02122-88-3 <0.022.4-DB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ----mg/kg0.0294-82-6 5 of 20:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results ----I2SED-1019I12SED-1019I11SED-1019I1SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) ----07-Oct-2019 00:0005-Oct-2019 00:0005-Oct-2019 00:0005-Oct-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time --------EB1926789-004EB1926789-003EB1926789-002EB1926789-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result ---- EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS - Continued <0.02Dicamba <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ----mg/kg0.021918-00-9 <0.02Mecoprop <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ----mg/kg0.0293-65-2 <0.02MCPA <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ----mg/kg0.0294-74-6 <0.022.4-DP <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ----mg/kg0.02120-36-5 <0.022.4-D <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ----mg/kg0.0294-75-7 <0.02Triclopyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ----mg/kg0.0255335-06-3 <0.022.4.5-TP (Silvex) <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ----mg/kg0.0293-72-1 <0.022.4.5-T <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ----mg/kg0.0293-76-5 <0.02MCPB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ----mg/kg0.0294-81-5 <0.02Picloram <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ----mg/kg0.021918-02-1 <0.02Clopyralid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ----mg/kg0.021702-17-6 <0.02Fluroxypyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ----mg/kg0.0269377-81-7 EP234A: OP Pesticides <0.005Azinphos-ethyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 ----mg/kg0.0052642-71-9 <0.005Azinphos-methyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 ----mg/kg0.00586-50-0 <0.005Chlorfenvinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 ----mg/kg0.005470-90-6 <0.002Coumaphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.00256-72-4 <0.002Diazinon <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.002333-41-5 <0.004Dimethoate <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 ----mg/kg0.00460-51-5 <0.01Disulfoton <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 ----mg/kg0.01298-04-4 <0.002Ethoprophos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.00213194-48-4 <0.002Fenamiphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.00222224-92-6 <0.5Fenitrothion <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5122-14-5 <0.005Fensulfothion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 ----mg/kg0.005115-90-2 <0.010Fenthion <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 ----mg/kg0.01055-38-9 <0.005Malathion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 ----mg/kg0.005121-75-5 <0.005^ Mevinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 ----mg/kg0.0057786-34-7 <0.005Monocrotophos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 ----mg/kg0.0056923-22-4 <0.002Omethoate <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.0021113-02-6 <0.05Parathion <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ----mg/kg0.0556-38-2 <0.5Parathion-methyl <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5298-00-0 <0.02Phorate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ----mg/kg0.02298-02-2 <0.002Pirimiphos-methyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.00229232-93-7 <0.001Sulfotep <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 ----mg/kg0.0013689-24-5 <0.002Tetrachlorvinphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.00222248-79-9 6 of 20:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results ----I2SED-1019I12SED-1019I11SED-1019I1SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) ----07-Oct-2019 00:0005-Oct-2019 00:0005-Oct-2019 00:0005-Oct-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time --------EB1926789-004EB1926789-003EB1926789-002EB1926789-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result ---- EP234A: OP Pesticides - Continued <0.001Triazophos <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 ----mg/kg0.00124017-47-8 EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates <0.01Aldicarb <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 ----mg/kg0.01116-06-3 <1Bendiocarb <1 <1 <1 ----mg/kg122781-23-3 <0.005Benomyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 ----mg/kg0.00517804-35-2 <0.002Carbaryl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.00263-25-2 <0.002Carbofuran <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.0021563-66-2 <0.0053-Hydroxy Carbofuran <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 ----mg/kg0.00516655-82-6 <0.002Methiocarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.0022032-65-7 <0.002Methomyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.00216752-77-5 <0.02Molinate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ----mg/kg0.022212-67-1 <0.002Oxamyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.00223135-22-0 <0.002Thiobencarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.00228249-77-6 <0.002Thiodicarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.00259669-26-0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides <0.004Hexazinone <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 ----mg/kg0.00451235-04-2 <0.004Metribuzin <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 ----mg/kg0.00421087-64-9 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides <0.004Cyproconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 ----mg/kg0.00494361-06-5 <0.004Flusilazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 ----mg/kg0.00485509-19-9 <0.004Hexaconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 ----mg/kg0.00479983-71-4 <0.01Paclobutrazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 ----mg/kg0.0176738-62-0 <0.01Propiconazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 ----mg/kg0.0160207-90-1 <0.002Tebuconazole <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.002107534-96-3 <0.002Cyprodinil <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.002121552-61-2 <0.005Pyrimethanil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 ----mg/kg0.00553112-28-0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides <0.005Diuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 ----mg/kg0.005330-54-1 <0.002Fluometuron <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.0022164-17-2 <0.005Tebuthiuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 ----mg/kg0.00534014-18-1 <0.005Bromacil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 ----mg/kg0.005314-40-9 EP234G: Chloracetanilides <0.002Metolachlor <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.00251218-45-2 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides 7 of 20:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results ----I2SED-1019I12SED-1019I11SED-1019I1SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) ----07-Oct-2019 00:0005-Oct-2019 00:0005-Oct-2019 00:0005-Oct-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time --------EB1926789-004EB1926789-003EB1926789-002EB1926789-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result ---- EP234H: Triazine Herbicides - Continued <0.002Ametryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.002834-12-8 <0.002Atrazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.0021912-24-9 <0.005Cyanazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 ----mg/kg0.00521725-46-2 <0.002Prometryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.0027287-19-6 <0.002Propazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.002139-40-2 <0.005Simazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 ----mg/kg0.005122-34-9 <0.002Terbuthylazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 ----mg/kg0.0025915-41-3 <0.1Terbutryn <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 ----mg/kg0.1886-50-0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides <0.005Fenarimol <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 ----mg/kg0.00560168-88-9 <0.001Irgarol <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 ----mg/kg0.00128159-98-0 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 76.9 88.0 94.3 111 ----%0.5----Tripropyltin EP094S: Pesticide Surrogate 73.1DEF 94.6 99.0 83.2 ----%0.0578-48-8 EP202S: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicide Surrogate 67.02.4-Dichlorophenyl Acetic Acid 56.9 66.5 67.2 ----%0.0219719-28-9 8 of 20:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results C5WAT-1019C4WAT-1019C3WAT-1019C2WAT-1019C1WAT-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER (Matrix: WATER) 08-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1926789-009EB1926789-008EB1926789-007EB1926789-006EB1926789-005UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA025: Total Suspended Solids dried at 104 ± 2°C 3 <1 2 2 <1mg/L1----Suspended Solids (SS) EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS <0.00004Mercury 0.00016 <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS <0.00004Mercury <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS <5Aluminium <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-36-0 1.6Arsenic 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.8µg/L0.57440-38-2 4Barium 3 3 3 4µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper <1 <1 <1 <1µg/L17440-50-8 <5Iron <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57439-89-6 <0.2Lead <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57440-66-6 EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS <5Aluminium <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-36-0 2.1Arsenic 1.7 1.9 1.6 1.6µg/L0.57440-38-2 4Barium 4 4 4 4µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper <1 <1 <1 <1µg/L17440-50-8 <0.2Lead <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57440-66-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds (Soluble) <2Tributyltin <2 <2 <2 <2ngSn/L256573-85-4 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 121 102 104 97.2 95.2%5----Tripropyltin 9 of 20:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results D2WAT-1019D1WAT-1019AMB05AMB04C6WAT-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER (Matrix: WATER) 08-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1926789-016EB1926789-015EB1926789-013EB1926789-011EB1926789-010UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA025: Total Suspended Solids dried at 104 ± 2°C 1 ---- ---- <1 <1mg/L1----Suspended Solids (SS) EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS <0.00004Mercury ---- ---- <0.00004 <0.00004mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS <0.00004Mercury ---- ---- <0.00004 <0.00004mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS <5Aluminium ---- ---- <5 <5µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony ---- ---- <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-36-0 1.9Arsenic ---- ---- 1.8 1.8µg/L0.57440-38-2 4Barium ---- ---- 4 4µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium ---- ---- <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium ---- ---- <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper ---- ---- <1 <1µg/L17440-50-8 <5Iron ---- ---- <5 <5µg/L57439-89-6 <0.2Lead ---- ---- <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel ---- ---- <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc ---- ---- <5 <5µg/L57440-66-6 EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS <5Aluminium ---- ---- <5 <5µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony ---- ---- <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-36-0 1.8Arsenic ---- ---- 1.8 1.4µg/L0.57440-38-2 4Barium ---- ---- 4 5µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium ---- ---- <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium ---- ---- <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper ---- ---- <1 <1µg/L17440-50-8 <0.2Lead ---- ---- <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel ---- ---- <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc ---- ---- <5 <5µg/L57440-66-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds (Soluble) <2Tributyltin <2 <2 <2 <2ngSn/L256573-85-4 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 95.1 88.5 132 103 85.4%5----Tripropyltin 10 of 20:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results E1WAT-1019AMB03D5WAT-1019D4WAT-1019D3WAT-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER (Matrix: WATER) 08-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1926789-022EB1926789-020EB1926789-019EB1926789-018EB1926789-017UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA025: Total Suspended Solids dried at 104 ± 2°C <1 <1 <1 ---- <1mg/L1----Suspended Solids (SS) EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS <0.00004Mercury <0.00004 <0.00004 ---- <0.00004mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS <0.00004Mercury <0.00004 <0.00004 ---- <0.00004mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS <5Aluminium <5 <5 ---- <5µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony <0.5 <0.5 ---- <0.5µg/L0.57440-36-0 2.0Arsenic 2.0 1.6 ---- 1.5µg/L0.57440-38-2 3Barium 4 3 ---- 4µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium <0.2 <0.2 ---- <0.2µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium <0.5 <0.5 ---- <0.5µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper <1 <1 ---- <1µg/L17440-50-8 <5Iron <5 <5 ---- <5µg/L57439-89-6 <0.2Lead <0.2 <0.2 ---- <0.2µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel 0.6 <0.5 ---- <0.5µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc <5 <5 ---- <5µg/L57440-66-6 EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS <5Aluminium <5 <5 ---- <5µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony <0.5 <0.5 ---- <0.5µg/L0.57440-36-0 1.8Arsenic 1.7 1.8 ---- 1.8µg/L0.57440-38-2 4Barium 5 5 ---- 4µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium <0.2 <0.2 ---- <0.2µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium <0.5 <0.5 ---- <0.5µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper <1 <1 ---- <1µg/L17440-50-8 <0.2Lead <0.2 <0.2 ---- 0.2µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel <0.5 <0.5 ---- <0.5µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc <5 <5 ---- <5µg/L57440-66-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds (Soluble) <2Tributyltin <2 <2 <2 <2ngSn/L256573-85-4 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 92.7 88.2 80.6 98.3 92.9%5----Tripropyltin 11 of 20:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results G1WAT-1019E5WAT-1019E4WAT-1019E3WAT-1019E2WAT-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER (Matrix: WATER) 08-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1926789-027EB1926789-026EB1926789-025EB1926789-024EB1926789-023UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA025: Total Suspended Solids dried at 104 ± 2°C <1 <1 <1 1 2mg/L1----Suspended Solids (SS) EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS <0.00004Mercury <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS <0.00004Mercury <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS <5Aluminium <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-36-0 1.6Arsenic 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6µg/L0.57440-38-2 4Barium 3 4 3 4µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper <1 <1 <1 <1µg/L17440-50-8 <5Iron <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57439-89-6 <0.2Lead <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57440-66-6 EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS <5Aluminium <5 9 <5 <5µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-36-0 1.9Arsenic 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.8µg/L0.57440-38-2 4Barium 4 4 4 4µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper <1 <1 <1 <1µg/L17440-50-8 <0.2Lead <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57440-66-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds (Soluble) <2Tributyltin <2 <2 <2 <2ngSn/L256573-85-4 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 110 103 100 106 94.0%5----Tripropyltin 12 of 20:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results A1WAT-1019G5WAT-1019G4WAT-1019G3WAT-1019G2WAT-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER (Matrix: WATER) 08-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1926789-032EB1926789-031EB1926789-030EB1926789-029EB1926789-028UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA025: Total Suspended Solids dried at 104 ± 2°C <1 <1 <1 <1 <1mg/L1----Suspended Solids (SS) EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS <0.00004Mercury <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS <0.00004Mercury <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS <5Aluminium <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-36-0 1.5Arsenic 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.5µg/L0.57440-38-2 4Barium 4 4 4 4µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper <1 <1 <1 <1µg/L17440-50-8 <5Iron <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57439-89-6 <0.2Lead <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57440-66-6 EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS <5Aluminium <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-36-0 1.7Arsenic 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.3µg/L0.57440-38-2 4Barium 4 4 4 4µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.7µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper <1 <1 <1 <1µg/L17440-50-8 <0.2Lead <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57440-66-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds (Soluble) <2Tributyltin <2 <2 <2 <2ngSn/L256573-85-4 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 110 96.4 90.5 99.0 108%5----Tripropyltin 13 of 20:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results A6WAT-1019A5WAT-1019A4WAT-1019A3WAT-1019A2WAT-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER (Matrix: WATER) 08-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1926789-037EB1926789-036EB1926789-035EB1926789-034EB1926789-033UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA025: Total Suspended Solids dried at 104 ± 2°C <1 <1 <1 <1 <1mg/L1----Suspended Solids (SS) EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS <0.00004Mercury <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS <0.00004Mercury <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS <5Aluminium <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-36-0 1.6Arsenic 1.7 1.5 1.6 1.5µg/L0.57440-38-2 4Barium 3 3 4 4µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper <1 <1 <1 <1µg/L17440-50-8 <5Iron <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57439-89-6 <0.2Lead <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57440-66-6 EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS <5Aluminium <5 7 <5 <5µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-36-0 1.6Arsenic 1.5 1.6 1.4 1.4µg/L0.57440-38-2 4Barium 4 4 4 4µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper <1 <1 <1 <1µg/L17440-50-8 <0.2Lead <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57440-66-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds (Soluble) <2Tributyltin <2 <2 <2 <2ngSn/L256573-85-4 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 90.9 98.7 82.7 110 113%5----Tripropyltin 14 of 20:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results B3WAT-1019B2WAT-1019B1WAT-1019AMB01A7WAT-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER (Matrix: WATER) 08-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1926789-043EB1926789-042EB1926789-041EB1926789-039EB1926789-038UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA025: Total Suspended Solids dried at 104 ± 2°C <1 ---- <1 <1 <1mg/L1----Suspended Solids (SS) EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS <0.00004Mercury ---- <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS <0.00004Mercury ---- <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS <5Aluminium ---- <5 <5 <5µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony ---- <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-36-0 1.5Arsenic ---- 1.6 1.4 1.8µg/L0.57440-38-2 4Barium ---- 4 3 4µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium ---- <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium ---- <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper ---- <1 <1 <1µg/L17440-50-8 <5Iron ---- <5 <5 <5µg/L57439-89-6 <0.2Lead ---- <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel ---- <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc ---- <5 <5 <5µg/L57440-66-6 EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS 12Aluminium ---- <5 <5 <5µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony ---- <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-36-0 1.8Arsenic ---- 1.2 1.6 1.5µg/L0.57440-38-2 4Barium ---- 4 4 4µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium ---- <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium ---- <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper ---- <1 <1 <1µg/L17440-50-8 <0.2Lead ---- <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel ---- <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc ---- <5 <5 <5µg/L57440-66-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds (Soluble) <2Tributyltin <2 <2 <2 <2ngSn/L256573-85-4 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 103 103 119 126 97.8%5----Tripropyltin 15 of 20:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results AMB02B7WAT-1019B6WAT-1019B5WAT-1019B4WAT-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER (Matrix: WATER) 08-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1926789-048EB1926789-047EB1926789-046EB1926789-045EB1926789-044UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA025: Total Suspended Solids dried at 104 ± 2°C <1 <1 <1 <1 ----mg/L1----Suspended Solids (SS) EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS <0.00004Mercury <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004 ----mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS <0.00004Mercury <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004 ----mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS <5Aluminium <5 <5 <5 ----µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ----µg/L0.57440-36-0 1.4Arsenic 1.4 1.5 1.4 ----µg/L0.57440-38-2 3Barium 4 4 4 ----µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 ----µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ----µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper <1 <1 <1 ----µg/L17440-50-8 <5Iron <5 <5 <5 ----µg/L57439-89-6 <0.2Lead <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 ----µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ----µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc <5 <5 <5 ----µg/L57440-66-6 EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS 5Aluminium <5 <5 <5 ----µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ----µg/L0.57440-36-0 1.5Arsenic 1.5 1.4 1.4 ----µg/L0.57440-38-2 4Barium 4 4 4 ----µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 ----µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ----µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper <1 <1 <1 ----µg/L17440-50-8 <0.2Lead <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 ----µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 ----µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc <5 <5 <5 ----µg/L57440-66-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds (Soluble) <2Tributyltin <2 <2 <2 <2ngSn/L256573-85-4 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 103 77.8 76.8 99.2 86.1%5----Tripropyltin 16 of 20:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results H5WAT-1019H4WAT-1019H3WAT-1019H2WAT-1019H1WAT-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER (Matrix: WATER) 08-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1926789-054EB1926789-053EB1926789-052EB1926789-051EB1926789-050UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA025: Total Suspended Solids dried at 104 ± 2°C <1 <1 <1 <1 <1mg/L1----Suspended Solids (SS) EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS <0.00004Mercury <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS <0.00004Mercury <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS <5Aluminium <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-36-0 1.6Arsenic 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.7µg/L0.57440-38-2 4Barium 3 4 3 4µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper <1 <1 <1 <1µg/L17440-50-8 <5Iron <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57439-89-6 <0.2Lead <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57440-66-6 EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS <5Aluminium <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-36-0 1.2Arsenic 1.7 1.4 1.9 1.5µg/L0.57440-38-2 4Barium 4 4 4 4µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium <0.5 <0.5 0.6 <0.5µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper <1 <1 <1 <1µg/L17440-50-8 <0.2Lead <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27439-92-1 0.7Nickel <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57440-66-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds (Soluble) <2Tributyltin <2 <2 <2 <2ngSn/L256573-85-4 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 82.1 83.5 81.4 80.9 98.6%5----Tripropyltin 17 of 20:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results I5WAT-1019I4WAT-1019I3WAT-1019I2WAT-1019I1WAT-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER (Matrix: WATER) 08-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1926789-059EB1926789-058EB1926789-057EB1926789-056EB1926789-055UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA025: Total Suspended Solids dried at 104 ± 2°C <1 <1 <1 <1 <1mg/L1----Suspended Solids (SS) EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS <0.00004Mercury <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS 0.00006Mercury <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS <5Aluminium <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-36-0 1.6Arsenic 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6µg/L0.57440-38-2 4Barium 4 4 4 3µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper <1 <1 <1 <1µg/L17440-50-8 <5Iron <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57439-89-6 <0.2Lead <0.2 0.3 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57440-66-6 EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS <5Aluminium <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-36-0 1.6Arsenic 1.4 1.8 1.3 1.6µg/L0.57440-38-2 4Barium 4 4 4 4µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27440-43-9 0.6Chromium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper <1 <1 <1 <1µg/L17440-50-8 <0.2Lead <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc <5 <5 <5 <5µg/L57440-66-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds (Soluble) <2Tributyltin <2 <2 <2 <2ngSn/L256573-85-4 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 90.9 80.8 95.6 92.7 96.5%5----Tripropyltin 18 of 20:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results ----R01-1019TB01-1019FB01-1019I6WAT-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER (Matrix: WATER) ----08-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time --------EB1926789-063EB1926789-062EB1926789-061EB1926789-060UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result ---- EA025: Total Suspended Solids dried at 104 ± 2°C <1 ---- ---- ---- ----mg/L1----Suspended Solids (SS) EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS <0.00004Mercury ---- ---- ---- ----mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS 0.00005Mercury <0.00004 <0.00004 <0.00004 ----mg/L0.000047439-97-6 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS <5Aluminium ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L0.57440-36-0 1.8Arsenic ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L0.57440-38-2 4Barium ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L17440-50-8 <5Iron ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L57439-89-6 <0.2Lead ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc ---- ---- ---- ----µg/L57440-66-6 EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS <5Aluminium 25 41 ---- ----µg/L57429-90-5 <0.5Antimony <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.57440-36-0 1.8Arsenic 1.7 1.7 ---- ----µg/L0.57440-38-2 4Barium 5 6 ---- ----µg/L17440-39-3 <0.2Cadmium <0.2 <0.2 ---- ----µg/L0.27440-43-9 <0.5Chromium <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.57440-47-3 <1Copper <1 <1 ---- ----µg/L17440-50-8 <0.2Lead 0.3 0.6 ---- ----µg/L0.27439-92-1 <0.5Nickel 0.7 0.8 ---- ----µg/L0.57440-02-0 <5Zinc 8 7 ---- ----µg/L57440-66-6 EG094T: Total metals in Fresh water by ORC-ICPMS ----Aluminium ---- ---- <5 ----µg/L57429-90-5 ----Antimony ---- ---- <0.2 ----µg/L0.27440-36-0 ----Arsenic ---- ---- <0.2 ----µg/L0.27440-38-2 ----Barium ---- ---- 1.2 ----µg/L0.57440-39-3 ----Cadmium ---- ---- <0.05 ----µg/L0.057440-43-9 19 of 20:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results ----R01-1019TB01-1019FB01-1019I6WAT-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: WATER (Matrix: WATER) ----08-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:0008-Oct-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time --------EB1926789-063EB1926789-062EB1926789-061EB1926789-060UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result ---- EG094T: Total metals in Fresh water by ORC-ICPMS - Continued ----Chromium ---- ---- <0.2 ----µg/L0.27440-47-3 ----Copper ---- ---- 1.9 ----µg/L0.57440-50-8 ----Lead ---- ---- 0.3 ----µg/L0.17439-92-1 ----Nickel ---- ---- <0.5 ----µg/L0.57440-02-0 ----Zinc ---- ---- 6 ----µg/L17440-66-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds (Soluble) <2Tributyltin ---- ---- ---- ----ngSn/L256573-85-4 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 80.2 ---- ---- ---- ----%5----Tripropyltin 20 of 20:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Surrogate Control Limits Recovery Limits (%)Sub-Matrix: SOIL Compound CAS Number Low High EP090S: Organotin Surrogate Tripropyltin ---- 35 130 EP094S: Pesticide Surrogate DEF 78-48-8 10 110 EP202S: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicide Surrogate 2.4-Dichlorophenyl Acetic Acid 19719-28-9 45 139 Recovery Limits (%)Sub-Matrix: WATER Compound CAS Number Low High EP090S: Organotin Surrogate Tripropyltin ---- 24 116 0 0.00 True Environmental CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Work Order : Page : 1 of 63EB1929990 :: LaboratoryClient BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Environmental Division Brisbane : :ContactContact MS BETH TOKI Andrew Epps :: AddressAddress PO BOX 203 SPRING HILL BRISBANE QLD 4004 2 Byth Street Stafford QLD Australia 4053 :Telephone 07 3831 6744 :Telephone +61 7 3552 8639 :Project B23282-4 Douglas Shoal Date Samples Received : 11-Nov-2019 08:35 :Order number ---- Date Analysis Commenced : 12-Nov-2019 :C-O-C number ---- Issue Date : 05-Dec-2019 11:43 Sampler : CONOR JONES Site : ---- Quote number : BN/165/18 B 61:No. of samples received 56:No. of samples analysed This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full. This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information: l General Comments l Analytical Results l Surrogate Control Limits Additional information pertinent to this report will be found in the following separate attachments: Quality Control Report, QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with Quality Review and Sample Receipt Notification. Signatories This document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11. Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition Alex Rossi Organic Chemist Sydney Organics, Smithfield, NSW Diana Mesa 2IC Organic Chemist Brisbane Inorganics, Stafford, QLD Diana Mesa 2IC Organic Chemist Brisbane Organics, Stafford, QLD Gaston Allende R&D Chemist Sydney Organics, Smithfield, NSW Kim McCabe Senior Inorganic Chemist Brisbane Inorganics, Stafford, QLD Satishkumar Trivedi Senior Acid Sulfate Soil Chemist Brisbane Acid Sulphate Soils, Stafford, QLD Satishkumar Trivedi Senior Acid Sulfate Soil Chemist Brisbane Inorganics, Stafford, QLD R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R 2 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD General Comments The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis. Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference. When sampling time information is not provided by the client, sampling dates are shown without a time component. In these instances, the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes. Where a result is required to meet compliance limits the associated uncertainty must be considered. Refer to the ALS Contact for details. CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society. LOR = Limit of reporting ^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reporting ø = ALS is not NATA accredited for these tests. ~ = Indicates an estimated value. Key : EP094 (Synthetic Pyrethroids by GCMS): Samples 'D8-SED-1019' and 'E5-SED-1019' show poor matrix spike recovery due to matrix interference.l EP234: Poor matrix spike recovery for particular compounds due to matrix interferences.l Herbicides and Pesticides analysis will be conducted by ALS Environmental, Sydney, NATA accreditation no. 825, Site No. 10911 (Micro site no. 14913).l EG020-SD (Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-MS): Samples EB1929990-001(A1-SED-1019) and EB1929990-013(A13-SED-1019) show poor duplicate results due to sample heterogeneity. Confirmed by visual inspection. l EG020-T (Total Metals by ICP-MS): Samples EB1929990-025(B11-SED-1019) and EB1929990-035(D5-SED-1019) show poor duplicate results due to sample heterogeneity. Confirmed by visual inspection.l EG020-SD (Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-MS): Sample EB1929990-003(A3-SED-1019) shows poor matrix spike recovery due to sample heterogeneity. Confirmed by visual inspection.l EP090 Organotins: Sample 'G9-SED-1019' shows poor surrogate recovery due to matrix interference. Confirmed by re-extraction and re-analysis.l EP090: Sample 'E4-SED-1019' shows poor matrix spike recovery due to sample heterogeneity. Confirmed by re-extraction and re-analysis.l EG005-SD (Total Fe and Al in Sediments by ICP-AES): Sample EB1929990-001 (A1-SED-1019) shows poor duplicate results due to sample heterogeneity. Confirmed by visual inspection.l 3 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results A7-SED-1019A6-SED-1019A4-SED-1019A3-SED-1019A1-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-007EB1929990-006EB1929990-004EB1929990-003EB1929990-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) 19.8 27.4 30.3 31.3 34.9%1.0----Moisture Content EA150: Particle Sizing 83 94 96 94 92%1----+75µm 82 94 96 94 92%1----+150µm 81 92 95 94 91%1----+300µm 79 90 94 93 88%1----+425µm 78 84 91 88 81%1----+600µm 70 64 60 54 49%1----+1180µm 58 35 26 19 21%1----+2.36mm 49 17 14 8 13%1----+4.75mm 31 5 7 4 9%1----+9.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+19.0mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+37.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+75.0mm EA150: Soil Classification based on Particle Size 9 4 3 5 5%1----Clay (<2 µm) 8 2 1 1 3%1----Silt (2-60 µm) 21 50 59 64 62%1----Sand (0.06-2.00 mm) 62 44 37 30 30%1----Gravel (>2mm) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----Cobbles (>6cm) EA152: Soil Particle Density 2.93 2.54 2.48 2.51 2.45g/cm30.01----Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES 300Aluminium 500 120 220 140mg/kg507429-90-5 360Iron 560 200 260 190mg/kg507439-89-6 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS <0.50Antimony <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50mg/kg0.507440-36-0 <1.00Arsenic 1.08 1.15 <1.00 <1.00mg/kg1.007440-38-2 <0.1Cadmium <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-43-9 3.9Chromium 5.2 2.0 3.4 1.8mg/kg1.07440-47-3 50.7Copper 117 <1.0 4.9 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-50-8 <0.5Cobalt <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.57440-48-4 <1.0Lead <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07439-92-1 14Manganese 18 <10 10 <10mg/kg107439-96-5 4 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results A7-SED-1019A6-SED-1019A4-SED-1019A3-SED-1019A1-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-007EB1929990-006EB1929990-004EB1929990-003EB1929990-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS - Continued 1.1Nickel 1.4 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-02-0 <0.1Selenium <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17782-49-2 <0.1Silver <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-22-4 <2.0Vanadium <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0mg/kg2.07440-62-2 7.7Zinc 9.6 <1.0 2.5 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-66-6 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS 3.9Barium 6.4 3.9 6.0 3.7mg/kg0.17440-39-3 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS <0.01Mercury <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.017439-97-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds 4.1Tributyltin ---- ---- ---- ----µgSn/kg0.556573-85-4 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids <0.05Bioresmethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0528434-01-07 <0.05Bifenthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0582657-04-3 <0.05Phenothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0526002-80-2 <0.05Lambda-cyhalothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568085-85-8 <0.05Permethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552645-53-1 <0.05Cyfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568359-37-5 <0.05Cypermethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552315-07-8 <0.05Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0551630-58-1/66230- 04- <0.05Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0562229-77-0/66841- 25- <0.05Allethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05584-79-2 <0.05Transfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05118712-89-3 <0.05Tetramethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.057696-12-0 <0.05Tau-fluvalinate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05102851-06-9 EP094B: Synergist <0.05Piperonyl Butoxide <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0563993-73-7 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS <0.024-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02122-88-3 <0.022.4-DB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-82-6 <0.02Dicamba <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-00-9 <0.02Mecoprop <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-65-2 5 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results A7-SED-1019A6-SED-1019A4-SED-1019A3-SED-1019A1-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-007EB1929990-006EB1929990-004EB1929990-003EB1929990-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS - Continued <0.02MCPA <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-74-6 <0.022.4-DP <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02120-36-5 <0.022.4-D <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-75-7 <0.02Triclopyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0255335-06-3 <0.022.4.5-TP (Silvex) <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-72-1 <0.022.4.5-T <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-76-5 <0.02MCPB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-81-5 <0.02Picloram <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-02-1 <0.02Clopyralid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021702-17-6 <0.02Fluroxypyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0269377-81-7 EP234A: OP Pesticides <0.005Azinphos-ethyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0052642-71-9 <0.005Azinphos-methyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00586-50-0 <0.005Chlorfenvinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005470-90-6 <0.002Coumaphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00256-72-4 <0.002Diazinon <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002333-41-5 <0.004Dimethoate <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00460-51-5 <0.01Disulfoton <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01298-04-4 <0.002Ethoprophos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00213194-48-4 <0.002Fenamiphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222224-92-6 <0.5Fenitrothion <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5122-14-5 <0.005Fensulfothion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005115-90-2 <0.010Fenthion <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010mg/kg0.01055-38-9 <0.005Malathion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005121-75-5 <0.005^ Mevinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0057786-34-7 <0.005Monocrotophos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0056923-22-4 <0.002Omethoate <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021113-02-6 <0.05Parathion <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0556-38-2 <0.5Parathion-methyl <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5298-00-0 <0.02Phorate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02298-02-2 <0.002Pirimiphos-methyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00229232-93-7 <0.001Sulfotep <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.0013689-24-5 <0.002Tetrachlorvinphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222248-79-9 <0.001Triazophos <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00124017-47-8 6 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results A7-SED-1019A6-SED-1019A4-SED-1019A3-SED-1019A1-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-007EB1929990-006EB1929990-004EB1929990-003EB1929990-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates <0.01Aldicarb <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01116-06-3 <1Bendiocarb <1 <1 <1 <1mg/kg122781-23-3 <0.005Benomyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00517804-35-2 <0.002Carbaryl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00263-25-2 <0.002Carbofuran <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021563-66-2 <0.0053-Hydroxy Carbofuran <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00516655-82-6 <0.002Methiocarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022032-65-7 <0.002Methomyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00216752-77-5 <0.02Molinate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.022212-67-1 <0.002Oxamyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00223135-22-0 <0.002Thiobencarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00228249-77-6 <0.002Thiodicarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00259669-26-0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides <0.004Hexazinone <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00451235-04-2 <0.004Metribuzin <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00421087-64-9 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides <0.004Cyproconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00494361-06-5 <0.004Flusilazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00485509-19-9 <0.004Hexaconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00479983-71-4 <0.01Paclobutrazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0176738-62-0 0.01Propiconazole 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01mg/kg0.0160207-90-1 <0.002Tebuconazole <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002107534-96-3 <0.002Cyprodinil <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002121552-61-2 <0.005Pyrimethanil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00553112-28-0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides 0.076Diuron 0.014 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005330-54-1 <0.002Fluometuron <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022164-17-2 <0.005Tebuthiuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00534014-18-1 <0.005Bromacil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005314-40-9 EP234G: Chloracetanilides <0.002Metolachlor <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00251218-45-2 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides <0.002Ametryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002834-12-8 <0.002Atrazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021912-24-9 7 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results A7-SED-1019A6-SED-1019A4-SED-1019A3-SED-1019A1-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-007EB1929990-006EB1929990-004EB1929990-003EB1929990-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234H: Triazine Herbicides - Continued <0.005Cyanazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00521725-46-2 <0.002Prometryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0027287-19-6 <0.002Propazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002139-40-2 <0.005Simazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005122-34-9 <0.002Terbuthylazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0025915-41-3 <0.1Terbutryn <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.1886-50-0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides <0.005Fenarimol <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00560168-88-9 <0.001Irgarol <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00128159-98-0 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 35.4 ---- ---- ---- ----%0.5----Tripropyltin EP094S: Pesticide Surrogate 84.7DEF 93.1 100 93.0 91.6%0.0578-48-8 EP202S: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicide Surrogate 64.52.4-Dichlorophenyl Acetic Acid 65.0 62.4 60.6 66.1%0.0219719-28-9 8 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results A12-SED-1019A11-SED-1019A10-SED-1019A9-SED-1019A8-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-012EB1929990-011EB1929990-010EB1929990-009EB1929990-008UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) 32.9 31.2 31.2 28.2 33.7%1.0----Moisture Content EA150: Particle Sizing 96 94 94 95 94%1----+75µm 96 94 94 95 94%1----+150µm 95 94 94 95 94%1----+300µm 95 93 93 94 93%1----+425µm 89 93 91 91 89%1----+600µm 50 70 58 57 59%1----+1180µm 12 27 18 24 26%1----+2.36mm 5 8 6 10 10%1----+4.75mm 4 <1 <1 <1 5%1----+9.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+19.0mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+37.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+75.0mm EA150: Soil Classification based on Particle Size 3 4 4 2 5%1----Clay (<2 µm) 1 2 2 3 1%1----Silt (2-60 µm) 72 54 64 61 58%1----Sand (0.06-2.00 mm) 24 40 30 34 36%1----Gravel (>2mm) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----Cobbles (>6cm) EA152: Soil Particle Density 2.50 2.53 2.46 2.60 2.53g/cm30.01----Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES 120Aluminium 150 370 200 220mg/kg507429-90-5 180Iron 200 430 240 260mg/kg507439-89-6 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS <0.50Antimony <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50mg/kg0.507440-36-0 1.05Arsenic 1.05 1.10 <1.00 1.04mg/kg1.007440-38-2 <0.1Cadmium <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-43-9 2.7Chromium 3.2 4.0 2.8 3.5mg/kg1.07440-47-3 124Copper 2.1 19.9 1.1 2.2mg/kg1.07440-50-8 <0.5Cobalt <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.57440-48-4 <1.0Lead <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07439-92-1 <10Manganese 10 13 <10 13mg/kg107439-96-5 9 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results A12-SED-1019A11-SED-1019A10-SED-1019A9-SED-1019A8-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-012EB1929990-011EB1929990-010EB1929990-009EB1929990-008UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS - Continued <1.0Nickel <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-02-0 <0.1Selenium <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17782-49-2 <0.1Silver <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-22-4 <2.0Vanadium <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0mg/kg2.07440-62-2 17.8Zinc 2.1 10.7 1.2 1.1mg/kg1.07440-66-6 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS 5.0Barium 6.0 4.7 4.5 5.1mg/kg0.17440-39-3 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS <0.01Mercury <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.017439-97-6 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids <0.05Bioresmethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0528434-01-07 <0.05Bifenthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0582657-04-3 <0.05Phenothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0526002-80-2 <0.05Lambda-cyhalothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568085-85-8 <0.05Permethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552645-53-1 <0.05Cyfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568359-37-5 <0.05Cypermethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552315-07-8 <0.05Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0551630-58-1/66230- 04- <0.05Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0562229-77-0/66841- 25- <0.05Allethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05584-79-2 <0.05Transfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05118712-89-3 <0.05Tetramethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.057696-12-0 <0.05Tau-fluvalinate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05102851-06-9 EP094B: Synergist <0.05Piperonyl Butoxide <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0563993-73-7 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS <0.024-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02122-88-3 <0.022.4-DB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-82-6 <0.02Dicamba <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-00-9 <0.02Mecoprop <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-65-2 <0.02MCPA <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-74-6 <0.022.4-DP <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02120-36-5 10 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results A12-SED-1019A11-SED-1019A10-SED-1019A9-SED-1019A8-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-012EB1929990-011EB1929990-010EB1929990-009EB1929990-008UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS - Continued <0.022.4-D <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-75-7 <0.02Triclopyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0255335-06-3 <0.022.4.5-TP (Silvex) <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-72-1 <0.022.4.5-T <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-76-5 <0.02MCPB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-81-5 <0.02Picloram <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-02-1 <0.02Clopyralid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021702-17-6 <0.02Fluroxypyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0269377-81-7 EP234A: OP Pesticides <0.005Azinphos-ethyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0052642-71-9 <0.005Azinphos-methyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00586-50-0 <0.005Chlorfenvinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005470-90-6 <0.002Coumaphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00256-72-4 <0.002Diazinon <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002333-41-5 <0.004Dimethoate <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00460-51-5 <0.01Disulfoton <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01298-04-4 <0.002Ethoprophos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00213194-48-4 <0.002Fenamiphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222224-92-6 <0.5Fenitrothion <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5122-14-5 <0.005Fensulfothion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005115-90-2 <0.010Fenthion <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010mg/kg0.01055-38-9 <0.005Malathion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005121-75-5 <0.005^ Mevinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0057786-34-7 <0.005Monocrotophos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0056923-22-4 <0.002Omethoate <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021113-02-6 <0.05Parathion <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0556-38-2 <0.5Parathion-methyl <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5298-00-0 <0.02Phorate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02298-02-2 <0.002Pirimiphos-methyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00229232-93-7 <0.001Sulfotep <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.0013689-24-5 <0.002Tetrachlorvinphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222248-79-9 <0.001Triazophos <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00124017-47-8 EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates <0.01Aldicarb <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01116-06-3 11 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results A12-SED-1019A11-SED-1019A10-SED-1019A9-SED-1019A8-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-012EB1929990-011EB1929990-010EB1929990-009EB1929990-008UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates - Continued <1Bendiocarb <1 <1 <1 <1mg/kg122781-23-3 <0.005Benomyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00517804-35-2 <0.002Carbaryl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00263-25-2 <0.002Carbofuran <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021563-66-2 <0.0053-Hydroxy Carbofuran <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00516655-82-6 <0.002Methiocarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022032-65-7 <0.002Methomyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00216752-77-5 <0.02Molinate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.022212-67-1 <0.002Oxamyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00223135-22-0 <0.002Thiobencarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00228249-77-6 <0.002Thiodicarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00259669-26-0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides <0.004Hexazinone <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00451235-04-2 <0.004Metribuzin <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00421087-64-9 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides <0.004Cyproconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00494361-06-5 <0.004Flusilazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00485509-19-9 <0.004Hexaconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00479983-71-4 <0.01Paclobutrazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0176738-62-0 0.01Propiconazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0160207-90-1 <0.002Tebuconazole <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002107534-96-3 <0.002Cyprodinil <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002121552-61-2 <0.005Pyrimethanil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00553112-28-0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides <0.005Diuron <0.005 0.149 0.008 <0.005mg/kg0.005330-54-1 <0.002Fluometuron <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022164-17-2 <0.005Tebuthiuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00534014-18-1 <0.005Bromacil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005314-40-9 EP234G: Chloracetanilides <0.002Metolachlor <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00251218-45-2 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides <0.002Ametryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002834-12-8 <0.002Atrazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021912-24-9 <0.005Cyanazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00521725-46-2 12 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results A12-SED-1019A11-SED-1019A10-SED-1019A9-SED-1019A8-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-012EB1929990-011EB1929990-010EB1929990-009EB1929990-008UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234H: Triazine Herbicides - Continued <0.002Prometryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0027287-19-6 <0.002Propazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002139-40-2 <0.005Simazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005122-34-9 <0.002Terbuthylazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0025915-41-3 <0.1Terbutryn <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.1886-50-0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides <0.005Fenarimol <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00560168-88-9 <0.001Irgarol <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00128159-98-0 EP094S: Pesticide Surrogate 94.2DEF 94.2 95.8 98.5 95.2%0.0578-48-8 EP202S: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicide Surrogate 81.72.4-Dichlorophenyl Acetic Acid 75.4 63.3 68.2 60.5%0.0219719-28-9 13 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results B4-SED-1019B3-SED-1019B1-SED-1019A14-SED-1019A13-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-018EB1929990-017EB1929990-015EB1929990-014EB1929990-013UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) 29.2 30.5 33.7 33.7 35.6%1.0----Moisture Content EA150: Particle Sizing 93 94 94 91 96%1----+75µm 93 94 94 91 96%1----+150µm 93 94 93 90 96%1----+300µm 92 93 92 89 93%1----+425µm 90 89 87 84 83%1----+600µm 62 62 42 51 32%1----+1180µm 28 35 8 16 5%1----+2.36mm 11 20 3 7 2%1----+4.75mm <1 8 <1 <1 <1%1----+9.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+19.0mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+37.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+75.0mm EA150: Soil Classification based on Particle Size 3 4 5 6 4%1----Clay (<2 µm) 4 2 1 3 <1%1----Silt (2-60 µm) 55 51 75 64 83%1----Sand (0.06-2.00 mm) 38 43 19 27 13%1----Gravel (>2mm) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----Cobbles (>6cm) EA152: Soil Particle Density 2.54 2.51 2.50 2.47 2.43g/cm30.01----Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES 310Aluminium 270 170 130 170mg/kg507429-90-5 340Iron 320 230 180 230mg/kg507439-89-6 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS <0.50Antimony <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50mg/kg0.507440-36-0 1.17Arsenic 1.03 1.36 1.13 <1.00mg/kg1.007440-38-2 <0.1Cadmium <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-43-9 4.3Chromium 3.6 3.0 2.5 3.4mg/kg1.07440-47-3 21.5Copper 16.8 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-50-8 <0.5Cobalt <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.57440-48-4 <1.0Lead <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07439-92-1 12Manganese 10 <10 <10 10mg/kg107439-96-5 14 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results B4-SED-1019B3-SED-1019B1-SED-1019A14-SED-1019A13-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-018EB1929990-017EB1929990-015EB1929990-014EB1929990-013UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS - Continued <1.0Nickel <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.2mg/kg1.07440-02-0 <0.1Selenium <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17782-49-2 <0.1Silver <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-22-4 <2.0Vanadium <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0mg/kg2.07440-62-2 14.2Zinc 8.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-66-6 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS 5.7Barium 6.2 6.1 5.5 5.1mg/kg0.17440-39-3 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS <0.01Mercury <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.017439-97-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds ----Tributyltin ---- <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µgSn/kg0.556573-85-4 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids <0.05Bioresmethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0528434-01-07 <0.05Bifenthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0582657-04-3 <0.05Phenothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0526002-80-2 <0.05Lambda-cyhalothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568085-85-8 <0.05Permethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552645-53-1 <0.05Cyfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568359-37-5 <0.05Cypermethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552315-07-8 <0.05Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0551630-58-1/66230- 04- <0.05Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0562229-77-0/66841- 25- <0.05Allethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05584-79-2 <0.05Transfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05118712-89-3 <0.05Tetramethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.057696-12-0 <0.05Tau-fluvalinate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05102851-06-9 EP094B: Synergist <0.05Piperonyl Butoxide <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0563993-73-7 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS <0.024-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02122-88-3 <0.022.4-DB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-82-6 <0.02Dicamba <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-00-9 <0.02Mecoprop <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-65-2 15 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results B4-SED-1019B3-SED-1019B1-SED-1019A14-SED-1019A13-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-018EB1929990-017EB1929990-015EB1929990-014EB1929990-013UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS - Continued <0.02MCPA <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-74-6 <0.022.4-DP <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02120-36-5 <0.022.4-D <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-75-7 <0.02Triclopyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0255335-06-3 <0.022.4.5-TP (Silvex) <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-72-1 <0.022.4.5-T <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-76-5 <0.02MCPB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-81-5 <0.02Picloram <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-02-1 <0.02Clopyralid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021702-17-6 <0.02Fluroxypyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0269377-81-7 EP234A: OP Pesticides <0.005Azinphos-ethyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0052642-71-9 <0.005Azinphos-methyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00586-50-0 <0.005Chlorfenvinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005470-90-6 <0.002Coumaphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00256-72-4 <0.002Diazinon <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002333-41-5 <0.004Dimethoate 0.007 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00460-51-5 <0.01Disulfoton <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01298-04-4 <0.002Ethoprophos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00213194-48-4 <0.002Fenamiphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222224-92-6 <0.5Fenitrothion <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5122-14-5 <0.005Fensulfothion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005115-90-2 <0.010Fenthion <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010mg/kg0.01055-38-9 <0.005Malathion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005121-75-5 <0.005^ Mevinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0057786-34-7 <0.005Monocrotophos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0056923-22-4 <0.002Omethoate <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021113-02-6 <0.05Parathion <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0556-38-2 <0.5Parathion-methyl <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5298-00-0 <0.02Phorate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02298-02-2 <0.002Pirimiphos-methyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00229232-93-7 <0.001Sulfotep <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.0013689-24-5 <0.002Tetrachlorvinphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222248-79-9 <0.001Triazophos <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00124017-47-8 16 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results B4-SED-1019B3-SED-1019B1-SED-1019A14-SED-1019A13-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-018EB1929990-017EB1929990-015EB1929990-014EB1929990-013UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates <0.01Aldicarb <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01116-06-3 <1Bendiocarb <1 <1 <1 <1mg/kg122781-23-3 <0.005Benomyl 0.031 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00517804-35-2 <0.002Carbaryl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00263-25-2 <0.002Carbofuran <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021563-66-2 <0.0053-Hydroxy Carbofuran <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00516655-82-6 <0.002Methiocarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022032-65-7 <0.002Methomyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00216752-77-5 <0.02Molinate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.022212-67-1 <0.002Oxamyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00223135-22-0 <0.002Thiobencarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00228249-77-6 <0.002Thiodicarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00259669-26-0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides <0.004Hexazinone <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00451235-04-2 <0.004Metribuzin <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00421087-64-9 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides <0.004Cyproconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00494361-06-5 <0.004Flusilazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00485509-19-9 <0.004Hexaconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00479983-71-4 <0.01Paclobutrazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0176738-62-0 0.01Propiconazole 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0160207-90-1 <0.002Tebuconazole <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002107534-96-3 <0.002Cyprodinil <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002121552-61-2 <0.005Pyrimethanil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00553112-28-0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides <0.005Diuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005330-54-1 <0.002Fluometuron <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022164-17-2 <0.005Tebuthiuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00534014-18-1 <0.005Bromacil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005314-40-9 EP234G: Chloracetanilides <0.002Metolachlor <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00251218-45-2 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides <0.002Ametryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002834-12-8 <0.002Atrazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021912-24-9 17 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results B4-SED-1019B3-SED-1019B1-SED-1019A14-SED-1019A13-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-018EB1929990-017EB1929990-015EB1929990-014EB1929990-013UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234H: Triazine Herbicides - Continued <0.005Cyanazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00521725-46-2 <0.002Prometryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0027287-19-6 <0.002Propazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002139-40-2 <0.005Simazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005122-34-9 <0.002Terbuthylazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0025915-41-3 <0.1Terbutryn <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.1886-50-0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides <0.005Fenarimol <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00560168-88-9 <0.001Irgarol <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00128159-98-0 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate ---- ---- 74.2 86.1 73.9%0.5----Tripropyltin EP094S: Pesticide Surrogate 96.4DEF 92.3 85.8 84.8 85.6%0.0578-48-8 EP202S: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicide Surrogate 67.32.4-Dichlorophenyl Acetic Acid 64.6 68.7 80.9 60.1%0.0219719-28-9 18 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results B10-SED-1019B8-SED-1019B7-SED-1019B6-SED-1019B5-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-024EB1929990-022EB1929990-021EB1929990-020EB1929990-019UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) 34.4 33.8 28.8 31.7 31.2%1.0----Moisture Content EA150: Particle Sizing 93 94 95 94 94%1----+75µm 93 94 95 94 94%1----+150µm 92 93 94 93 94%1----+300µm 90 92 94 93 93%1----+425µm 80 84 90 90 91%1----+600µm 43 36 65 65 67%1----+1180µm 18 10 20 27 30%1----+2.36mm 12 6 5 13 17%1----+4.75mm 8 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+9.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+19.0mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+37.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+75.0mm EA150: Soil Classification based on Particle Size 6 6 5 4 5%1----Clay (<2 µm) 1 <1 <1 2 1%1----Silt (2-60 µm) 67 76 61 55 53%1----Sand (0.06-2.00 mm) 26 18 34 39 41%1----Gravel (>2mm) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----Cobbles (>6cm) EA152: Soil Particle Density 2.63 2.46 2.48 2.65 2.51g/cm30.01----Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES 120Aluminium 240 150 140 80mg/kg507429-90-5 200Iron 310 220 190 120mg/kg507439-89-6 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS <0.50Antimony <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50mg/kg0.507440-36-0 1.15Arsenic 1.33 1.21 1.25 1.08mg/kg1.007440-38-2 <0.1Cadmium <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-43-9 2.9Chromium 4.2 3.3 3.0 2.1mg/kg1.07440-47-3 <1.0Copper <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-50-8 <0.5Cobalt <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.57440-48-4 <1.0Lead <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07439-92-1 11Manganese 12 12 <10 <10mg/kg107439-96-5 19 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results B10-SED-1019B8-SED-1019B7-SED-1019B6-SED-1019B5-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-024EB1929990-022EB1929990-021EB1929990-020EB1929990-019UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS - Continued 1.0Nickel 1.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-02-0 <0.1Selenium 0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17782-49-2 <0.1Silver <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-22-4 <2.0Vanadium <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0mg/kg2.07440-62-2 1.3Zinc <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-66-6 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS 5.4Barium 6.4 6.5 6.6 4.7mg/kg0.17440-39-3 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS <0.01Mercury <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.017439-97-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds <0.5Tributyltin <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µgSn/kg0.556573-85-4 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids <0.05Bioresmethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0528434-01-07 <0.05Bifenthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0582657-04-3 <0.05Phenothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0526002-80-2 <0.05Lambda-cyhalothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568085-85-8 <0.05Permethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552645-53-1 <0.05Cyfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568359-37-5 <0.05Cypermethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552315-07-8 <0.05Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0551630-58-1/66230- 04- <0.05Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0562229-77-0/66841- 25- <0.05Allethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05584-79-2 <0.05Transfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05118712-89-3 <0.05Tetramethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.057696-12-0 <0.05Tau-fluvalinate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05102851-06-9 EP094B: Synergist <0.05Piperonyl Butoxide <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0563993-73-7 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS <0.024-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02122-88-3 <0.022.4-DB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-82-6 <0.02Dicamba <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-00-9 <0.02Mecoprop <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-65-2 20 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results B10-SED-1019B8-SED-1019B7-SED-1019B6-SED-1019B5-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-024EB1929990-022EB1929990-021EB1929990-020EB1929990-019UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS - Continued <0.02MCPA <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-74-6 <0.022.4-DP <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02120-36-5 <0.022.4-D <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-75-7 <0.02Triclopyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0255335-06-3 <0.022.4.5-TP (Silvex) <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-72-1 <0.022.4.5-T <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-76-5 <0.02MCPB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-81-5 <0.02Picloram <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-02-1 <0.02Clopyralid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021702-17-6 <0.02Fluroxypyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0269377-81-7 EP234A: OP Pesticides <0.005Azinphos-ethyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0052642-71-9 <0.005Azinphos-methyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00586-50-0 <0.005Chlorfenvinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005470-90-6 <0.002Coumaphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00256-72-4 <0.002Diazinon <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002333-41-5 <0.004Dimethoate <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00460-51-5 <0.01Disulfoton <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01298-04-4 <0.002Ethoprophos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00213194-48-4 <0.002Fenamiphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222224-92-6 <0.5Fenitrothion <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5122-14-5 <0.005Fensulfothion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005115-90-2 <0.010Fenthion <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010mg/kg0.01055-38-9 <0.005Malathion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005121-75-5 <0.005^ Mevinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0057786-34-7 <0.005Monocrotophos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0056923-22-4 <0.002Omethoate <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021113-02-6 <0.05Parathion <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0556-38-2 <0.5Parathion-methyl <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5298-00-0 <0.02Phorate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02298-02-2 <0.002Pirimiphos-methyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00229232-93-7 <0.001Sulfotep <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.0013689-24-5 <0.002Tetrachlorvinphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222248-79-9 <0.001Triazophos <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00124017-47-8 21 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results B10-SED-1019B8-SED-1019B7-SED-1019B6-SED-1019B5-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-024EB1929990-022EB1929990-021EB1929990-020EB1929990-019UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates <0.01Aldicarb <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01116-06-3 <1Bendiocarb <1 <1 <1 <1mg/kg122781-23-3 <0.005Benomyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00517804-35-2 <0.002Carbaryl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00263-25-2 <0.002Carbofuran <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021563-66-2 <0.0053-Hydroxy Carbofuran <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00516655-82-6 <0.002Methiocarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022032-65-7 <0.002Methomyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00216752-77-5 <0.02Molinate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.022212-67-1 <0.002Oxamyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00223135-22-0 <0.002Thiobencarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00228249-77-6 <0.002Thiodicarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00259669-26-0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides <0.004Hexazinone <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00451235-04-2 <0.004Metribuzin <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00421087-64-9 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides <0.004Cyproconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00494361-06-5 <0.004Flusilazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00485509-19-9 <0.004Hexaconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00479983-71-4 <0.01Paclobutrazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0176738-62-0 <0.01Propiconazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0160207-90-1 <0.002Tebuconazole <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002107534-96-3 <0.002Cyprodinil <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002121552-61-2 <0.005Pyrimethanil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00553112-28-0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides <0.005Diuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005330-54-1 <0.002Fluometuron <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022164-17-2 <0.005Tebuthiuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00534014-18-1 <0.005Bromacil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005314-40-9 EP234G: Chloracetanilides <0.002Metolachlor <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00251218-45-2 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides <0.002Ametryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002834-12-8 <0.002Atrazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021912-24-9 22 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results B10-SED-1019B8-SED-1019B7-SED-1019B6-SED-1019B5-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-024EB1929990-022EB1929990-021EB1929990-020EB1929990-019UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234H: Triazine Herbicides - Continued <0.005Cyanazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00521725-46-2 <0.002Prometryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0027287-19-6 <0.002Propazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002139-40-2 <0.005Simazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005122-34-9 <0.002Terbuthylazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0025915-41-3 <0.1Terbutryn <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.1886-50-0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides <0.005Fenarimol <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00560168-88-9 <0.001Irgarol <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00128159-98-0 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 98.7 196 66.4 90.1 41.6%0.5----Tripropyltin EP094S: Pesticide Surrogate 87.6DEF 89.9 87.4 87.2 96.3%0.0578-48-8 EP202S: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicide Surrogate 52.52.4-Dichlorophenyl Acetic Acid 58.2 55.9 55.2 55.3%0.0219719-28-9 23 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results B15-SED-1019B14-SED-1019B13-SED-1019B12-SED-1019B11-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 04-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-029EB1929990-028EB1929990-027EB1929990-026EB1929990-025UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) 30.5 30.6 32.0 28.5 28.0%1.0----Moisture Content EA150: Particle Sizing 94 94 92 94 88%1----+75µm 94 94 92 94 87%1----+150µm 93 93 91 94 86%1----+300µm 91 92 90 92 86%1----+425µm 87 88 87 89 84%1----+600µm 57 62 61 63 71%1----+1180µm 15 19 26 25 46%1----+2.36mm 2 3 12 11 31%1----+4.75mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+9.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+19.0mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+37.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+75.0mm EA150: Soil Classification based on Particle Size 6 5 5 5 8%1----Clay (<2 µm) <1 1 3 1 4%1----Silt (2-60 µm) 67 62 55 57 34%1----Sand (0.06-2.00 mm) 27 32 37 37 54%1----Gravel (>2mm) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----Cobbles (>6cm) EA152: Soil Particle Density 2.67 2.75 2.71 2.68 2.68g/cm30.01----Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES 130Aluminium 180 120 140 160mg/kg507429-90-5 200Iron 240 150 210 220mg/kg507439-89-6 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS <0.50Antimony <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50mg/kg0.507440-36-0 1.12Arsenic 1.29 1.46 1.31 1.38mg/kg1.007440-38-2 <0.1Cadmium <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-43-9 3.0Chromium 3.7 2.5 3.1 3.2mg/kg1.07440-47-3 <1.0Copper <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-50-8 <0.5Cobalt <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.57440-48-4 <1.0Lead <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07439-92-1 10Manganese 10 <10 <10 12mg/kg107439-96-5 24 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results B15-SED-1019B14-SED-1019B13-SED-1019B12-SED-1019B11-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 04-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-029EB1929990-028EB1929990-027EB1929990-026EB1929990-025UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS - Continued <1.0Nickel <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-02-0 <0.1Selenium <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17782-49-2 <0.1Silver <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-22-4 <2.0Vanadium <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0mg/kg2.07440-62-2 <1.0Zinc <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-66-6 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS 9.0Barium 7.8 7.1 5.6 7.3mg/kg0.17440-39-3 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS <0.01Mercury <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.017439-97-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds <0.5Tributyltin <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µgSn/kg0.556573-85-4 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids <0.05Bioresmethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0528434-01-07 <0.05Bifenthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0582657-04-3 <0.05Phenothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0526002-80-2 <0.05Lambda-cyhalothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568085-85-8 <0.05Permethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552645-53-1 <0.05Cyfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568359-37-5 <0.05Cypermethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552315-07-8 <0.05Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0551630-58-1/66230- 04- <0.05Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0562229-77-0/66841- 25- <0.05Allethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05584-79-2 <0.05Transfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05118712-89-3 <0.05Tetramethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.057696-12-0 <0.05Tau-fluvalinate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05102851-06-9 EP094B: Synergist <0.05Piperonyl Butoxide <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0563993-73-7 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS <0.024-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02122-88-3 <0.022.4-DB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-82-6 <0.02Dicamba <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-00-9 <0.02Mecoprop <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-65-2 25 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results B15-SED-1019B14-SED-1019B13-SED-1019B12-SED-1019B11-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 04-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-029EB1929990-028EB1929990-027EB1929990-026EB1929990-025UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS - Continued <0.02MCPA <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-74-6 <0.022.4-DP <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02120-36-5 <0.022.4-D <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-75-7 <0.02Triclopyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0255335-06-3 <0.022.4.5-TP (Silvex) <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-72-1 <0.022.4.5-T <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-76-5 <0.02MCPB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-81-5 <0.02Picloram <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-02-1 <0.02Clopyralid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021702-17-6 <0.02Fluroxypyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0269377-81-7 EP234A: OP Pesticides <0.005Azinphos-ethyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0052642-71-9 <0.005Azinphos-methyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00586-50-0 <0.005Chlorfenvinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005470-90-6 <0.002Coumaphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00256-72-4 <0.002Diazinon <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002333-41-5 <0.004Dimethoate <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00460-51-5 <0.01Disulfoton <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01298-04-4 <0.002Ethoprophos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00213194-48-4 <0.002Fenamiphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222224-92-6 <0.5Fenitrothion <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5122-14-5 <0.005Fensulfothion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005115-90-2 <0.010Fenthion <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010mg/kg0.01055-38-9 <0.005Malathion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005121-75-5 <0.005^ Mevinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0057786-34-7 <0.005Monocrotophos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0056923-22-4 <0.002Omethoate <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021113-02-6 <0.05Parathion <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0556-38-2 <0.5Parathion-methyl <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5298-00-0 <0.02Phorate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02298-02-2 <0.002Pirimiphos-methyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00229232-93-7 <0.001Sulfotep <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.0013689-24-5 <0.002Tetrachlorvinphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222248-79-9 <0.001Triazophos <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00124017-47-8 26 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results B15-SED-1019B14-SED-1019B13-SED-1019B12-SED-1019B11-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 04-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-029EB1929990-028EB1929990-027EB1929990-026EB1929990-025UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates <0.01Aldicarb <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01116-06-3 <1Bendiocarb <1 <1 <1 <1mg/kg122781-23-3 <0.005Benomyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00517804-35-2 <0.002Carbaryl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00263-25-2 <0.002Carbofuran <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021563-66-2 <0.0053-Hydroxy Carbofuran <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00516655-82-6 <0.002Methiocarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022032-65-7 <0.002Methomyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00216752-77-5 <0.02Molinate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.022212-67-1 <0.002Oxamyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00223135-22-0 <0.002Thiobencarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00228249-77-6 <0.002Thiodicarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00259669-26-0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides <0.004Hexazinone <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00451235-04-2 <0.004Metribuzin <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00421087-64-9 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides <0.004Cyproconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00494361-06-5 <0.004Flusilazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00485509-19-9 <0.004Hexaconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00479983-71-4 <0.01Paclobutrazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0176738-62-0 <0.01Propiconazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0160207-90-1 <0.002Tebuconazole <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002107534-96-3 <0.002Cyprodinil <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002121552-61-2 <0.005Pyrimethanil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00553112-28-0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides <0.005Diuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005330-54-1 <0.002Fluometuron <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022164-17-2 <0.005Tebuthiuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00534014-18-1 <0.005Bromacil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005314-40-9 EP234G: Chloracetanilides <0.002Metolachlor <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00251218-45-2 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides <0.002Ametryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002834-12-8 <0.002Atrazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021912-24-9 27 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results B15-SED-1019B14-SED-1019B13-SED-1019B12-SED-1019B11-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 04-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-029EB1929990-028EB1929990-027EB1929990-026EB1929990-025UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234H: Triazine Herbicides - Continued <0.005Cyanazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00521725-46-2 <0.002Prometryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0027287-19-6 <0.002Propazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002139-40-2 <0.005Simazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005122-34-9 <0.002Terbuthylazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0025915-41-3 <0.1Terbutryn <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.1886-50-0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides <0.005Fenarimol <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00560168-88-9 <0.001Irgarol <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00128159-98-0 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 108 35.4 82.0 94.4 93.3%0.5----Tripropyltin EP094S: Pesticide Surrogate 94.0DEF 97.6 58.7 80.2 92.2%0.0578-48-8 EP202S: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicide Surrogate 85.52.4-Dichlorophenyl Acetic Acid 65.6 61.8 83.8 58.8%0.0219719-28-9 28 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results D4-SED-1019D3-SED-1019D2-SED-1019D1-SED-1019B16-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 04-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-034EB1929990-033EB1929990-032EB1929990-031EB1929990-030UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) 25.3 32.5 35.4 32.1 31.0%1.0----Moisture Content EA150: Particle Sizing 91 94 93 98 98%1----+75µm 91 94 93 98 98%1----+150µm 90 93 92 98 98%1----+300µm 90 92 91 97 97%1----+425µm 88 90 85 95 88%1----+600µm 75 64 51 63 48%1----+1180µm 46 26 23 26 18%1----+2.36mm 24 9 13 12 6%1----+4.75mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+9.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+19.0mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+37.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+75.0mm EA150: Soil Classification based on Particle Size 6 5 6 2 1%1----Clay (<2 µm) 3 1 1 <1 1%1----Silt (2-60 µm) 36 56 62 61 71%1----Sand (0.06-2.00 mm) 55 38 31 37 27%1----Gravel (>2mm) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----Cobbles (>6cm) EA152: Soil Particle Density 2.77 2.68 2.66 2.68 2.65g/cm30.01----Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES 110Aluminium 190 210 310 110mg/kg507429-90-5 180Iron 240 260 320 180mg/kg507439-89-6 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS <0.50Antimony <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50mg/kg0.507440-36-0 1.05Arsenic 1.16 1.17 1.34 1.46mg/kg1.007440-38-2 <0.1Cadmium <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-43-9 2.6Chromium 3.1 3.2 3.7 3.3mg/kg1.07440-47-3 <1.0Copper <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-50-8 <0.5Cobalt <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.57440-48-4 <1.0Lead <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07439-92-1 <10Manganese <10 11 13 11mg/kg107439-96-5 29 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results D4-SED-1019D3-SED-1019D2-SED-1019D1-SED-1019B16-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 04-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-034EB1929990-033EB1929990-032EB1929990-031EB1929990-030UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS - Continued <1.0Nickel <1.0 <1.0 1.1 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-02-0 <0.1Selenium 0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17782-49-2 <0.1Silver <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-22-4 <2.0Vanadium <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0mg/kg2.07440-62-2 <1.0Zinc <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-66-6 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS 5.0Barium 7.4 6.6 7.2 7.4mg/kg0.17440-39-3 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS <0.01Mercury <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.017439-97-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds <0.5Tributyltin <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µgSn/kg0.556573-85-4 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids <0.05Bioresmethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0528434-01-07 <0.05Bifenthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0582657-04-3 <0.05Phenothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0526002-80-2 <0.05Lambda-cyhalothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568085-85-8 <0.05Permethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552645-53-1 <0.05Cyfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568359-37-5 <0.05Cypermethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552315-07-8 <0.05Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0551630-58-1/66230- 04- <0.05Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0562229-77-0/66841- 25- <0.05Allethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05584-79-2 <0.05Transfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05118712-89-3 <0.05Tetramethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.057696-12-0 <0.05Tau-fluvalinate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05102851-06-9 EP094B: Synergist <0.05Piperonyl Butoxide <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0563993-73-7 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS <0.024-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02122-88-3 <0.022.4-DB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-82-6 <0.02Dicamba <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-00-9 <0.02Mecoprop <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-65-2 30 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results D4-SED-1019D3-SED-1019D2-SED-1019D1-SED-1019B16-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 04-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-034EB1929990-033EB1929990-032EB1929990-031EB1929990-030UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS - Continued <0.02MCPA <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-74-6 <0.022.4-DP <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02120-36-5 <0.022.4-D <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-75-7 <0.02Triclopyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0255335-06-3 <0.022.4.5-TP (Silvex) <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-72-1 <0.022.4.5-T <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-76-5 <0.02MCPB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-81-5 <0.02Picloram <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-02-1 <0.02Clopyralid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021702-17-6 <0.02Fluroxypyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0269377-81-7 EP234A: OP Pesticides <0.005Azinphos-ethyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0052642-71-9 <0.005Azinphos-methyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00586-50-0 <0.005Chlorfenvinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005470-90-6 <0.002Coumaphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00256-72-4 <0.002Diazinon <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002333-41-5 <0.004Dimethoate <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00460-51-5 <0.01Disulfoton <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01298-04-4 <0.002Ethoprophos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00213194-48-4 <0.002Fenamiphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222224-92-6 <0.5Fenitrothion <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5122-14-5 <0.005Fensulfothion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005115-90-2 <0.010Fenthion <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010mg/kg0.01055-38-9 <0.005Malathion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005121-75-5 <0.005^ Mevinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0057786-34-7 <0.005Monocrotophos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0056923-22-4 <0.002Omethoate <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021113-02-6 <0.05Parathion <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0556-38-2 <0.5Parathion-methyl <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5298-00-0 <0.02Phorate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02298-02-2 <0.002Pirimiphos-methyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00229232-93-7 <0.001Sulfotep <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.0013689-24-5 <0.002Tetrachlorvinphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222248-79-9 <0.001Triazophos <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00124017-47-8 31 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results D4-SED-1019D3-SED-1019D2-SED-1019D1-SED-1019B16-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 04-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-034EB1929990-033EB1929990-032EB1929990-031EB1929990-030UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates <0.01Aldicarb <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01116-06-3 <1Bendiocarb <1 <1 <1 <1mg/kg122781-23-3 <0.005Benomyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00517804-35-2 <0.002Carbaryl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00263-25-2 <0.002Carbofuran <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021563-66-2 <0.0053-Hydroxy Carbofuran <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00516655-82-6 <0.002Methiocarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022032-65-7 <0.002Methomyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00216752-77-5 <0.02Molinate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.022212-67-1 <0.002Oxamyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00223135-22-0 <0.002Thiobencarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00228249-77-6 <0.002Thiodicarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00259669-26-0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides <0.004Hexazinone <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00451235-04-2 <0.004Metribuzin <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00421087-64-9 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides <0.004Cyproconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00494361-06-5 <0.004Flusilazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00485509-19-9 <0.004Hexaconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00479983-71-4 <0.01Paclobutrazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0176738-62-0 <0.01Propiconazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0160207-90-1 <0.002Tebuconazole <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002107534-96-3 <0.002Cyprodinil <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002121552-61-2 <0.005Pyrimethanil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00553112-28-0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides <0.005Diuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005330-54-1 <0.002Fluometuron <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022164-17-2 <0.005Tebuthiuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00534014-18-1 <0.005Bromacil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005314-40-9 EP234G: Chloracetanilides <0.002Metolachlor <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00251218-45-2 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides <0.002Ametryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002834-12-8 <0.002Atrazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021912-24-9 32 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results D4-SED-1019D3-SED-1019D2-SED-1019D1-SED-1019B16-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 04-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-034EB1929990-033EB1929990-032EB1929990-031EB1929990-030UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234H: Triazine Herbicides - Continued <0.005Cyanazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00521725-46-2 <0.002Prometryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0027287-19-6 <0.002Propazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002139-40-2 <0.005Simazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005122-34-9 <0.002Terbuthylazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0025915-41-3 <0.1Terbutryn <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.1886-50-0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides <0.005Fenarimol <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00560168-88-9 <0.001Irgarol <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00128159-98-0 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 113 100 72.0 82.1 92.4%0.5----Tripropyltin EP094S: Pesticide Surrogate 75.8DEF 91.2 91.6 91.4 85.9%0.0578-48-8 EP202S: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicide Surrogate 81.32.4-Dichlorophenyl Acetic Acid 58.4 73.1 64.6 65.3%0.0219719-28-9 33 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results D9-SED-1019D8-SED-1019D7-SED-1019D6-SED-1019D5-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 04-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-039EB1929990-038EB1929990-037EB1929990-036EB1929990-035UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) 34.4 33.4 34.8 34.2 33.7%1.0----Moisture Content EA150: Particle Sizing 97 98 98 97 98%1----+75µm 97 97 98 97 98%1----+150µm 97 97 98 97 98%1----+300µm 96 95 97 97 97%1----+425µm 91 89 95 94 93%1----+600µm 48 55 63 63 48%1----+1180µm 20 23 27 26 17%1----+2.36mm 10 11 12 11 7%1----+4.75mm <1 6 <1 2 4%1----+9.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+19.0mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+37.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+75.0mm EA150: Soil Classification based on Particle Size 3 2 1 3 2%1----Clay (<2 µm) <1 <1 1 <1 <1%1----Silt (2-60 µm) 68 65 60 60 72%1----Sand (0.06-2.00 mm) 29 33 38 37 26%1----Gravel (>2mm) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----Cobbles (>6cm) EA152: Soil Particle Density 2.67 2.65 2.71 2.58 2.63g/cm30.01----Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES 210Aluminium 150 130 100 150mg/kg507429-90-5 280Iron 220 150 140 200mg/kg507439-89-6 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS <0.50Antimony <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50mg/kg0.507440-36-0 1.50Arsenic 1.28 1.14 1.08 1.21mg/kg1.007440-38-2 <0.1Cadmium <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-43-9 3.6Chromium 3.4 3.7 2.9 3.7mg/kg1.07440-47-3 <1.0Copper <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-50-8 <0.5Cobalt <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.57440-48-4 <1.0Lead <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07439-92-1 12Manganese 10 11 10 10mg/kg107439-96-5 34 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results D9-SED-1019D8-SED-1019D7-SED-1019D6-SED-1019D5-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 04-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-039EB1929990-038EB1929990-037EB1929990-036EB1929990-035UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS - Continued <1.0Nickel <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-02-0 <0.1Selenium <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17782-49-2 <0.1Silver <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-22-4 <2.0Vanadium <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0mg/kg2.07440-62-2 <1.0Zinc <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-66-6 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS 8.1Barium 5.3 7.5 7.0 5.4mg/kg0.17440-39-3 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS <0.01Mercury <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.017439-97-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds <0.5Tributyltin <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µgSn/kg0.556573-85-4 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids <0.05Bioresmethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0528434-01-07 <0.05Bifenthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0582657-04-3 <0.05Phenothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0526002-80-2 <0.05Lambda-cyhalothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568085-85-8 <0.05Permethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552645-53-1 <0.05Cyfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568359-37-5 <0.05Cypermethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552315-07-8 <0.05Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0551630-58-1/66230- 04- <0.05Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0562229-77-0/66841- 25- <0.05Allethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05584-79-2 <0.05Transfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05118712-89-3 <0.05Tetramethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.057696-12-0 <0.05Tau-fluvalinate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05102851-06-9 EP094B: Synergist <0.05Piperonyl Butoxide <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0563993-73-7 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS <0.024-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02122-88-3 <0.022.4-DB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-82-6 <0.02Dicamba <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-00-9 <0.02Mecoprop <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-65-2 35 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results D9-SED-1019D8-SED-1019D7-SED-1019D6-SED-1019D5-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 04-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-039EB1929990-038EB1929990-037EB1929990-036EB1929990-035UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS - Continued <0.02MCPA <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-74-6 <0.022.4-DP <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02120-36-5 <0.022.4-D <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-75-7 <0.02Triclopyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0255335-06-3 <0.022.4.5-TP (Silvex) <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-72-1 <0.022.4.5-T <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-76-5 <0.02MCPB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-81-5 <0.02Picloram <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-02-1 <0.02Clopyralid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021702-17-6 <0.02Fluroxypyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0269377-81-7 EP234A: OP Pesticides <0.005Azinphos-ethyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0052642-71-9 <0.005Azinphos-methyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00586-50-0 <0.005Chlorfenvinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005470-90-6 <0.002Coumaphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00256-72-4 <0.002Diazinon <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002333-41-5 <0.004Dimethoate <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00460-51-5 <0.01Disulfoton <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01298-04-4 <0.002Ethoprophos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00213194-48-4 <0.002Fenamiphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222224-92-6 <0.5Fenitrothion <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5122-14-5 <0.005Fensulfothion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005115-90-2 <0.010Fenthion <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010mg/kg0.01055-38-9 <0.005Malathion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005121-75-5 <0.005^ Mevinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0057786-34-7 <0.005Monocrotophos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0056923-22-4 <0.002Omethoate <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021113-02-6 <0.05Parathion <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0556-38-2 <0.5Parathion-methyl <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5298-00-0 <0.02Phorate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02298-02-2 <0.002Pirimiphos-methyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00229232-93-7 <0.001Sulfotep <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.0013689-24-5 <0.002Tetrachlorvinphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222248-79-9 <0.001Triazophos <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00124017-47-8 36 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results D9-SED-1019D8-SED-1019D7-SED-1019D6-SED-1019D5-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 04-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-039EB1929990-038EB1929990-037EB1929990-036EB1929990-035UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates <0.01Aldicarb <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01116-06-3 <1Bendiocarb <1 <1 <1 <1mg/kg122781-23-3 <0.005Benomyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00517804-35-2 <0.002Carbaryl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00263-25-2 <0.002Carbofuran <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021563-66-2 <0.0053-Hydroxy Carbofuran <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00516655-82-6 <0.002Methiocarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022032-65-7 <0.002Methomyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00216752-77-5 <0.02Molinate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.022212-67-1 <0.002Oxamyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00223135-22-0 <0.002Thiobencarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00228249-77-6 <0.002Thiodicarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00259669-26-0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides <0.004Hexazinone <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00451235-04-2 <0.004Metribuzin <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00421087-64-9 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides <0.004Cyproconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00494361-06-5 <0.004Flusilazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00485509-19-9 <0.004Hexaconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00479983-71-4 <0.01Paclobutrazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0176738-62-0 <0.01Propiconazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0160207-90-1 <0.002Tebuconazole <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002107534-96-3 <0.002Cyprodinil <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002121552-61-2 <0.005Pyrimethanil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00553112-28-0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides <0.005Diuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005330-54-1 <0.002Fluometuron <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022164-17-2 <0.005Tebuthiuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00534014-18-1 <0.005Bromacil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005314-40-9 EP234G: Chloracetanilides <0.002Metolachlor <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00251218-45-2 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides <0.002Ametryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002834-12-8 <0.002Atrazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021912-24-9 37 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results D9-SED-1019D8-SED-1019D7-SED-1019D6-SED-1019D5-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 04-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-039EB1929990-038EB1929990-037EB1929990-036EB1929990-035UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234H: Triazine Herbicides - Continued <0.005Cyanazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00521725-46-2 <0.002Prometryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0027287-19-6 <0.002Propazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002139-40-2 <0.005Simazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005122-34-9 <0.002Terbuthylazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0025915-41-3 <0.1Terbutryn <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.1886-50-0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides <0.005Fenarimol <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00560168-88-9 <0.001Irgarol <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00128159-98-0 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 80.4 114 93.9 89.2 74.4%0.5----Tripropyltin EP094S: Pesticide Surrogate 89.0DEF 89.9 109 116 100%0.0578-48-8 EP202S: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicide Surrogate 75.72.4-Dichlorophenyl Acetic Acid 81.4 59.1 68.4 60.8%0.0219719-28-9 38 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results G2-SED-1019G1-SED-1019D12-SED-1019D11-SED-1019D10-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 06-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-044EB1929990-043EB1929990-042EB1929990-041EB1929990-040UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) 34.5 29.8 34.6 31.3 33.3%1.0----Moisture Content EA150: Particle Sizing 98 97 98 98 98%1----+75µm 98 97 97 98 98%1----+150µm 98 97 97 97 98%1----+300µm 97 96 97 96 96%1----+425µm 94 91 91 91 84%1----+600µm 62 51 54 57 33%1----+1180µm 27 24 28 22 5%1----+2.36mm 13 13 18 6 <1%1----+4.75mm 2 4 4 <1 <1%1----+9.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+19.0mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+37.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+75.0mm EA150: Soil Classification based on Particle Size 2 3 2 2 2%1----Clay (<2 µm) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----Silt (2-60 µm) 60 65 62 65 84%1----Sand (0.06-2.00 mm) 38 32 36 33 14%1----Gravel (>2mm) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----Cobbles (>6cm) EA152: Soil Particle Density 2.66 2.72 2.70 2.70 2.72g/cm30.01----Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES 130Aluminium 190 120 160 160mg/kg507429-90-5 170Iron 260 170 210 230mg/kg507439-89-6 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS <0.50Antimony <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50mg/kg0.507440-36-0 1.04Arsenic 1.41 1.10 <1.00 1.33mg/kg1.007440-38-2 <0.1Cadmium <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-43-9 3.0Chromium 4.3 3.0 3.5 4.2mg/kg1.07440-47-3 <1.0Copper <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-50-8 <0.5Cobalt <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.57440-48-4 <1.0Lead <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07439-92-1 10Manganese 12 10 <10 11mg/kg107439-96-5 39 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results G2-SED-1019G1-SED-1019D12-SED-1019D11-SED-1019D10-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 06-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-044EB1929990-043EB1929990-042EB1929990-041EB1929990-040UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS - Continued <1.0Nickel 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-02-0 <0.1Selenium 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17782-49-2 <0.1Silver <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-22-4 <2.0Vanadium <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0mg/kg2.07440-62-2 <1.0Zinc <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-66-6 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS 6.1Barium 6.0 5.2 6.0 7.0mg/kg0.17440-39-3 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS <0.01Mercury <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.017439-97-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds <0.5Tributyltin <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µgSn/kg0.556573-85-4 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids <0.05Bioresmethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0528434-01-07 <0.05Bifenthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0582657-04-3 <0.05Phenothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0526002-80-2 <0.05Lambda-cyhalothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568085-85-8 <0.05Permethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552645-53-1 <0.05Cyfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568359-37-5 <0.05Cypermethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552315-07-8 <0.05Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0551630-58-1/66230- 04- <0.05Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0562229-77-0/66841- 25- <0.05Allethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05584-79-2 <0.05Transfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05118712-89-3 <0.05Tetramethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.057696-12-0 <0.05Tau-fluvalinate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05102851-06-9 EP094B: Synergist <0.05Piperonyl Butoxide <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0563993-73-7 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS <0.024-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02122-88-3 <0.022.4-DB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-82-6 <0.02Dicamba <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-00-9 <0.02Mecoprop <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-65-2 40 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results G2-SED-1019G1-SED-1019D12-SED-1019D11-SED-1019D10-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 06-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-044EB1929990-043EB1929990-042EB1929990-041EB1929990-040UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS - Continued <0.02MCPA <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-74-6 <0.022.4-DP <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02120-36-5 <0.022.4-D <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-75-7 <0.02Triclopyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0255335-06-3 <0.022.4.5-TP (Silvex) <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-72-1 <0.022.4.5-T <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-76-5 <0.02MCPB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-81-5 <0.02Picloram <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-02-1 <0.02Clopyralid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021702-17-6 <0.02Fluroxypyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0269377-81-7 EP234A: OP Pesticides <0.005Azinphos-ethyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0052642-71-9 <0.005Azinphos-methyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00586-50-0 <0.005Chlorfenvinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005470-90-6 <0.002Coumaphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00256-72-4 <0.002Diazinon <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002333-41-5 <0.004Dimethoate <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00460-51-5 <0.01Disulfoton <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01298-04-4 <0.002Ethoprophos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00213194-48-4 <0.002Fenamiphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222224-92-6 <0.5Fenitrothion <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5122-14-5 <0.005Fensulfothion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005115-90-2 <0.010Fenthion <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010mg/kg0.01055-38-9 <0.005Malathion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005121-75-5 <0.005^ Mevinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0057786-34-7 <0.005Monocrotophos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0056923-22-4 <0.002Omethoate <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021113-02-6 <0.05Parathion <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0556-38-2 <0.5Parathion-methyl <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5298-00-0 <0.02Phorate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02298-02-2 <0.002Pirimiphos-methyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00229232-93-7 <0.001Sulfotep <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.0013689-24-5 <0.002Tetrachlorvinphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222248-79-9 <0.001Triazophos <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00124017-47-8 41 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results G2-SED-1019G1-SED-1019D12-SED-1019D11-SED-1019D10-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 06-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-044EB1929990-043EB1929990-042EB1929990-041EB1929990-040UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates <0.01Aldicarb <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01116-06-3 <1Bendiocarb <1 <1 <1 <1mg/kg122781-23-3 <0.005Benomyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00517804-35-2 <0.002Carbaryl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00263-25-2 <0.002Carbofuran <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021563-66-2 <0.0053-Hydroxy Carbofuran <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00516655-82-6 <0.002Methiocarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022032-65-7 <0.002Methomyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00216752-77-5 <0.02Molinate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.022212-67-1 <0.002Oxamyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00223135-22-0 <0.002Thiobencarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00228249-77-6 <0.002Thiodicarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00259669-26-0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides <0.004Hexazinone <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00451235-04-2 <0.004Metribuzin <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00421087-64-9 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides <0.004Cyproconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00494361-06-5 <0.004Flusilazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00485509-19-9 <0.004Hexaconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00479983-71-4 <0.01Paclobutrazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0176738-62-0 <0.01Propiconazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0160207-90-1 <0.002Tebuconazole <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002107534-96-3 <0.002Cyprodinil <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002121552-61-2 <0.005Pyrimethanil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00553112-28-0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides <0.005Diuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005330-54-1 <0.002Fluometuron <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022164-17-2 <0.005Tebuthiuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00534014-18-1 <0.005Bromacil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005314-40-9 EP234G: Chloracetanilides <0.002Metolachlor <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00251218-45-2 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides <0.002Ametryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002834-12-8 <0.002Atrazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021912-24-9 42 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results G2-SED-1019G1-SED-1019D12-SED-1019D11-SED-1019D10-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 06-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:0004-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-044EB1929990-043EB1929990-042EB1929990-041EB1929990-040UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234H: Triazine Herbicides - Continued <0.005Cyanazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00521725-46-2 <0.002Prometryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0027287-19-6 <0.002Propazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002139-40-2 <0.005Simazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005122-34-9 <0.002Terbuthylazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0025915-41-3 <0.1Terbutryn <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.1886-50-0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides <0.005Fenarimol <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00560168-88-9 <0.001Irgarol <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00128159-98-0 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 94.0 84.0 73.0 84.7 93.7%0.5----Tripropyltin EP094S: Pesticide Surrogate 108DEF 58.8 91.4 102 99.5%0.0578-48-8 EP202S: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicide Surrogate 63.22.4-Dichlorophenyl Acetic Acid 64.8 60.2 51.0 66.4%0.0219719-28-9 43 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results G8-SED-1019G7-SED-1019G6-SED-1019G4-SED-1019G3-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 06-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-049EB1929990-048EB1929990-047EB1929990-046EB1929990-045UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) 31.2 31.7 27.4 33.9 32.4%1.0----Moisture Content EA150: Particle Sizing 98 98 98 97 98%1----+75µm 97 98 98 97 98%1----+150µm 97 98 97 97 98%1----+300µm 96 97 93 96 97%1----+425µm 93 95 81 93 93%1----+600µm 63 64 42 67 60%1----+1180µm 20 20 18 27 25%1----+2.36mm 6 11 9 12 10%1----+4.75mm 2 5 <1 <1 <1%1----+9.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+19.0mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+37.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+75.0mm EA150: Soil Classification based on Particle Size 3 2 2 3 2%1----Clay (<2 µm) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----Silt (2-60 µm) 64 65 73 58 62%1----Sand (0.06-2.00 mm) 33 33 25 39 36%1----Gravel (>2mm) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----Cobbles (>6cm) EA152: Soil Particle Density 2.66 2.82 2.73 2.61 2.61g/cm30.01----Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES 170Aluminium 330 210 120 140mg/kg507429-90-5 210Iron 320 260 170 200mg/kg507439-89-6 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS <0.50Antimony <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50mg/kg0.507440-36-0 <1.00Arsenic 1.05 <1.00 1.10 1.11mg/kg1.007440-38-2 <0.1Cadmium <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-43-9 3.0Chromium 4.5 3.8 2.9 2.8mg/kg1.07440-47-3 <1.0Copper <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-50-8 <0.5Cobalt <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.57440-48-4 <1.0Lead <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07439-92-1 11Manganese 13 <10 <10 <10mg/kg107439-96-5 44 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results G8-SED-1019G7-SED-1019G6-SED-1019G4-SED-1019G3-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 06-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-049EB1929990-048EB1929990-047EB1929990-046EB1929990-045UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS - Continued <1.0Nickel 1.2 <1.0 1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-02-0 <0.1Selenium <0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17782-49-2 <0.1Silver <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-22-4 <2.0Vanadium <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0mg/kg2.07440-62-2 <1.0Zinc <1.0 <1.0 1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-66-6 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS 5.3Barium 6.6 6.4 5.8 7.1mg/kg0.17440-39-3 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS <0.01Mercury <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.017439-97-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds <0.5Tributyltin <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µgSn/kg0.556573-85-4 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids <0.05Bioresmethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0528434-01-07 <0.05Bifenthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0582657-04-3 <0.05Phenothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0526002-80-2 <0.05Lambda-cyhalothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568085-85-8 <0.05Permethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552645-53-1 <0.05Cyfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568359-37-5 <0.05Cypermethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552315-07-8 <0.05Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0551630-58-1/66230- 04- <0.05Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0562229-77-0/66841- 25- <0.05Allethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05584-79-2 <0.05Transfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05118712-89-3 <0.05Tetramethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.057696-12-0 <0.05Tau-fluvalinate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05102851-06-9 EP094B: Synergist <0.05Piperonyl Butoxide <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0563993-73-7 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS <0.024-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02122-88-3 <0.022.4-DB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-82-6 <0.02Dicamba <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-00-9 <0.02Mecoprop <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-65-2 45 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results G8-SED-1019G7-SED-1019G6-SED-1019G4-SED-1019G3-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 06-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-049EB1929990-048EB1929990-047EB1929990-046EB1929990-045UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS - Continued <0.02MCPA <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-74-6 <0.022.4-DP <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02120-36-5 <0.022.4-D <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-75-7 <0.02Triclopyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0255335-06-3 <0.022.4.5-TP (Silvex) <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-72-1 <0.022.4.5-T <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-76-5 <0.02MCPB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-81-5 <0.02Picloram <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-02-1 <0.02Clopyralid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021702-17-6 <0.02Fluroxypyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0269377-81-7 EP234A: OP Pesticides <0.005Azinphos-ethyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0052642-71-9 <0.005Azinphos-methyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00586-50-0 <0.005Chlorfenvinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005470-90-6 <0.002Coumaphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00256-72-4 <0.002Diazinon <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002333-41-5 <0.004Dimethoate <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00460-51-5 <0.01Disulfoton <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01298-04-4 <0.002Ethoprophos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00213194-48-4 <0.002Fenamiphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222224-92-6 <0.5Fenitrothion <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5122-14-5 <0.005Fensulfothion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005115-90-2 <0.010Fenthion <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010mg/kg0.01055-38-9 <0.005Malathion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005121-75-5 <0.005^ Mevinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0057786-34-7 <0.005Monocrotophos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0056923-22-4 <0.002Omethoate <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021113-02-6 <0.05Parathion <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0556-38-2 <0.5Parathion-methyl <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5298-00-0 <0.02Phorate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02298-02-2 <0.002Pirimiphos-methyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00229232-93-7 <0.001Sulfotep <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.0013689-24-5 <0.002Tetrachlorvinphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222248-79-9 <0.001Triazophos <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00124017-47-8 46 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results G8-SED-1019G7-SED-1019G6-SED-1019G4-SED-1019G3-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 06-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-049EB1929990-048EB1929990-047EB1929990-046EB1929990-045UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates <0.01Aldicarb <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01116-06-3 <1Bendiocarb <1 <1 <1 <1mg/kg122781-23-3 <0.005Benomyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00517804-35-2 <0.002Carbaryl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00263-25-2 <0.002Carbofuran <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021563-66-2 <0.0053-Hydroxy Carbofuran <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00516655-82-6 <0.002Methiocarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022032-65-7 <0.002Methomyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00216752-77-5 <0.02Molinate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.022212-67-1 <0.002Oxamyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00223135-22-0 <0.002Thiobencarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00228249-77-6 <0.002Thiodicarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00259669-26-0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides <0.004Hexazinone <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00451235-04-2 <0.004Metribuzin <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00421087-64-9 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides <0.004Cyproconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00494361-06-5 <0.004Flusilazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00485509-19-9 <0.004Hexaconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00479983-71-4 <0.01Paclobutrazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0176738-62-0 <0.01Propiconazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0160207-90-1 <0.002Tebuconazole <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002107534-96-3 <0.002Cyprodinil <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002121552-61-2 <0.005Pyrimethanil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00553112-28-0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides <0.005Diuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005330-54-1 <0.002Fluometuron <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022164-17-2 <0.005Tebuthiuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00534014-18-1 <0.005Bromacil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005314-40-9 EP234G: Chloracetanilides <0.002Metolachlor <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00251218-45-2 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides <0.002Ametryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002834-12-8 <0.002Atrazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021912-24-9 47 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results G8-SED-1019G7-SED-1019G6-SED-1019G4-SED-1019G3-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 06-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-049EB1929990-048EB1929990-047EB1929990-046EB1929990-045UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234H: Triazine Herbicides - Continued <0.005Cyanazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00521725-46-2 <0.002Prometryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0027287-19-6 <0.002Propazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002139-40-2 <0.005Simazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005122-34-9 <0.002Terbuthylazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0025915-41-3 <0.1Terbutryn <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.1886-50-0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides <0.005Fenarimol <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00560168-88-9 <0.001Irgarol <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00128159-98-0 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 53.9 79.7 74.8 68.7 64.0%0.5----Tripropyltin EP094S: Pesticide Surrogate 109DEF 96.9 104 98.6 108%0.0578-48-8 EP202S: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicide Surrogate 53.22.4-Dichlorophenyl Acetic Acid 56.5 56.0 56.1 55.1%0.0219719-28-9 48 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results E1-SED-1019G12-SED-1019G11-SED-1019G10-SED-1019G9-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 06-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-054EB1929990-053EB1929990-052EB1929990-051EB1929990-050UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) 32.3 33.8 34.0 34.4 26.6%1.0----Moisture Content EA150: Particle Sizing 98 98 98 99 98%1----+75µm 98 98 98 98 98%1----+150µm 97 98 98 98 97%1----+300µm 96 97 97 98 97%1----+425µm 91 95 91 95 95%1----+600µm 47 61 49 55 74%1----+1180µm 8 21 13 14 39%1----+2.36mm 4 7 4 3 19%1----+4.75mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+9.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+19.0mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+37.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+75.0mm EA150: Soil Classification based on Particle Size 2 2 2 1 2%1----Clay (<2 µm) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----Silt (2-60 µm) 78 65 74 73 48%1----Sand (0.06-2.00 mm) 20 33 24 26 50%1----Gravel (>2mm) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----Cobbles (>6cm) EA152: Soil Particle Density 2.67 2.79 2.65 2.69 2.71g/cm30.01----Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES 230Aluminium 140 210 170 280mg/kg507429-90-5 250Iron 180 280 230 310mg/kg507439-89-6 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS <0.50Antimony <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50mg/kg0.507440-36-0 1.04Arsenic 1.16 1.32 1.19 1.33mg/kg1.007440-38-2 <0.1Cadmium <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-43-9 4.1Chromium 4.3 4.1 3.2 5.0mg/kg1.07440-47-3 <1.0Copper <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-50-8 <0.5Cobalt <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.57440-48-4 <1.0Lead <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07439-92-1 12Manganese 13 11 12 14mg/kg107439-96-5 49 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results E1-SED-1019G12-SED-1019G11-SED-1019G10-SED-1019G9-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 06-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-054EB1929990-053EB1929990-052EB1929990-051EB1929990-050UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS - Continued <1.0Nickel <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.4mg/kg1.07440-02-0 <0.1Selenium 0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17782-49-2 <0.1Silver <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-22-4 <2.0Vanadium <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0mg/kg2.07440-62-2 <1.0Zinc <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-66-6 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS 6.5Barium 5.9 6.1 7.1 7.4mg/kg0.17440-39-3 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS <0.01Mercury <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.017439-97-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds <0.5Tributyltin <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5µgSn/kg0.556573-85-4 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids <0.05Bioresmethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0528434-01-07 <0.05Bifenthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0582657-04-3 <0.05Phenothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0526002-80-2 <0.05Lambda-cyhalothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568085-85-8 <0.05Permethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552645-53-1 <0.05Cyfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568359-37-5 <0.05Cypermethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552315-07-8 <0.05Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0551630-58-1/66230- 04- <0.05Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0562229-77-0/66841- 25- <0.05Allethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05584-79-2 <0.05Transfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05118712-89-3 <0.05Tetramethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.057696-12-0 <0.05Tau-fluvalinate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05102851-06-9 EP094B: Synergist <0.05Piperonyl Butoxide <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0563993-73-7 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS <0.024-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02122-88-3 <0.022.4-DB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-82-6 <0.02Dicamba <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-00-9 <0.02Mecoprop <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-65-2 50 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results E1-SED-1019G12-SED-1019G11-SED-1019G10-SED-1019G9-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 06-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-054EB1929990-053EB1929990-052EB1929990-051EB1929990-050UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS - Continued <0.02MCPA <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-74-6 <0.022.4-DP <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02120-36-5 <0.022.4-D <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-75-7 <0.02Triclopyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0255335-06-3 <0.022.4.5-TP (Silvex) <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-72-1 <0.022.4.5-T <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-76-5 <0.02MCPB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-81-5 <0.02Picloram <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-02-1 <0.02Clopyralid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021702-17-6 <0.02Fluroxypyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0269377-81-7 EP234A: OP Pesticides <0.005Azinphos-ethyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0052642-71-9 <0.005Azinphos-methyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00586-50-0 <0.005Chlorfenvinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005470-90-6 <0.002Coumaphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00256-72-4 <0.002Diazinon <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002333-41-5 <0.004Dimethoate <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00460-51-5 <0.01Disulfoton <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01298-04-4 <0.002Ethoprophos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00213194-48-4 <0.002Fenamiphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222224-92-6 <0.5Fenitrothion <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5122-14-5 <0.005Fensulfothion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005115-90-2 <0.010Fenthion <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010mg/kg0.01055-38-9 <0.005Malathion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005121-75-5 <0.005^ Mevinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0057786-34-7 <0.005Monocrotophos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0056923-22-4 <0.002Omethoate <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021113-02-6 <0.05Parathion <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0556-38-2 <0.5Parathion-methyl <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5298-00-0 <0.02Phorate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02298-02-2 <0.002Pirimiphos-methyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00229232-93-7 <0.001Sulfotep <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.0013689-24-5 <0.002Tetrachlorvinphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222248-79-9 <0.001Triazophos <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00124017-47-8 51 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results E1-SED-1019G12-SED-1019G11-SED-1019G10-SED-1019G9-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 06-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-054EB1929990-053EB1929990-052EB1929990-051EB1929990-050UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates <0.01Aldicarb <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01116-06-3 <1Bendiocarb <1 <1 <1 <1mg/kg122781-23-3 <0.005Benomyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00517804-35-2 <0.002Carbaryl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00263-25-2 <0.002Carbofuran <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021563-66-2 <0.0053-Hydroxy Carbofuran <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00516655-82-6 <0.002Methiocarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022032-65-7 <0.002Methomyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00216752-77-5 <0.02Molinate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.022212-67-1 <0.002Oxamyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00223135-22-0 <0.002Thiobencarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00228249-77-6 <0.002Thiodicarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00259669-26-0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides <0.004Hexazinone <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00451235-04-2 <0.004Metribuzin <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00421087-64-9 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides <0.004Cyproconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00494361-06-5 <0.004Flusilazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00485509-19-9 <0.004Hexaconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00479983-71-4 <0.01Paclobutrazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0176738-62-0 <0.01Propiconazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0160207-90-1 <0.002Tebuconazole <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002107534-96-3 <0.002Cyprodinil <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002121552-61-2 <0.005Pyrimethanil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00553112-28-0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides <0.005Diuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005330-54-1 <0.002Fluometuron <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022164-17-2 <0.005Tebuthiuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00534014-18-1 <0.005Bromacil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005314-40-9 EP234G: Chloracetanilides <0.002Metolachlor <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00251218-45-2 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides <0.002Ametryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002834-12-8 <0.002Atrazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021912-24-9 52 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results E1-SED-1019G12-SED-1019G11-SED-1019G10-SED-1019G9-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 06-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-054EB1929990-053EB1929990-052EB1929990-051EB1929990-050UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234H: Triazine Herbicides - Continued <0.005Cyanazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00521725-46-2 <0.002Prometryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0027287-19-6 <0.002Propazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002139-40-2 <0.005Simazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005122-34-9 <0.002Terbuthylazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0025915-41-3 <0.1Terbutryn <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.1886-50-0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides <0.005Fenarimol <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00560168-88-9 <0.001Irgarol <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00128159-98-0 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 31.1 76.9 81.2 78.9 98.7%0.5----Tripropyltin EP094S: Pesticide Surrogate 77.6DEF 89.9 73.2 48.8 106%0.0578-48-8 EP202S: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicide Surrogate 54.02.4-Dichlorophenyl Acetic Acid 56.0 51.2 56.3 56.8%0.0219719-28-9 53 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results E6-SED-1019E5-SED-1019E4-SED-1019E3-SED-1019E2-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 06-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-059EB1929990-058EB1929990-057EB1929990-056EB1929990-055UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) 27.0 31.0 30.4 34.2 34.2%1.0----Moisture Content EA150: Particle Sizing 98 97 98 98 98%1----+75µm 98 97 98 98 98%1----+150µm 97 97 93 98 98%1----+300µm 96 96 83 97 96%1----+425µm 89 91 67 93 87%1----+600µm 44 60 37 54 38%1----+1180µm 19 23 22 20 13%1----+2.36mm 13 8 12 8 6%1----+4.75mm 8 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+9.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+19.0mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+37.5mm <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----+75.0mm EA150: Soil Classification based on Particle Size 2 3 2 2 2%1----Clay (<2 µm) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----Silt (2-60 µm) 71 63 72 68 77%1----Sand (0.06-2.00 mm) 27 34 26 30 21%1----Gravel (>2mm) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1%1----Cobbles (>6cm) EA152: Soil Particle Density 2.71 2.66 2.69 2.64 2.71g/cm30.01----Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES 370Aluminium 290 360 360 400mg/kg507429-90-5 390Iron 280 410 400 410mg/kg507439-89-6 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS <0.50Antimony <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50mg/kg0.507440-36-0 1.23Arsenic 1.14 <1.00 1.48 1.42mg/kg1.007440-38-2 <0.1Cadmium <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-43-9 5.0Chromium 4.1 4.6 5.4 5.2mg/kg1.07440-47-3 <1.0Copper <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07440-50-8 <0.5Cobalt <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.57440-48-4 <1.0Lead <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg1.07439-92-1 14Manganese 12 12 14 16mg/kg107439-96-5 54 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results E6-SED-1019E5-SED-1019E4-SED-1019E3-SED-1019E2-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 06-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-059EB1929990-058EB1929990-057EB1929990-056EB1929990-055UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS - Continued 1.2Nickel <1.0 1.2 1.2 1.5mg/kg1.07440-02-0 <0.1Selenium <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17782-49-2 <0.1Silver <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17440-22-4 <2.0Vanadium <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0mg/kg2.07440-62-2 1.2Zinc <1.0 1.5 <1.0 1.1mg/kg1.07440-66-6 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS 5.9Barium 4.9 4.8 6.5 5.6mg/kg0.17440-39-3 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS <0.01Mercury <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.017439-97-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds <0.5Tributyltin <0.5 2.9 2.4 <0.5µgSn/kg0.556573-85-4 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids <0.05Bioresmethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0528434-01-07 <0.05Bifenthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0582657-04-3 <0.05Phenothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0526002-80-2 <0.05Lambda-cyhalothrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568085-85-8 <0.05Permethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552645-53-1 <0.05Cyfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0568359-37-5 <0.05Cypermethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0552315-07-8 <0.05Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0551630-58-1/66230- 04- <0.05Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0562229-77-0/66841- 25- <0.05Allethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05584-79-2 <0.05Transfluthrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05118712-89-3 <0.05Tetramethrin <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.057696-12-0 <0.05Tau-fluvalinate <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.05102851-06-9 EP094B: Synergist <0.05Piperonyl Butoxide <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0563993-73-7 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS <0.024-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02122-88-3 <0.022.4-DB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-82-6 <0.02Dicamba <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-00-9 <0.02Mecoprop <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-65-2 55 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results E6-SED-1019E5-SED-1019E4-SED-1019E3-SED-1019E2-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 06-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-059EB1929990-058EB1929990-057EB1929990-056EB1929990-055UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS - Continued <0.02MCPA <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-74-6 <0.022.4-DP <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02120-36-5 <0.022.4-D <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-75-7 <0.02Triclopyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0255335-06-3 <0.022.4.5-TP (Silvex) <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-72-1 <0.022.4.5-T <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0293-76-5 <0.02MCPB <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0294-81-5 <0.02Picloram <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021918-02-1 <0.02Clopyralid <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.021702-17-6 <0.02Fluroxypyr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.0269377-81-7 EP234A: OP Pesticides <0.005Azinphos-ethyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0052642-71-9 <0.005Azinphos-methyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00586-50-0 <0.005Chlorfenvinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005470-90-6 <0.002Coumaphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00256-72-4 <0.002Diazinon <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002333-41-5 <0.004Dimethoate <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00460-51-5 <0.01Disulfoton <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01298-04-4 <0.002Ethoprophos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00213194-48-4 <0.002Fenamiphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222224-92-6 <0.5Fenitrothion <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5122-14-5 <0.005Fensulfothion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005115-90-2 <0.010Fenthion <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010mg/kg0.01055-38-9 <0.005Malathion <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005121-75-5 <0.005^ Mevinphos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0057786-34-7 <0.005Monocrotophos <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.0056923-22-4 <0.002Omethoate <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021113-02-6 <0.05Parathion <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05mg/kg0.0556-38-2 <0.5Parathion-methyl <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5298-00-0 <0.02Phorate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.02298-02-2 <0.002Pirimiphos-methyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00229232-93-7 <0.001Sulfotep <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.0013689-24-5 <0.002Tetrachlorvinphos <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00222248-79-9 <0.001Triazophos <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00124017-47-8 56 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results E6-SED-1019E5-SED-1019E4-SED-1019E3-SED-1019E2-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 06-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-059EB1929990-058EB1929990-057EB1929990-056EB1929990-055UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates <0.01Aldicarb <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.01116-06-3 <1Bendiocarb <1 <1 <1 <1mg/kg122781-23-3 <0.005Benomyl <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00517804-35-2 <0.002Carbaryl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00263-25-2 <0.002Carbofuran <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021563-66-2 <0.0053-Hydroxy Carbofuran <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00516655-82-6 <0.002Methiocarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022032-65-7 <0.002Methomyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00216752-77-5 <0.02Molinate <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02mg/kg0.022212-67-1 <0.002Oxamyl <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00223135-22-0 <0.002Thiobencarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00228249-77-6 <0.002Thiodicarb <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00259669-26-0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides <0.004Hexazinone <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00451235-04-2 <0.004Metribuzin <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00421087-64-9 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides <0.004Cyproconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00494361-06-5 <0.004Flusilazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00485509-19-9 <0.004Hexaconazole <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004mg/kg0.00479983-71-4 <0.01Paclobutrazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0176738-62-0 <0.01Propiconazole <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01mg/kg0.0160207-90-1 <0.002Tebuconazole <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002107534-96-3 <0.002Cyprodinil <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002121552-61-2 <0.005Pyrimethanil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00553112-28-0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides <0.005Diuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005330-54-1 <0.002Fluometuron <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0022164-17-2 <0.005Tebuthiuron <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00534014-18-1 <0.005Bromacil <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005314-40-9 EP234G: Chloracetanilides <0.002Metolachlor <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.00251218-45-2 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides <0.002Ametryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002834-12-8 <0.002Atrazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0021912-24-9 57 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results E6-SED-1019E5-SED-1019E4-SED-1019E3-SED-1019E2-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 06-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:0006-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1929990-059EB1929990-058EB1929990-057EB1929990-056EB1929990-055UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EP234H: Triazine Herbicides - Continued <0.005Cyanazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00521725-46-2 <0.002Prometryn <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0027287-19-6 <0.002Propazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.002139-40-2 <0.005Simazine <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.005122-34-9 <0.002Terbuthylazine <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002mg/kg0.0025915-41-3 <0.1Terbutryn <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.1886-50-0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides <0.005Fenarimol <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005mg/kg0.00560168-88-9 <0.001Irgarol <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001mg/kg0.00128159-98-0 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 99.9 114 108 99.9 106%0.5----Tripropyltin EP094S: Pesticide Surrogate 93.0DEF 111 82.8 84.4 93.2%0.0578-48-8 EP202S: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicide Surrogate 56.72.4-Dichlorophenyl Acetic Acid 54.2 51.0 51.2 53.7%0.0219719-28-9 58 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results ----------------E7-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) ----------------06-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time --------------------------------EB1929990-060UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result ---- ---- ---- ---- EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) 27.8 ---- ---- ---- ----%1.0----Moisture Content EA150: Particle Sizing 97 ---- ---- ---- ----%1----+75µm 97 ---- ---- ---- ----%1----+150µm 97 ---- ---- ---- ----%1----+300µm 96 ---- ---- ---- ----%1----+425µm 92 ---- ---- ---- ----%1----+600µm 75 ---- ---- ---- ----%1----+1180µm 53 ---- ---- ---- ----%1----+2.36mm 38 ---- ---- ---- ----%1----+4.75mm 21 ---- ---- ---- ----%1----+9.5mm <1 ---- ---- ---- ----%1----+19.0mm <1 ---- ---- ---- ----%1----+37.5mm <1 ---- ---- ---- ----%1----+75.0mm EA150: Soil Classification based on Particle Size 3 ---- ---- ---- ----%1----Clay (<2 µm) <1 ---- ---- ---- ----%1----Silt (2-60 µm) 37 ---- ---- ---- ----%1----Sand (0.06-2.00 mm) 60 ---- ---- ---- ----%1----Gravel (>2mm) <1 ---- ---- ---- ----%1----Cobbles (>6cm) EA152: Soil Particle Density 2.69 ---- ---- ---- ----g/cm30.01----Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES 440Aluminium ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg507429-90-5 510Iron ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg507439-89-6 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS <0.50Antimony ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.507440-36-0 1.32Arsenic ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg1.007440-38-2 <0.1Cadmium ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.17440-43-9 5.6Chromium ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg1.07440-47-3 <1.0Copper ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg1.07440-50-8 <0.5Cobalt ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.57440-48-4 <1.0Lead ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg1.07439-92-1 17Manganese ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg107439-96-5 59 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results ----------------E7-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) ----------------06-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time --------------------------------EB1929990-060UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result ---- ---- ---- ---- EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS - Continued 1.4Nickel ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg1.07440-02-0 <0.1Selenium ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.17782-49-2 <0.1Silver ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.17440-22-4 <2.0Vanadium ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg2.07440-62-2 1.4Zinc ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg1.07440-66-6 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS 5.2Barium ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.17440-39-3 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS <0.01Mercury ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.017439-97-6 EP090: Organotin Compounds <0.5Tributyltin ---- ---- ---- ----µgSn/kg0.556573-85-4 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids <0.05Bioresmethrin ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0528434-01-07 <0.05Bifenthrin ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0582657-04-3 <0.05Phenothrin ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0526002-80-2 <0.05Lambda-cyhalothrin ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0568085-85-8 <0.05Permethrin ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0552645-53-1 <0.05Cyfluthrin ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0568359-37-5 <0.05Cypermethrin ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0552315-07-8 <0.05Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0551630-58-1/66230- 04- <0.05Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0562229-77-0/66841- 25- <0.05Allethrin ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.05584-79-2 <0.05Transfluthrin ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.05118712-89-3 <0.05Tetramethrin ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.057696-12-0 <0.05Tau-fluvalinate ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.05102851-06-9 EP094B: Synergist <0.05Piperonyl Butoxide ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0563993-73-7 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS <0.024-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02122-88-3 <0.022.4-DB ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0294-82-6 <0.02Dicamba ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.021918-00-9 <0.02Mecoprop ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0293-65-2 60 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results ----------------E7-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) ----------------06-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time --------------------------------EB1929990-060UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result ---- ---- ---- ---- EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS - Continued <0.02MCPA ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0294-74-6 <0.022.4-DP ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02120-36-5 <0.022.4-D ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0294-75-7 <0.02Triclopyr ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0255335-06-3 <0.022.4.5-TP (Silvex) ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0293-72-1 <0.022.4.5-T ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0293-76-5 <0.02MCPB ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0294-81-5 <0.02Picloram ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.021918-02-1 <0.02Clopyralid ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.021702-17-6 <0.02Fluroxypyr ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0269377-81-7 EP234A: OP Pesticides <0.005Azinphos-ethyl ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0052642-71-9 <0.005Azinphos-methyl ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00586-50-0 <0.005Chlorfenvinphos ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.005470-90-6 <0.002Coumaphos ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00256-72-4 <0.002Diazinon ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.002333-41-5 <0.004Dimethoate ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00460-51-5 <0.01Disulfoton ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01298-04-4 <0.002Ethoprophos ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00213194-48-4 <0.002Fenamiphos ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00222224-92-6 <0.5Fenitrothion ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5122-14-5 <0.005Fensulfothion ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.005115-90-2 <0.010Fenthion ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01055-38-9 <0.005Malathion ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.005121-75-5 <0.005^ Mevinphos ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0057786-34-7 <0.005Monocrotophos ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0056923-22-4 <0.002Omethoate ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0021113-02-6 <0.05Parathion ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0556-38-2 <0.5Parathion-methyl ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5298-00-0 <0.02Phorate ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02298-02-2 <0.002Pirimiphos-methyl ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00229232-93-7 <0.001Sulfotep ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0013689-24-5 <0.002Tetrachlorvinphos ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00222248-79-9 <0.001Triazophos ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00124017-47-8 61 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results ----------------E7-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) ----------------06-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time --------------------------------EB1929990-060UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result ---- ---- ---- ---- EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates <0.01Aldicarb ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01116-06-3 <1Bendiocarb ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg122781-23-3 <0.005Benomyl ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00517804-35-2 <0.002Carbaryl ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00263-25-2 <0.002Carbofuran ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0021563-66-2 <0.0053-Hydroxy Carbofuran ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00516655-82-6 <0.002Methiocarb ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0022032-65-7 <0.002Methomyl ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00216752-77-5 <0.02Molinate ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.022212-67-1 <0.002Oxamyl ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00223135-22-0 <0.002Thiobencarb ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00228249-77-6 <0.002Thiodicarb ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00259669-26-0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides <0.004Hexazinone ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00451235-04-2 <0.004Metribuzin ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00421087-64-9 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides <0.004Cyproconazole ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00494361-06-5 <0.004Flusilazole ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00485509-19-9 <0.004Hexaconazole ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00479983-71-4 <0.01Paclobutrazole ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0176738-62-0 <0.01Propiconazole ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0160207-90-1 <0.002Tebuconazole ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.002107534-96-3 <0.002Cyprodinil ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.002121552-61-2 <0.005Pyrimethanil ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00553112-28-0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides <0.005Diuron ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.005330-54-1 <0.002Fluometuron ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0022164-17-2 <0.005Tebuthiuron ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00534014-18-1 <0.005Bromacil ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.005314-40-9 EP234G: Chloracetanilides <0.002Metolachlor ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00251218-45-2 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides <0.002Ametryn ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.002834-12-8 <0.002Atrazine ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0021912-24-9 62 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results ----------------E7-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) ----------------06-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time --------------------------------EB1929990-060UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result ---- ---- ---- ---- EP234H: Triazine Herbicides - Continued <0.005Cyanazine ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00521725-46-2 <0.002Prometryn ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0027287-19-6 <0.002Propazine ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.002139-40-2 <0.005Simazine ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.005122-34-9 <0.002Terbuthylazine ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0025915-41-3 <0.1Terbutryn ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.1886-50-0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides <0.005Fenarimol ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00560168-88-9 <0.001Irgarol ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.00128159-98-0 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 122 ---- ---- ---- ----%0.5----Tripropyltin EP094S: Pesticide Surrogate 96.2DEF ---- ---- ---- ----%0.0578-48-8 EP202S: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicide Surrogate 55.12.4-Dichlorophenyl Acetic Acid ---- ---- ---- ----%0.0219719-28-9 63 of 63:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Surrogate Control Limits Recovery Limits (%)Sub-Matrix: SOIL Compound CAS Number Low High EP090S: Organotin Surrogate Tripropyltin ---- 35 130 EP094S: Pesticide Surrogate DEF 78-48-8 10 110 EP202S: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicide Surrogate 2.4-Dichlorophenyl Acetic Acid 19719-28-9 45 139 0 0.00 True Environmental CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Work Order : Page : 1 of 6EB1932835 :: LaboratoryClient BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Environmental Division Brisbane : :ContactContact MS BETH TOKI Andrew Epps :: AddressAddress PO BOX 203 SPRING HILL BRISBANE QLD 4004 2 Byth Street Stafford QLD Australia 4053 :Telephone 07 3831 6744 :Telephone +61 7 3552 8639 :Project B23282-4 Douglas Shoal Date Samples Received : 05-Dec-2019 15:48 :Order number ---- Date Analysis Commenced : 06-Dec-2019 :C-O-C number ---- Issue Date : 16-Dec-2019 16:33 Sampler : ---- Site : ---- Quote number : BN/165/18 B 12:No. of samples received 12:No. of samples analysed This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full. This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information: l General Comments l Analytical Results l Surrogate Control Limits Additional information pertinent to this report will be found in the following separate attachments: Quality Control Report, QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with Quality Review and Sample Receipt Notification. Signatories This document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11. Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition Diana Mesa 2IC Organic Chemist Brisbane Organics, Stafford, QLD Kim McCabe Senior Inorganic Chemist Brisbane Inorganics, Stafford, QLD R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R 2 of 6:Page Work Order : :Client EB1932835 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD General Comments The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis. Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference. When sampling time information is not provided by the client, sampling dates are shown without a time component. In these instances, the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes. Where a result is required to meet compliance limits the associated uncertainty must be considered. Refer to the ALS Contact for details. CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society. LOR = Limit of reporting ^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reporting ø = ALS is not NATA accredited for these tests. ~ = Indicates an estimated value. Key : EP090 Organotin: Samples 'A10-SED-1026' and 'A13-SED-1029' show poor surrogate recovery due to matrix interference. Confirmed by re-extraction and re-analysis.l EP090 Organotin: Samples 'A3-SED-1019' and 'A14-SED-1030' show poor duplicate results due to sample heterogeneity. Confirmed by re-extraction and re-analysis.l EP090 Organotin: Significant sample heterogeneity was noted between extractions for samples 'A3-SED-1019', 'A10-SED-1026', 'A13-SED-1029' and 'A14-SED-1030'.l 3 of 6:Page Work Order : :Client EB1932835 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results A8-SED-1024A7-SED-1023A6-SED-1022A4-SED-1020A3-SED-1019Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1932835-006EB1932835-005EB1932835-004EB1932835-002EB1932835-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) 29.0 31.5 30.3 33.0 35.7%0.1----Moisture Content EP090: Organotin Compounds 1290Tributyltin 1.5 1.2 1.5 265µgSn/kg0.556573-85-4 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 44.1 119 38.9 113 88.8%0.5----Tripropyltin 4 of 6:Page Work Order : :Client EB1932835 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results A13-SED-1029A12-SED-1028A11-SED-1027A10-SED-1026A9-SED-1025Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) 05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time EB1932835-011EB1932835-010EB1932835-009EB1932835-008EB1932835-007UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result Result Result Result EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) 26.9 29.3 31.8 31.0 27.2%0.1----Moisture Content EP090: Organotin Compounds 1.2Tributyltin 178 2.4 0.7 74.8µgSn/kg0.556573-85-4 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 120 5.02 112 110 2.63%0.5----Tripropyltin 5 of 6:Page Work Order : :Client EB1932835 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Analytical Results ------------SOPH-1 CRMA14-SED-1030Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) ------------05-Nov-2019 00:0005-Nov-2019 00:00Client sampling date / time ------------------------EB1932835-013EB1932835-012UnitLORCAS NumberCompound Result Result ---- ---- ---- EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) 16.8 ---- ---- ---- ----%0.1----Moisture Content EP090: Organotin Compounds 735Tributyltin 133 ---- ---- ----µgSn/kg0.556573-85-4 EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 51.5 106 ---- ---- ----%0.5----Tripropyltin 6 of 6:Page Work Order : :Client EB1932835 B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Surrogate Control Limits Recovery Limits (%)Sub-Matrix: SOIL Compound CAS Number Low High EP090S: Organotin Surrogate Tripropyltin ---- 35 130 Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report D-3 Laboratory Results and QA/QC G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx D.2 Laboratory QA/QC Reporting False 5 5.00True Environmental QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Work Order : EB1926789 Page : 1 of 22 :: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division BrisbaneBMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD :Contact MS BETH TOKI :Contact Customer Services EB :Address PO BOX 203 SPRING HILL BRISBANE QLD 4004 Address : 2 Byth Street Stafford QLD Australia 4053 ::Telephone 07 3831 6744 +61-7-3243 7222Telephone :Project B23282 Douglas Shoal Date Samples Received : 10-Oct-2019 :Order number B23282 Date Analysis Commenced : 10-Oct-2019 :C-O-C number ---- Issue Date : 25-Oct-2019 Sampler : WILLIS BRASSIL Site : ---- Quote number : BN/165/18 B No. of samples received 58: No. of samples analysed 58: This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full. This Quality Control Report contains the following information: l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report; Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limits l Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limits l Matrix Spike (MS) Report; Recovery and Acceptance Limits Signatories This document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11. Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition Ben Felgendrejeris Senior Acid Sulfate Soil Chemist Brisbane Acid Sulphate Soils, Stafford, QLD Diana Mesa 2IC Organic Chemist Brisbane Organics, Stafford, QLD Franco Lentini LCMS Coordinator Sydney Organics, Smithfield, NSW Kim McCabe Senior Inorganic Chemist Brisbane Inorganics, Stafford, QLD Sarah Ashworth Laboratory Manager - Brisbane Brisbane Organics, Stafford, QLD R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R 2 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project General Comments The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis. Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference. Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lot CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society. LOR = Limit of reporting RPD = Relative Percentage Difference # = Indicates failed QC Key : Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report The quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity. The permitted ranges for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI -EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Result < 10 times LOR: No Limit; Result between 10 and 20 times LOR: 0% - 50%; Result > 20 times LOR: 0% - 20%. Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 2632907) EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg 220 280 23.3 No LimitI1SED-1019 EB1926789-001 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg 250 260 0.00 No Limit EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QC Lot: 2632905) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 0% - 20%I1SED-1019 EB1926789-001 EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) (QC Lot: 2632915) EA055: Moisture Content ---- 0.1 % 30.5 30.0 1.46 0% - 20%Anonymous EB1926662-007 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QC Lot: 2632906) EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No LimitI1SED-1019 EB1926789-001 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg 1.56 1.29 18.9 No Limit EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg 7.2 7.0 3.26 No Limit EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg 19 22 16.5 No Limit EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 0.00 No Limit EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QC Lot: 2632908) EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg 6.6 # 5.0 27.6 0% - 20%I1SED-1019 EB1926789-001 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QC Lot: 2651335) EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No LimitI1SED-1019 EB1926789-001 3 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP090: Organotin Compounds (QC Lot: 2651335) - continued EP090: Monobutyltin 78763-54-9 1 µgSn/kg <1 <1 0.00 No LimitI1SED-1019 EB1926789-001 EP090: Dibutyltin 1002-53-5 1 µgSn/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EP1910525-026 EP090: Monobutyltin 78763-54-9 1 µgSn/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EP090: Dibutyltin 1002-53-5 1 µgSn/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QC Lot: 2632913) EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitI1SED-1019 EB1926789-001 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/66 230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/66 841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094B: Synergist (QC Lot: 2632913) EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitI1SED-1019 EB1926789-001 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QC Lot: 2637610) EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitI1SED-1019 EB1926789-001 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitAnonymous ES1933348-004 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit 4 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QC Lot: 2637610) - continued EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitAnonymous ES1933348-004 EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234A: OP Pesticides (QC Lot: 2634892) EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1926754-001 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg 0.020 0.017 17.5 0% - 50% EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg 0.006 0.004 34.5 No Limit EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg 28.6 28.1 1.73 0% - 50% EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 <0.010 0.00 No Limit EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QC Lot: 2634892) EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1926754-001 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit 5 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QC Lot: 2634892) - continued EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg 0.003 0.003 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1926754-001 EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg 1.60 1.42 11.9 0% - 50% EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg 0.006 0.006 0.00 No Limit EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg 0.009 0.009 0.00 No Limit EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QC Lot: 2634892) EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1926754-001 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg 0.206 0.214 3.89 No Limit EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QC Lot: 2634892) EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg 0.320 0.381 17.2 0% - 20%Anonymous EB1926754-001 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg 0.128 0.146 13.2 0% - 20% EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QC Lot: 2634892) EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1926754-001 EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg 0.033 0.031 6.62 No Limit EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg 0.022 0.015 38.6 No Limit EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QC Lot: 2634892) EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg 2.11 1.96 7.23 0% - 50%Anonymous EB1926754-001 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QC Lot: 2634892) EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg 0.016 0.013 23.2 No LimitAnonymous EB1926754-001 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg 0.022 0.023 5.09 0% - 50% EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg 0.011 0.010 10.7 No Limit EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg 0.003 0.004 45.4 No Limit EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QC Lot: 2634892) EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1926754-001 6 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QC Lot: 2634892) - continued EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1926754-001 Sub-Matrix: WATER Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EA025: Total Suspended Solids dried at 104 ± 2°C (QC Lot: 2633285) EA025: Suspended Solids (SS) ---- 1 mg/L <1 <1 0.00 No LimitD3WAT-1019 EB1926789-017 EA025: Suspended Solids (SS) ---- 1 mg/L 4 4 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1926512-016 EA025: Total Suspended Solids dried at 104 ± 2°C (QC Lot: 2633286) EA025: Suspended Solids (SS) ---- 1 mg/L <1 <1 0.00 No LimitG3WAT-1019 EB1926789-029 EA025: Suspended Solids (SS) ---- 1 mg/L <1 <1 0.00 No LimitB1WAT-1019 EB1926789-041 EA025: Total Suspended Solids dried at 104 ± 2°C (QC Lot: 2633287) EA025: Suspended Solids (SS) ---- 1 mg/L <1 <1 0.00 No LimitH4WAT-1019 EB1926789-053 EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS (QC Lot: 2633722) EG035F-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.00004 mg/L <0.00004 <0.00004 0.00 No LimitC1WAT-1019 EB1926789-005 EG035F-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.00004 mg/L <0.00004 <0.00004 0.00 No LimitD5WAT-1019 EB1926789-019 EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS (QC Lot: 2633723) EG035F-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.00004 mg/L <0.00004 <0.00004 0.00 No LimitG5WAT-1019 EB1926789-031 EG035F-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.00004 mg/L <0.00004 <0.00004 0.00 No LimitB3WAT-1019 EB1926789-043 EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS (QC Lot: 2633725) EG035F-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.00004 mg/L <0.00004 <0.00004 0.00 No LimitH2WAT-1019 EB1926789-051 EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS (QC Lot: 2633756) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.00004 mg/L <0.00004 <0.00004 0.00 No LimitC1WAT-1019 EB1926789-005 EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.00004 mg/L <0.00004 <0.00004 0.00 No LimitD5WAT-1019 EB1926789-019 EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS (QC Lot: 2633775) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.00004 mg/L <0.00004 <0.00004 0.00 No LimitG5WAT-1019 EB1926789-031 EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.00004 mg/L <0.00004 <0.00004 0.00 No LimitB3WAT-1019 EB1926789-043 EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS (QC Lot: 2633779) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.00004 mg/L 0.00006 0.00006 0.00 No LimitI1WAT-1019 EB1926789-055 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QC Lot: 2633753) EG093A-F: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No LimitC3WAT-1019 EB1926789-007 EG093A-F: Lead 7439-92-1 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.5 µg/L 1.9 1.2 44.2 No Limit EG093A-F: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Barium 7440-39-3 1 µg/L 3 3 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Copper 7440-50-8 1 µg/L <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Aluminium 7429-90-5 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit 7 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: WATER Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QC Lot: 2633753) - continued EG093A-F: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No LimitD4WAT-1019 EB1926789-018 EG093A-F: Lead 7439-92-1 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.5 µg/L 2.0 1.5 31.6 No Limit EG093A-F: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.5 µg/L 0.6 <0.5 19.6 No Limit EG093A-F: Barium 7440-39-3 1 µg/L 4 4 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Copper 7440-50-8 1 µg/L <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Aluminium 7429-90-5 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QC Lot: 2633754) EG093B-F: Iron 7439-89-6 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No LimitC3WAT-1019 EB1926789-007 EG093B-F: Iron 7439-89-6 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No LimitD4WAT-1019 EB1926789-018 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QC Lot: 2633771) EG093B-F: Iron 7439-89-6 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No LimitA2WAT-1019 EB1926789-033 EG093B-F: Iron 7439-89-6 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No LimitB2WAT-1019 EB1926789-042 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QC Lot: 2633772) EG093A-F: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No LimitA2WAT-1019 EB1926789-033 EG093A-F: Lead 7439-92-1 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.5 µg/L 1.6 1.4 11.9 No Limit EG093A-F: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Barium 7440-39-3 1 µg/L 4 3 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Copper 7440-50-8 1 µg/L <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Aluminium 7429-90-5 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No LimitB2WAT-1019 EB1926789-042 EG093A-F: Lead 7439-92-1 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.5 µg/L 1.4 1.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Barium 7440-39-3 1 µg/L 3 3 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Copper 7440-50-8 1 µg/L <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Aluminium 7429-90-5 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QC Lot: 2633776) EG093B-F: Iron 7439-89-6 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No LimitI1WAT-1019 EB1926789-055 8 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: WATER Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QC Lot: 2633777) EG093A-F: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No LimitI1WAT-1019 EB1926789-055 EG093A-F: Lead 7439-92-1 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.5 µg/L 1.6 1.6 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Barium 7440-39-3 1 µg/L 4 3 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Copper 7440-50-8 1 µg/L <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Aluminium 7429-90-5 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-F: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QC Lot: 2633755) EG093A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No LimitC1WAT-1019 EB1926789-005 EG093A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.5 µg/L 2.1 1.8 20.2 No Limit EG093A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Barium 7440-39-3 1 µg/L 4 4 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 1 µg/L <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Aluminium 7429-90-5 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No LimitD4WAT-1019 EB1926789-018 EG093A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.5 µg/L 1.7 1.8 6.98 No Limit EG093A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Barium 7440-39-3 1 µg/L 5 4 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 1 µg/L <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Aluminium 7429-90-5 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QC Lot: 2633773) EG093A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No LimitG5WAT-1019 EB1926789-031 EG093A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.5 µg/L 1.6 1.4 14.6 No Limit EG093A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Barium 7440-39-3 1 µg/L 4 4 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 1 µg/L <1 <1 0.00 No Limit 9 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: WATER Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QC Lot: 2633773) - continued EG093A-T: Aluminium 7429-90-5 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No LimitG5WAT-1019 EB1926789-031 EG093A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No LimitB2WAT-1019 EB1926789-042 EG093A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.5 µg/L 1.6 1.4 11.8 No Limit EG093A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Barium 7440-39-3 1 µg/L 4 4 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 1 µg/L <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Aluminium 7429-90-5 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QC Lot: 2633778) EG093A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No LimitI1WAT-1019 EB1926789-055 EG093A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.5 µg/L 1.6 1.4 16.6 No Limit EG093A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.5 µg/L 0.6 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Barium 7440-39-3 1 µg/L 4 4 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 1 µg/L <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Aluminium 7429-90-5 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit EG093A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.00 No Limit EG094T: Total metals in Fresh water by ORC-ICPMS (QC Lot: 2664434) EG094A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.05 µg/L <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitR01-1019 EB1926789-063 EG094A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 0.1 µg/L 0.3 0.3 0.00 No Limit EG094A-T: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit EG094A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.2 µg/L <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No Limit EG094A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.2 µg/L <0.2 0.2 0.00 No Limit EG094A-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.5 µg/L 1.2 1.3 11.4 No Limit EG094A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 0.5 µg/L 1.9 1.7 14.1 No Limit EG094A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG094A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 µg/L 6 6 0.00 No Limit EG094A-T: Aluminium 7429-90-5 5 µg/L <5 6 19.5 No Limit EP090: Organotin Compounds (Soluble) (QC Lot: 2637687) EP090S: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 2 ngSn/L <2 <2 0.00 No LimitAMB01 EB1926789-039 EP090: Organotin Compounds (Soluble) (QC Lot: 2637690) EP090S: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 2 ngSn/L <2 <2 0.00 No LimitAMB02 EB1926789-048 EP090: Organotin Compounds (Soluble) (QC Lot: 2637740) 10 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: WATER Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP090: Organotin Compounds (Soluble) (QC Lot: 2637740) - continued EP090S: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 2 ngSn/L <2 <2 0.00 No LimitAMB04 EB1926789-011 EP090S: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 2 ngSn/L <2 <2 0.00 No LimitAMB03 EB1926789-020 11 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report The quality control term Method / Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. The quality control term Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) refers to a certified reference material, or a known interference free matrix spiked with target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS. Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES (QCLot: 2632907) EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg <50 11812361 mg/kg 13070.0 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg <50 10030024 mg/kg 13070.0 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QCLot: 2632905) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 95.20.0847 mg/kg 13070.0 EA152: Soil Particle Density (QCLot: 2633642) EA152: Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) ---- ---- g/cm3 ---- 1012.68 g/cm3 12080.0 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2632906) EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg <1.00 10896.1 mg/kg 12480.0 EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 1130.74 mg/kg 12287.0 EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg <1.0 11315.3 mg/kg 12979.0 EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg <1.0 10644.8 mg/kg 11885.0 EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 11352.8 mg/kg 11986.0 EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg <10 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg <1.0 10612.2 mg/kg 12377.0 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg <1.0 107114 mg/kg 12771.0 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2632908) EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 11077.4 mg/kg 12386.0 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QCLot: 2651335) EP090: Monobutyltin 78763-54-9 1 µgSn/kg <1 1021.25 µgSn/kg 12836.0 EP090: Dibutyltin 1002-53-5 1 µgSn/kg <1 1051.25 µgSn/kg 13242.0 EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg <0.5 92.01.25 µgSn/kg 13952.0 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2632913) EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.07 82.30.5 mg/kg 13767.0 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.07 86.40.5 mg/kg 13466.0 EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.07 92.00.5 mg/kg 13467.0 EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.07 1020.5 mg/kg 13460.0 EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.07 1000.5 mg/kg 12871.0 EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.07 97.60.5 mg/kg 13268.0 12 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2632913) - continued EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.07 96.40.5 mg/kg 13066.0 EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/ 66230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.07 1120.5 mg/kg 14260.0 EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/ 66841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.07 1200.5 mg/kg 13056.0 EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.07 96.60.5 mg/kg 13560.0 EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.07 95.50.5 mg/kg 13763.0 EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.07 88.30.5 mg/kg 13060.0 EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.07 1150.5 mg/kg 13662.0 EP094B: Synergist (QCLot: 2632913) EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.07 77.60.5 mg/kg 14559.0 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QCLot: 2637610) EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 96.30.1 mg/kg 12854.4 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 97.70.1 mg/kg 13045.5 EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 72.10.1 mg/kg 13551.7 EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 94.50.1 mg/kg 13060.0 EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 97.20.1 mg/kg 13156.8 EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 95.60.1 mg/kg 14150.0 EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 95.20.1 mg/kg 13168.5 EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 99.40.1 mg/kg 14150.8 EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 92.30.1 mg/kg 12640.8 EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 99.30.1 mg/kg 13957.4 EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 99.50.1 mg/kg 13738.9 EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 76.30.1 mg/kg 12948.7 EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 55.40.1 mg/kg 10649.4 EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 91.20.1 mg/kg 12853.2 EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2634892) EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 1110.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 82.40.04 mg/kg 11860.0 EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 1010.08 mg/kg 11161.0 EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 84.80.02 mg/kg 10165.0 EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 88.80.02 mg/kg 95.063.0 EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 95.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 87.80.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 92.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 74.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 76.84 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 81.60.02 mg/kg 11662.0 13 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2634892) - continued EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 81.40.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 81.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 89.20.08 mg/kg 12367.0 EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 93.20.04 mg/kg 11761.0 EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 80.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 1000.4 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 94.54 mg/kg 11862.0 EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 80.00.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 96.80.02 mg/kg 10363.0 EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 91.20.01 mg/kg 11159.0 EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 83.20.02 mg/kg 10660.0 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 83.20.01 mg/kg 10763.0 EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2634892) EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 90.90.1 mg/kg 11767.0 EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 1240.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 84.00.02 mg/kg 12256.0 EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 89.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 79.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 82.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 77.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 1070.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 95.90.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 76.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 71.20.02 mg/kg 10959.0 EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 72.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QCLot: 2634892) EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 79.20.04 mg/kg 12462.0 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 96.80.04 mg/kg 11965.0 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QCLot: 2634892) EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 76.20.08 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 80.40.04 mg/kg 10759.0 EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 80.80.04 mg/kg 10662.0 EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 1150.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 92.50.1 mg/kg 10260.0 EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 94.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 86.40.02 mg/kg 98.062.0 EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 84.40.04 mg/kg 12761.0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QCLot: 2634892) 14 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QCLot: 2634892) - continued EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 81.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 90.40.02 mg/kg 12264.0 EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 1020.04 mg/kg 10858.0 EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 1070.04 mg/kg 13161.0 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QCLot: 2634892) EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 82.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QCLot: 2634892) EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 81.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 88.80.02 mg/kg 12062.0 EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 84.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 1230.02 mg/kg 13058.0 EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 99.20.02 mg/kg 12761.0 EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 90.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 86.40.02 mg/kg 11763.0 EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 1020.02 mg/kg 11559.0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QCLot: 2634892) EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 1010.04 mg/kg 11462.0 EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 1000.004 mg/kg 11260.0 Sub-Matrix: WATER Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EA025: Total Suspended Solids dried at 104 ± 2°C (QCLot: 2633285) EA025: Suspended Solids (SS) ---- 1 mg/L <1 101150 mg/L 12084.0 <1 97.81000 mg/L 12084.0 <1 108951 mg/L 11687.9 EA025: Total Suspended Solids dried at 104 ± 2°C (QCLot: 2633286) EA025: Suspended Solids (SS) ---- 1 mg/L <1 99.2150 mg/L 12084.0 <1 95.51000 mg/L 12084.0 <1 104951 mg/L 11687.9 EA025: Total Suspended Solids dried at 104 ± 2°C (QCLot: 2633287) EA025: Suspended Solids (SS) ---- 1 mg/L <1 105150 mg/L 12084.0 <1 96.61000 mg/L 12084.0 <1 107951 mg/L 11687.9 EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 2633722) EG035F-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.00004 mg/L <0.00004 93.10.002 mg/L 11885.0 EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 2633723) EG035F-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.00004 mg/L <0.00004 98.10.002 mg/L 11885.0 15 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: WATER Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 2633725) EG035F-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.00004 mg/L <0.00004 1010.002 mg/L 11885.0 EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 2633756) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.00004 mg/L <0.00004 1000.002 mg/L 11484.0 EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 2633775) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.00004 mg/L <0.00004 1000.002 mg/L 11484.0 EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 2633779) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.00004 mg/L <0.00004 1010.002 mg/L 11484.0 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QCLot: 2633753) EG093A-F: Aluminium 7429-90-5 5 µg/L <5 86.550 µg/L 11885.0 EG093A-F: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 97.110 µg/L 11587.0 EG093A-F: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.5 µg/L <0.5 98.910 µg/L 11687.0 EG093A-F: Barium 7440-39-3 1 µg/L <1 90.810 µg/L 11487.0 EG093A-F: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.2 µg/L <0.2 93.210 µg/L 11488.0 EG093A-F: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.5 µg/L <0.5 93.210 µg/L 11583.0 EG093A-F: Copper 7440-50-8 1 µg/L <1 91.910 µg/L 11781.0 EG093A-F: Lead 7439-92-1 0.2 µg/L <0.2 87.410 µg/L 11780.0 EG093A-F: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 95.610 µg/L 11787.0 EG093A-F: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 µg/L <5 96.010 µg/L 12081.0 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QCLot: 2633754) EG093B-F: Iron 7439-89-6 5 µg/L <5 92.550 µg/L 12378.0 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QCLot: 2633771) EG093B-F: Iron 7439-89-6 5 µg/L <5 95.650 µg/L 12378.0 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QCLot: 2633772) EG093A-F: Aluminium 7429-90-5 5 µg/L <5 86.750 µg/L 11885.0 EG093A-F: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 10710 µg/L 11587.0 EG093A-F: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.5 µg/L <0.5 94.210 µg/L 11687.0 EG093A-F: Barium 7440-39-3 1 µg/L <1 89.110 µg/L 11487.0 EG093A-F: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.2 µg/L <0.2 94.710 µg/L 11488.0 EG093A-F: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.5 µg/L <0.5 92.810 µg/L 11583.0 EG093A-F: Copper 7440-50-8 1 µg/L <1 95.110 µg/L 11781.0 EG093A-F: Lead 7439-92-1 0.2 µg/L <0.2 10210 µg/L 11780.0 EG093A-F: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 99.310 µg/L 11787.0 EG093A-F: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 µg/L <5 98.210 µg/L 12081.0 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QCLot: 2633776) EG093B-F: Iron 7439-89-6 5 µg/L <5 96.250 µg/L 12378.0 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QCLot: 2633777) EG093A-F: Aluminium 7429-90-5 5 µg/L <5 91.050 µg/L 11885.0 16 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: WATER Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QCLot: 2633777) - continued EG093A-F: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 98.510 µg/L 11587.0 EG093A-F: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.5 µg/L <0.5 96.010 µg/L 11687.0 EG093A-F: Barium 7440-39-3 1 µg/L <1 89.810 µg/L 11487.0 EG093A-F: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.2 µg/L <0.2 94.710 µg/L 11488.0 EG093A-F: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.5 µg/L <0.5 87.610 µg/L 11583.0 EG093A-F: Copper 7440-50-8 1 µg/L <1 95.510 µg/L 11781.0 EG093A-F: Lead 7439-92-1 0.2 µg/L <0.2 10410 µg/L 11780.0 EG093A-F: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 94.110 µg/L 11787.0 EG093A-F: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 µg/L <5 95.710 µg/L 12081.0 EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QCLot: 2633755) EG093A-T: Aluminium 7429-90-5 5 µg/L <5 95.550 µg/L 12085.0 EG093A-T: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 98.110 µg/L 11683.0 EG093A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.5 µg/L <0.5 97.210 µg/L 11786.0 EG093A-T: Barium 7440-39-3 1 µg/L <1 10110 µg/L 11884.0 EG093A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.2 µg/L <0.2 97.810 µg/L 11584.0 EG093A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.5 µg/L <0.5 94.410 µg/L 12084.0 EG093A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 1 µg/L <1 10110 µg/L 11984.0 EG093A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 0.2 µg/L <0.2 10110 µg/L 12084.0 EG093A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 91.910 µg/L 12080.0 EG093A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 µg/L <5 95.910 µg/L 12481.0 EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QCLot: 2633773) EG093A-T: Aluminium 7429-90-5 5 µg/L <5 97.850 µg/L 12085.0 EG093A-T: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 98.210 µg/L 11683.0 EG093A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.5 µg/L <0.5 89.810 µg/L 11786.0 EG093A-T: Barium 7440-39-3 1 µg/L <1 89.410 µg/L 11884.0 EG093A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.2 µg/L <0.2 92.910 µg/L 11584.0 EG093A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.5 µg/L <0.5 90.910 µg/L 12084.0 EG093A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 1 µg/L <1 95.410 µg/L 11984.0 EG093A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 0.2 µg/L <0.2 96.710 µg/L 12084.0 EG093A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 10010 µg/L 12080.0 EG093A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 µg/L <5 92.610 µg/L 12481.0 EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QCLot: 2633778) EG093A-T: Aluminium 7429-90-5 5 µg/L <5 86.650 µg/L 12085.0 EG093A-T: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 92.010 µg/L 11683.0 EG093A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.5 µg/L <0.5 98.010 µg/L 11786.0 EG093A-T: Barium 7440-39-3 1 µg/L <1 10210 µg/L 11884.0 EG093A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.2 µg/L <0.2 94.410 µg/L 11584.0 EG093A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.5 µg/L <0.5 98.710 µg/L 12084.0 17 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: WATER Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QCLot: 2633778) - continued EG093A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 1 µg/L <1 97.910 µg/L 11984.0 EG093A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 0.2 µg/L <0.2 97.010 µg/L 12084.0 EG093A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 99.210 µg/L 12080.0 EG093A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 µg/L <5 10910 µg/L 12481.0 EG094T: Total metals in Fresh water by ORC-ICPMS (QCLot: 2664434) EG094A-T: Aluminium 7429-90-5 5 µg/L <5 92.250 µg/L 12080.0 EG094A-T: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.2 µg/L <0.2 10910 µg/L 12080.0 EG094A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.2 µg/L <0.2 99.410 µg/L 12080.0 EG094A-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.5 µg/L <0.5 95.210 µg/L 12080.0 EG094A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.05 µg/L <0.05 98.010 µg/L 12080.0 EG094A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.2 µg/L <0.2 10910 µg/L 12080.0 EG094A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 0.5 µg/L <0.5 10910 µg/L 12080.0 EG094A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 0.1 µg/L <0.1 98.910 µg/L 12080.0 EG094A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.5 µg/L <0.5 10710 µg/L 12080.0 EG094A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 µg/L <1 11010 µg/L 12080.0 EP090: Organotin Compounds (Soluble) (QCLot: 2637687) EP090S: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 2 ngSn/L <2 78.9147 ngSn/L 13430.7 EP090: Organotin Compounds (Soluble) (QCLot: 2637690) EP090S: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 2 ngSn/L <2 93.8147 ngSn/L 13430.7 EP090: Organotin Compounds (Soluble) (QCLot: 2637740) EP090S: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 2 ngSn/L <2 84.7147 ngSn/L 13430.7 Matrix Spike (MS) Report The quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on analyte recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference. Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QCLot: 2632905) I11SED-1019 EB1926789-002 7439-97-6EG035T-LL: Mercury 77.50.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2632906) I11SED-1019 EB1926789-002 7440-38-2EG020-SD: Arsenic 92.0100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-43-9EG020-SD: Cadmium 82.325 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-47-3EG020-SD: Chromium 93.8100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-50-8EG020-SD: Copper 80.2100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-48-4EG020-SD: Cobalt 94.0100 mg/kg 13070.0 7439-92-1EG020-SD: Lead 92.5100 mg/kg 13070.0 18 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2632906) - continued I11SED-1019 EB1926789-002 7439-96-5EG020-SD: Manganese 111100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-02-0EG020-SD: Nickel 80.5100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-62-2EG020-SD: Vanadium 99.5100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-66-6EG020-SD: Zinc 76.6100 mg/kg 13070.0 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2632908) I11SED-1019 EB1926789-002 7440-39-3EG020X-T: Barium 97.0100 mg/kg 13070.0 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QCLot: 2651335) I11SED-1019 EB1926789-002 78763-54-9EP090: Monobutyltin 79.31.25 µgSn/kg 13020.0 1002-53-5EP090: Dibutyltin 82.91.25 µgSn/kg 13020.0 56573-85-4EP090: Tributyltin 47.41.25 µgSn/kg 13020.0 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2632913) I11SED-1019 EB1926789-002 28434-01-07EP094: Bioresmethrin 60.60.5 mg/kg 14060.0 82657-04-3EP094: Bifenthrin 88.50.5 mg/kg 14060.0 26002-80-2EP094: Phenothrin 93.60.5 mg/kg 14060.0 68085-85-8EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 1030.5 mg/kg 14060.0 52645-53-1EP094: Permethrin 96.30.5 mg/kg 14060.0 68359-37-5EP094: Cyfluthrin 95.80.5 mg/kg 14060.0 52315-07-8EP094: Cypermethrin 95.00.5 mg/kg 14060.0 51630-58-1/6 6230-04- EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 1100.5 mg/kg 14060.0 62229-77-0/6 6841-25- EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 1190.5 mg/kg 14060.0 584-79-2EP094: Allethrin 1070.5 mg/kg 14060.0 118712-89-3EP094: Transfluthrin 95.80.5 mg/kg 14060.0 7696-12-0EP094: Tetramethrin 95.60.5 mg/kg 14060.0 102851-06-9EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 1140.5 mg/kg 14060.0 EP094B: Synergist (QCLot: 2632913) I11SED-1019 EB1926789-002 63993-73-7EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 79.70.5 mg/kg 14060.0 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QCLot: 2637610) I1SED-1019 EB1926789-001 93-65-2EP202: Mecoprop 95.80.1 mg/kg 14060.0 94-74-6EP202: MCPA 1000.1 mg/kg 14357.0 94-75-7EP202: 2.4-D 98.90.1 mg/kg 13968.0 55335-06-3EP202: Triclopyr 97.80.1 mg/kg 14551.0 93-76-5EP202: 2.4.5-T 96.50.1 mg/kg 14257.0 1918-02-1EP202: Picloram 66.20.1 mg/kg 13849.0 1702-17-6EP202: Clopyralid 60.00.1 mg/kg 14949.0 EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2634892) 19 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2634892) - continued Anonymous EB1926754-001 2642-71-9EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 1080.04 mg/kg 13070.0 86-50-0EP234: Azinphos-methyl 1150.04 mg/kg 13070.0 470-90-6EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 81.20.08 mg/kg 13070.0 56-72-4EP234: Coumaphos 80.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 333-41-5EP234: Diazinon # Not Determined 0.02 mg/kg 13070.0 60-51-5EP234: Dimethoate 1120.04 mg/kg 13070.0 298-04-4EP234: Disulfoton 1080.1 mg/kg 13070.0 13194-48-4EP234: Ethoprophos 80.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 22224-92-6EP234: Fenamiphos # Not Determined 0.02 mg/kg 13070.0 122-14-5EP234: Fenitrothion 1014 mg/kg 13070.0 115-90-2EP234: Fensulfothion 93.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 55-38-9EP234: Fenthion 76.60.1 mg/kg 13070.0 121-75-5EP234: Malathion 1160.04 mg/kg 13070.0 7786-34-7EP234: Mevinphos 1180.08 mg/kg 13070.0 6923-22-4EP234: Monocrotophos 1030.04 mg/kg 13070.0 1113-02-6EP234: Omethoate 1050.02 mg/kg 13070.0 56-38-2EP234: Parathion 1070.4 mg/kg 13070.0 298-00-0EP234: Parathion-methyl 86.54 mg/kg 13070.0 298-02-2EP234: Phorate 99.00.2 mg/kg 13070.0 29232-93-7EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 78.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 3689-24-5EP234: Sulfotep 1060.01 mg/kg 13070.0 22248-79-9EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 1060.02 mg/kg 13070.0 24017-47-8EP234: Triazophos 1200.01 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2634892) Anonymous EB1926754-001 116-06-3EP234: Aldicarb 1120.1 mg/kg 13070.0 22781-23-3EP234: Bendiocarb 1270.2 mg/kg 13070.0 17804-35-2EP234: Benomyl # 39.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 63-25-2EP234: Carbaryl 1140.02 mg/kg 13070.0 1563-66-2EP234: Carbofuran 1180.02 mg/kg 13070.0 16655-82-6EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 1200.04 mg/kg 13070.0 2032-65-7EP234: Methiocarb 1240.02 mg/kg 13070.0 16752-77-5EP234: Methomyl 1120.02 mg/kg 13070.0 2212-67-1EP234: Molinate 1040.2 mg/kg 13070.0 23135-22-0EP234: Oxamyl 1200.02 mg/kg 13070.0 28249-77-6EP234: Thiobencarb # Not Determined 0.02 mg/kg 13070.0 20 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2634892) - continued Anonymous EB1926754-001 59669-26-0EP234: Thiodicarb # Not Determined 0.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QCLot: 2634892) Anonymous EB1926754-001 51235-04-2EP234: Hexazinone # 18.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 21087-64-9EP234: Metribuzin # Not Determined 0.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QCLot: 2634892) Anonymous EB1926754-001 94361-06-5EP234: Cyproconazole 84.40.08 mg/kg 13070.0 85509-19-9EP234: Flusilazole # 52.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 79983-71-4EP234: Hexaconazole 1140.04 mg/kg 13070.0 76738-62-0EP234: Paclobutrazole 98.70.1 mg/kg 13070.0 60207-90-1EP234: Propiconazole 1150.1 mg/kg 13070.0 107534-96-3EP234: Tebuconazole # Not Determined 0.02 mg/kg 13070.0 121552-61-2EP234: Cyprodinil 1160.02 mg/kg 13070.0 53112-28-0EP234: Pyrimethanil # Not Determined 0.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QCLot: 2634892) Anonymous EB1926754-001 330-54-1EP234: Diuron # 26.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 2164-17-2EP234: Fluometuron 1170.02 mg/kg 13070.0 34014-18-1EP234: Tebuthiuron 1180.04 mg/kg 13070.0 314-40-9EP234: Bromacil 70.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QCLot: 2634892) Anonymous EB1926754-001 51218-45-2EP234: Metolachlor # Not Determined 0.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QCLot: 2634892) Anonymous EB1926754-001 834-12-8EP234: Ametryn # 3.200.02 mg/kg 13070.0 1912-24-9EP234: Atrazine # Not Determined 0.02 mg/kg 13070.0 21725-46-2EP234: Cyanazine # 0.000.04 mg/kg 13070.0 7287-19-6EP234: Prometryn 78.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 139-40-2EP234: Propazine # 42.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 122-34-9EP234: Simazine # 32.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 5915-41-3EP234: Terbuthylazine # 29.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 886-50-0EP234: Terbutryn 1220.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QCLot: 2634892) Anonymous EB1926754-001 60168-88-9EP234: Fenarimol 72.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 21 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QCLot: 2634892) - continued Anonymous EB1926754-001 28159-98-0EP234: Irgarol 1080.004 mg/kg 13070.0 Sub-Matrix: WATER Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 2633722) C2WAT-1019 EB1926789-006 7439-97-6EG035F-LL: Mercury 88.40.002 mg/L 13070.0 EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 2633723) A1WAT-1019 EB1926789-032 7439-97-6EG035F-LL: Mercury 92.40.002 mg/L 13070.0 EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 2633725) H3WAT-1019 EB1926789-052 7439-97-6EG035F-LL: Mercury 95.80.002 mg/L 13070.0 EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 2633756) C2WAT-1019 EB1926789-006 7439-97-6EG035T-LL: Mercury 94.00.002 mg/L 13070.0 EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 2633775) A1WAT-1019 EB1926789-032 7439-97-6EG035T-LL: Mercury 95.00.002 mg/L 13070.0 EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 2633779) I2WAT-1019 EB1926789-056 7439-97-6EG035T-LL: Mercury 95.80.002 mg/L 13070.0 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QCLot: 2633753) C4WAT-1019 EB1926789-008 7440-38-2EG093A-F: Arsenic 100250 µg/L 13070.0 7440-39-3EG093A-F: Barium 99.0250 µg/L 13070.0 7440-43-9EG093A-F: Cadmium 95.062.5 µg/L 13070.0 7440-47-3EG093A-F: Chromium 91.6250 µg/L 13070.0 7440-50-8EG093A-F: Copper 91.0250 µg/L 13070.0 7439-92-1EG093A-F: Lead 91.4250 µg/L 13070.0 7440-02-0EG093A-F: Nickel 99.8250 µg/L 13070.0 7440-66-6EG093A-F: Zinc 95.6250 µg/L 13070.0 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QCLot: 2633772) A3WAT-1019 EB1926789-034 7440-38-2EG093A-F: Arsenic 101250 µg/L 13070.0 7440-39-3EG093A-F: Barium 99.5250 µg/L 13070.0 7440-43-9EG093A-F: Cadmium 96.562.5 µg/L 13070.0 7440-47-3EG093A-F: Chromium 98.2250 µg/L 13070.0 7440-50-8EG093A-F: Copper 101250 µg/L 13070.0 7439-92-1EG093A-F: Lead 112250 µg/L 13070.0 7440-02-0EG093A-F: Nickel 98.4250 µg/L 13070.0 7440-66-6EG093A-F: Zinc 92.6250 µg/L 13070.0 EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QCLot: 2633777) I2WAT-1019 EB1926789-056 7440-38-2EG093A-F: Arsenic 104250 µg/L 13070.0 22 of 22:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: WATER Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QCLot: 2633777) - continued I2WAT-1019 EB1926789-056 7440-39-3EG093A-F: Barium 103250 µg/L 13070.0 7440-43-9EG093A-F: Cadmium 98.062.5 µg/L 13070.0 7440-47-3EG093A-F: Chromium 97.6250 µg/L 13070.0 7440-50-8EG093A-F: Copper 99.4250 µg/L 13070.0 7439-92-1EG093A-F: Lead 109250 µg/L 13070.0 7440-02-0EG093A-F: Nickel 98.6250 µg/L 13070.0 7440-66-6EG093A-F: Zinc 98.9250 µg/L 13070.0 EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QCLot: 2633755) C2WAT-1019 EB1926789-006 7440-38-2EG093A-T: Arsenic 101500 µg/L 13070.0 7440-39-3EG093A-T: Barium 98.8500 µg/L 13070.0 7440-43-9EG093A-T: Cadmium 95.1125 µg/L 13070.0 7440-47-3EG093A-T: Chromium 98.6500 µg/L 13070.0 7440-50-8EG093A-T: Copper 95.6500 µg/L 13070.0 7439-92-1EG093A-T: Lead 96.1500 µg/L 13070.0 7440-02-0EG093A-T: Nickel 90.8500 µg/L 13070.0 7440-66-6EG093A-T: Zinc 98.7500 µg/L 13070.0 EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QCLot: 2633773) A1WAT-1019 EB1926789-032 7440-38-2EG093A-T: Arsenic 98.7500 µg/L 13070.0 7440-39-3EG093A-T: Barium 96.3500 µg/L 13070.0 7440-43-9EG093A-T: Cadmium 94.1125 µg/L 13070.0 7440-47-3EG093A-T: Chromium 99.3500 µg/L 13070.0 7440-50-8EG093A-T: Copper 96.0500 µg/L 13070.0 7439-92-1EG093A-T: Lead 97.1500 µg/L 13070.0 7440-02-0EG093A-T: Nickel 95.7500 µg/L 13070.0 7440-66-6EG093A-T: Zinc 96.3500 µg/L 13070.0 EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS (QCLot: 2633778) I2WAT-1019 EB1926789-056 7440-38-2EG093A-T: Arsenic 102500 µg/L 13070.0 7440-39-3EG093A-T: Barium 100500 µg/L 13070.0 7440-43-9EG093A-T: Cadmium 96.0125 µg/L 13070.0 7440-47-3EG093A-T: Chromium 101500 µg/L 13070.0 7440-50-8EG093A-T: Copper 96.1500 µg/L 13070.0 7439-92-1EG093A-T: Lead 95.7500 µg/L 13070.0 7440-02-0EG093A-T: Nickel 95.3500 µg/L 13070.0 7440-66-6EG093A-T: Zinc 96.0500 µg/L 13070.0 EP090: Organotin Compounds (Soluble) (QCLot: 2637740) AMB05 EB1926789-013 56573-85-4EP090S: Tributyltin 82.1147 ngSn/L 13020.0 True Environmental QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with Quality Review Work Order : EB1926789 Page : 1 of 17 :: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division BrisbaneBMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD :Contact MS BETH TOKI Telephone : +61-7-3243 7222 :Project B23282 Douglas Shoal Date Samples Received : 10-Oct-2019 Site : ---- Issue Date : 25-Oct-2019 WILLIS BRASSIL:Sampler No. of samples received : 58 :Order number B23282 No. of samples analysed : 58 This report is automatically generated by the ALS LIMS through interpretation of the ALS Quality Control Report and several Quality Assurance parameters measured by ALS. This automated reporting highlights any non-conformances, facilitates faster and more accurate data validation and is designed to assist internal expert and external Auditor review. Many components of this report contribute to the overall DQO assessment and reporting for guideline compliance. Brief method summaries and references are also provided to assist in traceability. Summary of Outliers Outliers : Quality Control Samples This report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report. l NO Method Blank value outliers occur. l NO Laboratory Control outliers occur. l Duplicate outliers exist - please see following pages for full details. l Matrix Spike outliers exist - please see following pages for full details. l Surrogate recovery outliers exist for all regular sample matrices - please see following pages for full details. Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance l NO Analysis Holding Time Outliers exist. Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples l Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist - please see following pages for full details. R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R 2 of 17:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Outliers : Quality Control Samples Duplicates, Method Blanks, Laboratory Control Samples and Matrix Spikes Matrix: SOIL Compound Group Name CommentLimitsDataAnalyteClient Sample IDLaboratory Sample ID CAS Number Duplicate (DUP) RPDs EB1926789--001 7440-39-3BariumI1SED-1019 RPD exceeds LOR based limits0% - 20%27.6 %EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS Matrix Spike (MS) Recoveries EB1926754--001 22224-92-6FenamiphosAnonymous MS recovery not determined, background level greater than or equal to 4x spike level. ----Not Determined EP234A: OP Pesticides EB1926754--001 17804-35-2BenomylAnonymous Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%39.2 %EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates EB1926754--001 28249-77-6ThiobencarbAnonymous MS recovery not determined, background level greater than or equal to 4x spike level. ----Not Determined EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates EB1926754--001 51235-04-2HexazinoneAnonymous Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%18.0 %EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides EB1926754--001 21087-64-9MetribuzinAnonymous MS recovery not determined, background level greater than or equal to 4x spike level. ----Not Determined EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides EB1926754--001 85509-19-9FlusilazoleAnonymous Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%52.4 %EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides EB1926754--001 107534-96-3TebuconazoleAnonymous MS recovery not determined, background level greater than or equal to 4x spike level. ----Not Determined EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides EB1926754--001 330-54-1DiuronAnonymous Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%26.8 %EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides EB1926754--001 51218-45-2MetolachlorAnonymous MS recovery not determined, background level greater than or equal to 4x spike level. ----Not Determined EP234G: Chloracetanilides EB1926754--001 834-12-8AmetrynAnonymous Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%3.20 %EP234H: Triazine Herbicides EB1926754--001 21725-46-2CyanazineAnonymous Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%0.00 %EP234H: Triazine Herbicides EB1926754--001 139-40-2PropazineAnonymous Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%42.4 %EP234H: Triazine Herbicides EB1926754--001 122-34-9SimazineAnonymous Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%32.8 %EP234H: Triazine Herbicides EB1926754--001 5915-41-3TerbuthylazineAnonymous Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%29.6 %EP234H: Triazine Herbicides Regular Sample Surrogates Sub-Matrix: WATER Compound Group Name CommentLimitsDataAnalyteClient Sample IDLaboratory Sample ID CAS Number 3 of 17:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: WATER Compound Group Name CommentLimitsDataAnalyteClient Sample IDLaboratory Sample ID CAS Number Samples Submitted EB1926789-005 ----TripropyltinC1WAT-1019 Recovery greater than upper data quality objective 24.0-116 % EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 121 % EB1926789-013 ----TripropyltinAMB05 Recovery greater than upper data quality objective 24.0-116 % EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 132 % EB1926789-041 ----TripropyltinB1WAT-1019 Recovery greater than upper data quality objective 24.0-116 % EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 119 % EB1926789-042 ----TripropyltinB2WAT-1019 Recovery greater than upper data quality objective 24.0-116 % EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 126 % Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples Matrix: SOIL Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type Method ExpectedQC Regular Actual Rate (%)Count Laboratory Duplicates (DUP) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC StandardSoil Particle Density 0.00 10.000 2 Matrix: WATER Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type Method ExpectedQC Regular Actual Rate (%)Count Laboratory Duplicates (DUP) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC StandardOrganotin Compounds (Soluble) 7.84 10.004 51 Matrix Spikes (MS) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC StandardOrganotin Compounds (Soluble) 1.96 5.001 51 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC StandardTotal Metals in Fresh Water -Suite A by ORC-ICPMS 0.00 5.000 1 Analysis Holding Time Compliance Holding times for VOC in soils vary according to analytes of interest. Vinyl Chloride and Styrene holding time is 7 days; others 14 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all VOC analytes and should be verified in case the reported breach is a false positive or Vinyl Chloride and Styrene are not key analytes of interest/concern. Holding time for leachate methods (e.g. TCLP) vary according to the analytes reported. Assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method. These are: organics 14 days, mercury 28 days & other metals 180 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters. If samples are identified below as having been analysed or extracted outside of recommended holding times, this should be taken into consideration when interpreting results. This report summarizes extraction / preparation and analysis times and compares each with ALS recommended holding times (referencing USEPA SW 846, APHA, AS and NEPM) based on the sample container provided. Dates reported represent first date of extraction or analysis and preclude subsequent dilutions and reruns. A listing of breaches (if any) is provided herein. Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EA055) I1SED-1019, I11SED-1019, I12SED-1019 19-Oct-2019---- 10-Oct-2019----05-Oct-2019 ---- ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EA055) I2SED-1019 21-Oct-2019---- 10-Oct-2019----07-Oct-2019 ---- ü 4 of 17:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EA150: Particle Sizing Snap Lock Bag (EA150H) I1SED-1019 02-Apr-2020---- 18-Oct-2019----05-Oct-2019 ---- ü Snap Lock Bag (EA150H) I2SED-1019 04-Apr-2020---- 18-Oct-2019----07-Oct-2019 ---- ü EA150: Soil Classification based on Particle Size Snap Lock Bag (EA150H) I1SED-1019 02-Apr-2020---- 18-Oct-2019----05-Oct-2019 ---- ü Snap Lock Bag (EA150H) I2SED-1019 04-Apr-2020---- 18-Oct-2019----07-Oct-2019 ---- ü EA152: Soil Particle Density Snap Lock Bag (EA152) I1SED-1019 02-Apr-2020---- 18-Oct-2019----05-Oct-2019 ---- ü Snap Lock Bag (EA152) I2SED-1019 04-Apr-2020---- 18-Oct-2019----07-Oct-2019 ---- ü EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG005-SD) I1SED-1019, I11SED-1019, I12SED-1019 02-Apr-202002-Apr-2020 14-Oct-201911-Oct-201905-Oct-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG005-SD) I2SED-1019 04-Apr-202004-Apr-2020 14-Oct-201911-Oct-201907-Oct-2019 ü ü EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG020-SD) I1SED-1019, I11SED-1019, I12SED-1019 02-Apr-202002-Apr-2020 14-Oct-201911-Oct-201905-Oct-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG020-SD) I2SED-1019 04-Apr-202004-Apr-2020 14-Oct-201911-Oct-201907-Oct-2019 ü ü EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG020X-T) I1SED-1019, I11SED-1019, I12SED-1019 02-Apr-202002-Apr-2020 14-Oct-201911-Oct-201905-Oct-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG020X-T) I2SED-1019 04-Apr-202004-Apr-2020 14-Oct-201911-Oct-201907-Oct-2019 ü ü EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG035T-LL) I1SED-1019, I11SED-1019, I12SED-1019 02-Nov-201902-Nov-2019 14-Oct-201911-Oct-201905-Oct-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG035T-LL) I2SED-1019 04-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 14-Oct-201911-Oct-201907-Oct-2019 ü ü 5 of 17:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP090: Organotin Compounds Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP090) I1SED-1019, I11SED-1019, I12SED-1019 27-Nov-201919-Oct-2019 23-Oct-201918-Oct-201905-Oct-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP090) I2SED-1019 27-Nov-201921-Oct-2019 23-Oct-201918-Oct-201907-Oct-2019 ü ü EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP094) I1SED-1019, I11SED-1019, I12SED-1019 23-Nov-201919-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201914-Oct-201905-Oct-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP094) I2SED-1019 23-Nov-201921-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201914-Oct-201907-Oct-2019 ü ü EP094B: Synergist Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP094) I1SED-1019, I11SED-1019, I12SED-1019 23-Nov-201919-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201914-Oct-201905-Oct-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP094) I2SED-1019 23-Nov-201921-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201914-Oct-201907-Oct-2019 ü ü EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP202) I1SED-1019, I11SED-1019, I12SED-1019 25-Nov-201919-Oct-2019 16-Oct-201916-Oct-201905-Oct-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP202) I2SED-1019 25-Nov-201921-Oct-2019 16-Oct-201916-Oct-201907-Oct-2019 ü ü EP234A: OP Pesticides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I1SED-1019, I11SED-1019, I12SED-1019 24-Nov-201919-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201915-Oct-201905-Oct-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I2SED-1019 24-Nov-201921-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201915-Oct-201907-Oct-2019 ü ü EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I1SED-1019, I11SED-1019, I12SED-1019 24-Nov-201919-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201915-Oct-201905-Oct-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I2SED-1019 24-Nov-201921-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201915-Oct-201907-Oct-2019 ü ü EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I1SED-1019, I11SED-1019, I12SED-1019 24-Nov-201919-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201915-Oct-201905-Oct-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I2SED-1019 24-Nov-201921-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201915-Oct-201907-Oct-2019 ü ü 6 of 17:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I1SED-1019, I11SED-1019, I12SED-1019 24-Nov-201919-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201915-Oct-201905-Oct-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I2SED-1019 24-Nov-201921-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201915-Oct-201907-Oct-2019 ü ü EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I1SED-1019, I11SED-1019, I12SED-1019 24-Nov-201919-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201915-Oct-201905-Oct-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I2SED-1019 24-Nov-201921-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201915-Oct-201907-Oct-2019 ü ü EP234G: Chloracetanilides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I1SED-1019, I11SED-1019, I12SED-1019 24-Nov-201919-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201915-Oct-201905-Oct-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I2SED-1019 24-Nov-201921-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201915-Oct-201907-Oct-2019 ü ü EP234H: Triazine Herbicides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I1SED-1019, I11SED-1019, I12SED-1019 24-Nov-201919-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201915-Oct-201905-Oct-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I2SED-1019 24-Nov-201921-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201915-Oct-201907-Oct-2019 ü ü EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I1SED-1019, I11SED-1019, I12SED-1019 24-Nov-201919-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201915-Oct-201905-Oct-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I2SED-1019 24-Nov-201921-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201915-Oct-201907-Oct-2019 ü ü Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) 7 of 17:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EA025: Total Suspended Solids dried at 104 ± 2°C Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural (EA025) C1WAT-1019, C2WAT-1019, C3WAT-1019, C4WAT-1019, C5WAT-1019, C6WAT-1019, D1WAT-1019, D2WAT-1019, D3WAT-1019, D4WAT-1019, D5WAT-1019, E1WAT-1019, E2WAT-1019, E3WAT-1019, E4WAT-1019, E5WAT-1019, G1WAT-1019, G2WAT-1019, G3WAT-1019, G4WAT-1019, G5WAT-1019, A1WAT-1019, A2WAT-1019, A3WAT-1019, A4WAT-1019, A5WAT-1019, A6WAT-1019, A7WAT-1019, B1WAT-1019, B2WAT-1019, B3WAT-1019, B4WAT-1019, B5WAT-1019, B6WAT-1019, B7WAT-1019, H1WAT-1019, H2WAT-1019, H3WAT-1019, H4WAT-1019, H5WAT-1019, I1WAT-1019, I2WAT-1019, I3WAT-1019, I4WAT-1019, I5WAT-1019, I6WAT-1019 15-Oct-2019---- 11-Oct-2019----08-Oct-2019 ---- ü 8 of 17:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EG035F: Dissolved Mercury by FIMS Clear HDPE (U-T ORC) - Filtered; Lab-acidified (EG035F-LL) C1WAT-1019, C2WAT-1019, C3WAT-1019, C4WAT-1019, C5WAT-1019, C6WAT-1019, D1WAT-1019, D2WAT-1019, D3WAT-1019, D4WAT-1019, D5WAT-1019, E1WAT-1019, E2WAT-1019, E3WAT-1019, E4WAT-1019, E5WAT-1019, G1WAT-1019, G2WAT-1019, G3WAT-1019, G4WAT-1019, G5WAT-1019, A1WAT-1019, A2WAT-1019, A3WAT-1019, A4WAT-1019, A5WAT-1019, A6WAT-1019, A7WAT-1019, B1WAT-1019, B2WAT-1019, B3WAT-1019, B4WAT-1019, B5WAT-1019, B6WAT-1019, B7WAT-1019, H1WAT-1019, H2WAT-1019, H3WAT-1019, H4WAT-1019, H5WAT-1019, I1WAT-1019, I2WAT-1019, I3WAT-1019, I4WAT-1019, I5WAT-1019, I6WAT-1019 05-Nov-2019---- 11-Oct-2019----08-Oct-2019 ---- ü 9 of 17:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EG035T: Total Mercury by FIMS Clear HDPE (U-T ORC) - Unfiltered; Lab-acidified (EG035T-LL) C1WAT-1019, C2WAT-1019, C3WAT-1019, C4WAT-1019, C5WAT-1019, C6WAT-1019, D1WAT-1019, D2WAT-1019, D3WAT-1019, D4WAT-1019, D5WAT-1019, E1WAT-1019, E2WAT-1019, E3WAT-1019, E4WAT-1019, E5WAT-1019, G1WAT-1019, G2WAT-1019, G3WAT-1019, G4WAT-1019, G5WAT-1019, A1WAT-1019, A2WAT-1019, A3WAT-1019, A4WAT-1019, A5WAT-1019, A6WAT-1019, A7WAT-1019, B1WAT-1019, B2WAT-1019, B3WAT-1019, B4WAT-1019, B5WAT-1019, B6WAT-1019, B7WAT-1019, H1WAT-1019, H2WAT-1019, H3WAT-1019, H4WAT-1019, H5WAT-1019, I1WAT-1019, I2WAT-1019, I3WAT-1019, I4WAT-1019, I5WAT-1019, I6WAT-1019, FB01-1019, TB01-1019, R01-1019 05-Nov-2019---- 22-Oct-2019----08-Oct-2019 ---- ü 10 of 17:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EG093F: Dissolved Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS Clear HDPE (U-T ORC) - Filtered; Lab-acidified (EG093A-F) C1WAT-1019, C2WAT-1019, C3WAT-1019, C4WAT-1019, C5WAT-1019, C6WAT-1019, D1WAT-1019, D2WAT-1019, D3WAT-1019, D4WAT-1019, D5WAT-1019, E1WAT-1019, E2WAT-1019, E3WAT-1019, E4WAT-1019, E5WAT-1019, G1WAT-1019, G2WAT-1019, G3WAT-1019, G4WAT-1019, G5WAT-1019, A1WAT-1019, A2WAT-1019, A3WAT-1019, A4WAT-1019, A5WAT-1019, A6WAT-1019, A7WAT-1019, B1WAT-1019, B2WAT-1019, B3WAT-1019, B4WAT-1019, B5WAT-1019, B6WAT-1019, B7WAT-1019, H1WAT-1019, H2WAT-1019, H3WAT-1019, H4WAT-1019, H5WAT-1019, I1WAT-1019, I2WAT-1019, I3WAT-1019, I4WAT-1019, I5WAT-1019, I6WAT-1019 05-Apr-2020---- 22-Oct-2019----08-Oct-2019 ---- ü 11 of 17:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EG093T: Total Metals in Saline Water by ORC-ICPMS Clear HDPE (U-T ORC) - Unfiltered; Lab-acidified (EG093A-T) C1WAT-1019, C2WAT-1019, C3WAT-1019, C4WAT-1019, C5WAT-1019, C6WAT-1019, D1WAT-1019, D2WAT-1019, D3WAT-1019, D4WAT-1019, D5WAT-1019, E1WAT-1019, E2WAT-1019, E3WAT-1019, E4WAT-1019, E5WAT-1019, G1WAT-1019, G2WAT-1019, G3WAT-1019, G4WAT-1019, G5WAT-1019, A1WAT-1019, A2WAT-1019, A3WAT-1019, A4WAT-1019, A5WAT-1019, A6WAT-1019, A7WAT-1019, B1WAT-1019, B2WAT-1019, B3WAT-1019, B4WAT-1019, B5WAT-1019, B6WAT-1019, B7WAT-1019, H1WAT-1019, H2WAT-1019, H3WAT-1019, H4WAT-1019, H5WAT-1019, I1WAT-1019, I2WAT-1019, I3WAT-1019, I4WAT-1019, I5WAT-1019, I6WAT-1019, FB01-1019, TB01-1019 05-Apr-202005-Apr-2020 21-Oct-201921-Oct-201908-Oct-2019 ü ü EG094T: Total metals in Fresh water by ORC-ICPMS Clear HDPE (U-T ORC) - Unfiltered; Lab-acidified (EG094A-T) R01-1019 05-Apr-202005-Apr-2020 25-Oct-201925-Oct-201908-Oct-2019 ü ü 12 of 17:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP090: Organotin Compounds (Soluble) Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved (EP090S) G2WAT-1019, G3WAT-1019, G4WAT-1019, G5WAT-1019, A1WAT-1019, A2WAT-1019, A3WAT-1019, A4WAT-1019, A5WAT-1019, A6WAT-1019, A7WAT-1019, AMB01, B1WAT-1019, B2WAT-1019, B3WAT-1019, B4WAT-1019 23-Nov-201915-Oct-2019 15-Oct-201914-Oct-201908-Oct-2019 ü ü Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved (EP090S) C1WAT-1019, C2WAT-1019, C3WAT-1019, C4WAT-1019, C5WAT-1019, C6WAT-1019, AMB04, AMB05, D1WAT-1019, D2WAT-1019, D3WAT-1019, D4WAT-1019, D5WAT-1019, AMB03, E1WAT-1019, E2WAT-1019, E3WAT-1019, E4WAT-1019, E5WAT-1019, G1WAT-1019 23-Nov-201915-Oct-2019 16-Oct-201914-Oct-201908-Oct-2019 ü ü Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved (EP090S) B5WAT-1019, B6WAT-1019, B7WAT-1019, AMB02, H1WAT-1019, H2WAT-1019, H3WAT-1019, H4WAT-1019, H5WAT-1019, I1WAT-1019, I2WAT-1019, I3WAT-1019, I4WAT-1019, I5WAT-1019, I6WAT-1019 24-Nov-201915-Oct-2019 18-Oct-201915-Oct-201908-Oct-2019 ü ü 13 of 17:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance The following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(were) processed. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to the expected rate. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers. Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification. Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type ExpectedQC Regular Actual Rate (%)Count EvaluationAnalytical Methods Method Laboratory Duplicates (DUP) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.11 10.001 9 üMoisture Content EA055 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.11 10.002 18 üOrganotin Analysis EP090 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 20.00 10.001 5 üPesticides by LCMSMS (Positive Ion Mode) EP234 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 16.67 10.002 12 üPhenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides (LCMS - Standard DL) EP202 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 0.00 10.000 2 ûSoil Particle Density EA152 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 25.00 10.001 4 üSynthetic Pyrethroids by GCMS EP094 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 25.00 10.001 4 üTotal Fe and Al in Sediments by ICPAES EG005-SD NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 25.00 10.001 4 üTotal Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) EG035T-LL NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 25.00 10.001 4 üTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite X EG020X-T NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 25.00 10.001 4 üTotal Metals in Sediments by ICPMS EG020-SD Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.56 5.001 18 üOrganotin Analysis EP090 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 20.00 5.001 5 üPesticides by LCMSMS (Positive Ion Mode) EP234 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 8.33 5.001 12 üPhenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides (LCMS - Standard DL) EP202 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 50.00 5.001 2 üSoil Particle Density EA152 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 25.00 5.001 4 üSynthetic Pyrethroids by GCMS EP094 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 25.00 5.001 4 üTotal Fe and Al in Sediments by ICPAES EG005-SD NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 25.00 5.001 4 üTotal Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) EG035T-LL NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 25.00 5.001 4 üTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite X EG020X-T NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 25.00 5.001 4 üTotal Metals in Sediments by ICPMS EG020-SD Method Blanks (MB) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.56 5.001 18 üOrganotin Analysis EP090 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 20.00 5.001 5 üPesticides by LCMSMS (Positive Ion Mode) EP234 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 8.33 5.001 12 üPhenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides (LCMS - Standard DL) EP202 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 25.00 5.001 4 üSynthetic Pyrethroids by GCMS EP094 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 25.00 5.001 4 üTotal Fe and Al in Sediments by ICPAES EG005-SD NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 25.00 5.001 4 üTotal Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) EG035T-LL NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 25.00 5.001 4 üTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite X EG020X-T NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 25.00 5.001 4 üTotal Metals in Sediments by ICPMS EG020-SD Matrix Spikes (MS) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.56 5.001 18 üOrganotin Analysis EP090 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 20.00 5.001 5 üPesticides by LCMSMS (Positive Ion Mode) EP234 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 8.33 5.001 12 üPhenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides (LCMS - Standard DL) EP202 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 25.00 5.001 4 üSynthetic Pyrethroids by GCMS EP094 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 25.00 5.001 4 üTotal Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) EG035T-LL NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 25.00 5.001 4 üTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite X EG020X-T 14 of 17:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification. Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type ExpectedQC Regular Actual Rate (%)Count EvaluationAnalytical Methods Method Matrix Spikes (MS) - Continued NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 25.00 5.001 4 üTotal Metals in Sediments by ICPMS EG020-SD Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification. Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type ExpectedQC Regular Actual Rate (%)Count EvaluationAnalytical Methods Method Laboratory Duplicates (DUP) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.87 10.005 46 üDissolved Mercury by FIMS - Low Level EG035F-LL NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.87 10.005 46 üDissolved Metals in Saline Water -Suite A by ORC-ICPMS EG093A-F NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.87 10.005 46 üDissolved Metals in Saline Water -Suite B by ORC-ICPMS EG093B-F NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 7.84 10.004 51 ûOrganotin Compounds (Soluble) EP090S NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.42 10.005 48 üSuspended Solids EA025 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.20 10.005 49 üTotal Mercury by FIMS - Low Level EG035T-LL NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 100.00 10.001 1 üTotal Metals in Fresh Water -Suite A by ORC-ICPMS EG094A-T NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.42 10.005 48 üTotal Metals in Saline Water Suite A by ORC-ICPMS EG093A-T Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.52 5.003 46 üDissolved Mercury by FIMS - Low Level EG035F-LL NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.52 5.003 46 üDissolved Metals in Saline Water -Suite A by ORC-ICPMS EG093A-F NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.52 5.003 46 üDissolved Metals in Saline Water -Suite B by ORC-ICPMS EG093B-F NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.88 5.003 51 üOrganotin Compounds (Soluble) EP090S NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 18.75 15.009 48 üSuspended Solids EA025 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.12 5.003 49 üTotal Mercury by FIMS - Low Level EG035T-LL NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 100.00 5.001 1 üTotal Metals in Fresh Water -Suite A by ORC-ICPMS EG094A-T NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.003 48 üTotal Metals in Saline Water Suite A by ORC-ICPMS EG093A-T Method Blanks (MB) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.52 5.003 46 üDissolved Mercury by FIMS - Low Level EG035F-LL NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.52 5.003 46 üDissolved Metals in Saline Water -Suite A by ORC-ICPMS EG093A-F NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.52 5.003 46 üDissolved Metals in Saline Water -Suite B by ORC-ICPMS EG093B-F NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.88 5.003 51 üOrganotin Compounds (Soluble) EP090S NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.003 48 üSuspended Solids EA025 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.12 5.003 49 üTotal Mercury by FIMS - Low Level EG035T-LL NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 100.00 5.001 1 üTotal Metals in Fresh Water -Suite A by ORC-ICPMS EG094A-T NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.003 48 üTotal Metals in Saline Water Suite A by ORC-ICPMS EG093A-T Matrix Spikes (MS) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.52 5.003 46 üDissolved Mercury by FIMS - Low Level EG035F-LL NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.52 5.003 46 üDissolved Metals in Saline Water -Suite A by ORC-ICPMS EG093A-F NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 1.96 5.001 51 ûOrganotin Compounds (Soluble) EP090S NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.12 5.003 49 üTotal Mercury by FIMS - Low Level EG035T-LL NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 0.00 5.000 1 ûTotal Metals in Fresh Water -Suite A by ORC-ICPMS EG094A-T NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.003 48 üTotal Metals in Saline Water Suite A by ORC-ICPMS EG093A-T 15 of 17:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Brief Method Summaries The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the Certificate of Analysis. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions. Analytical Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod In house: A gravimetric procedure based on weight loss over a 12 hour drying period at 105-110 degrees C. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) Section 7.1 and Table 1 (14 day holding time). Moisture Content EA055 SOIL Particle Size Analysis by Hydrometer according to AS1289.3.6.3 - 2003Particle Size Analysis by Hydrometer EA150H SOIL Soil Particle Density by AS 1289.3.5.1-2006 : Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes - Soil classification tests - Determination of the soil particle density of a soil - Standard method Soil Particle Density EA152 SOIL In house: Referenced to APHA 3120; USEPA SW 846 - 6010. Metals are determined following an appropriate acid digestion of the soil. The ICPAES technique ionises samples in a plasma, emitting a characteristic spectrum based on metals present. Intensities at selected wavelengths are compared against those of matrix matched standards. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3). LORs per NODG Total Fe and Al in Sediments by ICPAES EG005-SD SOIL In house: Referenced to APHA 3125; USEPA SW846 - 6020, ALS QWI-EN/EG020. The ICPMS technique utilizes a highly efficient argon plasma to ionize selected elements. Ions are then passed into a high vacuum mass spectrometer, which separates the analytes based on their distinct mass to charge ratios prior to their measurement by a discrete dynode ion detector. Analyte list and LORs per NODG. Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS EG020-SD SOIL In house: Referenced to APHA 3125; USEPA SW846 - 6020, ALS QWI-EN/EG020. The ICPMS technique utilizes a highly efficient argon plasma to ionize selected elements. Ions are then passed into a high vacuum mass spectrometer, which separates the analytes based on their distinct mass to charge ratios prior to their measurement by a discrete dynode ion detector. Total Metals by ICP-MS - Suite X EG020X-T SOIL In house: Referenced to AS 3550, APHA 3112 Hg - B (Flow-injection (SnCl2)(Cold Vapour generation) AAS) FIM-AAS is an automated flameless atomic absorption technique. Mercury in solids are determined following an appropriate acid digestion. Ionic mercury is reduced online to atomic mercury vapour by SnCl2 which is then purged into a heated quartz cell. Quantification is by comparing absorbance against a calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) Total Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) EG035T-LL SOIL In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 8270D Prepared sample extracts are analysed by GC/MS coupled with high volume injection, and quanitified against an established calibration curve. Organotin Analysis EP090 SOIL In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 8270D Extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS and quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. This technique is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) (Method 504,505) Synthetic Pyrethroids by GCMS EP094 SOIL In house: LCMS (Electrospray in negative mode). Residues of acid herbicides are extracted from soil samples under the alkaline condition. An aliquot of the alkaline aqueous phase is taken and acidified before a SPE cleanup. After eluting off from the SPE cartridge, residues of acid herbicides are dissolved in HPLC mobile phase prior to instrument analysis. Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides (LCMS - Standard DL) EP202 SOIL In house: LC-MSMS, direct injection. A sample extracted into acetonitrile, diluted with water and injected directly onto the instrument.. Analysis is by LC/MSMS, ESI Positive Mode. Pesticides by LCMSMS (Positive Ion Mode) EP234 SOIL In house: Referenced to APHA 2540D. A gravimetric procedure employed to determine the amount of `non-filterable` residue in a aqueous sample. The prescribed GFC (1.2um) filter is rinsed with deionised water, oven dried and weighed prior to analysis. A well-mixed sample is filtered through a glass fibre filter (1.2um). The residue on the filter paper is dried at 104+/-2C . This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) Suspended Solids EA025 WATER 16 of 17:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Analytical Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod In house: Referenced to AS 3550, APHA 3112 Hg - B (Flow-injection (SnCl2)(Cold Vapour generation) AAS) Samples are 0.45µm filtered prior to analysis. FIM-AAS is an automated flameless atomic absorption technique. A bromate/bromide reagent is used to oxidise any organic mercury compounds in the filtered sample. The ionic mercury is reduced online to atomic mercury vapour by SnCl2 which is then purged into a heated quartz cell. Quantification is by comparing absorbance against a calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) Dissolved Mercury by FIMS - Low Level EG035F-LL WATER In house: Referenced to AS 3550, APHA 3112 Hg - B (Flow-injection (SnCl2)(Cold Vapour generation) AAS) FIM-AAS is an automated flameless atomic absorption technique. A bromate/bromide reagent is used to oxidise any organic mercury compounds in the unfiltered sample. The ionic mercury is reduced online to atomic mercury vapour by SnCl2 which is then purged into a heated quartz cell. Quantification is by comparing absorbance against a calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) Total Mercury by FIMS - Low Level EG035T-LL WATER In house: Referenced to APHA 3125; USEPA SW846 - 6020 Samples are 0.45µm filtered prior to analysis. The ORC-ICPMS technique removes interfering species through a series of chemical reactions prior to ion detection. Ions are passed into a high vacuum mass spectrometer, which separates the analytes based on their distinct mass to charge ratios prior to measurement by a discrete dynode ion detector. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) Dissolved Metals in Saline Water -Suite A by ORC-ICPMS EG093A-F WATER In house: Referenced to APHA 3125; USEPA SW846 - 6020. The ORC-ICPMS technique removes interfering species through a series of chemical reactions prior to ion detection. Ions are passed into a high vacuum mass spectrometer, which separates the analytes based on their distinct mass to charge ratios prior to measurement by a discrete dynode ion detector. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) Total Metals in Saline Water Suite A by ORC-ICPMS EG093A-T WATER In house: Referenced to APHA 3125; USEPA SW846 - 6020 Samples are 0.45µm filtered prior to analysis. The ORC-ICPMS technique removes interfering species through a series of chemical reactions prior to ion detection. Ions are passed into a high vacuum mass spectrometer, which separates the analytes based on their distinct mass to charge ratios prior to measurement by a discrete dynode ion detector. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) Dissolved Metals in Saline Water -Suite B by ORC-ICPMS EG093B-F WATER In house: Referenced to APHA 3125; USEPA SW846 - 6020. The ORC-ICPMS technique removes interfering species through a series of chemical reactions prior to ion detection. Ions are passed into a high vacuum mass spectrometer, which separates the analytes based on their distinct mass to charge ratios prior to measurement by a discrete dynode ion detector. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) Total Metals in Fresh Water -Suite A by ORC-ICPMS EG094A-T WATER In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 8270D Sample extracts are analysed by GC/MS coupled with high volume injection and quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) Organotin Compounds (Soluble) EP090S WATER Preparation Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod In house: Referenced to USEPA 200.2. Hot Block Acid Digestion 1.0g of sample is heated with Nitric and Hydrochloric acids, then cooled. Peroxide is added and samples heated and cooled again before being filtered and bulked to volume for analysis. Digest is appropriate for determination of selected metals in sludge, sediments, and soils. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) (Method 202) Hot Block Digest for metals in soils sediments and sludges EN69 SOIL In-House: Alkaline extract followed by SPE clean up of acidified portion of the sample extract.Extraction for Phenoxy Acid Herbicides in Soils. EP202-PR SOIL In houseSample preparation for Pesticides by LCMSMS EP234-PR SOIL 17 of 17:Page Work Order : :Client EB1926789 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282 Douglas Shoal:Project Preparation Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod In house: Mechanical agitation (tumbler). 10g of sample, Na2SO4 and surrogate are extracted with 30mL 1:1 DCM/Acetone by end over end tumble. The solvent is decanted, dehydrated and concentrated (by KD) to the desired volume for analysis. Tumbler Extraction of Solids ORG17 SOIL In house: 20g sample is spiked with surrogate and leached in a methanol:acetic acid:UHP water mix and vacuum filtered. Reagents and solvents are added to the sample and the mixture tumbled. The butyltin compounds are simultaneously derivatised and extracted. The extract is further extracted with petroleum ether. The resultant extracts are combined and concentrated for analysis. Organotin Sample Preparation ORG35 SOIL In house: Referenced to USEPA SW846-3005. This is an Ultrapure Nitric acid digestion procedure used to prepare surface and ground water samples for analysis by ORC- ICPMS. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) Digestion for Total Recoverable Metals - ORC EN25-ORC WATER In house. A specified volume of sample is spiked with surrogate, acidified and vacuum filtered. Reagents and solvent are added and the mixture tumbled. The butyltin compounds is derivitisated, extracted and the subtitution reaction completed. The extract is transferred to a separatory funnel and further extracted two times with petroleum ether. The resultant extracts are combined and concentrated for analysis. Organotin Sample Preparation ORG34 WATER False 7 7.00False Environmental QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Work Order : EB1929990 Page : 1 of 53 :: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division BrisbaneBMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD :Contact MS BETH TOKI :Contact Andrew Epps :Address PO BOX 203 SPRING HILL BRISBANE QLD 4004 Address : 2 Byth Street Stafford QLD Australia 4053 ::Telephone 07 3831 6744 +61 7 3552 8639Telephone :Project B23282-4 Douglas Shoal Date Samples Received : 11-Nov-2019 :Order number ---- Date Analysis Commenced : 12-Nov-2019 :C-O-C number ---- Issue Date : 05-Dec-2019 Sampler : CONOR JONES Site : ---- Quote number : BN/165/18 B No. of samples received 61: No. of samples analysed 56: This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full. This Quality Control Report contains the following information: l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report; Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limits l Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limits l Matrix Spike (MS) Report; Recovery and Acceptance Limits Signatories This document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11. Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition Alex Rossi Organic Chemist Sydney Organics, Smithfield, NSW Diana Mesa 2IC Organic Chemist Brisbane Inorganics, Stafford, QLD Diana Mesa 2IC Organic Chemist Brisbane Organics, Stafford, QLD Gaston Allende R&D Chemist Sydney Organics, Smithfield, NSW Kim McCabe Senior Inorganic Chemist Brisbane Inorganics, Stafford, QLD Satishkumar Trivedi Senior Acid Sulfate Soil Chemist Brisbane Acid Sulphate Soils, Stafford, QLD Satishkumar Trivedi Senior Acid Sulfate Soil Chemist Brisbane Inorganics, Stafford, QLD R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R 2 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project General Comments The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis. Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference. Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lot CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society. LOR = Limit of reporting RPD = Relative Percentage Difference # = Indicates failed QC Key : Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report The quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity. The permitted ranges for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI -EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Result < 10 times LOR: No Limit; Result between 10 and 20 times LOR: 0% - 50%; Result > 20 times LOR: 0% - 20%. Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 2697255) EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg 300 # 530 54.8 0% - 50%A1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg 360 570 46.4 0% - 50% EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg 310 270 13.0 No LimitA13-SED-1019 EB1929990-013 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg 340 290 14.7 No Limit EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 2697260) EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg 130 140 11.4 No LimitB11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg 200 230 14.5 No Limit EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg 210 220 6.47 No LimitD5-SED-1019 EB1929990-035 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg 280 290 4.62 No Limit EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 2697273) EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg 150 200 25.0 No LimitD6-SED-1019 EB1929990-036 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg 220 250 12.0 No Limit EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg 330 220 42.7 No LimitG4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg 320 240 27.2 No Limit EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 2697280) EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg 290 60 128 No LimitE3-SED-1019 EB1929990-056 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg 280 100 91.2 No Limit EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg 470 510 8.12 0% - 50%Anonymous EB1929995-006 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg 560 600 7.71 0% - 50% EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QC Lot: 2697258) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 0% - 20%A1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 0% - 20%A13-SED-1019 EB1929990-013 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QC Lot: 2697259) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 0% - 20%B11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 3 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QC Lot: 2697259) - continued EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 0% - 20%D5-SED-1019 EB1929990-035 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QC Lot: 2697272) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 0% - 20%D6-SED-1019 EB1929990-036 EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 0% - 20%G4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QC Lot: 2697279) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 0% - 20%E3-SED-1019 EB1929990-056 EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 0% - 20%Anonymous EB1929995-006 EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) (QC Lot: 2697265) EA055: Moisture Content ---- 0.1 % 19.8 19.9 0.529 0% - 50%A1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EA055: Moisture Content ---- 0.1 % 29.2 28.4 2.66 0% - 20%A13-SED-1019 EB1929990-013 EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) (QC Lot: 2697266) EA055: Moisture Content ---- 0.1 % 30.5 31.9 4.58 0% - 20%B11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 EA055: Moisture Content ---- 0.1 % 34.4 33.9 1.27 0% - 20%D5-SED-1019 EB1929990-035 EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) (QC Lot: 2697277) EA055: Moisture Content ---- 0.1 % 33.4 34.0 1.79 0% - 20%D6-SED-1019 EB1929990-036 EA055: Moisture Content ---- 0.1 % 31.7 31.9 0.664 0% - 20%G4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) (QC Lot: 2697284) EA055: Moisture Content ---- 0.1 % 31.0 32.5 4.72 0% - 20%E3-SED-1019 EB1929990-056 EA055: Moisture Content ---- 0.1 % 26.6 26.7 0.00 0% - 20%Anonymous EB1929995-006 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QC Lot: 2697256) EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No LimitA1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg <1.00 1.16 14.9 No Limit EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg 3.9 5.6 36.6 No Limit EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg 50.7 # 11.0 129 0% - 20% EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg 1.1 1.4 28.4 No Limit EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg 7.7 7.5 2.35 No Limit EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg 14 18 25.3 No Limit EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No LimitA13-SED-1019 EB1929990-013 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg 1.17 <1.00 15.3 No Limit 4 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QC Lot: 2697256) - continued EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg 4.3 3.8 12.8 No LimitA13-SED-1019 EB1929990-013 EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg 21.5 # 14.3 40.6 0% - 20% EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg 14.2 # 7.6 60.2 0% - 50% EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg 12 11 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QC Lot: 2697261) EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No LimitB11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg 1.12 1.34 17.7 No Limit EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg 3.0 3.4 11.2 No Limit EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg 10 10 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No LimitD5-SED-1019 EB1929990-035 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg 1.50 1.22 21.1 No Limit EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg 3.6 3.2 10.3 No Limit EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg 12 10 16.8 No Limit EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QC Lot: 2697274) EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No LimitD6-SED-1019 EB1929990-036 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit 5 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QC Lot: 2697274) - continued EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg 1.28 1.32 2.94 No LimitD6-SED-1019 EB1929990-036 EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg 3.4 3.5 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg <1.0 1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg 10 12 11.3 No Limit EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No LimitG4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg 1.05 1.12 6.17 No Limit EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg 4.5 3.6 22.2 No Limit EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg 1.2 <1.0 17.6 No Limit EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg 13 12 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QC Lot: 2697281) EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No LimitE3-SED-1019 EB1929990-056 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg 1.14 <1.00 13.5 No Limit EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg 4.1 2.2 60.1 No Limit EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg 12 <10 14.6 No Limit EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1929995-006 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit 6 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QC Lot: 2697281) - continued EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg 1.52 1.30 15.6 No LimitAnonymous EB1929995-006 EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg 6.0 5.5 9.61 No Limit EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg 2.3 2.5 7.86 No Limit EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg 1.3 1.3 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg 2.6 3.0 12.1 No Limit EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg 17 18 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 0.00 No Limit EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QC Lot: 2697257) EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg 3.9 4.7 19.3 0% - 20%A1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg 5.7 5.3 6.69 0% - 20%A13-SED-1019 EB1929990-013 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QC Lot: 2697262) EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg 9.0 # 5.1 55.7 0% - 20%B11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg 8.1 # 6.6 21.0 0% - 20%D5-SED-1019 EB1929990-035 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QC Lot: 2697275) EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg 5.3 5.6 5.66 0% - 20%D6-SED-1019 EB1929990-036 EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg 6.6 7.6 13.2 0% - 20%G4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QC Lot: 2697282) EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg 3.3 3.8 13.4 0% - 20%Anonymous EB1929995-006 EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg 4.9 4.6 6.02 0% - 20%E3-SED-1019 EB1929990-056 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QC Lot: 2697264) EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg 4.1 2.2 59.5 No LimitA1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No LimitB12-SED-1019 EB1929990-026 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QC Lot: 2697276) EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No LimitD6-SED-1019 EB1929990-036 EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No LimitG4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QC Lot: 2697283) EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No LimitE3-SED-1019 EB1929990-056 EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1929995-006 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QC Lot: 2697263) EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitA1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/66 230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit 7 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QC Lot: 2697263) - continued EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/66 841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitA1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitA13-SED-1019 EB1929990-013 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/66 230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/66 841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QC Lot: 2717819) EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitB1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/66 230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/66 841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitB10-SED-1019 EB1929990-024 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit 8 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QC Lot: 2717819) - continued EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitB10-SED-1019 EB1929990-024 EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/66 230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/66 841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QC Lot: 2717820) EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitD7-SED-1019 EB1929990-037 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/66 230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/66 841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitG6-SED-1019 EB1929990-047 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/66 230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/66 841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit 9 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QC Lot: 2717820) - continued EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitG6-SED-1019 EB1929990-047 EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QC Lot: 2717823) EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitE4-SED-1019 EB1929990-057 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/66 230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/66 841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QC Lot: 2721656) EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitB11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/66 230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/66 841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitG12-SED-1019 EB1929990-053 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit 10 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QC Lot: 2721656) - continued EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitG12-SED-1019 EB1929990-053 EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/66 230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/66 841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094B: Synergist (QC Lot: 2697263) EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitA1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitA13-SED-1019 EB1929990-013 EP094B: Synergist (QC Lot: 2717819) EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitB1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitB10-SED-1019 EB1929990-024 EP094B: Synergist (QC Lot: 2717820) EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitD7-SED-1019 EB1929990-037 EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitG6-SED-1019 EB1929990-047 EP094B: Synergist (QC Lot: 2717823) EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitE4-SED-1019 EB1929990-057 EP094B: Synergist (QC Lot: 2721656) EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitB11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitG12-SED-1019 EB1929990-053 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QC Lot: 2699902) EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitA1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit 11 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QC Lot: 2699902) - continued EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitA11-SED-1019 EB1929990-011 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QC Lot: 2719467) EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitB1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitD5-SED-1019 EB1929990-035 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit 12 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QC Lot: 2719467) - continued EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitD5-SED-1019 EB1929990-035 EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QC Lot: 2719469) EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitB4-SED-1019 EB1929990-018 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitG6-SED-1019 EB1929990-047 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QC Lot: 2719471) EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitE4-SED-1019 EB1929990-057 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit 13 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QC Lot: 2719471) - continued EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitE4-SED-1019 EB1929990-057 EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234A: OP Pesticides (QC Lot: 2700881) EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitA1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 <0.010 0.00 No Limit EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitA13-SED-1019 EB1929990-013 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit 14 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234A: OP Pesticides (QC Lot: 2700881) - continued EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No LimitA13-SED-1019 EB1929990-013 EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 <0.010 0.00 No Limit EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234A: OP Pesticides (QC Lot: 2719758) EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitB11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 <0.010 0.00 No Limit EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitD3-SED-1019 EB1929990-033 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit 15 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234A: OP Pesticides (QC Lot: 2719758) - continued EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitD3-SED-1019 EB1929990-033 EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 <0.010 0.00 No Limit EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234A: OP Pesticides (QC Lot: 2719763) EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitB1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit 16 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234A: OP Pesticides (QC Lot: 2719763) - continued EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 <0.010 0.00 No LimitB1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitD12-SED-1019 EB1929990-042 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 <0.010 0.00 No Limit EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234A: OP Pesticides (QC Lot: 2719766) EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitG4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit 17 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234A: OP Pesticides (QC Lot: 2719766) - continued EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No LimitG4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 <0.010 0.00 No Limit EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitE3-SED-1019 EB1929990-056 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 <0.010 0.00 No Limit EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QC Lot: 2700881) EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitA1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit 18 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QC Lot: 2700881) - continued EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitA1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitA13-SED-1019 EB1929990-013 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QC Lot: 2719758) EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitB11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitD3-SED-1019 EB1929990-033 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit 19 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QC Lot: 2719758) - continued EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No LimitD3-SED-1019 EB1929990-033 EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QC Lot: 2719763) EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitB1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitD12-SED-1019 EB1929990-042 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QC Lot: 2719766) EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitG4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit 20 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QC Lot: 2719766) - continued EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No LimitG4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitE3-SED-1019 EB1929990-056 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QC Lot: 2700881) EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No LimitA1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No LimitA13-SED-1019 EB1929990-013 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QC Lot: 2719758) EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No LimitB11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No LimitD3-SED-1019 EB1929990-033 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QC Lot: 2719763) EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No LimitB1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No LimitD12-SED-1019 EB1929990-042 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QC Lot: 2719766) EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No LimitG4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No LimitE3-SED-1019 EB1929990-056 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QC Lot: 2700881) EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitA1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit 21 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QC Lot: 2700881) - continued EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No LimitA1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg 0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitA13-SED-1019 EB1929990-013 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg 0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QC Lot: 2719758) EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitB11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitD3-SED-1019 EB1929990-033 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QC Lot: 2719763) EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitB1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitD12-SED-1019 EB1929990-042 22 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QC Lot: 2719763) - continued EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitD12-SED-1019 EB1929990-042 EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QC Lot: 2719766) EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitG4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitE3-SED-1019 EB1929990-056 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QC Lot: 2700881) EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitA1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg 0.076 0.075 0.00 0% - 50% EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitA13-SED-1019 EB1929990-013 EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 0.006 26.8 No Limit EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QC Lot: 2719758) EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitB11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitD3-SED-1019 EB1929990-033 EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit 23 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QC Lot: 2719758) - continued EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No LimitD3-SED-1019 EB1929990-033 EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QC Lot: 2719763) EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitB1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitD12-SED-1019 EB1929990-042 EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QC Lot: 2719766) EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitG4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitE3-SED-1019 EB1929990-056 EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QC Lot: 2700881) EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitA1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitA13-SED-1019 EB1929990-013 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QC Lot: 2719758) EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitB11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitD3-SED-1019 EB1929990-033 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QC Lot: 2719763) EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitB1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitD12-SED-1019 EB1929990-042 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QC Lot: 2719766) EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitG4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitE3-SED-1019 EB1929990-056 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QC Lot: 2700881) EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitA1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit 24 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QC Lot: 2700881) - continued EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No LimitA1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitA13-SED-1019 EB1929990-013 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QC Lot: 2719758) EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitB11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitD3-SED-1019 EB1929990-033 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QC Lot: 2719763) EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitB1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitD12-SED-1019 EB1929990-042 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit 25 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QC Lot: 2719763) - continued EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitD12-SED-1019 EB1929990-042 EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QC Lot: 2719766) EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitG4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitE3-SED-1019 EB1929990-056 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QC Lot: 2700881) EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitA1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitA13-SED-1019 EB1929990-013 EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QC Lot: 2719758) EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitB11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitD3-SED-1019 EB1929990-033 EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QC Lot: 2719763) EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitB1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitD12-SED-1019 EB1929990-042 EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QC Lot: 2719766) EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitG4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit 26 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QC Lot: 2719766) - continued EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitE3-SED-1019 EB1929990-056 EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit 27 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report The quality control term Method / Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. The quality control term Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) refers to a certified reference material, or a known interference free matrix spiked with target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS. Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES (QCLot: 2697255) EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg <50 10212361 mg/kg 13070.0 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg <50 89.330024 mg/kg 13070.0 EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES (QCLot: 2697260) EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg <50 10212361 mg/kg 13070.0 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg <50 88.930024 mg/kg 13070.0 EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES (QCLot: 2697273) EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg <50 10212361 mg/kg 13070.0 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg <50 94.830024 mg/kg 13070.0 EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES (QCLot: 2697280) EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg <50 10212361 mg/kg 13070.0 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg <50 93.430024 mg/kg 13070.0 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QCLot: 2697258) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 80.30.0847 mg/kg 13070.0 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QCLot: 2697259) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 79.70.0847 mg/kg 13070.0 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QCLot: 2697272) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 1020.0847 mg/kg 13070.0 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QCLot: 2697279) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 91.50.0847 mg/kg 13070.0 EA152: Soil Particle Density (QCLot: 2698511) EA152: Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) ---- ---- g/cm3 ---- 2.68 g/cm3 12080.0 EA152: Soil Particle Density (QCLot: 2698513) EA152: Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) ---- ---- g/cm3 ---- 2.68 g/cm3 12080.0 EA152: Soil Particle Density (QCLot: 2698515) EA152: Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) ---- ---- g/cm3 ---- 2.68 g/cm3 12080.0 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2697256) EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg <1.00 10196.1 mg/kg 12480.0 EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 1000.74 mg/kg 12287.0 EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg <1.0 10015.3 mg/kg 12979.0 EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg <1.0 95.244.8 mg/kg 11885.0 EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 10352.8 mg/kg 11986.0 28 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2697256) - continued EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg <10 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg <1.0 96.412.2 mg/kg 12377.0 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg <1.0 94.9114 mg/kg 12771.0 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2697261) EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg <1.00 10196.1 mg/kg 12480.0 EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 1020.74 mg/kg 12287.0 EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg <1.0 93.815.3 mg/kg 12979.0 EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg <1.0 89.544.8 mg/kg 11885.0 EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 10552.8 mg/kg 11986.0 EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg <10 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg <1.0 93.412.2 mg/kg 12377.0 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg <1.0 92.0114 mg/kg 12771.0 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2697274) EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg <1.00 93.496.1 mg/kg 12480.0 EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 96.70.74 mg/kg 12287.0 EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg <1.0 97.015.3 mg/kg 12979.0 EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg <1.0 11144.8 mg/kg 11885.0 EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 10552.8 mg/kg 11986.0 EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg <10 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg <1.0 98.212.2 mg/kg 12377.0 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg <1.0 93.5114 mg/kg 12771.0 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2697281) EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg <1.00 96.296.1 mg/kg 12480.0 EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 99.50.74 mg/kg 12287.0 29 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2697281) - continued EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg <1.0 99.915.3 mg/kg 12979.0 EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg <1.0 91.944.8 mg/kg 11885.0 EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 98.652.8 mg/kg 11986.0 EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg <10 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg <1.0 97.112.2 mg/kg 12377.0 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg <1.0 93.5114 mg/kg 12771.0 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2697257) EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 98.277.4 mg/kg 12386.0 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2697262) EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 11277.4 mg/kg 12386.0 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2697275) EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 94.877.4 mg/kg 12386.0 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2697282) EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 95.277.4 mg/kg 12386.0 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QCLot: 2697264) EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg <0.5 91.41.25 µgSn/kg 13952.0 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QCLot: 2697276) EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg <0.5 83.81.25 µgSn/kg 13952.0 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QCLot: 2697283) EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg <0.5 1141.25 µgSn/kg 13952.0 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2697263) EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 # 69.40.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 79.00.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 76.40.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 81.60.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 80.50.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 81.80.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 80.70.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/ 66230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 97.30.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/ 66841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 74.00.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 84.30.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 95.60.5 mg/kg 13070.0 30 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2697263) - continued EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 76.30.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 91.40.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2717819) EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 77.50.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 84.40.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 84.00.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 82.90.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 87.30.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 83.50.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 92.00.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/ 66230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 88.70.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/ 66841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 74.60.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 77.90.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 95.30.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 86.00.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 81.00.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2717820) EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 90.20.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 90.70.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 91.20.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 90.50.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 95.40.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 1000.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 1020.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/ 66230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 92.30.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/ 66841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 91.10.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 87.40.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 95.50.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 97.60.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 87.20.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2717823) EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 75.60.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 80.20.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 89.60.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 83.30.5 mg/kg 13070.0 31 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2717823) - continued EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 81.60.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 97.00.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 89.50.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/ 66230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 79.40.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/ 66841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 82.20.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 89.00.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 79.80.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 81.50.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 77.90.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2721656) EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 84.30.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 90.00.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 1080.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 1030.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 96.50.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 97.60.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 1180.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/ 66230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 98.40.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/ 66841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 99.50.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 1030.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 90.70.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 95.00.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 97.10.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094B: Synergist (QCLot: 2697263) EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 # 65.00.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094B: Synergist (QCLot: 2717819) EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 76.00.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094B: Synergist (QCLot: 2717820) EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 87.50.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094B: Synergist (QCLot: 2717823) EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 75.70.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094B: Synergist (QCLot: 2721656) EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 86.00.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QCLot: 2699902) 32 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QCLot: 2699902) - continued EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 92.40.1 mg/kg 12854.4 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 91.30.1 mg/kg 13045.5 EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 97.30.1 mg/kg 13551.7 EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 84.40.1 mg/kg 13060.0 EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 90.30.1 mg/kg 13156.8 EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 92.80.1 mg/kg 14150.0 EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 96.00.1 mg/kg 13168.5 EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 98.00.1 mg/kg 14150.8 EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 89.10.1 mg/kg 12640.8 EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 98.60.1 mg/kg 13957.4 EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 95.40.1 mg/kg 13738.9 EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 85.70.1 mg/kg 12948.7 EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 84.00.1 mg/kg 10649.4 EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 85.60.1 mg/kg 12853.2 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QCLot: 2719467) EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 67.40.1 mg/kg 12854.4 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 73.60.1 mg/kg 13045.5 EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 68.30.1 mg/kg 13551.7 EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 84.20.1 mg/kg 13060.0 EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 69.70.1 mg/kg 13156.8 EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 72.60.1 mg/kg 14150.0 EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 78.00.1 mg/kg 13168.5 EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 79.70.1 mg/kg 14150.8 EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 64.50.1 mg/kg 12640.8 EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 76.00.1 mg/kg 13957.4 EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 67.00.1 mg/kg 13738.9 EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 62.00.1 mg/kg 12948.7 EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 56.90.1 mg/kg 10649.4 EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 74.50.1 mg/kg 12853.2 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QCLot: 2719469) EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 75.30.1 mg/kg 12854.4 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 61.30.1 mg/kg 13045.5 EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 79.70.1 mg/kg 13551.7 EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 86.30.1 mg/kg 13060.0 EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 71.20.1 mg/kg 13156.8 EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 72.60.1 mg/kg 14150.0 EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 79.90.1 mg/kg 13168.5 EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 74.50.1 mg/kg 14150.8 EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 63.00.1 mg/kg 12640.8 33 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QCLot: 2719469) - continued EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 82.60.1 mg/kg 13957.4 EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 72.20.1 mg/kg 13738.9 EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 60.70.1 mg/kg 12948.7 EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 52.30.1 mg/kg 10649.4 EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 97.70.1 mg/kg 12853.2 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QCLot: 2719471) EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 80.50.1 mg/kg 12854.4 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 72.30.1 mg/kg 13045.5 EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 85.50.1 mg/kg 13551.7 EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 89.90.1 mg/kg 13060.0 EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 71.20.1 mg/kg 13156.8 EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 73.60.1 mg/kg 14150.0 EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 76.60.1 mg/kg 13168.5 EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 75.20.1 mg/kg 14150.8 EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 66.60.1 mg/kg 12640.8 EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 83.50.1 mg/kg 13957.4 EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 93.10.1 mg/kg 13738.9 EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 64.60.1 mg/kg 12948.7 EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 54.60.1 mg/kg 10649.4 EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 1050.1 mg/kg 12853.2 EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2700881) EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 74.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 1020.04 mg/kg 11860.0 EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 89.60.08 mg/kg 11161.0 EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 93.60.02 mg/kg 10165.0 EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 86.40.02 mg/kg 95.063.0 EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 90.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 78.90.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 91.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 94.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1114 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 1020.02 mg/kg 11662.0 EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 1130.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 98.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 95.90.08 mg/kg 12367.0 EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 86.80.04 mg/kg 11761.0 EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 1010.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 1100.4 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 94.44 mg/kg 11862.0 34 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2700881) - continued EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 77.30.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 88.80.02 mg/kg 10363.0 EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 89.60.01 mg/kg 11159.0 EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 72.80.02 mg/kg 10660.0 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 97.60.01 mg/kg 10763.0 EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2719758) EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 1040.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 87.60.04 mg/kg 11860.0 EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 78.00.08 mg/kg 11161.0 EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 85.60.02 mg/kg 10165.0 EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 92.80.02 mg/kg 95.063.0 EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 83.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 81.00.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 1070.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 84.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 85.64 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 78.40.02 mg/kg 11662.0 EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 1140.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 96.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 87.20.08 mg/kg 12367.0 EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 90.00.04 mg/kg 11761.0 EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 84.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 73.60.4 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 83.14 mg/kg 11862.0 EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 1190.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 79.20.02 mg/kg 10363.0 EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 1040.01 mg/kg 11159.0 EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 84.00.02 mg/kg 10660.0 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 83.20.01 mg/kg 10763.0 EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2719763) EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 97.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 1010.04 mg/kg 11860.0 EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 85.60.08 mg/kg 11161.0 EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 95.20.02 mg/kg 10165.0 EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 85.60.02 mg/kg 95.063.0 EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 98.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 77.00.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 93.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 70.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 35 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2719763) - continued EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1084 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 71.20.02 mg/kg 11662.0 EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 87.20.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 74.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 78.40.08 mg/kg 12367.0 EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 80.40.04 mg/kg 11761.0 EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 82.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 1220.4 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 92.14 mg/kg 11862.0 EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 87.40.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 96.00.02 mg/kg 10363.0 EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 70.40.01 mg/kg 11159.0 EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 96.80.02 mg/kg 10660.0 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 81.60.01 mg/kg 10763.0 EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2719766) EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 1040.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 87.60.04 mg/kg 11860.0 EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 78.00.08 mg/kg 11161.0 EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 85.60.02 mg/kg 10165.0 EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 92.80.02 mg/kg 95.063.0 EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 83.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 81.00.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 1070.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 84.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 85.64 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 78.40.02 mg/kg 11662.0 EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 1140.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 96.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 87.20.08 mg/kg 12367.0 EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 90.00.04 mg/kg 11761.0 EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 84.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 73.60.4 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 83.14 mg/kg 11862.0 EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 1190.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 79.20.02 mg/kg 10363.0 EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 1040.01 mg/kg 11159.0 EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 84.00.02 mg/kg 10660.0 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 83.20.01 mg/kg 10763.0 EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2700881) 36 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2700881) - continued EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 96.50.1 mg/kg 11767.0 EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 74.50.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 95.20.02 mg/kg 12256.0 EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 1000.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 91.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 1030.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 1010.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 1000.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 1050.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 1060.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 84.80.02 mg/kg 10959.0 EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 72.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2719758) EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 84.00.1 mg/kg 11767.0 EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 76.30.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 83.20.02 mg/kg 12256.0 EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 74.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 80.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 84.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 82.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 92.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 84.10.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 79.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 1050.02 mg/kg 10959.0 EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 79.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2719763) EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 83.70.1 mg/kg 11767.0 EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 76.20.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 91.20.02 mg/kg 12256.0 EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 72.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 84.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 81.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 70.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 80.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 88.90.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 79.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 96.00.02 mg/kg 10959.0 EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 1010.02 mg/kg 13070.0 37 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2719766) EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 84.00.1 mg/kg 11767.0 EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 76.30.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 83.20.02 mg/kg 12256.0 EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 74.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 80.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 84.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 82.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 92.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 84.10.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 79.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 1050.02 mg/kg 10959.0 EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 79.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QCLot: 2700881) EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 97.60.04 mg/kg 12462.0 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 94.00.04 mg/kg 11965.0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QCLot: 2719758) EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 87.20.04 mg/kg 12462.0 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 94.00.04 mg/kg 11965.0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QCLot: 2719763) EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 75.60.04 mg/kg 12462.0 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 76.00.04 mg/kg 11965.0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QCLot: 2719766) EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 87.20.04 mg/kg 12462.0 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 94.00.04 mg/kg 11965.0 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QCLot: 2700881) EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 93.00.08 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 1020.04 mg/kg 10759.0 EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 96.40.04 mg/kg 10662.0 EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 96.20.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 90.60.1 mg/kg 10260.0 EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 78.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 95.20.02 mg/kg 98.062.0 EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 1000.04 mg/kg 12761.0 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QCLot: 2719758) EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 87.40.08 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 80.40.04 mg/kg 10759.0 EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 1020.04 mg/kg 10662.0 EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 99.80.1 mg/kg 13070.0 38 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QCLot: 2719758) - continued EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 96.00.1 mg/kg 10260.0 EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 82.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 90.40.02 mg/kg 98.062.0 EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 78.40.04 mg/kg 12761.0 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QCLot: 2719763) EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 88.60.08 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 94.40.04 mg/kg 10759.0 EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 97.60.04 mg/kg 10662.0 EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 92.30.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 88.50.1 mg/kg 10260.0 EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 70.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 74.40.02 mg/kg 98.062.0 EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 91.20.04 mg/kg 12761.0 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QCLot: 2719766) EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 87.40.08 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 80.40.04 mg/kg 10759.0 EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 1020.04 mg/kg 10662.0 EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 99.80.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 96.00.1 mg/kg 10260.0 EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 82.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 90.40.02 mg/kg 98.062.0 EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 78.40.04 mg/kg 12761.0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QCLot: 2700881) EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 1010.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 87.20.02 mg/kg 12264.0 EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 98.80.04 mg/kg 10858.0 EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 1000.04 mg/kg 13161.0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QCLot: 2719758) EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 88.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 89.60.02 mg/kg 12264.0 EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 88.40.04 mg/kg 10858.0 EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 1000.04 mg/kg 13161.0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QCLot: 2719763) EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 76.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 73.60.02 mg/kg 12264.0 EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 74.40.04 mg/kg 10858.0 EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 73.60.04 mg/kg 13161.0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QCLot: 2719766) 39 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QCLot: 2719766) - continued EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 88.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 89.60.02 mg/kg 12264.0 EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 88.40.04 mg/kg 10858.0 EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 1000.04 mg/kg 13161.0 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QCLot: 2700881) EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 73.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QCLot: 2719758) EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 88.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QCLot: 2719763) EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 97.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QCLot: 2719766) EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 88.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QCLot: 2700881) EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 91.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 98.40.02 mg/kg 12062.0 EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 1070.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 90.40.02 mg/kg 13058.0 EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 99.20.02 mg/kg 12761.0 EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 97.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 92.00.02 mg/kg 11763.0 EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 92.00.02 mg/kg 11559.0 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QCLot: 2719758) EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 84.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 84.00.02 mg/kg 12062.0 EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 89.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 85.60.02 mg/kg 13058.0 EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 83.20.02 mg/kg 12761.0 EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 85.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 92.00.02 mg/kg 11763.0 EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 85.60.02 mg/kg 11559.0 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QCLot: 2719763) EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 75.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 72.80.02 mg/kg 12062.0 EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 80.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 76.00.02 mg/kg 13058.0 EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 76.80.02 mg/kg 12761.0 EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 70.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 82.40.02 mg/kg 11763.0 40 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QCLot: 2719763) - continued EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 1020.02 mg/kg 11559.0 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QCLot: 2719766) EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 84.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 84.00.02 mg/kg 12062.0 EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 89.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 85.60.02 mg/kg 13058.0 EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 83.20.02 mg/kg 12761.0 EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 85.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 92.00.02 mg/kg 11763.0 EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 85.60.02 mg/kg 11559.0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QCLot: 2700881) EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 76.80.04 mg/kg 11462.0 EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 1000.004 mg/kg 11260.0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QCLot: 2719758) EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 82.00.04 mg/kg 11462.0 EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 84.00.004 mg/kg 11260.0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QCLot: 2719763) EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 89.60.04 mg/kg 11462.0 EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 84.00.004 mg/kg 11260.0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QCLot: 2719766) EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 82.00.04 mg/kg 11462.0 EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 84.00.004 mg/kg 11260.0 Matrix Spike (MS) Report The quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on analyte recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference. Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QCLot: 2697258) A3-SED-1019 EB1929990-003 7439-97-6EG035T-LL: Mercury 99.30.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QCLot: 2697259) B12-SED-1019 EB1929990-026 7439-97-6EG035T-LL: Mercury 99.50.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QCLot: 2697272) D7-SED-1019 EB1929990-037 7439-97-6EG035T-LL: Mercury 93.70.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QCLot: 2697279) 41 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QCLot: 2697279) - continued E4-SED-1019 EB1929990-057 7439-97-6EG035T-LL: Mercury 83.90.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2697256) A3-SED-1019 EB1929990-003 7440-38-2EG020-SD: Arsenic 106100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-43-9EG020-SD: Cadmium 95.625 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-47-3EG020-SD: Chromium 107100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-50-8EG020-SD: Copper # 27.4100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-48-4EG020-SD: Cobalt 102100 mg/kg 13070.0 7439-92-1EG020-SD: Lead 97.0100 mg/kg 13070.0 7439-96-5EG020-SD: Manganese 117100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-02-0EG020-SD: Nickel 96.5100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-62-2EG020-SD: Vanadium 111100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-66-6EG020-SD: Zinc 88.4100 mg/kg 13070.0 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2697261) B12-SED-1019 EB1929990-026 7440-38-2EG020-SD: Arsenic 107100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-43-9EG020-SD: Cadmium 10125 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-47-3EG020-SD: Chromium 102100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-50-8EG020-SD: Copper 92.5100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-48-4EG020-SD: Cobalt 99.2100 mg/kg 13070.0 7439-92-1EG020-SD: Lead 102100 mg/kg 13070.0 7439-96-5EG020-SD: Manganese 112100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-02-0EG020-SD: Nickel 92.1100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-62-2EG020-SD: Vanadium 107100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-66-6EG020-SD: Zinc 88.0100 mg/kg 13070.0 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2697274) D7-SED-1019 EB1929990-037 7440-38-2EG020-SD: Arsenic 99.2100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-43-9EG020-SD: Cadmium 88.625 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-47-3EG020-SD: Chromium 104100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-50-8EG020-SD: Copper 91.5100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-48-4EG020-SD: Cobalt 98.1100 mg/kg 13070.0 7439-92-1EG020-SD: Lead 98.1100 mg/kg 13070.0 7439-96-5EG020-SD: Manganese 106100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-02-0EG020-SD: Nickel 93.2100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-62-2EG020-SD: Vanadium 107100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-66-6EG020-SD: Zinc 83.9100 mg/kg 13070.0 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2697281) E4-SED-1019 EB1929990-057 7440-38-2EG020-SD: Arsenic 91.8100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-43-9EG020-SD: Cadmium 82.325 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-47-3EG020-SD: Chromium 97.1100 mg/kg 13070.0 42 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2697281) - continued E4-SED-1019 EB1929990-057 7440-50-8EG020-SD: Copper 80.8100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-48-4EG020-SD: Cobalt 88.2100 mg/kg 13070.0 7439-92-1EG020-SD: Lead 86.8100 mg/kg 13070.0 7439-96-5EG020-SD: Manganese 99.9100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-02-0EG020-SD: Nickel 81.9100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-62-2EG020-SD: Vanadium 92.6100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-66-6EG020-SD: Zinc 76.0100 mg/kg 13070.0 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2697257) A3-SED-1019 EB1929990-003 7440-39-3EG020X-T: Barium 86.2100 mg/kg 13070.0 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2697262) B12-SED-1019 EB1929990-026 7440-39-3EG020X-T: Barium 103100 mg/kg 13070.0 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2697275) D7-SED-1019 EB1929990-037 7440-39-3EG020X-T: Barium 102100 mg/kg 13070.0 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2697282) E4-SED-1019 EB1929990-057 7440-39-3EG020X-T: Barium 75.2100 mg/kg 13070.0 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QCLot: 2697264) B1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 56573-85-4EP090: Tributyltin 72.91.25 µgSn/kg 13020.0 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QCLot: 2697276) D7-SED-1019 EB1929990-037 56573-85-4EP090: Tributyltin 81.81.25 µgSn/kg 13020.0 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QCLot: 2697283) E4-SED-1019 EB1929990-057 56573-85-4EP090: Tributyltin # Not Determined 1.25 µgSn/kg 13020.0 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2697263) A3-SED-1019 EB1929990-003 28434-01-07EP094: Bioresmethrin 67.00.5 mg/kg 14060.0 82657-04-3EP094: Bifenthrin 81.80.5 mg/kg 14060.0 26002-80-2EP094: Phenothrin 98.40.5 mg/kg 14060.0 68085-85-8EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 89.70.5 mg/kg 14060.0 52645-53-1EP094: Permethrin 91.80.5 mg/kg 14060.0 68359-37-5EP094: Cyfluthrin 89.00.5 mg/kg 14060.0 52315-07-8EP094: Cypermethrin 88.70.5 mg/kg 14060.0 51630-58-1/6 6230-04- EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 92.10.5 mg/kg 14060.0 62229-77-0/6 6841-25- EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 64.20.5 mg/kg 14060.0 584-79-2EP094: Allethrin 88.70.5 mg/kg 14060.0 118712-89-3EP094: Transfluthrin 88.80.5 mg/kg 14060.0 43 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2697263) - continued A3-SED-1019 EB1929990-003 7696-12-0EP094: Tetramethrin 79.50.5 mg/kg 14060.0 102851-06-9EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 1020.5 mg/kg 14060.0 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2717819) B3-SED-1019 EB1929990-017 28434-01-07EP094: Bioresmethrin 78.70.5 mg/kg 14060.0 82657-04-3EP094: Bifenthrin 86.60.5 mg/kg 14060.0 26002-80-2EP094: Phenothrin 88.70.5 mg/kg 14060.0 68085-85-8EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 86.40.5 mg/kg 14060.0 52645-53-1EP094: Permethrin 91.80.5 mg/kg 14060.0 68359-37-5EP094: Cyfluthrin 90.90.5 mg/kg 14060.0 52315-07-8EP094: Cypermethrin 93.60.5 mg/kg 14060.0 51630-58-1/6 6230-04- EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 91.00.5 mg/kg 14060.0 62229-77-0/6 6841-25- EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 78.10.5 mg/kg 14060.0 584-79-2EP094: Allethrin 83.70.5 mg/kg 14060.0 118712-89-3EP094: Transfluthrin 94.40.5 mg/kg 14060.0 7696-12-0EP094: Tetramethrin 89.60.5 mg/kg 14060.0 102851-06-9EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 84.00.5 mg/kg 14060.0 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2717820) D8-SED-1019 EB1929990-038 28434-01-07EP094: Bioresmethrin # 30.50.5 mg/kg 14060.0 82657-04-3EP094: Bifenthrin 94.40.5 mg/kg 14060.0 26002-80-2EP094: Phenothrin 91.80.5 mg/kg 14060.0 68085-85-8EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 93.10.5 mg/kg 14060.0 52645-53-1EP094: Permethrin 99.10.5 mg/kg 14060.0 68359-37-5EP094: Cyfluthrin 93.00.5 mg/kg 14060.0 52315-07-8EP094: Cypermethrin 1010.5 mg/kg 14060.0 51630-58-1/6 6230-04- EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 94.40.5 mg/kg 14060.0 62229-77-0/6 6841-25- EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 93.40.5 mg/kg 14060.0 584-79-2EP094: Allethrin 98.60.5 mg/kg 14060.0 118712-89-3EP094: Transfluthrin 99.50.5 mg/kg 14060.0 7696-12-0EP094: Tetramethrin 99.00.5 mg/kg 14060.0 102851-06-9EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 91.10.5 mg/kg 14060.0 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2717823) E5-SED-1019 EB1929990-058 28434-01-07EP094: Bioresmethrin # 28.20.5 mg/kg 14060.0 82657-04-3EP094: Bifenthrin 93.40.5 mg/kg 14060.0 26002-80-2EP094: Phenothrin 1120.5 mg/kg 14060.0 68085-85-8EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 1020.5 mg/kg 14060.0 44 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2717823) - continued E5-SED-1019 EB1929990-058 52645-53-1EP094: Permethrin 1020.5 mg/kg 14060.0 68359-37-5EP094: Cyfluthrin 1260.5 mg/kg 14060.0 52315-07-8EP094: Cypermethrin 95.10.5 mg/kg 14060.0 51630-58-1/6 6230-04- EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 99.30.5 mg/kg 14060.0 62229-77-0/6 6841-25- EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 1010.5 mg/kg 14060.0 584-79-2EP094: Allethrin 1060.5 mg/kg 14060.0 118712-89-3EP094: Transfluthrin 96.20.5 mg/kg 14060.0 7696-12-0EP094: Tetramethrin 95.50.5 mg/kg 14060.0 102851-06-9EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 99.80.5 mg/kg 14060.0 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2721656) B12-SED-1019 EB1929990-026 28434-01-07EP094: Bioresmethrin 72.90.5 mg/kg 14060.0 82657-04-3EP094: Bifenthrin 92.60.5 mg/kg 14060.0 26002-80-2EP094: Phenothrin 1100.5 mg/kg 14060.0 68085-85-8EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 1010.5 mg/kg 14060.0 52645-53-1EP094: Permethrin 1040.5 mg/kg 14060.0 68359-37-5EP094: Cyfluthrin 1070.5 mg/kg 14060.0 52315-07-8EP094: Cypermethrin 94.60.5 mg/kg 14060.0 51630-58-1/6 6230-04- EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 95.10.5 mg/kg 14060.0 62229-77-0/6 6841-25- EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 98.90.5 mg/kg 14060.0 584-79-2EP094: Allethrin 1050.5 mg/kg 14060.0 118712-89-3EP094: Transfluthrin 91.70.5 mg/kg 14060.0 7696-12-0EP094: Tetramethrin 1000.5 mg/kg 14060.0 102851-06-9EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 95.20.5 mg/kg 14060.0 EP094B: Synergist (QCLot: 2697263) A3-SED-1019 EB1929990-003 63993-73-7EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 75.70.5 mg/kg 14060.0 EP094B: Synergist (QCLot: 2717819) B3-SED-1019 EB1929990-017 63993-73-7EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 81.00.5 mg/kg 14060.0 EP094B: Synergist (QCLot: 2717820) D8-SED-1019 EB1929990-038 63993-73-7EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 93.30.5 mg/kg 14060.0 EP094B: Synergist (QCLot: 2717823) E5-SED-1019 EB1929990-058 63993-73-7EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 89.60.5 mg/kg 14060.0 EP094B: Synergist (QCLot: 2721656) B12-SED-1019 EB1929990-026 63993-73-7EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 83.60.5 mg/kg 14060.0 45 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QCLot: 2699902) A1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 93-65-2EP202: Mecoprop 74.80.1 mg/kg 14060.0 94-74-6EP202: MCPA 73.40.1 mg/kg 14357.0 94-75-7EP202: 2.4-D 73.40.1 mg/kg 13968.0 55335-06-3EP202: Triclopyr 75.30.1 mg/kg 14551.0 93-76-5EP202: 2.4.5-T 73.50.1 mg/kg 14257.0 1918-02-1EP202: Picloram 77.80.1 mg/kg 13849.0 1702-17-6EP202: Clopyralid 75.30.1 mg/kg 14949.0 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QCLot: 2719467) B1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 93-65-2EP202: Mecoprop 71.30.1 mg/kg 14060.0 94-74-6EP202: MCPA 62.10.1 mg/kg 14357.0 94-75-7EP202: 2.4-D 73.50.1 mg/kg 13968.0 55335-06-3EP202: Triclopyr 64.50.1 mg/kg 14551.0 93-76-5EP202: 2.4.5-T 68.20.1 mg/kg 14257.0 1918-02-1EP202: Picloram 66.50.1 mg/kg 13849.0 1702-17-6EP202: Clopyralid 61.80.1 mg/kg 14949.0 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QCLot: 2719469) B4-SED-1019 EB1929990-018 93-65-2EP202: Mecoprop 84.70.1 mg/kg 14060.0 94-74-6EP202: MCPA 67.50.1 mg/kg 14357.0 94-75-7EP202: 2.4-D 73.30.1 mg/kg 13968.0 55335-06-3EP202: Triclopyr 79.20.1 mg/kg 14551.0 93-76-5EP202: 2.4.5-T 79.50.1 mg/kg 14257.0 1918-02-1EP202: Picloram 67.90.1 mg/kg 13849.0 1702-17-6EP202: Clopyralid 60.00.1 mg/kg 14949.0 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QCLot: 2719471) E4-SED-1019 EB1929990-057 93-65-2EP202: Mecoprop 92.20.1 mg/kg 14060.0 94-74-6EP202: MCPA 70.30.1 mg/kg 14357.0 94-75-7EP202: 2.4-D 72.60.1 mg/kg 13968.0 55335-06-3EP202: Triclopyr 75.60.1 mg/kg 14551.0 93-76-5EP202: 2.4.5-T 85.60.1 mg/kg 14257.0 1918-02-1EP202: Picloram 66.10.1 mg/kg 13849.0 1702-17-6EP202: Clopyralid 57.10.1 mg/kg 14949.0 EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2700881) A1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 2642-71-9EP234: Azinphos-ethyl # 58.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 86-50-0EP234: Azinphos-methyl 75.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 470-90-6EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 77.80.08 mg/kg 13070.0 56-72-4EP234: Coumaphos 1030.02 mg/kg 13070.0 333-41-5EP234: Diazinon # 54.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 60-51-5EP234: Dimethoate 82.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 46 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2700881) - continued A1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 298-04-4EP234: Disulfoton # 41.90.1 mg/kg 13070.0 13194-48-4EP234: Ethoprophos 82.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 22224-92-6EP234: Fenamiphos 71.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 122-14-5EP234: Fenitrothion 98.94 mg/kg 13070.0 115-90-2EP234: Fensulfothion 74.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 55-38-9EP234: Fenthion # 56.00.1 mg/kg 13070.0 121-75-5EP234: Malathion 82.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 7786-34-7EP234: Mevinphos 75.10.08 mg/kg 13070.0 6923-22-4EP234: Monocrotophos 78.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 1113-02-6EP234: Omethoate 77.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 56-38-2EP234: Parathion 73.00.4 mg/kg 13070.0 298-00-0EP234: Parathion-methyl 71.84 mg/kg 13070.0 298-02-2EP234: Phorate 1120.2 mg/kg 13070.0 29232-93-7EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 80.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 3689-24-5EP234: Sulfotep # 56.00.01 mg/kg 13070.0 22248-79-9EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos # 53.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 24017-47-8EP234: Triazophos 92.80.01 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2719758) B11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 2642-71-9EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 82.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 86-50-0EP234: Azinphos-methyl 80.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 470-90-6EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 96.40.08 mg/kg 13070.0 56-72-4EP234: Coumaphos 93.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 333-41-5EP234: Diazinon 92.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 60-51-5EP234: Dimethoate 88.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 298-04-4EP234: Disulfoton 75.20.1 mg/kg 13070.0 13194-48-4EP234: Ethoprophos 1080.02 mg/kg 13070.0 22224-92-6EP234: Fenamiphos 1010.02 mg/kg 13070.0 122-14-5EP234: Fenitrothion 90.64 mg/kg 13070.0 115-90-2EP234: Fensulfothion 84.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 55-38-9EP234: Fenthion 1040.1 mg/kg 13070.0 121-75-5EP234: Malathion 1080.04 mg/kg 13070.0 7786-34-7EP234: Mevinphos 89.40.08 mg/kg 13070.0 6923-22-4EP234: Monocrotophos 93.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 1113-02-6EP234: Omethoate 91.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 56-38-2EP234: Parathion 85.20.4 mg/kg 13070.0 298-00-0EP234: Parathion-methyl 92.64 mg/kg 13070.0 298-02-2EP234: Phorate 1010.2 mg/kg 13070.0 29232-93-7EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 84.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 3689-24-5EP234: Sulfotep 80.00.01 mg/kg 13070.0 47 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2719758) - continued B11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 22248-79-9EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 93.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 24017-47-8EP234: Triazophos 94.40.01 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2719763) B1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 2642-71-9EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 98.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 86-50-0EP234: Azinphos-methyl 85.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 470-90-6EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 89.80.08 mg/kg 13070.0 56-72-4EP234: Coumaphos 70.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 333-41-5EP234: Diazinon 82.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 60-51-5EP234: Dimethoate 1010.04 mg/kg 13070.0 298-04-4EP234: Disulfoton 91.00.1 mg/kg 13070.0 13194-48-4EP234: Ethoprophos 1000.02 mg/kg 13070.0 22224-92-6EP234: Fenamiphos 95.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 122-14-5EP234: Fenitrothion 73.94 mg/kg 13070.0 115-90-2EP234: Fensulfothion 73.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 55-38-9EP234: Fenthion 77.90.1 mg/kg 13070.0 121-75-5EP234: Malathion 92.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 7786-34-7EP234: Mevinphos 85.50.08 mg/kg 13070.0 6923-22-4EP234: Monocrotophos 77.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 1113-02-6EP234: Omethoate 81.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 56-38-2EP234: Parathion 81.60.4 mg/kg 13070.0 298-00-0EP234: Parathion-methyl 1004 mg/kg 13070.0 298-02-2EP234: Phorate 1010.2 mg/kg 13070.0 29232-93-7EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 92.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 3689-24-5EP234: Sulfotep 75.20.01 mg/kg 13070.0 22248-79-9EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 70.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 24017-47-8EP234: Triazophos 84.80.01 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2719766) G4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 2642-71-9EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 82.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 86-50-0EP234: Azinphos-methyl 80.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 470-90-6EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 96.40.08 mg/kg 13070.0 56-72-4EP234: Coumaphos 93.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 333-41-5EP234: Diazinon 92.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 60-51-5EP234: Dimethoate 88.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 298-04-4EP234: Disulfoton 75.20.1 mg/kg 13070.0 13194-48-4EP234: Ethoprophos 1080.02 mg/kg 13070.0 22224-92-6EP234: Fenamiphos 1010.02 mg/kg 13070.0 122-14-5EP234: Fenitrothion 90.64 mg/kg 13070.0 115-90-2EP234: Fensulfothion 84.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 55-38-9EP234: Fenthion 1040.1 mg/kg 13070.0 48 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2719766) - continued G4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 121-75-5EP234: Malathion 1080.04 mg/kg 13070.0 7786-34-7EP234: Mevinphos 89.40.08 mg/kg 13070.0 6923-22-4EP234: Monocrotophos 93.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 1113-02-6EP234: Omethoate 91.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 56-38-2EP234: Parathion 85.50.4 mg/kg 13070.0 298-00-0EP234: Parathion-methyl 92.64 mg/kg 13070.0 298-02-2EP234: Phorate 1010.2 mg/kg 13070.0 29232-93-7EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 84.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 3689-24-5EP234: Sulfotep 80.00.01 mg/kg 13070.0 22248-79-9EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 93.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 24017-47-8EP234: Triazophos 94.40.01 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2700881) A1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 116-06-3EP234: Aldicarb 75.20.1 mg/kg 13070.0 22781-23-3EP234: Bendiocarb 90.20.2 mg/kg 13070.0 17804-35-2EP234: Benomyl 76.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 63-25-2EP234: Carbaryl 86.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 1563-66-2EP234: Carbofuran 76.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 16655-82-6EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 89.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 2032-65-7EP234: Methiocarb 91.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 16752-77-5EP234: Methomyl 97.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 2212-67-1EP234: Molinate 71.30.2 mg/kg 13070.0 23135-22-0EP234: Oxamyl 88.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 28249-77-6EP234: Thiobencarb # 60.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 59669-26-0EP234: Thiodicarb # 0.8000.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2719758) B11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 116-06-3EP234: Aldicarb 87.50.1 mg/kg 13070.0 22781-23-3EP234: Bendiocarb 1140.2 mg/kg 13070.0 17804-35-2EP234: Benomyl 96.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 63-25-2EP234: Carbaryl 92.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 1563-66-2EP234: Carbofuran 89.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 16655-82-6EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 94.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 2032-65-7EP234: Methiocarb 1010.02 mg/kg 13070.0 16752-77-5EP234: Methomyl 1240.02 mg/kg 13070.0 2212-67-1EP234: Molinate 94.60.2 mg/kg 13070.0 23135-22-0EP234: Oxamyl 1090.02 mg/kg 13070.0 28249-77-6EP234: Thiobencarb 88.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 59669-26-0EP234: Thiodicarb # 0.000.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2719763) 49 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2719763) - continued B1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 116-06-3EP234: Aldicarb 87.70.1 mg/kg 13070.0 22781-23-3EP234: Bendiocarb 1180.2 mg/kg 13070.0 17804-35-2EP234: Benomyl 84.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 63-25-2EP234: Carbaryl 88.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 1563-66-2EP234: Carbofuran 70.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 16655-82-6EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 89.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 2032-65-7EP234: Methiocarb 1030.02 mg/kg 13070.0 16752-77-5EP234: Methomyl 77.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 2212-67-1EP234: Molinate 76.50.2 mg/kg 13070.0 23135-22-0EP234: Oxamyl 1150.02 mg/kg 13070.0 28249-77-6EP234: Thiobencarb 94.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 59669-26-0EP234: Thiodicarb # 0.000.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2719766) G4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 116-06-3EP234: Aldicarb 87.50.1 mg/kg 13070.0 22781-23-3EP234: Bendiocarb 1140.2 mg/kg 13070.0 17804-35-2EP234: Benomyl 96.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 63-25-2EP234: Carbaryl 92.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 1563-66-2EP234: Carbofuran 89.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 16655-82-6EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 94.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 2032-65-7EP234: Methiocarb 1010.02 mg/kg 13070.0 16752-77-5EP234: Methomyl 1250.02 mg/kg 13070.0 2212-67-1EP234: Molinate 94.60.2 mg/kg 13070.0 23135-22-0EP234: Oxamyl 1090.02 mg/kg 13070.0 28249-77-6EP234: Thiobencarb 89.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 59669-26-0EP234: Thiodicarb # 0.000.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QCLot: 2700881) A1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 51235-04-2EP234: Hexazinone 78.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 21087-64-9EP234: Metribuzin 78.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QCLot: 2719758) B11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 51235-04-2EP234: Hexazinone 97.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 21087-64-9EP234: Metribuzin 87.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QCLot: 2719763) B1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 51235-04-2EP234: Hexazinone 71.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 21087-64-9EP234: Metribuzin 95.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QCLot: 2719766) G4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 51235-04-2EP234: Hexazinone 97.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 21087-64-9EP234: Metribuzin 87.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 50 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QCLot: 2700881) A1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 94361-06-5EP234: Cyproconazole 89.00.08 mg/kg 13070.0 85509-19-9EP234: Flusilazole 1000.04 mg/kg 13070.0 79983-71-4EP234: Hexaconazole 99.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 76738-62-0EP234: Paclobutrazole 81.90.1 mg/kg 13070.0 60207-90-1EP234: Propiconazole 80.50.1 mg/kg 13070.0 107534-96-3EP234: Tebuconazole 71.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 121552-61-2EP234: Cyprodinil 87.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 53112-28-0EP234: Pyrimethanil 70.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QCLot: 2719758) B11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 94361-06-5EP234: Cyproconazole 95.40.08 mg/kg 13070.0 85509-19-9EP234: Flusilazole 92.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 79983-71-4EP234: Hexaconazole 1070.04 mg/kg 13070.0 76738-62-0EP234: Paclobutrazole 96.60.1 mg/kg 13070.0 60207-90-1EP234: Propiconazole 95.70.1 mg/kg 13070.0 107534-96-3EP234: Tebuconazole 1160.02 mg/kg 13070.0 121552-61-2EP234: Cyprodinil 1140.02 mg/kg 13070.0 53112-28-0EP234: Pyrimethanil 92.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QCLot: 2719763) B1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 94361-06-5EP234: Cyproconazole 95.00.08 mg/kg 13070.0 85509-19-9EP234: Flusilazole 72.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 79983-71-4EP234: Hexaconazole 70.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 76738-62-0EP234: Paclobutrazole 92.50.1 mg/kg 13070.0 60207-90-1EP234: Propiconazole 87.50.1 mg/kg 13070.0 107534-96-3EP234: Tebuconazole 92.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 121552-61-2EP234: Cyprodinil 94.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 53112-28-0EP234: Pyrimethanil 92.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QCLot: 2719766) G4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 94361-06-5EP234: Cyproconazole 95.40.08 mg/kg 13070.0 85509-19-9EP234: Flusilazole 92.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 79983-71-4EP234: Hexaconazole 1070.04 mg/kg 13070.0 76738-62-0EP234: Paclobutrazole 96.60.1 mg/kg 13070.0 60207-90-1EP234: Propiconazole 96.20.1 mg/kg 13070.0 107534-96-3EP234: Tebuconazole 1180.02 mg/kg 13070.0 121552-61-2EP234: Cyprodinil 1170.02 mg/kg 13070.0 53112-28-0EP234: Pyrimethanil 91.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QCLot: 2700881) A1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 330-54-1EP234: Diuron # Not Determined 0.04 mg/kg 13070.0 51 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QCLot: 2700881) - continued A1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 2164-17-2EP234: Fluometuron 75.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 34014-18-1EP234: Tebuthiuron 78.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 314-40-9EP234: Bromacil 74.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QCLot: 2719758) B11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 330-54-1EP234: Diuron 88.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 2164-17-2EP234: Fluometuron 85.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 34014-18-1EP234: Tebuthiuron 92.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 314-40-9EP234: Bromacil 88.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QCLot: 2719763) B1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 330-54-1EP234: Diuron 87.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 2164-17-2EP234: Fluometuron 71.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 34014-18-1EP234: Tebuthiuron 77.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 314-40-9EP234: Bromacil 85.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QCLot: 2719766) G4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 330-54-1EP234: Diuron 88.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 2164-17-2EP234: Fluometuron 85.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 34014-18-1EP234: Tebuthiuron 92.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 314-40-9EP234: Bromacil 88.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QCLot: 2700881) A1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 51218-45-2EP234: Metolachlor 92.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QCLot: 2719758) B11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 51218-45-2EP234: Metolachlor 92.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QCLot: 2719763) B1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 51218-45-2EP234: Metolachlor 73.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QCLot: 2719766) G4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 51218-45-2EP234: Metolachlor 92.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QCLot: 2700881) A1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 834-12-8EP234: Ametryn 72.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 1912-24-9EP234: Atrazine 80.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 21725-46-2EP234: Cyanazine 72.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 7287-19-6EP234: Prometryn 72.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 139-40-2EP234: Propazine 84.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 122-34-9EP234: Simazine 76.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 5915-41-3EP234: Terbuthylazine 85.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 886-50-0EP234: Terbutryn 73.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QCLot: 2719758) 52 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QCLot: 2719758) - continued B11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 834-12-8EP234: Ametryn 84.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 1912-24-9EP234: Atrazine 92.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 21725-46-2EP234: Cyanazine 77.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 7287-19-6EP234: Prometryn 1000.02 mg/kg 13070.0 139-40-2EP234: Propazine 96.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 122-34-9EP234: Simazine 89.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 5915-41-3EP234: Terbuthylazine 99.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 886-50-0EP234: Terbutryn 87.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QCLot: 2719763) B1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 834-12-8EP234: Ametryn 88.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 1912-24-9EP234: Atrazine 90.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 21725-46-2EP234: Cyanazine 74.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 7287-19-6EP234: Prometryn 84.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 139-40-2EP234: Propazine 82.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 122-34-9EP234: Simazine 78.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 5915-41-3EP234: Terbuthylazine 84.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 886-50-0EP234: Terbutryn 88.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QCLot: 2719766) G4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 834-12-8EP234: Ametryn 84.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 1912-24-9EP234: Atrazine 92.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 21725-46-2EP234: Cyanazine 77.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 7287-19-6EP234: Prometryn 1000.02 mg/kg 13070.0 139-40-2EP234: Propazine 96.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 122-34-9EP234: Simazine 89.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 5915-41-3EP234: Terbuthylazine 99.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 886-50-0EP234: Terbutryn 87.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QCLot: 2700881) A1-SED-1019 EB1929990-001 60168-88-9EP234: Fenarimol 71.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 28159-98-0EP234: Irgarol 88.00.004 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QCLot: 2719758) B11-SED-1019 EB1929990-025 60168-88-9EP234: Fenarimol 1120.04 mg/kg 13070.0 28159-98-0EP234: Irgarol 84.00.004 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QCLot: 2719763) B1-SED-1019 EB1929990-015 60168-88-9EP234: Fenarimol 70.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 28159-98-0EP234: Irgarol 88.00.004 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QCLot: 2719766) G4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 60168-88-9EP234: Fenarimol 1120.04 mg/kg 13070.0 53 of 53:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QCLot: 2719766) - continued G4-SED-1019 EB1929990-046 28159-98-0EP234: Irgarol 80.00.004 mg/kg 13070.0 True Environmental QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with Quality Review Work Order : EB1929990 Page : 1 of 36 :: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division BrisbaneBMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD :Contact MS BETH TOKI Telephone : +61 7 3552 8639 :Project B23282-4 Douglas Shoal Date Samples Received : 11-Nov-2019 Site : ---- Issue Date : 05-Dec-2019 CONOR JONES:Sampler No. of samples received : 61 :Order number ---- No. of samples analysed : 56 This report is automatically generated by the ALS LIMS through interpretation of the ALS Quality Control Report and several Quality Assurance parameters measured by ALS. This automated reporting highlights any non-conformances, facilitates faster and more accurate data validation and is designed to assist internal expert and external Auditor review. Many components of this report contribute to the overall DQO assessment and reporting for guideline compliance. Brief method summaries and references are also provided to assist in traceability. Summary of Outliers Outliers : Quality Control Samples This report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report. l NO Method Blank value outliers occur. l Duplicate outliers exist - please see following pages for full details. l Laboratory Control outliers exist - please see following pages for full details. l Matrix Spike outliers exist - please see following pages for full details. l Surrogate recovery outliers exist for all regular sample matrices - please see following pages for full details. Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance l Analysis Holding Time Outliers exist - please see following pages for full details. Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples l Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist - please see following pages for full details. R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R 2 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Outliers : Quality Control Samples Duplicates, Method Blanks, Laboratory Control Samples and Matrix Spikes Matrix: SOIL Compound Group Name CommentLimitsDataAnalyteClient Sample IDLaboratory Sample ID CAS Number Duplicate (DUP) RPDs EB1929990--001 7429-90-5AluminiumA1-SED-1019 RPD exceeds LOR based limits0% - 50%54.8 %EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-A S EB1929990--001 7440-50-8CopperA1-SED-1019 RPD exceeds LOR based limits0% - 20%129 %EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS EB1929990--013 7440-50-8CopperA13-SED-1019 RPD exceeds LOR based limits0% - 20%40.6 %EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS EB1929990--013 7440-66-6ZincA13-SED-1019 RPD exceeds LOR based limits0% - 50%60.2 %EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS EB1929990--025 7440-39-3BariumB11-SED-1019 RPD exceeds LOR based limits0% - 20%55.7 %EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS EB1929990--035 7440-39-3BariumD5-SED-1019 RPD exceeds LOR based limits0% - 20%21.0 %EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Recoveries QC-2697263-002 28434-01-07Bioresmethrin---- Recovery less than lower control limit70.0-130%69.4 %EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids QC-2697263-002 63993-73-7Piperonyl Butoxide---- Recovery less than lower control limit70.0-130%65.0 %EP094B: Synergist Matrix Spike (MS) Recoveries EB1929990--003 7440-50-8CopperA3-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%27.4 %EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS EB1929990--038 28434-01-07BioresmethrinD8-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 60.0-140%30.5 %EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids EB1929990--058 28434-01-07BioresmethrinE5-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 60.0-140%28.2 %EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids EB1929990--001 2642-71-9Azinphos-ethylA1-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%58.4 %EP234A: OP Pesticides EB1929990--001 333-41-5DiazinonA1-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%54.4 %EP234A: OP Pesticides EB1929990--001 298-04-4DisulfotonA1-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%41.9 %EP234A: OP Pesticides EB1929990--001 55-38-9FenthionA1-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%56.0 %EP234A: OP Pesticides EB1929990--001 3689-24-5SulfotepA1-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%56.0 %EP234A: OP Pesticides EB1929990--001 22248-79-9TetrachlorvinphosA1-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%53.6 %EP234A: OP Pesticides EB1929990--001 28249-77-6ThiobencarbA1-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%60.0 %EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates EB1929990--001 59669-26-0ThiodicarbA1-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%0.800 %EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates EB1929990--025 59669-26-0ThiodicarbB11-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%0.00 %EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates EB1929990--015 59669-26-0ThiodicarbB1-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%0.00 %EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates EB1929990--046 59669-26-0ThiodicarbG4-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%0.00 %EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates Regular Sample Surrogates 3 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Compound Group Name CommentLimitsDataAnalyteClient Sample IDLaboratory Sample ID CAS Number Samples Submitted EB1929990-020 ----TripropyltinB6-SED-1019 Recovery greater than upper data quality objective 35.0-130 % EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 196 % EB1929990-050 ----TripropyltinG9-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 35.0-130 % EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 31.1 % EB1929990-038 78-48-8DEFD8-SED-1019 Recovery greater than upper data quality objective 10.0-110 % EP094S: Pesticide Surrogate 116 % EB1929990-056 78-48-8DEFE3-SED-1019 Recovery greater than upper data quality objective 10.0-110 % EP094S: Pesticide Surrogate 111 % Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance Matrix: SOIL AnalysisExtraction / Preparation Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue Days overdue Due for extraction Due for analysis Method EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) ----19-Nov-2019B1-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 6 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Frozen ----18-Nov-2019B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 ----26-Nov-2019 8 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Frozen ----19-Nov-2019B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 6 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Frozen ----20-Nov-2019G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019 ----26-Nov-2019 6 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----18-Nov-2019D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019, D10-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 7 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 ----22-Nov-2019 2 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G9-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 5 ---- 4 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL AnalysisExtraction / Preparation Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue Days overdue Due for extraction Due for analysis Method EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids - Analysis Holding Time Compliance Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019, G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 5 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G12-SED-1019 ----26-Nov-2019 6 ---- EP094B: Synergist Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) ----19-Nov-2019B1-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 6 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Frozen ----18-Nov-2019B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 ----26-Nov-2019 8 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Frozen ----19-Nov-2019B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 6 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Frozen ----20-Nov-2019G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019 ----26-Nov-2019 6 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----18-Nov-2019D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019, D10-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 7 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 ----22-Nov-2019 2 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G9-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 5 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019, G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 5 ---- 5 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL AnalysisExtraction / Preparation Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue Days overdue Due for extraction Due for analysis Method EP094B: Synergist - Analysis Holding Time Compliance Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G12-SED-1019 ----26-Nov-2019 6 ---- EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----18-Nov-2019B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019, D10-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 ----03-Dec-2019 15 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----19-Nov-2019B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 ----02-Dec-2019 13 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----19-Nov-2019B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019 ----03-Dec-2019 14 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019, G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 ----02-Dec-2019 12 ---- EP234A: OP Pesticides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----18-Nov-2019B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019 ----01-Dec-2019 13 ---- 6 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL AnalysisExtraction / Preparation Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue Days overdue Due for extraction Due for analysis Method EP234A: OP Pesticides - Analysis Holding Time Compliance Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----18-Nov-2019D10-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 10 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----19-Nov-2019B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 9 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 ----01-Dec-2019 11 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 8 ---- EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----18-Nov-2019B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019 ----01-Dec-2019 13 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----18-Nov-2019D10-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 10 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----19-Nov-2019B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 9 ---- 7 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL AnalysisExtraction / Preparation Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue Days overdue Due for extraction Due for analysis Method EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates - Analysis Holding Time Compliance Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 ----01-Dec-2019 11 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 8 ---- EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----18-Nov-2019B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019 ----01-Dec-2019 13 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----18-Nov-2019D10-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 10 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----19-Nov-2019B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 9 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 ----01-Dec-2019 11 ---- 8 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL AnalysisExtraction / Preparation Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue Days overdue Due for extraction Due for analysis Method EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides - Analysis Holding Time Compliance Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 8 ---- EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----18-Nov-2019B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019 ----01-Dec-2019 13 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----18-Nov-2019D10-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 10 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----19-Nov-2019B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 9 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 ----01-Dec-2019 11 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 8 ---- EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides 9 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL AnalysisExtraction / Preparation Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue Days overdue Due for extraction Due for analysis Method EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides - Analysis Holding Time Compliance Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----18-Nov-2019B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019 ----01-Dec-2019 13 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----18-Nov-2019D10-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 10 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----19-Nov-2019B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 9 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 ----01-Dec-2019 11 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 8 ---- EP234G: Chloracetanilides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----18-Nov-2019B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019 ----01-Dec-2019 13 ---- 10 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL AnalysisExtraction / Preparation Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue Days overdue Due for extraction Due for analysis Method EP234G: Chloracetanilides - Analysis Holding Time Compliance Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----18-Nov-2019D10-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 10 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----19-Nov-2019B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 9 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 ----01-Dec-2019 11 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 8 ---- EP234H: Triazine Herbicides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----18-Nov-2019B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019 ----01-Dec-2019 13 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----18-Nov-2019D10-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 10 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----19-Nov-2019B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 9 ---- 11 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL AnalysisExtraction / Preparation Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue Days overdue Due for extraction Due for analysis Method EP234H: Triazine Herbicides - Analysis Holding Time Compliance Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 ----01-Dec-2019 11 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 8 ---- EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----18-Nov-2019B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019 ----01-Dec-2019 13 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----18-Nov-2019D10-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 10 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----19-Nov-2019B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 9 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 ----01-Dec-2019 11 ---- 12 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL AnalysisExtraction / Preparation Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue Days overdue Due for extraction Due for analysis Method EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides - Analysis Holding Time Compliance Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----20-Nov-2019G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 8 ---- Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples Matrix: SOIL Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type Method ExpectedQC Regular Actual Rate (%)Count Laboratory Duplicates (DUP) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC StandardSoil Particle Density 0.00 10.000 56 Analysis Holding Time Compliance Holding times for VOC in soils vary according to analytes of interest. Vinyl Chloride and Styrene holding time is 7 days; others 14 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all VOC analytes and should be verified in case the reported breach is a false positive or Vinyl Chloride and Styrene are not key analytes of interest/concern. Holding time for leachate methods (e.g. TCLP) vary according to the analytes reported. Assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method. These are: organics 14 days, mercury 28 days & other metals 180 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters. If samples are identified below as having been analysed or extracted outside of recommended holding times, this should be taken into consideration when interpreting results. This report summarizes extraction / preparation and analysis times and compares each with ALS recommended holding times (referencing USEPA SW 846, APHA, AS and NEPM) based on the sample container provided. Dates reported represent first date of extraction or analysis and preclude subsequent dilutions and reruns. A listing of breaches (if any) is provided herein. Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EA055) B1-SED-1019 03-May-2020---- 12-Nov-2019----05-Nov-2019 ---- ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EA055) B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 02-May-2020---- 12-Nov-2019----04-Nov-2019 ---- ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EA055) B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 03-May-2020---- 12-Nov-2019----05-Nov-2019 ---- ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EA055) G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019 04-May-2020---- 12-Nov-2019----06-Nov-2019 ---- ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EA055) 13 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) - Continued D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019, D10-SED-1019 18-Nov-2019---- 12-Nov-2019----04-Nov-2019 ---- ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EA055) A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A4-SED-1019, A6-SED-1019, A7-SED-1019, A8-SED-1019, A9-SED-1019, A10-SED-1019, A11-SED-1019, A12-SED-1019, A13-SED-1019, A14-SED-1019 19-Nov-2019---- 12-Nov-2019----05-Nov-2019 ---- ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EA055) G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019, G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 20-Nov-2019---- 12-Nov-2019----06-Nov-2019 ---- ü 14 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EA150: Particle Sizing Snap Lock Bag (EA150H) D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019, D10-SED-1019 02-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----04-Nov-2019 ---- ü Snap Lock Bag (EA150H) A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A4-SED-1019, A6-SED-1019, A7-SED-1019, A8-SED-1019, A9-SED-1019, A10-SED-1019, B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 03-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----05-Nov-2019 ---- ü Snap Lock Bag (EA150H) G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019, G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 04-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----06-Nov-2019 ---- ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EA150H) B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 02-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----04-Nov-2019 ---- ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EA150H) G11-SED-1019 04-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----06-Nov-2019 ---- ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EA150H) A11-SED-1019, A12-SED-1019, A13-SED-1019, A14-SED-1019 03-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----05-Nov-2019 ---- ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EA150H) G12-SED-1019 04-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----06-Nov-2019 ---- ü 15 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EA150: Soil Classification based on Particle Size Snap Lock Bag (EA150H) D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019, D10-SED-1019 02-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----04-Nov-2019 ---- ü Snap Lock Bag (EA150H) A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A4-SED-1019, A6-SED-1019, A7-SED-1019, A8-SED-1019, A9-SED-1019, A10-SED-1019, B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 03-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----05-Nov-2019 ---- ü Snap Lock Bag (EA150H) G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019, G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 04-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----06-Nov-2019 ---- ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EA150H) B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 02-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----04-Nov-2019 ---- ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EA150H) G11-SED-1019 04-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----06-Nov-2019 ---- ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EA150H) A11-SED-1019, A12-SED-1019, A13-SED-1019, A14-SED-1019 03-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----05-Nov-2019 ---- ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EA150H) G12-SED-1019 04-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----06-Nov-2019 ---- ü 16 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EA152: Soil Particle Density Snap Lock Bag (EA152) D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019, D10-SED-1019 02-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----04-Nov-2019 ---- ü Snap Lock Bag (EA152) A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A4-SED-1019, A6-SED-1019, A7-SED-1019, A8-SED-1019, A9-SED-1019, A10-SED-1019, B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 03-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----05-Nov-2019 ---- ü Snap Lock Bag (EA152) G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019, G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 04-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----06-Nov-2019 ---- ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EA152) B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 02-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----04-Nov-2019 ---- ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EA152) G11-SED-1019 04-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----06-Nov-2019 ---- ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EA152) A11-SED-1019, A12-SED-1019, A13-SED-1019, A14-SED-1019 03-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----05-Nov-2019 ---- ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EA152) G12-SED-1019 04-May-2020---- 28-Nov-2019----06-Nov-2019 ---- ü 17 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EG005-SD) B1-SED-1019 03-May-202003-May-2020 21-Nov-201912-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EG005-SD) B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019 02-May-202002-May-2020 21-Nov-201912-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EG005-SD) D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 02-May-202002-May-2020 14-Nov-201913-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EG005-SD) B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 03-May-202003-May-2020 21-Nov-201912-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EG005-SD) G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019 04-May-202004-May-2020 14-Nov-201913-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG005-SD) D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019 02-May-202002-May-2020 21-Nov-201912-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG005-SD) D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019, D10-SED-1019 02-May-202002-May-2020 14-Nov-201913-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG005-SD) A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A4-SED-1019, A6-SED-1019, A7-SED-1019, A8-SED-1019, A9-SED-1019, A10-SED-1019, A11-SED-1019, A12-SED-1019, A13-SED-1019, A14-SED-1019 03-May-202003-May-2020 21-Nov-201912-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG005-SD) G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019, G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 04-May-202004-May-2020 14-Nov-201913-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 ü ü 18 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EG020-SD) B1-SED-1019 03-May-202003-May-2020 21-Nov-201912-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EG020-SD) B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019 02-May-202002-May-2020 21-Nov-201912-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EG020-SD) D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 02-May-202002-May-2020 14-Nov-201913-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EG020-SD) B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 03-May-202003-May-2020 21-Nov-201912-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EG020-SD) G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019 04-May-202004-May-2020 14-Nov-201913-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG020-SD) D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019 02-May-202002-May-2020 21-Nov-201912-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG020-SD) D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019, D10-SED-1019 02-May-202002-May-2020 14-Nov-201913-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG020-SD) A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A4-SED-1019, A6-SED-1019, A7-SED-1019, A8-SED-1019, A9-SED-1019, A10-SED-1019, A11-SED-1019, A12-SED-1019, A13-SED-1019, A14-SED-1019 03-May-202003-May-2020 21-Nov-201912-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG020-SD) G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019, G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 04-May-202004-May-2020 14-Nov-201913-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 ü ü 19 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EG020X-T) B1-SED-1019 03-May-202003-May-2020 21-Nov-201912-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EG020X-T) B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019 02-May-202002-May-2020 21-Nov-201912-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EG020X-T) D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 02-May-202002-May-2020 14-Nov-201913-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EG020X-T) B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 03-May-202003-May-2020 21-Nov-201912-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EG020X-T) G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019 04-May-202004-May-2020 14-Nov-201913-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG020X-T) D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019 02-May-202002-May-2020 21-Nov-201912-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG020X-T) D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019, D10-SED-1019 02-May-202002-May-2020 14-Nov-201913-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG020X-T) A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A4-SED-1019, A6-SED-1019, A7-SED-1019, A8-SED-1019, A9-SED-1019, A10-SED-1019, A11-SED-1019, A12-SED-1019, A13-SED-1019, A14-SED-1019 03-May-202003-May-2020 21-Nov-201912-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG020X-T) G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019, G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 04-May-202004-May-2020 14-Nov-201913-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 ü ü 20 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EG035T-LL) B1-SED-1019 31-Dec-201931-Dec-2019 22-Nov-201912-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EG035T-LL) B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019 30-Dec-201930-Dec-2019 22-Nov-201912-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EG035T-LL) D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 30-Dec-201930-Dec-2019 14-Nov-201913-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EG035T-LL) B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 31-Dec-201931-Dec-2019 22-Nov-201912-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EG035T-LL) G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019 01-Jan-202001-Jan-2020 14-Nov-201913-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG035T-LL) D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019 02-Dec-201902-Dec-2019 22-Nov-201912-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG035T-LL) D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019, D10-SED-1019 02-Dec-201902-Dec-2019 14-Nov-201913-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG035T-LL) A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A4-SED-1019, A6-SED-1019, A7-SED-1019, A8-SED-1019, A9-SED-1019, A10-SED-1019, A11-SED-1019, A12-SED-1019, A13-SED-1019, A14-SED-1019 03-Dec-201903-Dec-2019 22-Nov-201912-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG035T-LL) G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019, G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 04-Dec-201904-Dec-2019 14-Nov-201913-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 ü ü 21 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP090: Organotin Compounds Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EP090) B1-SED-1019 25-Dec-201931-Dec-2019 22-Nov-201915-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EP090) D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 24-Dec-201930-Dec-2019 25-Nov-201914-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EP090) B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019 25-Dec-201930-Dec-2019 22-Nov-201915-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EP090) B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 25-Dec-201931-Dec-2019 22-Nov-201915-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EP090) G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019 24-Dec-201901-Jan-2020 25-Nov-201914-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP090) D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019, D10-SED-1019 24-Dec-201918-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201914-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP090) D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019 25-Dec-201918-Nov-2019 22-Nov-201915-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP090) A1-SED-1019 25-Dec-201919-Nov-2019 22-Nov-201915-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP090) E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 22-Dec-201920-Nov-2019 14-Nov-201912-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP090) G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019, G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019 24-Dec-201920-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201914-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 ü ü 22 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EP094) B1-SED-1019 04-Jan-202019-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EP094) B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 05-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 27-Nov-201926-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EP094) B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 04-Jan-202019-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EP094) G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019 05-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 27-Nov-201926-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP094) D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019, D10-SED-1019 04-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP094) A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A4-SED-1019, A6-SED-1019, A7-SED-1019, A8-SED-1019, A9-SED-1019, A10-SED-1019, A11-SED-1019, A12-SED-1019, A13-SED-1019, A14-SED-1019 24-Dec-201919-Nov-2019 15-Nov-201914-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP094) E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 01-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201922-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP094) G9-SED-1019 04-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201925-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP094) G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019, G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019 04-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP094) G12-SED-1019 05-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 27-Nov-201926-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 û ü 23 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP094B: Synergist Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EP094) B1-SED-1019 04-Jan-202019-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EP094) B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 05-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 27-Nov-201926-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EP094) B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 04-Jan-202019-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Frozen (EP094) G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019 05-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 27-Nov-201926-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP094) D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019, D10-SED-1019 04-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP094) A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A4-SED-1019, A6-SED-1019, A7-SED-1019, A8-SED-1019, A9-SED-1019, A10-SED-1019, A11-SED-1019, A12-SED-1019, A13-SED-1019, A14-SED-1019 24-Dec-201919-Nov-2019 15-Nov-201914-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP094) E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 01-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201922-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP094) G9-SED-1019 04-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201925-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP094) G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019, G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019 04-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP094) G12-SED-1019 05-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 27-Nov-201926-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 û ü 24 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP202) B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019, D10-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 12-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 03-Dec-201903-Dec-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP202) B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 11-Jan-202019-Nov-2019 03-Dec-201902-Dec-201905-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP202) B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019 12-Jan-202019-Nov-2019 03-Dec-201903-Dec-201905-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP202) A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A4-SED-1019, A6-SED-1019, A7-SED-1019, A8-SED-1019, A9-SED-1019, A10-SED-1019, A11-SED-1019, A12-SED-1019, A13-SED-1019, A14-SED-1019 24-Dec-201919-Nov-2019 14-Nov-201914-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP202) G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019, G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 11-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 03-Dec-201902-Dec-201906-Nov-2019 û ü 25 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP234A: OP Pesticides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019 10-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201901-Dec-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) D10-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 07-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A4-SED-1019, A6-SED-1019, A7-SED-1019, A8-SED-1019, A9-SED-1019, A10-SED-1019, A11-SED-1019, A12-SED-1019, A13-SED-1019, A14-SED-1019 24-Dec-201919-Nov-2019 14-Nov-201914-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 07-Jan-202019-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 10-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201901-Dec-201906-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019 07-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 û ü 26 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019 10-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201901-Dec-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) D10-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 07-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A4-SED-1019, A6-SED-1019, A7-SED-1019, A8-SED-1019, A9-SED-1019, A10-SED-1019, A11-SED-1019, A12-SED-1019, A13-SED-1019, A14-SED-1019 24-Dec-201919-Nov-2019 14-Nov-201914-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 07-Jan-202019-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 10-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201901-Dec-201906-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019 07-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 û ü 27 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019 10-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201901-Dec-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) D10-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 07-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A4-SED-1019, A6-SED-1019, A7-SED-1019, A8-SED-1019, A9-SED-1019, A10-SED-1019, A11-SED-1019, A12-SED-1019, A13-SED-1019, A14-SED-1019 24-Dec-201919-Nov-2019 14-Nov-201914-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 07-Jan-202019-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 10-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201901-Dec-201906-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019 07-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 û ü 28 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019 10-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201901-Dec-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) D10-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 07-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A4-SED-1019, A6-SED-1019, A7-SED-1019, A8-SED-1019, A9-SED-1019, A10-SED-1019, A11-SED-1019, A12-SED-1019, A13-SED-1019, A14-SED-1019 24-Dec-201919-Nov-2019 14-Nov-201914-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 07-Jan-202019-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 10-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201901-Dec-201906-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019 07-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 û ü 29 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019 10-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201901-Dec-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) D10-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 07-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A4-SED-1019, A6-SED-1019, A7-SED-1019, A8-SED-1019, A9-SED-1019, A10-SED-1019, A11-SED-1019, A12-SED-1019, A13-SED-1019, A14-SED-1019 24-Dec-201919-Nov-2019 14-Nov-201914-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 07-Jan-202019-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 10-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201901-Dec-201906-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019 07-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 û ü 30 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP234G: Chloracetanilides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019 10-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201901-Dec-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) D10-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 07-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A4-SED-1019, A6-SED-1019, A7-SED-1019, A8-SED-1019, A9-SED-1019, A10-SED-1019, A11-SED-1019, A12-SED-1019, A13-SED-1019, A14-SED-1019 24-Dec-201919-Nov-2019 14-Nov-201914-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 07-Jan-202019-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 10-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201901-Dec-201906-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019 07-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 û ü 31 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP234H: Triazine Herbicides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019 10-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201901-Dec-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) D10-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 07-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A4-SED-1019, A6-SED-1019, A7-SED-1019, A8-SED-1019, A9-SED-1019, A10-SED-1019, A11-SED-1019, A12-SED-1019, A13-SED-1019, A14-SED-1019 24-Dec-201919-Nov-2019 14-Nov-201914-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 07-Jan-202019-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 10-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201901-Dec-201906-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019 07-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 û ü 32 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) B11-SED-1019, B12-SED-1019, B13-SED-1019, B14-SED-1019, B15-SED-1019, B16-SED-1019, D1-SED-1019, D2-SED-1019, D3-SED-1019, D4-SED-1019, D5-SED-1019, D6-SED-1019, D7-SED-1019, D8-SED-1019, D9-SED-1019 10-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201901-Dec-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) D10-SED-1019, D11-SED-1019, D12-SED-1019 07-Jan-202018-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201904-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) A1-SED-1019, A3-SED-1019, A4-SED-1019, A6-SED-1019, A7-SED-1019, A8-SED-1019, A9-SED-1019, A10-SED-1019, A11-SED-1019, A12-SED-1019, A13-SED-1019, A14-SED-1019 24-Dec-201919-Nov-2019 14-Nov-201914-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) B1-SED-1019, B3-SED-1019, B4-SED-1019, B5-SED-1019, B6-SED-1019, B7-SED-1019, B8-SED-1019, B10-SED-1019 07-Jan-202019-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201905-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) G4-SED-1019, G6-SED-1019, G7-SED-1019, G8-SED-1019, G9-SED-1019, G10-SED-1019, G11-SED-1019, G12-SED-1019, E1-SED-1019, E2-SED-1019, E3-SED-1019, E4-SED-1019, E5-SED-1019, E6-SED-1019, E7-SED-1019 10-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201901-Dec-201906-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) G1-SED-1019, G2-SED-1019, G3-SED-1019 07-Jan-202020-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201906-Nov-2019 û ü 33 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance The following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(were) processed. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to the expected rate. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers. Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification. Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type ExpectedQC Regular Actual Rate (%)Count EvaluationAnalytical Methods Method Laboratory Duplicates (DUP) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.27 10.008 71 üMoisture Content EA055 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.006 60 üOrganotin Analysis EP090 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 14.29 10.008 56 üPesticides by LCMSMS (Positive Ion Mode) EP234 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.94 10.007 64 üPhenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides (LCMS - Standard DL) EP202 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 0.00 10.000 56 ûSoil Particle Density EA152 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 15.00 10.009 60 üSynthetic Pyrethroids by GCMS EP094 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.27 10.008 71 üTotal Fe and Al in Sediments by ICPAES EG005-SD NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.27 10.008 71 üTotal Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) EG035T-LL NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.27 10.008 71 üTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite X EG020X-T NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.27 10.008 71 üTotal Metals in Sediments by ICPMS EG020-SD Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.00 5.003 60 üOrganotin Analysis EP090 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 7.14 5.004 56 üPesticides by LCMSMS (Positive Ion Mode) EP234 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.004 64 üPhenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides (LCMS - Standard DL) EP202 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.36 5.003 56 üSoil Particle Density EA152 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 8.33 5.005 60 üSynthetic Pyrethroids by GCMS EP094 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.63 5.004 71 üTotal Fe and Al in Sediments by ICPAES EG005-SD NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.63 5.004 71 üTotal Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) EG035T-LL NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.63 5.004 71 üTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite X EG020X-T NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.63 5.004 71 üTotal Metals in Sediments by ICPMS EG020-SD Method Blanks (MB) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.00 5.003 60 üOrganotin Analysis EP090 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 7.14 5.004 56 üPesticides by LCMSMS (Positive Ion Mode) EP234 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.004 64 üPhenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides (LCMS - Standard DL) EP202 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 8.33 5.005 60 üSynthetic Pyrethroids by GCMS EP094 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.63 5.004 71 üTotal Fe and Al in Sediments by ICPAES EG005-SD NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.63 5.004 71 üTotal Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) EG035T-LL NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.63 5.004 71 üTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite X EG020X-T NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.63 5.004 71 üTotal Metals in Sediments by ICPMS EG020-SD Matrix Spikes (MS) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.00 5.003 60 üOrganotin Analysis EP090 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 7.14 5.004 56 üPesticides by LCMSMS (Positive Ion Mode) EP234 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.004 64 üPhenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides (LCMS - Standard DL) EP202 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 8.33 5.005 60 üSynthetic Pyrethroids by GCMS EP094 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.63 5.004 71 üTotal Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) EG035T-LL NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.63 5.004 71 üTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite X EG020X-T 34 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification. Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type ExpectedQC Regular Actual Rate (%)Count EvaluationAnalytical Methods Method Matrix Spikes (MS) - Continued NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.63 5.004 71 üTotal Metals in Sediments by ICPMS EG020-SD 35 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Brief Method Summaries The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the Certificate of Analysis. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions. Analytical Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod In house: A gravimetric procedure based on weight loss over a 12 hour drying period at 105-110 degrees C. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) Section 6.1 and Table 1 (14 day holding time). Moisture Content EA055 SOIL Particle Size Analysis by Hydrometer according to AS1289.3.6.3 - 2003Particle Size Analysis by Hydrometer EA150H SOIL Soil Particle Density by AS 1289.3.5.1-2006 : Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes - Soil classification tests - Determination of the soil particle density of a soil - Standard method Soil Particle Density EA152 SOIL In house: Referenced to APHA 3120; USEPA SW 846 - 6010. Metals are determined following an appropriate acid digestion of the soil. The ICPAES technique ionises samples in a plasma, emitting a characteristic spectrum based on metals present. Intensities at selected wavelengths are compared against those of matrix matched standards. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3). LORs per NODG Total Fe and Al in Sediments by ICPAES EG005-SD SOIL In house: Referenced to APHA 3125; USEPA SW846 - 6020, ALS QWI-EN/EG020. The ICPMS technique utilizes a highly efficient argon plasma to ionize selected elements. Ions are then passed into a high vacuum mass spectrometer, which separates the analytes based on their distinct mass to charge ratios prior to their measurement by a discrete dynode ion detector. Analyte list and LORs per NODG. Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS EG020-SD SOIL In house: Referenced to APHA 3125; USEPA SW846 - 6020, ALS QWI-EN/EG020. The ICPMS technique utilizes a highly efficient argon plasma to ionize selected elements. Ions are then passed into a high vacuum mass spectrometer, which separates the analytes based on their distinct mass to charge ratios prior to their measurement by a discrete dynode ion detector. Total Metals by ICP-MS - Suite X EG020X-T SOIL In house: Referenced to AS 3550, APHA 3112 Hg - B (Flow-injection (SnCl2)(Cold Vapour generation) AAS) FIM-AAS is an automated flameless atomic absorption technique. Mercury in solids are determined following an appropriate acid digestion. Ionic mercury is reduced online to atomic mercury vapour by SnCl2 which is then purged into a heated quartz cell. Quantification is by comparing absorbance against a calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) Total Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) EG035T-LL SOIL In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 8270D Prepared sample extracts are analysed by GC/MS coupled with high volume injection, and quanitified against an established calibration curve. Organotin Analysis EP090 SOIL In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 8270D Extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS and quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. This technique is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) (Method 504,505) Synthetic Pyrethroids by GCMS EP094 SOIL In house: LCMS (Electrospray in negative mode). Residues of acid herbicides are extracted from soil samples under the alkaline condition. An aliquot of the alkaline aqueous phase is taken and acidified before a SPE cleanup. After eluting off from the SPE cartridge, residues of acid herbicides are dissolved in HPLC mobile phase prior to instrument analysis. Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides (LCMS - Standard DL) EP202 SOIL In house: LC-MSMS, direct injection. A sample extracted into acetonitrile, diluted with water and injected directly onto the instrument.. Analysis is by LC/MSMS, ESI Positive Mode. Pesticides by LCMSMS (Positive Ion Mode) EP234 SOIL Preparation Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod 36 of 36:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929990 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Preparation Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod In house: Referenced to USEPA 200.2. Hot Block Acid Digestion 1.0g of sample is heated with Nitric and Hydrochloric acids, then cooled. Peroxide is added and samples heated and cooled again before being filtered and bulked to volume for analysis. Digest is appropriate for determination of selected metals in sludge, sediments, and soils. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) (Method 202) Hot Block Digest for metals in soils sediments and sludges EN69 SOIL In-House: Alkaline extract followed by SPE clean up of acidified portion of the sample extract.Extraction for Phenoxy Acid Herbicides in Soils. EP202-PR SOIL In houseSample preparation for Pesticides by LCMSMS EP234-PR SOIL In house: Mechanical agitation (tumbler). 10g of sample, Na2SO4 and surrogate are extracted with 30mL 1:1 DCM/Acetone by end over end tumble. The solvent is decanted, dehydrated and concentrated (by KD) to the desired volume for analysis. Tumbler Extraction of Solids ORG17 SOIL In house: 20g sample is spiked with surrogate and leached in a methanol:acetic acid:UHP water mix and vacuum filtered. Reagents and solvents are added to the sample and the mixture tumbled. The butyltin compounds are simultaneously derivatised and extracted. The extract is further extracted with petroleum ether. The resultant extracts are combined and concentrated for analysis. Organotin Sample Preparation ORG35 SOIL False 5 5.00True Environmental QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Work Order : EB1929995 Page : 1 of 38 :: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division BrisbaneBMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD :Contact MS BETH TOKI :Contact Andrew Epps :Address PO BOX 203 SPRING HILL BRISBANE QLD 4004 Address : 2 Byth Street Stafford QLD Australia 4053 ::Telephone 07 3831 6744 +61 7 3552 8639Telephone :Project B23282-4 Douglas Shoal Date Samples Received : 11-Nov-2019 :Order number ---- Date Analysis Commenced : 12-Nov-2019 :C-O-C number ---- Issue Date : 06-Dec-2019 Sampler : CONOR JONES Site : ---- Quote number : BN/165/18 B No. of samples received 47: No. of samples analysed 47: This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full. This Quality Control Report contains the following information: l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report; Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limits l Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limits l Matrix Spike (MS) Report; Recovery and Acceptance Limits Signatories This document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11. Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition Alex Rossi Organic Chemist Sydney Organics, Smithfield, NSW Diana Mesa 2IC Organic Chemist Brisbane Organics, Stafford, QLD Kim McCabe Senior Inorganic Chemist Brisbane Inorganics, Stafford, QLD Sarah Ashworth Laboratory Manager - Brisbane Brisbane Organics, Stafford, QLD Satishkumar Trivedi Senior Acid Sulfate Soil Chemist Brisbane Acid Sulphate Soils, Stafford, QLD R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R 2 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project General Comments The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis. Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference. Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lot CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society. LOR = Limit of reporting RPD = Relative Percentage Difference # = Indicates failed QC Key : Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report The quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity. The permitted ranges for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI -EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Result < 10 times LOR: No Limit; Result between 10 and 20 times LOR: 0% - 50%; Result > 20 times LOR: 0% - 20%. Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 2697280) EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg 290 60 128 No LimitAnonymous EB1929990-056 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg 280 100 91.2 No Limit EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg 470 510 8.12 0% - 50%C2-SED-1019 EB1929995-006 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg 560 600 7.71 0% - 50% EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 2697290) EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg 510 620 18.8 0% - 50%C12-SED-1019 EB1929995-016 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg 650 760 15.0 0% - 50% EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg 220 230 0.00 No LimitI14-SED-1019 EB1929995-026 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg 300 330 8.86 No Limit EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 2697297) EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg 150 200 26.2 No LimitG5-SED-1019 EB1929995-047 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg 230 270 15.8 No Limit EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg 250 260 4.39 No LimitH10-SED-1019 EB1929995-036 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg 330 320 3.95 No Limit EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QC Lot: 2697279) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 0% - 20%Anonymous EB1929990-056 EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 0% - 20%C2-SED-1019 EB1929995-006 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QC Lot: 2697293) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 0% - 20%C12-SED-1019 EB1929995-016 EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 0% - 20%I14-SED-1019 EB1929995-026 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QC Lot: 2697300) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 0% - 20%G5-SED-1019 EB1929995-047 EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 0% - 20%H10-SED-1019 EB1929995-036 EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) (QC Lot: 2697284) 3 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) (QC Lot: 2697284) - continued EA055: Moisture Content ---- 0.1 % 31.0 32.5 4.72 0% - 20%Anonymous EB1929990-056 EA055: Moisture Content ---- 0.1 % 26.6 26.7 0.00 0% - 20%C2-SED-1019 EB1929995-006 EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) (QC Lot: 2697295) EA055: Moisture Content ---- 0.1 % 19.6 19.8 0.712 0% - 50%C12-SED-1019 EB1929995-016 EA055: Moisture Content ---- 0.1 % 21.3 20.9 1.59 0% - 20%I14-SED-1019 EB1929995-026 EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) (QC Lot: 2697302) EA055: Moisture Content ---- 0.1 % 31.3 31.0 1.26 0% - 20%H10-SED-1019 EB1929995-036 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QC Lot: 2697281) EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1929990-056 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg 1.14 <1.00 13.5 No Limit EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg 4.1 2.2 60.1 No Limit EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg 12 <10 14.6 No Limit EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No LimitC2-SED-1019 EB1929995-006 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg 1.52 1.30 15.6 No Limit EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg 6.0 5.5 9.61 No Limit EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg 2.3 2.5 7.86 No Limit EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg 1.3 1.3 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg 2.6 3.0 12.1 No Limit EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg 17 18 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QC Lot: 2697291) EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No LimitC12-SED-1019 EB1929995-016 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 0.00 No Limit 4 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QC Lot: 2697291) - continued EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No LimitC12-SED-1019 EB1929995-016 EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg 1.41 1.87 27.9 No Limit EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg 4.3 4.8 10.0 No Limit EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg 1.8 1.7 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg 1.3 1.5 17.5 No Limit EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg 1.8 1.8 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg 18 21 17.4 No Limit EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 2.4 16.9 No Limit EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No LimitI14-SED-1019 EB1929995-026 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg 1.39 1.48 6.49 No Limit EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg 6.2 5.6 10.0 No Limit EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg 18 20 10.4 No Limit EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QC Lot: 2697298) EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No LimitG5-SED-1019 EB1929995-047 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg 1.23 1.41 13.5 No Limit EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg 4.2 4.7 12.5 No Limit EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg <1.0 1.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg 11 14 21.4 No Limit EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No LimitH10-SED-1019 EB1929995-036 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 0.00 No Limit 5 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QC Lot: 2697298) - continued EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No LimitH10-SED-1019 EB1929995-036 EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg 1.50 1.62 7.90 No Limit EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg 8.3 9.1 9.34 No Limit EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg 1.0 1.2 16.5 No Limit EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg 19 19 0.00 No Limit EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 2.0 0.00 No Limit EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QC Lot: 2697282) EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg 3.3 3.8 13.4 0% - 20%C2-SED-1019 EB1929995-006 EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg 4.9 4.6 6.02 0% - 20%Anonymous EB1929990-056 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QC Lot: 2697292) EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg 4.5 4.1 9.04 0% - 20%C12-SED-1019 EB1929995-016 EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg 6.9 6.4 7.45 0% - 20%I14-SED-1019 EB1929995-026 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QC Lot: 2697299) EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg 7.2 8.4 15.6 0% - 20%H10-SED-1019 EB1929995-036 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QC Lot: 2697283) EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1929990-056 EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No LimitC2-SED-1019 EB1929995-006 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QC Lot: 2697294) EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No LimitC12-SED-1019 EB1929995-016 EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No LimitI14-SED-1019 EB1929995-026 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QC Lot: 2697301) EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No LimitH10-SED-1019 EB1929995-036 EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No LimitG5-SED-1019 EB1929995-047 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QC Lot: 2717821) EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitE9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/66 230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/66 841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit 6 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QC Lot: 2717821) - continued EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitE9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitC7-SED-1019 EB1929995-011 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/66 230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/66 841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QC Lot: 2717822) EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitI7-SED-1019 EB1929995-021 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/66 230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/66 841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitH5-SED-1019 EB1929995-031 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit 7 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QC Lot: 2717822) - continued EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitH5-SED-1019 EB1929995-031 EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/66 230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/66 841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QC Lot: 2717823) EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1929990-057 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/66 230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/66 841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP094B: Synergist (QC Lot: 2717821) EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitE9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitC7-SED-1019 EB1929995-011 EP094B: Synergist (QC Lot: 2717822) EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitI7-SED-1019 EB1929995-021 EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitH5-SED-1019 EB1929995-031 EP094B: Synergist (QC Lot: 2717823) EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EB1929990-057 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QC Lot: 2719233) EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitH4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit 8 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QC Lot: 2719233) - continued EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitH4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitA2-B-SED-1019 EB1929995-039 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QC Lot: 2719462) EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitE9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitC7-SED-1019 EB1929995-011 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit 9 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QC Lot: 2719462) - continued EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitC7-SED-1019 EB1929995-011 EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QC Lot: 2722113) EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitC8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitI8-SED-1019 EB1929995-022 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit 10 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QC Lot: 2722113) - continued EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No LimitI8-SED-1019 EB1929995-022 EP234A: OP Pesticides (QC Lot: 2719769) EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitE9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 <0.010 0.00 No Limit EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitC7-SED-1019 EB1929995-011 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit 11 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234A: OP Pesticides (QC Lot: 2719769) - continued EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No LimitC7-SED-1019 EB1929995-011 EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 <0.010 0.00 No Limit EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234A: OP Pesticides (QC Lot: 2719770) EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitH4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 <0.010 0.00 No Limit EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitA2-B-SED-1019 EB1929995-039 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit 12 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234A: OP Pesticides (QC Lot: 2719770) - continued EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitA2-B-SED-1019 EB1929995-039 EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 <0.010 0.00 No Limit EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234A: OP Pesticides (QC Lot: 2722042) EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitC8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No Limit EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 <0.010 0.00 No Limit EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitI8-SED-1019 EB1929995-022 13 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234A: OP Pesticides (QC Lot: 2722042) - continued EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitI8-SED-1019 EB1929995-022 EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 <0.010 0.00 No Limit EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QC Lot: 2719769) EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitE9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitC7-SED-1019 EB1929995-011 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit 14 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QC Lot: 2719769) - continued EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitC7-SED-1019 EB1929995-011 EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QC Lot: 2719770) EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitH4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitA2-B-SED-1019 EB1929995-039 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QC Lot: 2722042) EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitC8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit 15 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QC Lot: 2722042) - continued EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No LimitC8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitI8-SED-1019 EB1929995-022 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QC Lot: 2719769) EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No LimitE9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No LimitC7-SED-1019 EB1929995-011 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QC Lot: 2719770) EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No LimitH4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No LimitA2-B-SED-1019 EB1929995-039 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QC Lot: 2722042) EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No LimitC8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No LimitI8-SED-1019 EB1929995-022 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QC Lot: 2719769) EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitE9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit 16 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QC Lot: 2719769) - continued EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No LimitE9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitC7-SED-1019 EB1929995-011 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QC Lot: 2719770) EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitH4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitA2-B-SED-1019 EB1929995-039 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QC Lot: 2722042) EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitC8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitI8-SED-1019 EB1929995-022 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No Limit 17 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QC Lot: 2722042) - continued EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 <0.004 0.00 No LimitI8-SED-1019 EB1929995-022 EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No Limit EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QC Lot: 2719769) EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitE9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitC7-SED-1019 EB1929995-011 EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QC Lot: 2719770) EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitH4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitA2-B-SED-1019 EB1929995-039 EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QC Lot: 2722042) EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitC8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitI8-SED-1019 EB1929995-022 EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QC Lot: 2719769) EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitE9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitC7-SED-1019 EB1929995-011 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QC Lot: 2719770) EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitH4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitA2-B-SED-1019 EB1929995-039 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QC Lot: 2722042) EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitC8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 18 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QC Lot: 2722042) - continued EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitI8-SED-1019 EB1929995-022 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QC Lot: 2719769) EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitE9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitC7-SED-1019 EB1929995-011 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QC Lot: 2719770) EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitH4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitA2-B-SED-1019 EB1929995-039 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QC Lot: 2722042) EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitC8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit 19 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%) EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QC Lot: 2722042) - continued EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitC8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No LimitI8-SED-1019 EB1929995-022 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 <0.002 0.00 No Limit EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No Limit EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QC Lot: 2719769) EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitE9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitC7-SED-1019 EB1929995-011 EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QC Lot: 2719770) EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitH4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitA2-B-SED-1019 EB1929995-039 EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QC Lot: 2722042) EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitC8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 0.00 No LimitI8-SED-1019 EB1929995-022 EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 <0.005 0.00 No Limit 20 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report The quality control term Method / Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. The quality control term Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) refers to a certified reference material, or a known interference free matrix spiked with target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS. Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES (QCLot: 2697280) EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg <50 10212361 mg/kg 13070.0 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg <50 93.430024 mg/kg 13070.0 EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES (QCLot: 2697290) EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg <50 12612361 mg/kg 13070.0 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg <50 11430024 mg/kg 13070.0 EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES (QCLot: 2697297) EG005-SD: Aluminium 7429-90-5 50 mg/kg <50 10212361 mg/kg 13070.0 EG005-SD: Iron 7439-89-6 50 mg/kg <50 91.930024 mg/kg 13070.0 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QCLot: 2697279) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 91.50.0847 mg/kg 13070.0 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QCLot: 2697293) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 1040.0847 mg/kg 13070.0 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QCLot: 2697300) EG035T-LL: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 92.70.0847 mg/kg 13070.0 EA152: Soil Particle Density (QCLot: 2698505) EA152: Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) ---- ---- g/cm3 ---- 2.68 g/cm3 12080.0 EA152: Soil Particle Density (QCLot: 2698507) EA152: Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) ---- ---- g/cm3 ---- 2.68 g/cm3 12080.0 EA152: Soil Particle Density (QCLot: 2698509) EA152: Soil Particle Density (Clay/Silt/Sand) ---- ---- g/cm3 ---- 2.68 g/cm3 12080.0 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2697281) EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg <1.00 96.296.1 mg/kg 12480.0 EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 99.50.74 mg/kg 12287.0 EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg <1.0 99.915.3 mg/kg 12979.0 EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg <1.0 91.944.8 mg/kg 11885.0 EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 98.652.8 mg/kg 11986.0 EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg <10 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg <1.0 97.112.2 mg/kg 12377.0 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 -------- -------- 21 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2697281) - continued EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg <1.0 93.5114 mg/kg 12771.0 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2697291) EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg <1.00 11896.1 mg/kg 12480.0 EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 1160.74 mg/kg 12287.0 EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg <1.0 12115.3 mg/kg 12979.0 EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg <1.0 11544.8 mg/kg 11885.0 EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 11352.8 mg/kg 11986.0 EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg <10 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg <1.0 11612.31 mg/kg 12377.0 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg <1.0 117114 mg/kg 12771.0 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2697298) EG020-SD: Antimony 7440-36-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.50 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/kg <1.00 94.096.1 mg/kg 12480.0 EG020-SD: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 88.10.74 mg/kg 12287.0 EG020-SD: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/kg <1.0 10115.3 mg/kg 12979.0 EG020-SD: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/kg <1.0 87.244.8 mg/kg 11885.0 EG020-SD: Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/kg <1.0 90.252.8 mg/kg 11986.0 EG020-SD: Manganese 7439-96-5 10 mg/kg <10 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/kg <1.0 92.012.2 mg/kg 12377.0 EG020-SD: Selenium 7782-49-2 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Silver 7440-22-4 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Vanadium 7440-62-2 2 mg/kg <2.0 -------- -------- EG020-SD: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/kg <1.0 111114 mg/kg 12771.0 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2697282) EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 95.277.4 mg/kg 12386.0 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2697292) EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 11677.4 mg/kg 12386.0 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2697299) EG020X-T: Barium 7440-39-3 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 86.977.4 mg/kg 12386.0 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QCLot: 2697283) EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg <0.5 1141.25 µgSn/kg 13952.0 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QCLot: 2697294) 22 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP090: Organotin Compounds (QCLot: 2697294) - continued EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg <0.5 1341.25 µgSn/kg 13952.0 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QCLot: 2697301) EP090: Tributyltin 56573-85-4 0.5 µgSn/kg <0.5 1231.25 µgSn/kg 13952.0 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2717821) EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 84.70.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 90.70.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 93.80.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 93.30.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 99.20.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 92.90.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 85.50.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/ 66230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 89.30.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/ 66841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 93.40.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 95.20.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 85.30.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 94.60.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 84.20.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2717822) EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 77.60.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 81.40.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 82.50.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 82.90.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 86.50.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 86.10.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 92.60.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/ 66230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 86.10.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/ 66841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 85.70.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 78.80.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 89.80.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 88.00.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 80.20.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2717823) EP094: Bioresmethrin 28434-01-07 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 75.60.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 80.20.5 mg/kg 13070.0 23 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2717823) - continued EP094: Phenothrin 26002-80-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 89.60.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 68085-85-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 83.30.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Permethrin 52645-53-1 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 81.60.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 97.00.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 89.50.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 51630-58-1/ 66230-04- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 79.40.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 62229-77-0/ 66841-25- 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 82.20.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Allethrin 584-79-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 89.00.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Transfluthrin 118712-89-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 79.80.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Tetramethrin 7696-12-0 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 81.50.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 102851-06-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 77.90.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094B: Synergist (QCLot: 2717821) EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 83.30.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094B: Synergist (QCLot: 2717822) EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 77.20.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP094B: Synergist (QCLot: 2717823) EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 63993-73-7 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 75.70.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QCLot: 2719233) EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 65.30.1 mg/kg 12854.4 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 96.40.1 mg/kg 13045.5 EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 74.60.1 mg/kg 13551.7 EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 73.80.1 mg/kg 13060.0 EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 68.50.1 mg/kg 13156.8 EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 70.10.1 mg/kg 14150.0 EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 98.20.1 mg/kg 13168.5 EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 83.50.1 mg/kg 14150.8 EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 68.60.1 mg/kg 12640.8 EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 72.90.1 mg/kg 13957.4 EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 81.20.1 mg/kg 13738.9 EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 69.30.1 mg/kg 12948.7 EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 79.30.1 mg/kg 10649.4 EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 68.10.1 mg/kg 12853.2 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QCLot: 2719462) EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 66.90.1 mg/kg 12854.4 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 76.10.1 mg/kg 13045.5 EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 66.20.1 mg/kg 13551.7 24 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QCLot: 2719462) - continued EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 71.40.1 mg/kg 13060.0 EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 73.70.1 mg/kg 13156.8 EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 77.10.1 mg/kg 14150.0 EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 75.10.1 mg/kg 13168.5 EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 69.00.1 mg/kg 14150.8 EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 67.20.1 mg/kg 12640.8 EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 77.80.1 mg/kg 13957.4 EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 73.00.1 mg/kg 13738.9 EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 65.30.1 mg/kg 12948.7 EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 68.40.1 mg/kg 10649.4 EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 71.90.1 mg/kg 12853.2 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QCLot: 2722113) EP202: 4-Chlorophenoxy acetic acid 122-88-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 76.90.1 mg/kg 12854.4 EP202: 2.4-DB 94-82-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 76.50.1 mg/kg 13045.5 EP202: Dicamba 1918-00-9 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 1020.1 mg/kg 13551.7 EP202: Mecoprop 93-65-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 1030.1 mg/kg 13060.0 EP202: MCPA 94-74-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 75.80.1 mg/kg 13156.8 EP202: 2.4-DP 120-36-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 91.50.1 mg/kg 14150.0 EP202: 2.4-D 94-75-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 98.20.1 mg/kg 13168.5 EP202: Triclopyr 55335-06-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 1010.1 mg/kg 14150.8 EP202: 2.4.5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 1030.1 mg/kg 12640.8 EP202: 2.4.5-T 93-76-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 96.20.1 mg/kg 13957.4 EP202: MCPB 94-81-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 75.00.1 mg/kg 13738.9 EP202: Picloram 1918-02-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 79.60.1 mg/kg 12948.7 EP202: Clopyralid 1702-17-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 84.20.1 mg/kg 10649.4 EP202: Fluroxypyr 69377-81-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 88.90.1 mg/kg 12853.2 EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2719769) EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 92.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 82.00.04 mg/kg 11860.0 EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 75.00.08 mg/kg 11161.0 EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 98.40.02 mg/kg 10165.0 EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 72.00.02 mg/kg 95.063.0 EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 82.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 93.80.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 90.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 72.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 97.74 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 84.00.02 mg/kg 11662.0 EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 92.30.1 mg/kg 13070.0 25 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2719769) - continued EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 82.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 91.00.08 mg/kg 12367.0 EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 91.20.04 mg/kg 11761.0 EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 83.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 92.90.4 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 98.14 mg/kg 11862.0 EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 72.60.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 70.40.02 mg/kg 10363.0 EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 92.80.01 mg/kg 11159.0 EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 80.80.02 mg/kg 10660.0 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 80.00.01 mg/kg 10763.0 EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2719770) EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 1040.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 87.60.04 mg/kg 11860.0 EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 78.00.08 mg/kg 11161.0 EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 85.60.02 mg/kg 10165.0 EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 92.80.02 mg/kg 95.063.0 EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 83.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 81.00.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 1070.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 84.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 85.64 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 78.40.02 mg/kg 11662.0 EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 1140.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 96.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 87.20.08 mg/kg 12367.0 EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 90.00.04 mg/kg 11761.0 EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 84.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 73.60.4 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 83.14 mg/kg 11862.0 EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 1190.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 79.20.02 mg/kg 10363.0 EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 1040.01 mg/kg 11159.0 EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 84.00.02 mg/kg 10660.0 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 83.20.01 mg/kg 10763.0 EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2722042) EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 2642-71-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 97.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Azinphos-methyl 86-50-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 1010.04 mg/kg 11860.0 EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 470-90-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 85.60.08 mg/kg 11161.0 26 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2722042) - continued EP234: Coumaphos 56-72-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 95.20.02 mg/kg 10165.0 EP234: Diazinon 333-41-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 85.60.02 mg/kg 95.063.0 EP234: Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 98.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Disulfoton 298-04-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 77.00.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 93.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fenamiphos 22224-92-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 70.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fenitrothion 122-14-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1084 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fensulfothion 115-90-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 71.20.02 mg/kg 11662.0 EP234: Fenthion 55-38-9 0.01 mg/kg <0.010 87.20.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Malathion 121-75-5 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 74.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Mevinphos 7786-34-7 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 78.40.08 mg/kg 12367.0 EP234: Monocrotophos 6923-22-4 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 80.40.04 mg/kg 11761.0 EP234: Omethoate 1113-02-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 82.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Parathion 56-38-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 1220.4 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Parathion-methyl 298-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 92.14 mg/kg 11862.0 EP234: Phorate 298-02-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 87.40.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 29232-93-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 96.00.02 mg/kg 10363.0 EP234: Sulfotep 3689-24-5 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 70.40.01 mg/kg 11159.0 EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 22248-79-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 96.80.02 mg/kg 10660.0 EP234: Triazophos 24017-47-8 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 81.60.01 mg/kg 10763.0 EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2719769) EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 70.40.1 mg/kg 11767.0 EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 95.30.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 80.80.02 mg/kg 12256.0 EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 73.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 80.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 92.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 92.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 70.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 81.30.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 74.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 86.40.02 mg/kg 10959.0 EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 97.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2719770) EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 84.00.1 mg/kg 11767.0 EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 76.30.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 83.20.02 mg/kg 12256.0 EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 74.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 80.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 27 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2719770) - continued EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 84.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 82.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 92.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 84.10.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 79.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 1050.02 mg/kg 10959.0 EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 79.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2722042) EP234: Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 83.70.1 mg/kg 11767.0 EP234: Bendiocarb 22781-23-3 1 mg/kg <1 76.20.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Benomyl 17804-35-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 91.20.02 mg/kg 12256.0 EP234: Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 72.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 84.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 16655-82-6 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 81.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 70.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 80.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Molinate 2212-67-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 81.80.2 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Oxamyl 23135-22-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 79.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Thiobencarb 28249-77-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 96.00.02 mg/kg 10959.0 EP234: Thiodicarb 59669-26-0 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 1010.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QCLot: 2719769) EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 76.00.04 mg/kg 12462.0 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 78.00.04 mg/kg 11965.0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QCLot: 2719770) EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 87.20.04 mg/kg 12462.0 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 94.00.04 mg/kg 11965.0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QCLot: 2722042) EP234: Hexazinone 51235-04-2 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 75.60.04 mg/kg 12462.0 EP234: Metribuzin 21087-64-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 76.00.04 mg/kg 11965.0 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QCLot: 2719769) EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 86.40.08 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 96.80.04 mg/kg 10759.0 EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 99.60.04 mg/kg 10662.0 EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 70.40.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 87.80.1 mg/kg 10260.0 EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 78.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 70.40.02 mg/kg 98.062.0 EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 81.60.04 mg/kg 12761.0 28 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QCLot: 2719770) EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 87.40.08 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 80.40.04 mg/kg 10759.0 EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 1020.04 mg/kg 10662.0 EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 99.80.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 96.00.1 mg/kg 10260.0 EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 82.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 90.40.02 mg/kg 98.062.0 EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 78.40.04 mg/kg 12761.0 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QCLot: 2722042) EP234: Cyproconazole 94361-06-5 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 88.60.08 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Flusilazole 85509-19-9 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 94.40.04 mg/kg 10759.0 EP234: Hexaconazole 79983-71-4 0.004 mg/kg <0.004 97.60.04 mg/kg 10662.0 EP234: Paclobutrazole 76738-62-0 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 92.30.1 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Propiconazole 60207-90-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 88.50.1 mg/kg 10260.0 EP234: Tebuconazole 107534-96-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 70.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Cyprodinil 121552-61-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 74.40.02 mg/kg 98.062.0 EP234: Pyrimethanil 53112-28-0 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 91.20.04 mg/kg 12761.0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QCLot: 2719769) EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 75.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 75.20.02 mg/kg 12264.0 EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 73.20.04 mg/kg 10858.0 EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 92.80.04 mg/kg 13161.0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QCLot: 2719770) EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 88.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 89.60.02 mg/kg 12264.0 EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 88.40.04 mg/kg 10858.0 EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 1000.04 mg/kg 13161.0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QCLot: 2722042) EP234: Diuron 330-54-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 76.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Fluometuron 2164-17-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 73.60.02 mg/kg 12264.0 EP234: Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 74.40.04 mg/kg 10858.0 EP234: Bromacil 314-40-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 73.60.04 mg/kg 13161.0 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QCLot: 2719769) EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 80.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QCLot: 2719770) EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 88.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QCLot: 2722042) EP234: Metolachlor 51218-45-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 97.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 29 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QCLot: 2719769) EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 88.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 74.40.02 mg/kg 12062.0 EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 78.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 83.20.02 mg/kg 13058.0 EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 77.60.02 mg/kg 12761.0 EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 77.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 72.80.02 mg/kg 11763.0 EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 1050.02 mg/kg 11559.0 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QCLot: 2719770) EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 84.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 84.00.02 mg/kg 12062.0 EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 89.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 85.60.02 mg/kg 13058.0 EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 83.20.02 mg/kg 12761.0 EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 85.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 92.00.02 mg/kg 11763.0 EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 85.60.02 mg/kg 11559.0 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QCLot: 2722042) EP234: Ametryn 834-12-8 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 75.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Atrazine 1912-24-9 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 72.80.02 mg/kg 12062.0 EP234: Cyanazine 21725-46-2 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 80.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Prometryn 7287-19-6 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 76.00.02 mg/kg 13058.0 EP234: Propazine 139-40-2 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 76.80.02 mg/kg 12761.0 EP234: Simazine 122-34-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 70.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234: Terbuthylazine 5915-41-3 0.002 mg/kg <0.002 82.40.02 mg/kg 11763.0 EP234: Terbutryn 886-50-0 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 1020.02 mg/kg 11559.0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QCLot: 2719769) EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 70.80.04 mg/kg 11462.0 EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 72.00.004 mg/kg 11260.0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QCLot: 2719770) EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 82.00.04 mg/kg 11462.0 EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 84.00.004 mg/kg 11260.0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QCLot: 2722042) EP234: Fenarimol 60168-88-9 0.005 mg/kg <0.005 89.60.04 mg/kg 11462.0 EP234: Irgarol 28159-98-0 0.001 mg/kg <0.001 84.00.004 mg/kg 11260.0 Matrix Spike (MS) Report 30 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project The quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on analyte recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference. Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QCLot: 2697279) Anonymous EB1929990-057 7439-97-6EG035T-LL: Mercury 83.90.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QCLot: 2697293) I3-SED-1019 EB1929995-017 7439-97-6EG035T-LL: Mercury 77.30.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) (QCLot: 2697300) H11-SED-1019 EB1929995-037 7439-97-6EG035T-LL: Mercury # 63.40.5 mg/kg 13070.0 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2697281) Anonymous EB1929990-057 7440-38-2EG020-SD: Arsenic 91.8100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-43-9EG020-SD: Cadmium 82.325 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-47-3EG020-SD: Chromium 97.1100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-50-8EG020-SD: Copper 80.8100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-48-4EG020-SD: Cobalt 88.2100 mg/kg 13070.0 7439-92-1EG020-SD: Lead 86.8100 mg/kg 13070.0 7439-96-5EG020-SD: Manganese 99.9100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-02-0EG020-SD: Nickel 81.9100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-62-2EG020-SD: Vanadium 92.6100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-66-6EG020-SD: Zinc 76.0100 mg/kg 13070.0 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2697291) I3-SED-1019 EB1929995-017 7440-38-2EG020-SD: Arsenic 101100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-43-9EG020-SD: Cadmium 91.025 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-47-3EG020-SD: Chromium 90.4100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-50-8EG020-SD: Copper 89.3100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-48-4EG020-SD: Cobalt 97.3100 mg/kg 13070.0 7439-92-1EG020-SD: Lead 91.2100 mg/kg 13070.0 7439-96-5EG020-SD: Manganese 93.4100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-02-0EG020-SD: Nickel 84.2100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-62-2EG020-SD: Vanadium 103100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-66-6EG020-SD: Zinc 87.1100 mg/kg 13070.0 EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2697298) H11-SED-1019 EB1929995-037 7440-38-2EG020-SD: Arsenic 113100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-43-9EG020-SD: Cadmium 93.725 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-47-3EG020-SD: Chromium 111100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-50-8EG020-SD: Copper 97.0100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-48-4EG020-SD: Cobalt 105100 mg/kg 13070.0 7439-92-1EG020-SD: Lead 86.9100 mg/kg 13070.0 7439-96-5EG020-SD: Manganese 109100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-02-0EG020-SD: Nickel 100100 mg/kg 13070.0 31 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS (QCLot: 2697298) - continued H11-SED-1019 EB1929995-037 7440-62-2EG020-SD: Vanadium 120100 mg/kg 13070.0 7440-66-6EG020-SD: Zinc 92.6100 mg/kg 13070.0 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2697282) Anonymous EB1929990-057 7440-39-3EG020X-T: Barium 75.2100 mg/kg 13070.0 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2697292) I3-SED-1019 EB1929995-017 7440-39-3EG020X-T: Barium 101100 mg/kg 13070.0 EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 2697299) H11-SED-1019 EB1929995-037 7440-39-3EG020X-T: Barium 94.7100 mg/kg 13070.0 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QCLot: 2697283) Anonymous EB1929990-057 56573-85-4EP090: Tributyltin # Not Determined 1.25 µgSn/kg 13020.0 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QCLot: 2697294) I3-SED-1019 EB1929995-017 56573-85-4EP090: Tributyltin 92.91.25 µgSn/kg 13020.0 EP090: Organotin Compounds (QCLot: 2697301) H11-SED-1019 EB1929995-037 56573-85-4EP090: Tributyltin 96.31.25 µgSn/kg 13020.0 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2717821) E10-SED-1019 EB1929995-002 28434-01-07EP094: Bioresmethrin # 14.90.5 mg/kg 14060.0 82657-04-3EP094: Bifenthrin 82.20.5 mg/kg 14060.0 26002-80-2EP094: Phenothrin 87.40.5 mg/kg 14060.0 68085-85-8EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 86.50.5 mg/kg 14060.0 52645-53-1EP094: Permethrin 91.00.5 mg/kg 14060.0 68359-37-5EP094: Cyfluthrin 87.90.5 mg/kg 14060.0 52315-07-8EP094: Cypermethrin 79.50.5 mg/kg 14060.0 51630-58-1/6 6230-04- EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 80.00.5 mg/kg 14060.0 62229-77-0/6 6841-25- EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 85.70.5 mg/kg 14060.0 584-79-2EP094: Allethrin 89.20.5 mg/kg 14060.0 118712-89-3EP094: Transfluthrin 79.20.5 mg/kg 14060.0 7696-12-0EP094: Tetramethrin 86.40.5 mg/kg 14060.0 102851-06-9EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 77.30.5 mg/kg 14060.0 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2717822) I8-SED-1019 EB1929995-022 28434-01-07EP094: Bioresmethrin 72.20.5 mg/kg 14060.0 82657-04-3EP094: Bifenthrin 95.80.5 mg/kg 14060.0 26002-80-2EP094: Phenothrin 92.40.5 mg/kg 14060.0 68085-85-8EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 91.70.5 mg/kg 14060.0 32 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2717822) - continued I8-SED-1019 EB1929995-022 52645-53-1EP094: Permethrin 96.50.5 mg/kg 14060.0 68359-37-5EP094: Cyfluthrin 92.90.5 mg/kg 14060.0 52315-07-8EP094: Cypermethrin 1010.5 mg/kg 14060.0 51630-58-1/6 6230-04- EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 94.70.5 mg/kg 14060.0 62229-77-0/6 6841-25- EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 95.90.5 mg/kg 14060.0 584-79-2EP094: Allethrin 89.70.5 mg/kg 14060.0 118712-89-3EP094: Transfluthrin 98.80.5 mg/kg 14060.0 7696-12-0EP094: Tetramethrin 99.00.5 mg/kg 14060.0 102851-06-9EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 90.80.5 mg/kg 14060.0 EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids (QCLot: 2717823) Anonymous EB1929990-058 28434-01-07EP094: Bioresmethrin # 28.20.5 mg/kg 14060.0 82657-04-3EP094: Bifenthrin 93.40.5 mg/kg 14060.0 26002-80-2EP094: Phenothrin 1120.5 mg/kg 14060.0 68085-85-8EP094: Lambda-cyhalothrin 1020.5 mg/kg 14060.0 52645-53-1EP094: Permethrin 1020.5 mg/kg 14060.0 68359-37-5EP094: Cyfluthrin 1260.5 mg/kg 14060.0 52315-07-8EP094: Cypermethrin 95.10.5 mg/kg 14060.0 51630-58-1/6 6230-04- EP094: Fenvalerate & Esfenvalerate 99.30.5 mg/kg 14060.0 62229-77-0/6 6841-25- EP094: Deltamethrin & Tralomethrin 1010.5 mg/kg 14060.0 584-79-2EP094: Allethrin 1060.5 mg/kg 14060.0 118712-89-3EP094: Transfluthrin 96.20.5 mg/kg 14060.0 7696-12-0EP094: Tetramethrin 95.50.5 mg/kg 14060.0 102851-06-9EP094: Tau-fluvalinate 99.80.5 mg/kg 14060.0 EP094B: Synergist (QCLot: 2717821) E10-SED-1019 EB1929995-002 63993-73-7EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 76.20.5 mg/kg 14060.0 EP094B: Synergist (QCLot: 2717822) I8-SED-1019 EB1929995-022 63993-73-7EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 87.40.5 mg/kg 14060.0 EP094B: Synergist (QCLot: 2717823) Anonymous EB1929990-058 63993-73-7EP094: Piperonyl Butoxide 89.60.5 mg/kg 14060.0 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QCLot: 2719233) H4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 93-65-2EP202: Mecoprop 73.80.1 mg/kg 14060.0 94-74-6EP202: MCPA 67.40.1 mg/kg 14357.0 94-75-7EP202: 2.4-D 89.60.1 mg/kg 13968.0 55335-06-3EP202: Triclopyr 71.50.1 mg/kg 14551.0 33 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QCLot: 2719233) - continued H4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 93-76-5EP202: 2.4.5-T 73.20.1 mg/kg 14257.0 1918-02-1EP202: Picloram 59.20.1 mg/kg 13849.0 1702-17-6EP202: Clopyralid 59.40.1 mg/kg 14949.0 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QCLot: 2719462) E9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 93-65-2EP202: Mecoprop 77.10.1 mg/kg 14060.0 94-74-6EP202: MCPA 79.40.1 mg/kg 14357.0 94-75-7EP202: 2.4-D 78.20.1 mg/kg 13968.0 55335-06-3EP202: Triclopyr 86.40.1 mg/kg 14551.0 93-76-5EP202: 2.4.5-T 97.00.1 mg/kg 14257.0 1918-02-1EP202: Picloram # 43.50.1 mg/kg 13849.0 1702-17-6EP202: Clopyralid 50.60.1 mg/kg 14949.0 EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS (QCLot: 2722113) C8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 93-65-2EP202: Mecoprop 81.20.1 mg/kg 14060.0 94-74-6EP202: MCPA 68.40.1 mg/kg 14357.0 94-75-7EP202: 2.4-D 87.30.1 mg/kg 13968.0 55335-06-3EP202: Triclopyr 82.40.1 mg/kg 14551.0 93-76-5EP202: 2.4.5-T 97.80.1 mg/kg 14257.0 1918-02-1EP202: Picloram 71.80.1 mg/kg 13849.0 1702-17-6EP202: Clopyralid 65.60.1 mg/kg 14949.0 EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2719769) E9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 2642-71-9EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 79.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 86-50-0EP234: Azinphos-methyl 72.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 470-90-6EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 88.20.08 mg/kg 13070.0 56-72-4EP234: Coumaphos 74.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 333-41-5EP234: Diazinon 74.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 60-51-5EP234: Dimethoate 71.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 298-04-4EP234: Disulfoton 70.70.1 mg/kg 13070.0 13194-48-4EP234: Ethoprophos 88.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 22224-92-6EP234: Fenamiphos 72.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 122-14-5EP234: Fenitrothion 92.64 mg/kg 13070.0 115-90-2EP234: Fensulfothion 70.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 55-38-9EP234: Fenthion 95.50.1 mg/kg 13070.0 121-75-5EP234: Malathion 95.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 7786-34-7EP234: Mevinphos 95.00.08 mg/kg 13070.0 6923-22-4EP234: Monocrotophos 90.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 1113-02-6EP234: Omethoate 76.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 56-38-2EP234: Parathion 92.60.4 mg/kg 13070.0 298-00-0EP234: Parathion-methyl 98.04 mg/kg 13070.0 34 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2719769) - continued E9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 298-02-2EP234: Phorate 81.70.2 mg/kg 13070.0 29232-93-7EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 80.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 3689-24-5EP234: Sulfotep 76.80.01 mg/kg 13070.0 22248-79-9EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 84.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 24017-47-8EP234: Triazophos 91.20.01 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2719770) H4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 2642-71-9EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 82.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 86-50-0EP234: Azinphos-methyl 80.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 470-90-6EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 96.40.08 mg/kg 13070.0 56-72-4EP234: Coumaphos 93.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 333-41-5EP234: Diazinon 92.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 60-51-5EP234: Dimethoate 88.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 298-04-4EP234: Disulfoton 74.90.1 mg/kg 13070.0 13194-48-4EP234: Ethoprophos 1080.02 mg/kg 13070.0 22224-92-6EP234: Fenamiphos 1010.02 mg/kg 13070.0 122-14-5EP234: Fenitrothion 90.64 mg/kg 13070.0 115-90-2EP234: Fensulfothion 84.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 55-38-9EP234: Fenthion 1040.1 mg/kg 13070.0 121-75-5EP234: Malathion 1080.04 mg/kg 13070.0 7786-34-7EP234: Mevinphos 89.40.08 mg/kg 13070.0 6923-22-4EP234: Monocrotophos 93.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 1113-02-6EP234: Omethoate 91.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 56-38-2EP234: Parathion 85.50.4 mg/kg 13070.0 298-00-0EP234: Parathion-methyl 92.64 mg/kg 13070.0 298-02-2EP234: Phorate 1010.2 mg/kg 13070.0 29232-93-7EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 84.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 3689-24-5EP234: Sulfotep 80.00.01 mg/kg 13070.0 22248-79-9EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 93.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 24017-47-8EP234: Triazophos 94.40.01 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2722042) C8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 2642-71-9EP234: Azinphos-ethyl 98.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 86-50-0EP234: Azinphos-methyl 85.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 470-90-6EP234: Chlorfenvinphos 89.80.08 mg/kg 13070.0 56-72-4EP234: Coumaphos 70.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 333-41-5EP234: Diazinon 85.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 60-51-5EP234: Dimethoate 1010.04 mg/kg 13070.0 298-04-4EP234: Disulfoton 91.00.1 mg/kg 13070.0 13194-48-4EP234: Ethoprophos 1000.02 mg/kg 13070.0 22224-92-6EP234: Fenamiphos 95.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 35 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP234A: OP Pesticides (QCLot: 2722042) - continued C8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 122-14-5EP234: Fenitrothion 73.94 mg/kg 13070.0 115-90-2EP234: Fensulfothion 73.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 55-38-9EP234: Fenthion 77.80.1 mg/kg 13070.0 121-75-5EP234: Malathion 92.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 7786-34-7EP234: Mevinphos 85.50.08 mg/kg 13070.0 6923-22-4EP234: Monocrotophos 77.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 1113-02-6EP234: Omethoate 81.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 56-38-2EP234: Parathion 81.60.4 mg/kg 13070.0 298-00-0EP234: Parathion-methyl 1004 mg/kg 13070.0 298-02-2EP234: Phorate 1010.2 mg/kg 13070.0 29232-93-7EP234: Pirimiphos-methyl 93.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 3689-24-5EP234: Sulfotep 76.80.01 mg/kg 13070.0 22248-79-9EP234: Tetrachlorvinphos 70.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 24017-47-8EP234: Triazophos 84.80.01 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2719769) E9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 116-06-3EP234: Aldicarb 72.30.1 mg/kg 13070.0 22781-23-3EP234: Bendiocarb 95.90.2 mg/kg 13070.0 17804-35-2EP234: Benomyl 86.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 63-25-2EP234: Carbaryl 82.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 1563-66-2EP234: Carbofuran 70.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 16655-82-6EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 78.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 2032-65-7EP234: Methiocarb 97.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 16752-77-5EP234: Methomyl 70.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 2212-67-1EP234: Molinate 71.40.2 mg/kg 13070.0 23135-22-0EP234: Oxamyl 80.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 28249-77-6EP234: Thiobencarb 89.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 59669-26-0EP234: Thiodicarb # 0.000.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2719770) H4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 116-06-3EP234: Aldicarb 87.50.1 mg/kg 13070.0 22781-23-3EP234: Bendiocarb 1140.2 mg/kg 13070.0 17804-35-2EP234: Benomyl 96.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 63-25-2EP234: Carbaryl 92.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 1563-66-2EP234: Carbofuran 89.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 16655-82-6EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 94.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 2032-65-7EP234: Methiocarb 1010.02 mg/kg 13070.0 16752-77-5EP234: Methomyl 1250.02 mg/kg 13070.0 2212-67-1EP234: Molinate 94.20.2 mg/kg 13070.0 23135-22-0EP234: Oxamyl 1090.02 mg/kg 13070.0 28249-77-6EP234: Thiobencarb 88.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 36 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2719770) - continued H4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 59669-26-0EP234: Thiodicarb # 0.000.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates (QCLot: 2722042) C8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 116-06-3EP234: Aldicarb 87.70.1 mg/kg 13070.0 22781-23-3EP234: Bendiocarb 1180.2 mg/kg 13070.0 17804-35-2EP234: Benomyl 84.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 63-25-2EP234: Carbaryl 88.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 1563-66-2EP234: Carbofuran 70.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 16655-82-6EP234: 3-Hydroxy Carbofuran 89.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 2032-65-7EP234: Methiocarb 1030.02 mg/kg 13070.0 16752-77-5EP234: Methomyl 78.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 2212-67-1EP234: Molinate 70.10.2 mg/kg 13070.0 23135-22-0EP234: Oxamyl 1150.02 mg/kg 13070.0 28249-77-6EP234: Thiobencarb 93.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 59669-26-0EP234: Thiodicarb # 0.000.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QCLot: 2719769) E9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 51235-04-2EP234: Hexazinone 82.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 21087-64-9EP234: Metribuzin 79.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QCLot: 2719770) H4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 51235-04-2EP234: Hexazinone 97.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 21087-64-9EP234: Metribuzin 87.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides (QCLot: 2722042) C8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 51235-04-2EP234: Hexazinone 71.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 21087-64-9EP234: Metribuzin 95.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QCLot: 2719769) E9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 94361-06-5EP234: Cyproconazole 71.60.08 mg/kg 13070.0 85509-19-9EP234: Flusilazole 86.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 79983-71-4EP234: Hexaconazole 93.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 76738-62-0EP234: Paclobutrazole 74.10.1 mg/kg 13070.0 60207-90-1EP234: Propiconazole 75.00.1 mg/kg 13070.0 107534-96-3EP234: Tebuconazole 85.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 121552-61-2EP234: Cyprodinil 87.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 53112-28-0EP234: Pyrimethanil 71.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QCLot: 2719770) H4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 94361-06-5EP234: Cyproconazole 95.40.08 mg/kg 13070.0 85509-19-9EP234: Flusilazole 92.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 79983-71-4EP234: Hexaconazole 1070.04 mg/kg 13070.0 76738-62-0EP234: Paclobutrazole 96.60.1 mg/kg 13070.0 37 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QCLot: 2719770) - continued H4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 60207-90-1EP234: Propiconazole 95.20.1 mg/kg 13070.0 107534-96-3EP234: Tebuconazole 1150.02 mg/kg 13070.0 121552-61-2EP234: Cyprodinil 1170.02 mg/kg 13070.0 53112-28-0EP234: Pyrimethanil 92.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides (QCLot: 2722042) C8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 94361-06-5EP234: Cyproconazole 95.00.08 mg/kg 13070.0 85509-19-9EP234: Flusilazole 72.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 79983-71-4EP234: Hexaconazole 70.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 76738-62-0EP234: Paclobutrazole 92.50.1 mg/kg 13070.0 60207-90-1EP234: Propiconazole 89.10.1 mg/kg 13070.0 107534-96-3EP234: Tebuconazole 91.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 121552-61-2EP234: Cyprodinil 94.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 53112-28-0EP234: Pyrimethanil 92.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QCLot: 2719769) E9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 330-54-1EP234: Diuron 73.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 2164-17-2EP234: Fluometuron 89.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 34014-18-1EP234: Tebuthiuron 88.00.04 mg/kg 13070.0 314-40-9EP234: Bromacil 85.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QCLot: 2719770) H4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 330-54-1EP234: Diuron 88.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 2164-17-2EP234: Fluometuron 85.60.02 mg/kg 13070.0 34014-18-1EP234: Tebuthiuron 92.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 314-40-9EP234: Bromacil 88.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides (QCLot: 2722042) C8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 330-54-1EP234: Diuron 87.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 2164-17-2EP234: Fluometuron 71.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 34014-18-1EP234: Tebuthiuron 77.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 314-40-9EP234: Bromacil 85.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QCLot: 2719769) E9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 51218-45-2EP234: Metolachlor 74.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QCLot: 2719770) H4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 51218-45-2EP234: Metolachlor 92.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234G: Chloracetanilides (QCLot: 2722042) C8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 51218-45-2EP234: Metolachlor 72.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QCLot: 2719769) E9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 834-12-8EP234: Ametryn 74.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 38 of 38:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QCLot: 2719769) - continued E9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 1912-24-9EP234: Atrazine 1270.02 mg/kg 13070.0 21725-46-2EP234: Cyanazine 83.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 7287-19-6EP234: Prometryn 72.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 139-40-2EP234: Propazine 91.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 122-34-9EP234: Simazine 73.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 5915-41-3EP234: Terbuthylazine 72.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 886-50-0EP234: Terbutryn 72.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QCLot: 2719770) H4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 834-12-8EP234: Ametryn 84.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 1912-24-9EP234: Atrazine 92.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 21725-46-2EP234: Cyanazine 77.20.04 mg/kg 13070.0 7287-19-6EP234: Prometryn 1000.02 mg/kg 13070.0 139-40-2EP234: Propazine 96.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 122-34-9EP234: Simazine 89.60.04 mg/kg 13070.0 5915-41-3EP234: Terbuthylazine 99.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 886-50-0EP234: Terbutryn 87.20.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234H: Triazine Herbicides (QCLot: 2722042) C8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 834-12-8EP234: Ametryn 88.00.02 mg/kg 13070.0 1912-24-9EP234: Atrazine 90.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 21725-46-2EP234: Cyanazine 74.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 7287-19-6EP234: Prometryn 84.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 139-40-2EP234: Propazine 82.40.02 mg/kg 13070.0 122-34-9EP234: Simazine 78.80.04 mg/kg 13070.0 5915-41-3EP234: Terbuthylazine 84.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 886-50-0EP234: Terbutryn 88.80.02 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QCLot: 2719769) E9-SED-1019 EB1929995-001 60168-88-9EP234: Fenarimol 1190.04 mg/kg 13070.0 28159-98-0EP234: Irgarol 76.00.004 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QCLot: 2719770) H4-SED-1019 EB1929995-030 60168-88-9EP234: Fenarimol 1120.04 mg/kg 13070.0 28159-98-0EP234: Irgarol 80.00.004 mg/kg 13070.0 EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides (QCLot: 2722042) C8-SED-1019 EB1929995-012 60168-88-9EP234: Fenarimol 70.40.04 mg/kg 13070.0 28159-98-0EP234: Irgarol 84.00.004 mg/kg 13070.0 True Environmental QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with Quality Review Work Order : EB1929995 Page : 1 of 34 :: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division BrisbaneBMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD :Contact MS BETH TOKI Telephone : +61 7 3552 8639 :Project B23282-4 Douglas Shoal Date Samples Received : 11-Nov-2019 Site : ---- Issue Date : 06-Dec-2019 CONOR JONES:Sampler No. of samples received : 47 :Order number ---- No. of samples analysed : 47 This report is automatically generated by the ALS LIMS through interpretation of the ALS Quality Control Report and several Quality Assurance parameters measured by ALS. This automated reporting highlights any non-conformances, facilitates faster and more accurate data validation and is designed to assist internal expert and external Auditor review. Many components of this report contribute to the overall DQO assessment and reporting for guideline compliance. Brief method summaries and references are also provided to assist in traceability. Summary of Outliers Outliers : Quality Control Samples This report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report. l NO Method Blank value outliers occur. l NO Duplicate outliers occur. l NO Laboratory Control outliers occur. l Matrix Spike outliers exist - please see following pages for full details. l Surrogate recovery outliers exist for all regular sample matrices - please see following pages for full details. Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance l Analysis Holding Time Outliers exist - please see following pages for full details. Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples l Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist - please see following pages for full details. R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R 2 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Outliers : Quality Control Samples Duplicates, Method Blanks, Laboratory Control Samples and Matrix Spikes Matrix: SOIL Compound Group Name CommentLimitsDataAnalyteClient Sample IDLaboratory Sample ID CAS Number Matrix Spike (MS) Recoveries EB1929995--037 7439-97-6MercuryH11-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%63.4 %EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) EB1929995--002 28434-01-07BioresmethrinE10-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 60.0-140%14.9 %EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids EB1929990--058 28434-01-07BioresmethrinAnonymous Recovery less than lower data quality objective 60.0-140%28.2 %EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids EB1929995--001 1918-02-1PicloramE9-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 49.0-138%43.5 %EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS EB1929995--001 59669-26-0ThiodicarbE9-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%0.00 %EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates EB1929995--030 59669-26-0ThiodicarbH4-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%0.00 %EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates EB1929995--012 59669-26-0ThiodicarbC8-SED-1019 Recovery less than lower data quality objective 70.0-130%0.00 %EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates Regular Sample Surrogates Sub-Matrix: SOIL Compound Group Name CommentLimitsDataAnalyteClient Sample IDLaboratory Sample ID CAS Number Samples Submitted EB1929995-037 ----TripropyltinH11-SED-1019 Recovery greater than upper data quality objective 35.0-130 % EP090S: Organotin Surrogate 154 % Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance Matrix: SOIL AnalysisExtraction / Preparation Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue Days overdue Due for extraction Due for analysis Method EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids 3 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL AnalysisExtraction / Preparation Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue Days overdue Due for extraction Due for analysis Method EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids - Analysis Holding Time Compliance Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) ----21-Nov-2019E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019, C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 ----22-Nov-2019 1 ---- EP094B: Synergist Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) ----21-Nov-2019E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019, C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 ----22-Nov-2019 1 ---- EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----21-Nov-2019E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019 ----22-Nov-2019 1 ---- 4 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL AnalysisExtraction / Preparation Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue Days overdue Due for extraction Due for analysis Method EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS - Analysis Holding Time Compliance Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----21-Nov-2019C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 4 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019I10-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 2 ---- EP234A: OP Pesticides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----21-Nov-2019E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 4 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----21-Nov-2019C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 7 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 ----02-Dec-2019 9 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 2 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019I10-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 5 ---- EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates 5 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL AnalysisExtraction / Preparation Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue Days overdue Due for extraction Due for analysis Method EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates - Analysis Holding Time Compliance Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----21-Nov-2019E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 4 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----21-Nov-2019C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 7 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 ----02-Dec-2019 9 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 2 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019I10-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 5 ---- EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----21-Nov-2019E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 4 ---- 6 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL AnalysisExtraction / Preparation Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue Days overdue Due for extraction Due for analysis Method EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides - Analysis Holding Time Compliance Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----21-Nov-2019C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 7 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 ----02-Dec-2019 9 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 2 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019I10-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 5 ---- EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----21-Nov-2019E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 4 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----21-Nov-2019C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 7 ---- 7 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL AnalysisExtraction / Preparation Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue Days overdue Due for extraction Due for analysis Method EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides - Analysis Holding Time Compliance Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 ----02-Dec-2019 9 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 2 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019I10-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 5 ---- EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----21-Nov-2019E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 4 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----21-Nov-2019C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 7 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 ----02-Dec-2019 9 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 2 ---- 8 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL AnalysisExtraction / Preparation Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue Days overdue Due for extraction Due for analysis Method EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides - Analysis Holding Time Compliance Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019I10-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 5 ---- EP234G: Chloracetanilides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----21-Nov-2019E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 4 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----21-Nov-2019C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 7 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 ----02-Dec-2019 9 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 2 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019I10-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 5 ---- EP234H: Triazine Herbicides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----21-Nov-2019E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 4 ---- 9 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL AnalysisExtraction / Preparation Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue Days overdue Due for extraction Due for analysis Method EP234H: Triazine Herbicides - Analysis Holding Time Compliance Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----21-Nov-2019C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 7 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 ----02-Dec-2019 9 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 2 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019I10-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 5 ---- EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----21-Nov-2019E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 4 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----21-Nov-2019C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 7 ---- 10 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL AnalysisExtraction / Preparation Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue Days overdue Due for extraction Due for analysis Method EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides - Analysis Holding Time Compliance Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 ----02-Dec-2019 9 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019 ----25-Nov-2019 2 ---- Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved ----23-Nov-2019I10-SED-1019 ----28-Nov-2019 5 ---- Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples Matrix: SOIL Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type Method ExpectedQC Regular Actual Rate (%)Count Laboratory Duplicates (DUP) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC StandardSoil Particle Density 0.00 10.000 44 Analysis Holding Time Compliance Holding times for VOC in soils vary according to analytes of interest. Vinyl Chloride and Styrene holding time is 7 days; others 14 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all VOC analytes and should be verified in case the reported breach is a false positive or Vinyl Chloride and Styrene are not key analytes of interest/concern. Holding time for leachate methods (e.g. TCLP) vary according to the analytes reported. Assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method. These are: organics 14 days, mercury 28 days & other metals 180 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters. If samples are identified below as having been analysed or extracted outside of recommended holding times, this should be taken into consideration when interpreting results. This report summarizes extraction / preparation and analysis times and compares each with ALS recommended holding times (referencing USEPA SW 846, APHA, AS and NEPM) based on the sample container provided. Dates reported represent first date of extraction or analysis and preclude subsequent dilutions and reruns. A listing of breaches (if any) is provided herein. Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) 11 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EA055: Moisture Content (Dried @ 105-110°C) Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EA055) E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019, C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 05-May-2020---- 12-Nov-2019----07-Nov-2019 ---- ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EA055) I10-SED-1019, H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019, H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 07-May-2020---- 12-Nov-2019----09-Nov-2019 ---- ü 12 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EA150: Particle Sizing Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EA150H) E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 05-May-2020---- 22-Nov-2019----07-Nov-2019 ---- ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EA150H) H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019 07-May-2020---- 22-Nov-2019----09-Nov-2019 ---- ü Snap Lock Bag (EA150H) E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019, C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019 05-May-2020---- 22-Nov-2019----07-Nov-2019 ---- ü Snap Lock Bag (EA150H) I10-SED-1019, H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019, H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 07-May-2020---- 22-Nov-2019----09-Nov-2019 ---- ü 13 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EA150: Soil Classification based on Particle Size Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EA150H) E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 05-May-2020---- 22-Nov-2019----07-Nov-2019 ---- ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EA150H) H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019 07-May-2020---- 22-Nov-2019----09-Nov-2019 ---- ü Snap Lock Bag (EA150H) E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019, C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019 05-May-2020---- 22-Nov-2019----07-Nov-2019 ---- ü Snap Lock Bag (EA150H) I10-SED-1019, H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019, H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 07-May-2020---- 22-Nov-2019----09-Nov-2019 ---- ü 14 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EA152: Soil Particle Density Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EA152) E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 05-May-2020---- 22-Nov-2019----07-Nov-2019 ---- ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EA152) H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019 07-May-2020---- 22-Nov-2019----09-Nov-2019 ---- ü Snap Lock Bag (EA152) E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019, C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019 05-May-2020---- 22-Nov-2019----07-Nov-2019 ---- ü Snap Lock Bag (EA152) I10-SED-1019, H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019, H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 07-May-2020---- 22-Nov-2019----09-Nov-2019 ---- ü 15 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EG005(ED093)-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICP-AES Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EG005-SD) C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 05-May-202005-May-2020 13-Nov-201913-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 ü ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EG005-SD) E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019, C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019 05-May-202005-May-2020 14-Nov-201913-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 ü ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EG005-SD) I10-SED-1019, H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019, H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019 07-May-202007-May-2020 13-Nov-201913-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 ü ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EG005-SD) H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 07-May-202007-May-2020 15-Nov-201913-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG005-SD) MESS-4 CRM, PACS-3 CRM 07-May-202007-May-2020 15-Nov-201913-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 ü ü 16 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EG020-SD: Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EG020-SD) C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 05-May-202005-May-2020 13-Nov-201913-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 ü ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EG020-SD) E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019, C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019 05-May-202005-May-2020 14-Nov-201913-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 ü ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EG020-SD) I10-SED-1019, H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019, H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019 07-May-202007-May-2020 13-Nov-201913-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 ü ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EG020-SD) H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 07-May-202007-May-2020 15-Nov-201913-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG020-SD) MESS-4 CRM, PACS-3 CRM 07-May-202007-May-2020 15-Nov-201913-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 ü ü 17 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EG020X-T) C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 05-May-202005-May-2020 13-Nov-201913-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 ü ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EG020X-T) E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019, C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019 05-May-202005-May-2020 14-Nov-201913-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 ü ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EG020X-T) I10-SED-1019, H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019, H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019 07-May-202007-May-2020 13-Nov-201913-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 ü ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EG020X-T) H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 07-May-202007-May-2020 15-Nov-201913-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG020X-T) MESS-4 CRM 07-May-202007-May-2020 15-Nov-201913-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 ü ü 18 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EG035T-LL) C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 02-Jan-202002-Jan-2020 13-Nov-201913-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 ü ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EG035T-LL) E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019, C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019 02-Jan-202002-Jan-2020 14-Nov-201913-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 ü ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EG035T-LL) I10-SED-1019, H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019, H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019 04-Jan-202004-Jan-2020 13-Nov-201913-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 ü ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EG035T-LL) H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 04-Jan-202004-Jan-2020 15-Nov-201913-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG035T-LL) MESS-4 CRM, PACS-3 CRM 07-Dec-201907-Dec-2019 15-Nov-201913-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 ü ü 19 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP090: Organotin Compounds Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EP090) E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019, C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019 22-Dec-201902-Jan-2020 14-Nov-201912-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 ü ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EP090) C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 22-Dec-201902-Jan-2020 18-Nov-201912-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 ü ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EP090) I10-SED-1019, H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019, H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019 22-Dec-201904-Jan-2020 18-Nov-201912-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 ü ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EP090) H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, MESS-4 CRM, PACS-3 CRM, SOPH-1 CRM, G5-SED-1019 23-Dec-201904-Jan-2020 15-Nov-201913-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 ü ü 20 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP094A: Synthetic Pyrethroids Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EP094) E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019, C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 01-Jan-202021-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201922-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 û ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EP094) I10-SED-1019, H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019, H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 01-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201922-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 ü ü 21 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP094B: Synergist Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EP094) E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019, C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 01-Jan-202021-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201922-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 û ü Sediment Glass Jar - Frozen (NAGD) (EP094) I10-SED-1019, H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019, H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 01-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201922-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 ü ü 22 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP202A: Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides by LCMS Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP202) E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019 01-Jan-202021-Nov-2019 26-Nov-201922-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP202) C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 04-Jan-202021-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201925-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP202) H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019, H3-SED-1019 01-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 26-Nov-201922-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP202) H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 02-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 04-Dec-201923-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 ü ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP202) I10-SED-1019 04-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201925-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 û ü 23 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP234A: OP Pesticides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019 04-Jan-202021-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 07-Jan-202021-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 11-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201902-Dec-201909-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019 04-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I10-SED-1019 07-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 û ü 24 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP234B: Thiocarbamates and Carbamates Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019 04-Jan-202021-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 07-Jan-202021-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 11-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201902-Dec-201909-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019 04-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I10-SED-1019 07-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 û ü 25 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP234D: Triazinone Herbicides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019 04-Jan-202021-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 07-Jan-202021-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 11-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201902-Dec-201909-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019 04-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I10-SED-1019 07-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 û ü 26 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP234E: Conazole and Aminopyrimidine Fungicides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019 04-Jan-202021-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 07-Jan-202021-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 11-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201902-Dec-201909-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019 04-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I10-SED-1019 07-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 û ü 27 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP234F: Phenylurea, Thizdiazolurea, Uracil and Sulfonylurea Herbicides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019 04-Jan-202021-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 07-Jan-202021-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 11-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201902-Dec-201909-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019 04-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I10-SED-1019 07-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 û ü 28 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP234G: Chloracetanilides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019 04-Jan-202021-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 07-Jan-202021-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 11-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201902-Dec-201909-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019 04-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I10-SED-1019 07-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 û ü 29 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP234H: Triazine Herbicides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019 04-Jan-202021-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 07-Jan-202021-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 11-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201902-Dec-201909-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019 04-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I10-SED-1019 07-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 û ü 30 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) EP234I: Miscellaneous (ESI Positive Mode) Pesticides Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) E9-SED-1019, E10-SED-1019, E11-SED-1019, E12-SED-1019, C1-SED-1019, C2-SED-1019, C3-SED-1019, C4-SED-1019, C5-SED-1019, C6-SED-1019, C7-SED-1019 04-Jan-202021-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) C8-SED-1019, C9-SED-1019, C10-SED-1019, C11-SED-1019, C12-SED-1019, I3-SED-1019, I4-SED-1019, I5-SED-1019, I6-SED-1019, I7-SED-1019, I8-SED-1019, I9-SED-1019, I13-SED-1019, I14-SED-1019 07-Jan-202021-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201907-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) H3-SED-1019, H4-SED-1019, H5-SED-1019, H6-SED-1019, H7-SED-1019, H8-SED-1019, H9-SED-1019, H10-SED-1019, H11-SED-1019, H12-SED-1019, A2-B-SED-1019, A5-B-SED-1019, B2-B-SED-1019, B9-B-SED-1019, E8-B-SED-1019, G5-SED-1019 11-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 02-Dec-201902-Dec-201909-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) H1-SED-1019, H2-SED-1019 04-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 25-Nov-201925-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 û ü Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP234) I10-SED-1019 07-Jan-202023-Nov-2019 28-Nov-201928-Nov-201909-Nov-2019 û ü 31 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance The following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(were) processed. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to the expected rate. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers. Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification. Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type ExpectedQC Regular Actual Rate (%)Count EvaluationAnalytical Methods Method Laboratory Duplicates (DUP) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.005 50 üMoisture Content EA055 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.32 10.006 53 üOrganotin Analysis EP090 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 13.64 10.006 44 üPesticides by LCMSMS (Positive Ion Mode) EP234 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 13.64 10.006 44 üPhenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides (LCMS - Standard DL) EP202 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 0.00 10.000 44 ûSoil Particle Density EA152 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.42 10.005 48 üSynthetic Pyrethroids by GCMS EP094 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.76 10.006 51 üTotal Fe and Al in Sediments by ICPAES EG005-SD NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.76 10.006 51 üTotal Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) EG035T-LL NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.005 50 üTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite X EG020X-T NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.76 10.006 51 üTotal Metals in Sediments by ICPMS EG020-SD Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.66 5.003 53 üOrganotin Analysis EP090 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.82 5.003 44 üPesticides by LCMSMS (Positive Ion Mode) EP234 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.82 5.003 44 üPhenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides (LCMS - Standard DL) EP202 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.82 5.003 44 üSoil Particle Density EA152 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.003 48 üSynthetic Pyrethroids by GCMS EP094 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.88 5.003 51 üTotal Fe and Al in Sediments by ICPAES EG005-SD NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.88 5.003 51 üTotal Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) EG035T-LL NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.00 5.003 50 üTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite X EG020X-T NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.88 5.003 51 üTotal Metals in Sediments by ICPMS EG020-SD Method Blanks (MB) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.66 5.003 53 üOrganotin Analysis EP090 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.82 5.003 44 üPesticides by LCMSMS (Positive Ion Mode) EP234 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.82 5.003 44 üPhenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides (LCMS - Standard DL) EP202 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.003 48 üSynthetic Pyrethroids by GCMS EP094 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.88 5.003 51 üTotal Fe and Al in Sediments by ICPAES EG005-SD NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.88 5.003 51 üTotal Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) EG035T-LL NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.00 5.003 50 üTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite X EG020X-T NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.88 5.003 51 üTotal Metals in Sediments by ICPMS EG020-SD Matrix Spikes (MS) NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.66 5.003 53 üOrganotin Analysis EP090 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.82 5.003 44 üPesticides by LCMSMS (Positive Ion Mode) EP234 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.82 5.003 44 üPhenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides (LCMS - Standard DL) EP202 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.003 48 üSynthetic Pyrethroids by GCMS EP094 NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.88 5.003 51 üTotal Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) EG035T-LL NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.00 5.003 50 üTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite X EG020X-T 32 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification. Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type ExpectedQC Regular Actual Rate (%)Count EvaluationAnalytical Methods Method Matrix Spikes (MS) - Continued NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.88 5.003 51 üTotal Metals in Sediments by ICPMS EG020-SD 33 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Brief Method Summaries The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the Certificate of Analysis. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions. Analytical Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod In house: A gravimetric procedure based on weight loss over a 12 hour drying period at 105-110 degrees C. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) Section 6.1 and Table 1 (14 day holding time). Moisture Content EA055 SOIL Particle Size Analysis by Hydrometer according to AS1289.3.6.3 - 2003Particle Size Analysis by Hydrometer EA150H SOIL Soil Particle Density by AS 1289.3.5.1-2006 : Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes - Soil classification tests - Determination of the soil particle density of a soil - Standard method Soil Particle Density EA152 SOIL In house: Referenced to APHA 3120; USEPA SW 846 - 6010. Metals are determined following an appropriate acid digestion of the soil. The ICPAES technique ionises samples in a plasma, emitting a characteristic spectrum based on metals present. Intensities at selected wavelengths are compared against those of matrix matched standards. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3). LORs per NODG Total Fe and Al in Sediments by ICPAES EG005-SD SOIL In house: Referenced to APHA 3125; USEPA SW846 - 6020, ALS QWI-EN/EG020. The ICPMS technique utilizes a highly efficient argon plasma to ionize selected elements. Ions are then passed into a high vacuum mass spectrometer, which separates the analytes based on their distinct mass to charge ratios prior to their measurement by a discrete dynode ion detector. Analyte list and LORs per NODG. Total Metals in Sediments by ICPMS EG020-SD SOIL In house: Referenced to APHA 3125; USEPA SW846 - 6020, ALS QWI-EN/EG020. The ICPMS technique utilizes a highly efficient argon plasma to ionize selected elements. Ions are then passed into a high vacuum mass spectrometer, which separates the analytes based on their distinct mass to charge ratios prior to their measurement by a discrete dynode ion detector. Total Metals by ICP-MS - Suite X EG020X-T SOIL In house: Referenced to AS 3550, APHA 3112 Hg - B (Flow-injection (SnCl2)(Cold Vapour generation) AAS) FIM-AAS is an automated flameless atomic absorption technique. Mercury in solids are determined following an appropriate acid digestion. Ionic mercury is reduced online to atomic mercury vapour by SnCl2 which is then purged into a heated quartz cell. Quantification is by comparing absorbance against a calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) Total Mercury by FIMS (Low Level) EG035T-LL SOIL In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 8270D Prepared sample extracts are analysed by GC/MS coupled with high volume injection, and quanitified against an established calibration curve. Organotin Analysis EP090 SOIL In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 8270D Extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS and quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. This technique is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) (Method 504,505) Synthetic Pyrethroids by GCMS EP094 SOIL In house: LCMS (Electrospray in negative mode). Residues of acid herbicides are extracted from soil samples under the alkaline condition. An aliquot of the alkaline aqueous phase is taken and acidified before a SPE cleanup. After eluting off from the SPE cartridge, residues of acid herbicides are dissolved in HPLC mobile phase prior to instrument analysis. Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides (LCMS - Standard DL) EP202 SOIL In house: LC-MSMS, direct injection. A sample extracted into acetonitrile, diluted with water and injected directly onto the instrument.. Analysis is by LC/MSMS, ESI Positive Mode. Pesticides by LCMSMS (Positive Ion Mode) EP234 SOIL Preparation Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod 34 of 34:Page Work Order : :Client EB1929995 BMT COMMERCIAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD B23282-4 Douglas Shoal:Project Preparation Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod In house: Referenced to USEPA 200.2. Hot Block Acid Digestion 1.0g of sample is heated with Nitric and Hydrochloric acids, then cooled. Peroxide is added and samples heated and cooled again before being filtered and bulked to volume for analysis. Digest is appropriate for determination of selected metals in sludge, sediments, and soils. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) (Method 202) Hot Block Digest for metals in soils sediments and sludges EN69 SOIL In-House: Alkaline extract followed by SPE clean up of acidified portion of the sample extract.Extraction for Phenoxy Acid Herbicides in Soils. EP202-PR SOIL In houseSample preparation for Pesticides by LCMSMS EP234-PR SOIL In house: Mechanical agitation (tumbler). 10g of sample, Na2SO4 and surrogate are extracted with 30mL 1:1 DCM/Acetone by end over end tumble. The solvent is decanted, dehydrated and concentrated (by KD) to the desired volume for analysis. Tumbler Extraction of Solids ORG17 SOIL In house: 20g sample is spiked with surrogate and leached in a methanol:acetic acid:UHP water mix and vacuum filtered. Reagents and solvents are added to the sample and the mixture tumbled. The butyltin compounds are simultaneously derivatised and extracted. The extract is further extracted with petroleum ether. The resultant extracts are combined and concentrated for analysis. Organotin Sample Preparation ORG35 SOIL Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report E-1 BRUV Habitat Images and Tabulated Data G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Appendix E BRUV Habitat Images and Tabulated Data E.1 BRUV Habitat Images Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report E-2 BRUV Habitat Images and Tabulated Data G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure E-1 Event 1 (spring 2019) BRUV Habitat Images, locations mA, mB, mC, and mD Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report E-3 BRUV Habitat Images and Tabulated Data G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure E-2 Event 1 (spring 2019) BRUV Habitat Images, locations mE, mG, mH, and mI Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report E-4 BRUV Habitat Images and Tabulated Data G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure E-3 Event 2 (autumn 2020) BRUV habitat images, locations mA, mB, mC, and mD Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report E-5 BRUV Habitat Images and Tabulated Data G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx Figure E-4 Event 2 (autumn 2020) BRUV habitat images, locations mE, mG, mH, and mI Douglas Shoal Remediation Project Pre-remediation Monitoring Report E-6 BRUV Habitat Images and Tabulated Data G:\Admin\B23282.g.bft_DouglasShoal_Monitoring\R.B23282.008.03.Pre- Remediation_Monitoring.docx E.2 Tabulated BRUV Data Event Treat. Location Rep Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed. period Length (mm) Precision (mm) RMS (mm) Range_(mm) Type Tape Reader Family Genus Species CAABI Code Weight (g) E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 1 A1_2_left.MP4 18079 27.77 Before 224.90 27.00 9.83 4746.63 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 236.65 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 1 A1_2_left.MP4 18079 27.77 Before 236.06 17.19 3.92 4693.89 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 273.48 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 1 A1_2_left.MP4 21554 29.70 Before 245.11 2.27 5.50 1439.79 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 328.43 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 1 A1_1_left.MP4 7762 4.32 Before 246.74 1.43 7.76 1815.83 Fish LP Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 54.86 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 1 A1_2_left.MP4 21554 29.70 Before 246.89 3.30 1.30 1680.57 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 335.46 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 1 A1_2_left.MP4 12371 24.60 Before 254.44 7.66 4.26 2507.62 Fish LP Serranidae Epinephelus fasciatus 37 311014 242.34 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 1 A1_2_left.MP4 18079 27.77 Before 260.25 36.57 1.52 4931.54 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 366.05 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 1 A1_2_left.MP4 21574 29.72 Before 262.82 2.83 5.27 1486.48 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 402.95 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 1 A1_2_left.MP4 21554 29.70 Before 264.54 1.74 1.70 1290.68 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 410.71 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 1 A1_2_left.MP4 18007 27.73 Before 278.67 54.74 6.07 5778.07 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 449.04 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 1 A1_2_left.MP4 11296 24.00 Before 281.38 9.56 3.88 2847.61 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 653.77 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 1 A1_2_left.MP4 21554 29.70 Before 295.63 2.78 13.90 1256.09 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 568.82 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 1 A1_2_left.MP4 19224 28.41 Before 333.03 32.02 10.19 5966.92 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 983.27 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 1 A1_2_left.MP4 19224 28.41 Before 346.82 37.47 5.04 5239.02 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 1111.03 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 1 A1_2_left.MP4 19224 28.41 Before 374.24 17.43 7.07 4629.98 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 1397.06 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 1 A1_2_left.MP4 10749 23.70 Before 411.98 10.17 6.38 3697.05 Fish LP Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 408.82 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 1 A1_2_left.MP4 10749 23.70 Before 530.96 10.84 8.38 3660.62 Fish LP Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 942.01 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 1 A1_2_left.MP4 25736 32.03 Before 2140.15 124.42 36.12 8936.34 Elasmobranch LP Carcharhinidae Galeocerdo cuvier 37 018022 117674.29 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 2 A2_1_left.MP4 23059 12.82 Before 366.12 2.20 10.06 2143.98 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1488.32 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 3 A3_1_left.MP4 5023 2.79 Before 241.90 55.22 31.21 8812.85 Fish LP Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 237.08 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 3 A3_1_left.MP4 2738 1.52 Before 287.45 15.86 30.31 3952.08 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 698.86 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 3 A3_1_left.MP4 17633 9.81 Before 287.97 5.91 10.31 1936.78 Fish LP Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 80.48 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 3 A3_1_left.MP4 2738 1.52 Before 425.70 40.71 25.13 4914.89 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2384.08 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 3 A3_1_left.MP4 26220 14.58 Before 427.11 98.73 32.73 10451.47 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 2079.47 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 3 A3_2_left.MP4 15379 26.27 Before 551.50 148.06 59.48 10068.41 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 3452.12 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 3 A3_1_left.MP4 23188 12.90 Before 924.93 5.14 26.03 2598.84 Elasmobranch LP Hemiscylliidae Chiloscyllium punctatum 37 013008 7308.30 E1 10/2019 Remed. mA 3 A3_3_left.MP4 21916 47.62 Before 2799.44 7.78 21.76 2982.85 Elasmobranch LP Carcharhinidae Galeocerdo cuvier 37 018022 274194.50 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 1 B1_1_left.MP4 4396 2.44 Before 206.06 13.91 4.12 3192.28 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 197.49 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 1 B1_1_left.MP4 4332 2.41 Before 222.37 14.40 3.83 5517.86 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 246.88 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 1 B1_1_left.MP4 6072 3.38 Before 223.32 2.74 0.73 2100.34 Fish LP Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 42.84 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 1 B1_1_left.MP4 6366 3.54 Before 255.77 17.98 2.19 5339.72 Fish LP Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 59.98 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 1 B1_1_left.MP4 4476 2.49 Before 260.86 2.29 4.24 2167.88 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 516.01 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 1 B1_1_left.MP4 4332 2.41 Before 267.50 6.96 3.77 2169.85 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 424.35 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 1 B1_1_left.MP4 9218 5.13 Before 286.35 7.60 4.93 4270.25 Fish LP Serranidae Plectropomus sp 361.64 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 1 B1_1_left.MP4 4332 2.41 Before 287.83 5.27 0.41 3262.20 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 525.93 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 1 B1_1_left.MP4 4368 2.43 Before 288.43 8.55 0.55 2201.92 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 529.15 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 1 B1_1_left.MP4 4519 2.51 Before 290.54 2.80 1.63 2215.15 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 722.60 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 1 B1_1_left.MP4 14957 8.32 Before 300.50 2.86 5.94 3055.58 Fish LP Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 444.45 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 1 B1_1_left.MP4 4348 2.42 Before 323.22 85.75 20.29 7196.98 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 738.86 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 1 B1_1_left.MP4 4529 2.52 Before 331.17 2.77 4.10 2187.87 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1087.73 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7866 4.37 Before 223.13 50.92 38.78 7955.20 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso brevirostris 37 437026 226.42 Event Treat. Location Rep Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed. period Length (mm) Precision (mm) RMS (mm) Range_(mm) Type Tape Reader Family Genus Species CAABI Code Weight (g) E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7866 4.37 Before 237.26 19.20 5.80 7869.81 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso brevirostris 37 437026 274.36 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 6806 3.78 Before 245.51 18.73 1.83 5941.09 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 307.52 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7113 3.96 Before 248.99 25.85 13.73 5670.88 Fish LP Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 45.42 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7153 3.98 Before 257.77 32.48 12.48 5139.81 Fish LP Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 49.98 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 14148 7.87 Before 263.37 24.34 19.16 5850.27 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso lituratus 37 437029 370.13 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7153 3.98 Before 265.72 26.02 8.57 5422.99 Fish LP Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 54.35 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7192 4.00 Before 268.05 22.72 5.07 4982.39 Fish LP Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 55.68 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7886 4.39 Before 272.45 32.38 10.06 5525.26 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso brevirostris 37 437026 422.84 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 17242 9.59 Before 273.08 4.84 0.40 1747.66 Fish LP Carangidae Pseudocaranx dentex 37 337082 252.65 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 17272 9.61 Before 281.19 4.04 7.26 2155.61 Fish LP Carangidae Pseudocaranx dentex 37 337082 274.68 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 13933 7.75 Before 281.60 4.41 8.24 1737.38 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 493.25 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 4174 2.32 Before 285.45 5.93 11.71 2589.05 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 683.76 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7866 4.37 Before 290.47 18.51 18.72 4734.66 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso brevirostris 37 437026 516.61 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 17709 9.85 Before 291.79 4.31 4.29 2856.00 Fish LP Balistidae Sufflamen fraenatum 37 465014 643.63 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 6806 3.78 Before 291.95 27.55 4.08 5383.43 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 516.07 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 20950 11.65 Before 292.64 1.44 18.19 1135.98 Fish LP Lutjanidae Lutjanus adetii 37 346033 398.65 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 6806 3.78 Before 295.83 16.33 8.54 5193.55 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 536.80 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7866 4.37 Before 297.10 13.72 23.49 5822.94 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso brevirostris 37 437026 554.43 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 13940 7.75 Before 300.78 9.87 4.94 2445.28 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 598.34 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7866 4.37 Before 308.52 30.90 13.28 6996.24 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso brevirostris 37 437026 623.85 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7866 4.37 Before 309.10 43.38 42.03 7661.55 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso brevirostris 37 437026 627.53 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 13006 7.23 Before 309.46 1.80 4.46 1716.87 Fish LP Lutjanidae Lutjanus fulviflamma 37 346034 468.03 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7856 4.37 Before 312.47 57.34 18.08 7641.12 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso brevirostris 37 437026 649.17 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7866 4.37 Before 313.77 40.54 0.37 7623.61 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso brevirostris 37 437026 657.69 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7866 4.37 Before 317.88 16.55 9.23 5575.06 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso brevirostris 37 437026 685.00 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7866 4.37 Before 318.59 86.71 14.95 9284.90 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso brevirostris 37 437026 689.77 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7866 4.37 Before 318.96 40.07 7.12 8233.78 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso brevirostris 37 437026 692.29 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7153 3.98 Before 319.77 38.78 12.40 5462.25 Fish LP Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 90.63 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 6806 3.78 Before 323.33 10.38 6.15 5829.16 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 700.11 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 13933 7.75 Before 325.78 6.99 5.00 2274.49 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 756.15 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7197 4.00 Before 328.37 9.20 18.91 7828.80 Fish LP Acanthuridae Acanthurus sp 97.51 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7866 4.37 Before 328.82 11.29 14.68 5720.70 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso brevirostris 37 437026 761.44 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7866 4.37 Before 332.74 20.57 5.17 5679.74 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso brevirostris 37 437026 790.21 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 11307 6.29 Before 338.13 14.88 5.79 3824.50 Fish LP Serranidae Plectropomus sp 582.25 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_2_left.MP4 15971 26.60 Before 339.25 8.25 9.05 3960.98 Fish LP Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 120.84 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 6786 3.77 Before 344.79 39.78 8.37 5581.83 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 1091.63 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7153 3.98 Before 351.13 24.42 3.22 3952.62 Fish LP Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 117.34 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7153 3.98 Before 353.78 27.10 13.09 4382.80 Fish LP Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 119.79 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7153 3.98 Before 362.94 52.74 9.73 5711.60 Fish LP Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 128.56 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7192 4.00 Before 366.44 46.48 12.88 5564.09 Fish LP Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 132.01 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 6786 3.77 Before 367.50 11.41 5.91 4212.50 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 1322.63 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7153 3.98 Before 371.15 33.05 5.93 5498.38 Fish LP Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 136.75 Event Treat. Location Rep Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed. period Length (mm) Precision (mm) RMS (mm) Range_(mm) Type Tape Reader Family Genus Species CAABI Code Weight (g) E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7153 3.98 Before 381.57 78.81 26.98 7669.32 Fish LP Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 147.62 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7884 4.38 Before 400.62 33.59 15.73 7087.98 Fish LP Labridae Scarus rubroviolaceus 37 386028 1680.54 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7956 4.42 Before 416.91 56.50 12.26 6248.71 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso brevirostris 37 437026 1599.95 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 6766 3.76 Before 418.37 30.66 7.86 5362.58 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 1953.92 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 6786 3.77 Before 446.66 27.49 9.43 5329.08 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 2379.37 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7866 4.37 Before 448.08 91.37 30.57 8441.25 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso brevirostris 37 437026 2004.60 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 6801 3.78 Before 453.99 9.73 31.92 3372.86 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 2498.82 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7896 4.39 Before 454.96 121.45 23.68 8791.06 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso brevirostris 37 437026 2102.49 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 6806 3.78 Before 483.66 36.76 20.28 7243.98 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 2332.18 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7885 4.38 Before 537.87 90.22 17.46 8837.94 Fish LP Labridae Scarus rubroviolaceus 37 386028 4199.57 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 2 B2_1_left.MP4 17286 9.61 Before 806.57 2.83 6.47 2285.42 Fish LP Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 3727.81 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 15470 0.01 Before 244.71 0.89 7.48 1171.34 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 326.86 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_2_left.MP4 22235 0.02 Before 260.83 1.78 11.74 1856.64 Fish CMJ Siganidae Siganus canaliculatus 37 438004 226.57 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 15506 0.01 Before 267.77 3.84 3.46 1802.74 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 425.58 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 17542 0.01 Before 270.77 7.50 6.99 3811.59 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Naso brachycentron 37 437025 414.73 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 26775 0.01 Before 272.38 5.15 9.43 2258.66 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 590.59 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 13508 0.01 Before 277.23 2.38 12.22 2274.98 Fish CMJ Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 329.60 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 15506 0.01 Before 277.27 5.12 12.90 2316.41 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 471.38 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_2_left.MP4 22235 0.02 Before 280.23 2.25 12.66 2140.32 Fish CMJ Siganidae Siganus canaliculatus 37 438004 281.19 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 26775 0.01 Before 282.21 3.57 7.03 2036.81 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 659.80 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_2_left.MP4 22235 0.02 Before 287.55 1.49 9.95 1505.10 Fish CMJ Siganidae Siganus canaliculatus 37 438004 303.91 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 4600 0.00 Before 289.86 28.51 12.14 4801.15 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 647.46 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 15470 0.01 Before 291.06 2.67 4.56 1303.32 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 543.43 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_2_left.MP4 22235 0.02 Before 292.13 3.34 3.10 2014.18 Fish CMJ Siganidae Siganus canaliculatus 37 438004 318.71 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 19665 0.01 Before 292.89 6.65 9.51 3167.34 Fish CMJ Labridae Scarus sp 634.66 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 15470 0.01 Before 304.60 3.01 3.71 1629.19 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 620.89 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 15470 0.01 Before 312.97 1.70 6.62 1435.67 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 672.25 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 15470 0.01 Before 314.66 1.24 4.55 1400.19 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 682.95 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 18572 0.01 Before 321.44 1.55 2.23 1788.99 Fish CMJ Labridae Hologymnosus doliatus 37 384127 307.10 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 4600 0.00 Before 341.30 18.81 27.76 3412.86 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 1058.65 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 4600 0.00 Before 346.18 5.60 123.25 2285.23 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 1104.85 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 4600 0.00 Before 405.24 27.72 12.67 4418.31 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 1775.08 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 4600 0.00 Before 412.68 40.02 8.40 5024.39 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 1875.02 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 4600 0.00 Before 421.65 12.94 13.89 5557.43 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 2000.48 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 4600 0.00 Before 421.77 6.28 14.44 4069.80 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 2002.17 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 8467 0.00 Before 434.38 27.67 15.40 5153.50 Fish CMJ Haemulidae Plectorhinchus unicolor 37 350013 1197.69 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 4600 0.00 Before 463.18 36.17 17.16 5057.33 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 2654.10 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 4600 0.00 Before 561.70 32.09 29.75 4554.86 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 4742.73 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mB 3 B3_1_left.MP4 8624 0.00 Before 628.37 65.39 14.42 6901.42 Fish CMJ Labridae Scarus niger 37 386021 8683.47 E1 10/2019 Remed. mC 1 C1_1_left.MP4 26203 14.57 Before 256.59 2.36 3.37 1568.14 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 375.57 E1 10/2019 Remed. mC 1 C1_1_left.MP4 21477 11.94 Before 351.48 5.40 8.66 2733.40 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1310.16 E1 10/2019 Remed. mC 1 C1_2_left.MP4 5725 20.90 Before 357.31 1.39 5.49 1818.36 Fish LP Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 255.94 Event Treat. Location Rep Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed. period Length (mm) Precision (mm) RMS (mm) Range_(mm) Type Tape Reader Family Genus Species CAABI Code Weight (g) E1 10/2019 Remed. mC 1 C1_1_left.MP4 21477 11.94 Before 367.21 6.30 12.79 3213.50 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1502.22 E1 10/2019 Remed. mC 1 C1_1_left.MP4 2305 1.28 Before 482.99 32.61 6.98 5580.38 Fish LP Labridae Scarus sp 3005.34 E1 10/2019 Remed. mC 1 C1_2_left.MP4 5701 20.89 Before 489.03 2.86 2.13 1985.22 Fish LP Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 718.64 E1 10/2019 Remed. mC 1 C1_2_left.MP4 5701 20.89 Before 1913.14 3.58 1.95 1900.84 Elasmobranch LP Ginglymostomatidae Nebrius ferrugineus 37 013010 53446.19 E1 10/2019 Remed. mC 2 C2_1_left.MP4 17636 9.81 Before 270.26 9.69 6.74 2521.37 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 437.30 E1 10/2019 Remed. mC 2 C2_1_left.MP4 17696 9.84 Before 277.19 1.75 8.02 1287.33 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 470.99 E1 10/2019 Remed. mC 2 C2_1_left.MP4 23318 12.97 Before 321.25 18.36 28.18 6889.38 Fish LP Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 540.08 E1 10/2019 Remed. mC 2 C2_1_left.MP4 23318 12.97 Before 372.67 20.41 7.01 4729.62 Fish LP Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 833.07 E1 10/2019 Remed. mC 2 C2_2_left.MP4 23044 30.53 Before 1848.40 200.84 0.50 12157.22 Elasmobranch LP Carcharhinidae Carcharhinus leucas 37018021 49222.27 E1 10/2019 Remed. mC 3 C3_2_Left.MP4 3948 0.01 Before 261.01 12.90 35.97 3053.23 Fish CMJ Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 91.08 E1 10/2019 Remed. mC 3 C3_1_Left.MP4 23487 0.01 Before 346.95 1.79 22.81 1797.85 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1258.06 E1 10/2019 Remed. mC 3 C3_1_Left.MP4 23487 0.01 Before 393.67 6.18 22.95 2356.70 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1867.08 E1 10/2019 Remed. mC 3 C3_1_Left.MP4 9446 0.00 Before 627.79 2.50 23.52 1690.29 Fish CMJ Dasyatidae Neotrygon kuhlii 37 035903 5387.57 E1 10/2019 Remed. mC 3 C3_2_Left.MP4 12318 0.02 Before 902.18 23.28 86.05 8512.26 Fish CMJ Sphyrnidae Sphyrna lewini 37 019001 15683.53 E1 10/2019 Remed. mC 3 C3_2_Left.MP4 3948 0.01 Before 1668.60 20.58 47.35 3286.24 Elasmobranch CMJ Mobulidae Mobula sp 62510.53 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 1 D1_1_left.MP4 12817 7.13 Before 241.71 4.32 2.29 2097.14 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 315.25 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 1 D1_1_left.MP4 12817 7.13 Before 250.24 2.21 5.45 1729.50 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 348.98 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 1 D1_1_left.MP4 12787 7.11 Before 253.70 1.87 0.04 1598.10 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 363.31 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 1 D1_1_left.MP4 12797 7.12 Before 257.60 2.90 3.74 1936.07 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 379.93 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 1 D1_1_left.MP4 16136 8.97 Before 260.32 8.75 1.02 2453.08 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 512.68 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 1 D1_1_left.MP4 12787 7.11 Before 263.32 3.50 3.39 1614.83 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 405.17 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 1 D1_1_left.MP4 12787 7.11 Before 280.41 1.32 3.99 1418.07 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 487.18 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 1 D1_1_left.MP4 16095 8.95 Before 310.59 4.61 3.86 2155.41 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 890.17 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 1 D1_2_left.MP4 20295 29.00 Before 460.67 62.33 4.74 6858.15 Elasmobranch LP Dasyatidae Dasyatidae sp 31549.63 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 1 D1_1_left.MP4 2676 1.49 Before 655.83 7.22 3.24 2428.19 Fish LP Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 1887.30 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_1_left.MP4 24794 13.79 Before 301.69 3.30 8.05 1561.75 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 603.67 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_1_left.MP4 24208 13.46 Before 351.13 118.63 52.29 11013.40 Fish LP Acanthuridae Acanthurus sp 117.33 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_2_left.MP4 22421 30.19 Before 367.42 53.36 33.40 7566.67 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 1321.80 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_1_left.MP4 22803 12.68 Before 376.02 23.27 24.80 5411.22 Fish LP Serranidae Plectropomus maculatus 37 311012 705.06 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_1_left.MP4 29024 16.14 Before 407.95 8.51 9.51 2954.20 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2087.01 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_2_left.MP4 22420 30.19 Before 417.65 15.16 22.26 8547.95 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 1943.86 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_1_left.MP4 6056 3.37 Before 434.62 27.52 30.14 5299.56 Fish LP Serranidae Plectropomus sp 1195.30 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_2_left.MP4 22430 30.19 Before 446.32 73.80 25.07 7544.17 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 2373.78 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_2_left.MP4 22420 30.19 Before 446.32 25.22 18.68 7530.11 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 2373.92 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_2_left.MP4 4036 19.96 Before 457.93 4.58 9.07 2130.20 Fish LP Balistidae Abalistes stellaris 37 465011 180.91 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_2_left.MP4 22420 30.19 Before 482.05 14.04 23.34 7283.71 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 2993.18 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_2_left.MP4 22420 30.19 Before 505.89 54.18 13.15 8644.52 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 3461.19 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_2_left.MP4 22420 30.19 Before 522.99 28.08 28.65 5776.08 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 3825.45 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_2_left.MP4 22420 30.19 Before 527.11 45.23 35.50 8665.70 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 3916.88 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_2_left.MP4 22420 30.19 Before 532.43 21.83 4.48 6664.95 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 4037.13 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_1_left.MP4 22803 12.68 Before 533.00 23.44 26.92 5380.75 Fish LP Serranidae Plectropomus maculatus 37 311012 2126.65 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_2_left.MP4 22479 30.22 Before 539.58 114.48 34.52 8786.18 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 4202.59 Event Treat. Location Rep Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed. period Length (mm) Precision (mm) RMS (mm) Range_(mm) Type Tape Reader Family Genus Species CAABI Code Weight (g) E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_2_left.MP4 22451 30.20 Before 544.82 111.73 25.76 9219.52 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 4326.45 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_2_left.MP4 22420 30.19 Before 596.95 40.28 20.21 5893.58 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 5696.21 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_2_left.MP4 22421 30.19 Before 598.31 130.63 21.86 10033.74 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 5735.34 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 2 D2_2_left.MP4 10462 23.54 Before 900.77 3.36 7.78 1952.33 Elasmobranch LP Hemiscylliidae Chiloscyllium punctatum 37 013008 6725.37 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 3 D3_2_left.MP4 3462 19.64 Before 245.32 55.70 41.12 6794.93 Fish LP Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 245.81 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 3 D3_2_left.MP4 19333 28.47 Before 258.10 3.90 18.36 2287.65 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 382.09 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 3 D3_2_left.MP4 19167 28.38 Before 262.18 3.55 21.89 1795.85 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 400.07 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 3 D3_2_left.MP4 19167 28.38 Before 278.20 3.79 2.77 2246.61 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 476.00 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 3 D3_2_left.MP4 19167 28.38 Before 298.19 2.39 11.79 1695.01 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 583.38 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 3 D3_2_left.MP4 19167 28.38 Before 304.45 4.98 20.36 2268.98 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 620.01 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 3 D3_2_left.MP4 21069 29.43 Before 304.86 43.62 7.65 5676.62 Fish LP Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 151.80 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 3 D3_2_left.MP4 19167 28.38 Before 318.99 4.20 9.61 1567.67 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 710.84 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 3 D3_2_left.MP4 19167 28.38 Before 320.47 4.65 9.07 2115.98 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 720.60 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 3 D3_2_left.MP4 21069 29.43 Before 490.22 12.75 21.15 4308.51 Fish LP Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 724.39 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mD 3 D3_2_left.MP4 21169 29.49 Before 2357.38 20.56 25.92 4219.14 Elasmobranch LP Ginglymostomatidae Nebrius ferrugineus 37 013010 101676.31 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 1 E1_1_left.MP4 7937 4.41 Before 293.64 1.79 2.04 1810.76 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 557.68 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 1 E1_1_left.MP4 7937 4.41 Before 300.00 4.01 4.28 1859.18 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 593.84 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 1 E1_1_left.MP4 10650 5.92 Before 303.02 2.50 2.59 1938.15 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 824.06 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 1 E1_1_left.MP4 7937 4.41 Before 317.92 3.40 1.27 2126.40 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 703.92 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 1 E1_1_left.MP4 27765 15.44 Before 325.00 6.20 3.57 3087.99 Fish CMJ Balistidae Abalistes stellaris 37 465011 71.39 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 1 E1_2_left.MP4 27392 32.95 Before 441.38 7.32 13.93 6355.73 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Lethrinus nebulosus 37 351008 1204.79 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 1 E1_1_left.MP4 6588 3.66 Before 503.47 12.46 4.68 3167.86 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon schoenleinii 37 384010 2607.50 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 1 E1_1_left.MP4 16700 9.29 Before 530.56 2.79 16.60 2173.41 Fish CMJ Haemulidae Diagramma pictum 37 350003 2190.65 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 1 E1_2_left.MP4 31396 35.18 Before 553.31 10.59 5.02 3774.34 Fish CMJ Scombridae Scomberomorus queenslandicus 37 441014 986.84 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 1 E1_1_left.MP4 16700 9.29 Before 555.55 3.26 5.18 1860.84 Fish CMJ Haemulidae Diagramma pictum 37 350003 2517.24 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 1 E1_2_left.MP4 19703 28.67 Before 630.95 6.39 6.26 5710.44 Fish CMJ Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 1661.77 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 2 E2_1_Left.MP4 17373 9.66 Before 289.92 6.96 37.58 3085.77 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 717.80 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 2 E2_1_Left.MP4 17373 9.66 Before 314.98 3.27 18.23 1935.46 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 930.06 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 2 E2_2_left.MP4 655 18.08 Before 780.16 2.16 23.15 1196.70 Elasmobranch CMJ Hemiscylliidae Chiloscyllium punctatum 37 013008 4282.43 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 3 E3_1_left.MP4 4027 2.24 Before 261.48 14.21 21.55 4870.06 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 519.84 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 3 E3_1_left.MP4 4027 2.24 Before 280.40 3.43 12.74 2421.02 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 646.62 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 3 E3_2_left.MP4 23109 30.57 Before 347.59 7.73 0.59 3851.08 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 679.77 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 3 E3_2_left.MP4 22855 30.43 Before 349.66 1.81 7.22 1829.49 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 930.34 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 3 E3_1_left.MP4 4027 2.24 Before 421.43 23.57 7.36 5652.73 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2310.07 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 3 E3_2_left.MP4 12250 24.53 Before 725.19 16.54 3.21 4482.78 Fish CMJ Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 2627.21 E1 10/2019 Remed. mE 3 E3_1_left.MP4 4027 2.24 Before 979.58 66.56 20.68 6272.05 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 32238.38 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mG 1 G1_1_left.MP4 30327 16.87 Before 268.71 5.17 1.05 2931.77 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 429.97 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mG 1 G1_1_left.MP4 31519 17.53 Before 273.87 4.54 2.91 2335.65 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 600.78 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mG 1 G1_1_left.MP4 30327 16.87 Before 282.55 2.76 4.60 2027.69 Fish LP Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 498.15 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mG 1 G1_1_left.MP4 31511 17.52 Before 306.77 18.04 11.07 4058.71 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 856.32 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mG 2 G2_2_Left.MP4 15742 26.47 Before 201.49 9.33 12.26 10684.38 Fish CMJ Labridae Scarus sp 786.22 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mG 2 G2_1_Left.MP4 8237 4.58 Before 251.71 36.06 13.78 6310.17 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 355.02 Event Treat. Location Rep Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed. period Length (mm) Precision (mm) RMS (mm) Range_(mm) Type Tape Reader Family Genus Species CAABI Code Weight (g) E1 10/2019 Nearfield mG 2 G2_1_Left.MP4 8491 4.72 Before 254.40 8.57 2.27 3615.90 Fish CMJ Siganidae Siganus sp 210.16 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mG 2 G2_1_Left.MP4 8237 4.58 Before 298.50 5.49 4.03 2465.62 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 198.35 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mG 2 G2_1_Left.MP4 8237 4.58 Before 316.31 1.70 1.28 1524.60 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 693.52 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mG 2 G2_1_Left.MP4 11916 6.63 Before 362.06 37.52 24.14 6231.16 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 765.68 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mG 2 G2_2_Left.MP4 14070 25.54 Before 400.23 104.22 20.94 8817.73 Fish CMJ Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 943.86 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mG 2 G2_2_Left.MP4 15742 26.47 Before 424.00 153.27 7.00 10536.16 Fish CMJ Labridae Scarus sp 2004.49 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mG 2 G2_2_Left.MP4 13057 24.98 Before 450.76 43.04 2.46 6974.32 Fish CMJ Lutjanidae Symphorus nametophorus 37 346017 2318.72 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mG 2 G2_2_Left.MP4 15742 26.47 Before 476.96 98.35 23.07 10003.63 Fish CMJ Labridae Scarus sp 2890.35 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mG 2 G2_2_Left.MP4 7981 22.16 Before 497.81 119.93 14.55 9086.12 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 3297.47 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mG 2 G2_2_Left.MP4 7981 22.16 Before 512.40 94.32 16.16 7911.98 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 3597.00 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mG 2 G2_2_Left.MP4 24169 31.16 Before 596.43 1.44 3.76 1587.59 Fish CMJ Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 1380.98 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mG 3 G3_1_left.MP4 2516 1.40 Before 315.45 12.54 11.65 2851.19 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 934.36 E1 10/2019 Nearfield mG 3 G3_2_left.MP4 259 17.86 Before 389.98 2.19 4.61 1803.77 Fish LP Balistidae Abalistes stellaris 37 465011 117.03 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 1 H1_2_left.MP4 6230 21.18 Before 203.72 18.26 12.85 3316.05 Fish LP Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 142.90 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 1 H1_1_left.MP4 11566 NA Before 205.10 5.54 15.03 2313.01 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 228.57 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 1 H1_2_left.MP4 6230 38.90 Before 211.68 3.08 3.42 1514.17 Fish LP Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 159.83 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 1 H1_2_left.MP4 6230 21.18 Before 214.10 26.72 22.26 4317.85 Fish LP Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 165.21 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 1 H1_2_left.MP4 6230 21.18 Before 215.49 22.13 17.07 4179.49 Fish LP Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 168.36 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 1 H1_2_left.MP4 6230 21.18 Before 228.52 6.11 10.56 2573.03 Fish LP Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 199.84 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 1 H1_1_left.MP4 9079 NA Before 229.39 1.70 25.50 2246.02 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 345.26 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 1 H1_1_left.MP4 11560 6.43 Before 230.37 5.14 9.21 1970.15 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 324.29 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 1 H1_1_left.MP4 11427 NA Before 239.86 13.69 10.15 3512.51 Fish LP Labridae Scarus sp 341.08 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 1 H1_2_left.MP4 6230 21.18 Before 244.32 23.16 24.90 5633.80 Fish LP Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 242.90 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 1 H1_2_left.MP4 6230 21.18 Before 250.63 3.93 3.77 1745.60 Fish LP Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 261.67 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 1 H1_1_left.MP4 11566 6.43 Before 257.41 8.09 10.07 2775.92 Fish LP Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 452.87 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 1 H1_2_left.MP4 6230 21.18 Before 267.54 27.63 15.72 4201.22 Fish LP Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 316.61 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 1 H1_1_left.MP4 9079 5.05 Before 280.00 2.80 21.41 2758.38 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 643.75 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 1 H1_2_left.MP4 6395 21.27 Before 296.32 38.38 18.01 4779.33 Fish LP Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 426.61 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 1 H1_2_left.MP4 6230 21.18 Before 301.84 31.35 8.40 4766.45 Fish LP Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 450.25 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 1 H1_1_left.MP4 11427 6.35 Before 350.87 28.01 13.92 4787.57 Fish LP Labridae Scarus sp 1112.76 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 1 H1_2_left.MP4 25620 49.68 Before 459.27 11.38 31.74 5361.93 Fish LP Lutjanidae Symphorus nametophorus 37 346017 2450.09 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 1 H1_2_left.MP4 25620 31.97 Before 747.96 50.30 10.76 8819.41 Fish LP Lutjanidae Symphorus nametophorus 37 346017 10313.02 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 2 H2_1_left.MP4 28242 15.71 Before 224.82 19.49 14.40 3538.14 Fish LP Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 190.54 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 2 H2_1_left.MP4 28272 15.72 Before 238.73 8.65 8.60 2301.80 Fish LP Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 227.03 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 2 H2_1_left.MP4 18429 10.25 Before 242.71 2.49 2.67 1893.42 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 411.88 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 2 H2_1_left.MP4 28242 15.71 Before 248.98 12.92 6.39 3225.31 Fish LP Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 256.67 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 2 H2_1_left.MP4 20247 11.26 Before 320.55 31.55 22.66 6417.57 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 982.43 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 2 H2_1_left.MP4 18464 10.27 Before 441.34 35.71 10.11 5139.84 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2668.57 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 2 H2_1_left.MP4 20194 11.23 Before 481.65 58.50 19.68 5992.53 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 3506.65 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 2 H2_2_left.MP4 9172 22.82 Before 596.85 3.64 17.24 2000.55 Fish LP Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 1384.20 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 2 H2_1_left.MP4 8680 4.83 Before 931.27 103.63 22.38 9427.93 Fish LP Lutjanidae Symphorus nametophorus 37 346017 19675.99 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 2 H2_1_left.MP4 21328 11.86 Before 998.69 16.82 20.35 3275.41 Elasmobranch LP Hemiscylliidae Chiloscyllium punctatum 37 013008 9299.15 Event Treat. Location Rep Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed. period Length (mm) Precision (mm) RMS (mm) Range_(mm) Type Tape Reader Family Genus Species CAABI Code Weight (g) E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 3 H3_2_left.MP4 23171 0.02 Before 208.67 0.64 1.17 812.61 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 291.87 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 3 H3_2_left.MP4 23171 0.02 Before 230.86 2.76 2.68 1366.54 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 319.78 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 3 H3_1_left.MP4 17186 0.01 Before 277.62 1.99 3.22 1153.38 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 131.06 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 3 H3_1_left.MP4 6619 0.00 Before 286.81 1.14 2.30 1192.27 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 174.00 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 3 H3_2_left.MP4 23171 0.02 Before 304.76 3.14 1.90 1318.86 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 379.15 E1 10/2019 Ref. mH 3 H3_1_left.MP4 26156 0.01 Before 315.14 2.14 0.81 1597.38 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 931.47 E1 10/2019 Ref. mI 1 I1_1_left.MP4 27621 15.36 Before 204.02 7.80 16.22 2354.64 Fish LP Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 123.04 E1 10/2019 Ref. mI 1 I1_1_left.MP4 27621 15.36 Before 214.67 29.26 26.86 4899.06 Fish LP Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 141.91 E1 10/2019 Ref. mI 1 I1_1_left.MP4 14189 7.89 Before 235.32 7.78 18.17 2505.99 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 373.94 E1 10/2019 Ref. mI 1 I1_1_left.MP4 28455 15.82 Before 264.58 3.70 23.54 2660.47 Fish LP Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 306.50 E1 10/2019 Ref. mI 1 I1_1_left.MP4 14189 7.89 Before 280.42 4.37 13.44 2117.40 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 646.77 E1 10/2019 Ref. mI 2 I2_2_left.MP4 5566 20.81 Before 200.68 0.95 4.27 1190.02 Fish LP Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 117.47 E1 10/2019 Ref. mI 2 I2_2_left.MP4 3983 19.93 Before 284.54 5.88 17.21 3817.89 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1171.27 E1 10/2019 Ref. mI 2 I2_1_left.MP4 8958 4.98 Before 339.10 9.31 10.37 2759.64 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 676.99 E1 10/2019 Ref. mI 3 I3_1_left.MP4 8796 4.89 Before 207.23 3.22 8.59 1542.43 Fish LP Pinguipedidae Parapercis sp1 110.35 E1 10/2019 Ref. mI 3 I3_1_left.MP4 3662 2.04 Before 223.04 4.85 6.50 1811.62 Fish LP Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 157.98 E1 10/2019 Ref. mI 3 I3_1_left.MP4 30069 16.72 Before 263.38 6.44 14.45 3800.64 Fish LP Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 531.73 E1 10/2019 Ref. mI 3 I3_1_left.MP4 24810 13.80 Before 847.79 3.21 16.07 1813.16 Elasmobranch LP Hemiscylliidae Chiloscyllium punctatum 37 013008 5559.75 E2 04/2020 Remed. mA 1 A1L-1.MP4 7109 4.74 Before 212.34 26.41 6.67 4318.80 Fish CMJ Balistidae Sufflamen chrysopterum 37 465079 145.01 E2 04/2020 Remed. mA 1 A1L-1.MP4 9339 6.23 Before 216.21 4.52 18.76 2427.65 Fish CMJ Carangidae Carangoides orthogrammus 37 337057 118.70 E2 04/2020 Remed. mA 1 A1L-1.MP4 9339 6.23 Before 239.16 4.03 16.33 2183.78 Fish CMJ Carangidae Caranx melampygus 37 337050 180.79 E2 04/2020 Remed. mA 1 A1L-1.MP4 9907 6.60 Before 245.63 15.84 6.96 5351.71 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 307.96 E2 04/2020 Remed. mA 1 A1L-2.MP4 693 18.16 Before 258.95 7.10 7.33 2780.67 Fish CMJ Siganidae Siganus argenteus 37 438007 229.81 E2 04/2020 Remed. mA 1 A1L-1.MP4 13261 8.84 Before 261.67 13.28 11.35 4925.77 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347028 63.47 E2 04/2020 Remed. mA 1 A1L-2.MP4 693 18.16 Before 283.58 5.61 6.24 2769.18 Fish CMJ Siganidae Siganus argenteus 37 438007 301.25 E2 04/2020 Remed. mA 1 A1L-1.MP4 9339 6.23 Before 286.41 5.08 12.23 2363.29 Fish CMJ Carangidae Carangoides orthogrammus 37 337057 273.62 E2 04/2020 Remed. mA 1 A1L-1.MP4 5486 3.66 Before 287.84 2.55 2.67 1441.29 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 526.01 E2 04/2020 Remed. mA 1 A1L-1.MP4 7732 5.15 Before 288.95 14.43 11.93 2767.24 Fish CMJ Serranidae Epinephelus merra 37 311063 347.41 E2 04/2020 Remed. mA 1 A1L-2.MP4 693 18.16 Before 293.57 2.52 4.22 2343.46 Fish CMJ Siganidae Siganus argenteus 37 438007 333.99 E2 04/2020 Remed. mA 1 A1L-1.MP4 5486 3.66 Before 298.67 1.69 3.57 1493.43 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 586.16 E2 04/2020 Remed. mA 1 A1L-2.MP4 21383 31.95 Before 336.90 1.54 6.97 1403.28 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1459.95 E2 04/2020 Remed. mA 1 A1L-1.MP4 3887 2.59 Before 370.73 2.68 1.86 1755.26 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347028 150.58 E2 04/2020 Remed. mA 1 A1L-1.MP4 26447 17.63 Before 411.23 16.39 5.91 4568.12 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon schoenleinii 37 384010 1147.68 E2 04/2020 Remed. mA 1 A1L-2.MP4 5680 21.48 Before 709.06 65.60 12.02 6158.14 Fish CMJ Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 4859.29 E2 04/2020 Remed. mA 1 A1L-1.MP4 10223 6.82 Before 793.04 3.84 1.52 2274.20 Fish CMJ Carangidae Carangoides fulvoguttatus 37 337037 3962.77 E2 04/2020 Remed. mA 3 A3L-1.MP4 25012 16.67 Before 414.12 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2187.18 E2 04/2020 Remed. mA 3 A3L-1.MP4 4351 2.90 Before 723.36 Fish CMJ Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 2605.46 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 1 B1L_2.MP4 8341 23.26 Before 229.15 6.46 6.37 3239.90 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 269.60 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 1 B1L_2.MP4 11005 25.03 Before 229.60 3.60 7.30 2136.99 Fish CMJ Balistidae Sufflamen fraenatum 37 465014 317.57 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 1 B1L_2.MP4 23305 33.23 Before 278.34 9.08 10.47 3089.64 Fish CMJ Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 333.40 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 1 B1L_2.MP4 8341 23.26 Before 281.87 1.32 2.90 1442.40 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 494.68 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 1 B1L_1.MP4 13935 9.29 Before 303.30 3.79 5.99 2112.62 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347028 91.53 Event Treat. Location Rep Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed. period Length (mm) Precision (mm) RMS (mm) Range_(mm) Type Tape Reader Family Genus Species CAABI Code Weight (g) E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 1 B1L_2.MP4 1593 18.76 Before 304.60 9.68 9.56 2628.36 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 837.59 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 1 B1L_2.MP4 1593 18.76 Before 308.11 4.64 5.82 2478.59 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 868.13 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 1 B1L_2.MP4 24007 33.70 Before 317.83 9.34 6.44 2715.12 Fish CMJ Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 487.59 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 1 B1L_2.MP4 8341 23.26 Before 320.81 3.68 4.60 1627.12 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 722.82 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 1 B1L_1.MP4 13898 9.27 Before 452.89 2.97 9.93 2167.43 Fish CMJ Carangidae Pseudocaranx dentex 37 337082 1070.89 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 1 B1L_1.MP4 20440 13.63 Before 576.10 21.05 13.80 4522.10 Fish CMJ Carangidae Alectis ciliaris 37 337018 1612.39 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 1 B1L_1.MP4 22180 14.79 Before 649.10 4.61 3.76 2065.08 Fish CMJ Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 1824.38 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 1 B1L_1.MP4 3307 2.20 Before 657.28 11.13 7.69 5343.23 Fish CMJ Scombridae Scomberomorus commerson 37 441007 1661.18 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 1 B1L_2.MP4 25131 34.45 Before 705.33 5.77 1.77 3183.91 Fish CMJ Monacanthidae Aluterus scriptus 37 465045 4543.16 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 1 B1L_1.MP4 3307 2.20 Before 752.99 11.69 11.01 4971.94 Fish CMJ Scombridae Scomberomorus commerson 37 441007 2505.89 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 1 B1L_1.MP4 3307 2.20 Before 762.27 16.33 9.61 4856.74 Fish CMJ Scombridae Scomberomorus commerson 37 441007 2600.46 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 1 B1L_1.MP4 3307 2.20 Before 799.11 15.31 1.57 4814.52 Fish CMJ Scombridae Scomberomorus commerson 37 441007 2999.39 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 1 B1L_1.MP4 3307 2.20 Before 871.65 16.49 3.67 5449.44 Fish CMJ Scombridae Scomberomorus commerson 37 441007 3900.83 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 1 B1L_1.MP4 3307 2.20 Before 974.21 44.92 18.17 5778.53 Fish CMJ Scombridae Scomberomorus commerson 37 441007 5460.81 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 18395 12.26 Before 206.07 39.28 9.21 5873.53 Fish CMJ Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 149.40 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 4992 3.33 Before 221.34 6.11 6.67 2907.30 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 32.82 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 4992 3.33 Before 241.74 6.86 13.70 2610.68 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 41.86 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 4992 3.33 Before 247.13 4.32 19.92 3259.94 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 44.49 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-2.MP4 17104 29.10 Before 266.68 11.56 23.08 3778.10 Fish CMJ Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 5976.37 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 4992 3.33 Before 267.58 10.95 12.63 2935.21 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 55.41 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 4992 3.33 Before 267.60 7.69 8.74 3223.06 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 55.42 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 4992 3.33 Before 268.83 4.66 12.54 3172.91 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 56.13 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 18395 12.26 Before 274.48 58.61 19.18 5899.30 Fish CMJ Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 341.12 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 26157 17.44 Before 278.43 13.17 10.61 3722.71 Fish CMJ Labridae Coris gaimard 37 384094 302.57 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 4992 3.33 Before 281.08 10.24 9.17 3207.35 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 63.47 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 3292 2.19 Before 288.08 2.94 14.25 2832.21 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347028 80.56 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-2.MP4 17104 29.10 Before 295.33 16.85 14.18 5022.10 Fish CMJ Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 294.93 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 4992 3.33 Before 299.44 6.02 9.42 2495.25 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 75.60 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 4992 3.33 Before 304.24 10.13 22.01 2951.32 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 78.98 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 16402 10.93 Before 312.28 5.19 8.03 2028.33 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon schoenleinii 37 384010 663.31 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 2145 1.43 Before 316.74 13.87 16.20 3901.86 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 658.31 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 16402 10.93 Before 326.95 26.32 31.87 4674.67 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon schoenleinii 37 384010 756.57 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 4992 3.33 Before 330.86 4.81 32.30 2775.49 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 99.57 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 4992 3.33 Before 331.36 5.01 19.27 3117.00 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 99.99 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 4992 3.33 Before 333.56 9.99 26.75 3150.65 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 101.83 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 4992 3.33 Before 344.17 6.74 30.13 3146.91 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 111.02 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 2984 1.99 Before 352.55 5.29 18.51 2350.10 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1322.59 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 4992 3.33 Before 363.50 4.51 23.97 3417.53 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 129.10 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-2.MP4 17104 29.10 Before 388.37 7.64 19.32 4522.24 Fish CMJ Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 395.08 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 20627 13.75 Before 390.22 13.12 4.42 4627.51 Fish CMJ Pomacanthidae Pomacanthus semicirculatus 37 365080 961.48 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-2.MP4 17104 29.10 Before 391.76 33.18 30.43 4908.14 Fish CMJ Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 865.90 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 4992 3.33 Before 395.71 29.36 11.34 4730.76 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 163.22 Event Treat. Location Rep Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed. period Length (mm) Precision (mm) RMS (mm) Range_(mm) Type Tape Reader Family Genus Species CAABI Code Weight (g) E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 2984 1.99 Before 424.23 11.19 19.32 4254.95 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2358.43 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 20627 13.75 Before 463.48 8.79 15.94 2770.27 Fish CMJ Pomacanthidae Pomacanthus semicirculatus 37 365080 1578.07 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-2.MP4 17104 29.10 Before 501.54 23.15 23.10 4577.97 Fish CMJ Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 887.78 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 20280 13.52 Before 737.57 2.14 9.77 1902.73 Fish CMJ Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 2777.60 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 2 B2L-1.MP4 8620 5.75 Before 762.16 44.50 25.92 5848.70 Fish CMJ Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 1801.73 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 3 B3L_1.MP4 2517 1.68 Before 252.86 17.96 9.34 3565.00 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 47.40 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 3 B3L_1.MP4 11256 7.50 Before 293.50 1.89 8.12 1236.26 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 745.82 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 3 B3L_1.MP4 9493 6.33 Before 339.13 3.49 8.88 1980.53 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 850.61 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 3 B3L_2.MP4 15077 27.75 Before 389.12 1.72 9.00 1718.36 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347028 169.79 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 3 B3L_1.MP4 21729 14.49 Before 416.04 3.85 6.81 1590.97 Fish CMJ Carangidae Carangoides gymnostethus 37 337022 1066.35 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 3 B3L_2.MP4 15077 27.75 Before 426.33 1.24 8.49 1478.04 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347028 212.95 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 3 B3L_1.MP4 21729 14.49 Before 443.40 2.46 6.76 1421.98 Fish CMJ Carangidae Carangoides gymnostethus 37 337022 1284.32 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 3 B3L_1.MP4 16703 11.14 Before 488.09 3.35 5.40 1647.30 Fish CMJ Haemulidae Diagramma pictum 37 350003 1702.93 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 3 B3L_2.MP4 8653 23.47 Before 526.40 5.28 5.62 2404.33 Fish CMJ Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 2069.71 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mB 3 B3L_1.MP4 17424 11.62 Before 1022.97 30.70 18.25 4513.15 Fish CMJ Scombridae Scomberomorus commerson 37 441007 6329.89 E2 04/2020 Remed. mC 1 C1L-1.MP4 25429 16.95 Before 203.44 11.05 2.20 2829.55 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 237.25 E2 04/2020 Remed. mC 1 C1L-1.MP4 25429 16.95 Before 209.20 3.93 3.77 1715.89 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 258.88 E2 04/2020 Remed. mC 1 C1L-2.MP4 2241 19.19 Before 386.56 1.30 2.04 1460.87 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1763.64 E2 04/2020 Remed. mC 1 C1L-1.MP4 7803 5.20 Before 733.32 16.01 11.95 3774.31 Fish CMJ Carangidae Carangoides fulvoguttatus 37 337037 3157.88 E2 04/2020 Remed. mC 1 C1L-1.MP4 7803 5.20 Before 786.50 37.98 13.76 5028.90 Fish CMJ Carangidae Carangoides fulvoguttatus 37 337037 3868.80 E2 04/2020 Remed. mC 2 C2L-1.MP4 10106 6.74 Before 217.00 2.41 6.96 1873.03 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 290.29 E2 04/2020 Remed. mC 2 C2L-1.MP4 23663 15.78 Before 599.57 15.07 31.03 5520.92 Fish CMJ Carangidae Carangoides fulvoguttatus 37 337037 1761.08 E2 04/2020 Remed. mC 2 C2L-1.MP4 23517 15.68 Before 686.48 9.41 10.73 2538.09 Fish CMJ Carangidae Carangoides fulvoguttatus 37 337037 2607.77 E2 04/2020 Remed. mC 2 C2L-1.MP4 23517 15.68 Before 775.39 4.78 16.28 2354.67 Fish CMJ Carangidae Carangoides fulvoguttatus 37 337037 3712.43 E2 04/2020 Remed. mC 2 C2L-1.MP4 23517 15.68 Before 796.47 5.51 14.88 3297.43 Fish CMJ Carangidae Carangoides fulvoguttatus 37 337037 4012.79 E2 04/2020 Remed. mC 3 C3L-1.MP4 5608 3.74 Before 213.39 3.00 8.87 1994.69 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 218.79 E2 04/2020 Remed. mC 3 C3L-1.MP4 13128 8.75 Before 643.15 26.21 10.64 4222.75 Fish CMJ Scombridae Scomberomorus commerson 37 441007 1555.46 E2 04/2020 Remed. mC 3 C3L-1.MP4 16504 11.00 Before 767.94 6.31 8.42 2105.73 Fish CMJ Carangidae Carangoides fulvoguttatus 37 337037 3609.90 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-1.MP4 5651 3.77 Before 209.33 19.35 12.17 4953.31 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 190.98 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-2.MP4 4867 20.94 Before 263.76 10.73 1.60 5565.90 Fish CMJ Labridae Coris gaimard 37 384094 849.46 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-1.MP4 1774 1.18 Before 276.36 27.09 13.13 4898.72 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 60.58 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-1.MP4 21378 14.25 Before 317.47 3.31 2.06 2055.51 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 700.96 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-2.MP4 21417 31.98 Before 321.15 5.54 4.19 5273.66 Fish CMJ Pomacanthidae Pomacanthus semicirculatus 37 365080 548.62 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-2.MP4 2294 19.23 Before 342.37 3.57 0.57 1851.87 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2107.96 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-2.MP4 2294 19.23 Before 342.70 2.87 2.73 2113.32 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 256.38 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-1.MP4 16355 10.90 Before 352.22 39.10 8.39 6461.80 Fish CMJ Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 654.46 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-1.MP4 16355 10.90 Before 353.85 56.69 21.33 6605.49 Fish CMJ Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 663.19 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-1.MP4 21378 14.25 Before 354.13 1.65 1.50 2004.98 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 965.64 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-1.MP4 5711 3.81 Before 354.61 46.60 27.95 5401.56 Fish CMJ Labridae Cheilinus fasciatus 37 384066 1206.92 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-1.MP4 1774 1.18 Before 360.84 42.55 18.92 5292.40 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 126.52 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-2.MP4 21417 31.98 Before 363.43 37.98 14.11 6312.94 Fish CMJ Pomacanthidae Pomacanthus semicirculatus 37 365080 783.36 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-1.MP4 16355 10.90 Before 393.67 33.13 13.36 4743.40 Fish CMJ Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 900.22 Event Treat. Location Rep Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed. period Length (mm) Precision (mm) RMS (mm) Range_(mm) Type Tape Reader Family Genus Species CAABI Code Weight (g) E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-1.MP4 1806 1.20 Before 406.80 30.07 13.14 4481.55 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 176.15 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-1.MP4 16562 11.04 Before 407.25 3.68 9.98 3849.70 Fish CMJ Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 992.08 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-1.MP4 5471 3.65 Before 409.26 10.00 6.87 2553.06 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1210.55 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-1.MP4 11789 7.86 Before 440.68 5.82 2.94 2733.04 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 231.18 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-1.MP4 18887 12.59 Before 447.95 23.84 4.74 4901.23 Fish CMJ Lutjanidae Symphorus nametophorus 37 346017 2276.32 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-1.MP4 16808 11.21 Before 478.66 18.91 13.32 3797.79 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 2930.14 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 1 D1L-2.MP4 21782 32.22 Before 862.04 2.01 4.89 1875.84 Fish CMJ Serranidae Epinephelus coioides 37 311007 9863.70 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 3 D3L-1.MP4 24210 16.14 Before 256.09 5.92 8.13 2891.14 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon anchorago 37 384071 487.35 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 3 D3L-2.MP4 2093 19.09 Before 275.85 4.73 6.61 1926.71 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 614.44 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 3 D3L-1.MP4 24184 16.12 Before 282.74 2.88 6.05 1592.23 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 499.16 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 3 D3L-1.MP4 24210 16.14 Before 301.58 2.71 7.13 1904.54 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 603.06 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 3 D3L-1.MP4 24184 16.12 Before 315.74 1.31 3.90 1407.69 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 689.85 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 3 D3L-1.MP4 24210 16.14 Before 327.16 3.91 10.34 1834.93 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 765.57 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 3 D3L-2.MP4 2785 19.55 Before 329.71 4.10 7.52 2215.80 Fish CMJ Lutjanidae Lutjanus adetii 37 346033 561.48 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 3 D3L-1.MP4 24210 16.14 Before 331.04 1.83 6.87 1385.74 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 792.46 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 3 D3L-1.MP4 24210 16.14 Before 338.22 3.40 3.82 1674.50 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 843.94 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 3 D3L-2.MP4 2080 19.08 Before 379.80 6.07 10.89 1996.97 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1669.12 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 3 D3L-1.MP4 26510 17.67 Before 469.32 18.30 14.29 3294.90 Fish CMJ Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 1489.65 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 3 D3L-2.MP4 19238 30.52 Before 472.06 7.14 9.70 2936.07 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon schoenleinii 37 384010 2167.91 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 3 D3L-1.MP4 13917 9.28 Before 521.14 0.76 6.51 902.29 Fish CMJ Carangidae Carangoides fulvoguttatus 37 337037 1172.78 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mD 3 D3L-1.MP4 9576 6.38 Before 863.67 3.45 8.00 1865.64 Fish CMJ Serranidae Epinephelus coioides 37 311007 9920.50 E2 04/2020 Remed. mE 1 E1L-1.MP4 5530 3.69 Before 303.95 2.99 2.25 2229.04 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 617.06 E2 04/2020 Remed. mE 1 E1L-1.MP4 16063 10.71 Before 319.92 18.02 7.48 3533.00 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 976.40 E2 04/2020 Remed. mE 1 E1L-1.MP4 16063 10.71 Before 352.12 5.85 2.92 2296.21 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1317.52 E2 04/2020 Remed. mE 1 E1L-1.MP4 7951 5.30 Before 562.63 28.27 9.27 4084.09 Fish CMJ Scombridae Scomberomorus commerson 37 441007 1038.01 E2 04/2020 Remed. mE 1 E1L-1.MP4 14338 9.56 Before 680.49 2.48 1.08 1906.70 Fish CMJ Carangidae Carangoides fulvoguttatus 37 337037 2542.39 E2 04/2020 Remed. mE 2 E2L-1.MP4 15590 10.39 Before 344.16 7.67 10.25 2824.98 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1226.68 E2 04/2020 Remed. mE 2 E2L-2.MP4 19885 30.95 Before 358.47 3.40 12.71 2456.28 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1393.24 E2 04/2020 Remed. mE 2 E2L-2.MP4 19692 30.83 Before 407.99 6.38 6.46 2298.12 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 190.95 E2 04/2020 Remed. mE 3 E3L-1.MP4 2516 1.68 Before 220.89 3.01 6.86 2978.76 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 306.82 E2 04/2020 Remed. mE 3 E3L-1.MP4 2669 1.78 Before 289.44 8.55 14.08 3971.63 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 714.04 E2 04/2020 Remed. mE 3 E3L-2.MP4 13640 26.79 Before 350.20 14.03 10.40 3277.80 Fish CMJ Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 239.56 E2 04/2020 Remed. mE 3 E3L-2.MP4 17790 29.56 Before 354.06 2.13 7.68 1763.41 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 134.34 E2 04/2020 Remed. mE 3 E3L-2.MP4 15436 27.99 Before 392.00 4.84 16.81 4374.02 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 965.54 E2 04/2020 Remed. mE 3 E3L-2.MP4 13640 26.79 Before 540.73 11.82 9.54 3852.74 Fish CMJ Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 1000.26 E2 04/2020 Remed. mE 3 E3L-2.MP4 12920 26.31 Before 2636.63 11.76 12.60 3830.74 Elasmobranch CMJ Carcharhinidae Galeocerdo cuvier 37 018022 227032.22 E2 04/2020 Remed. mE 3 E3L-2.MP4 13649 26.80 Before 2647.45 13.81 12.65 3714.23 Elasmobranch CMJ Carcharhinidae Galeocerdo cuvier 37 018022 229981.62 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mG 1 G1L-1.MP4 2634 1.76 Before 292.94 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 741.41 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mG 1 G1L-1.MP4 2534 1.69 Before 295.13 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 758.85 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mG 1 G1L-1.MP4 2371 1.58 Before 352.52 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 132.90 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mG 1 G1L-1.MP4 8371 5.58 Before 393.72 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon schoenleinii 37 384010 1288.75 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mG 1 G1L-1.MP4 20892 13.93 Before 616.45 Fish CMJ Lutjanidae Symphorus nametophorus 37 346017 5832.96 Event Treat. Location Rep Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed. period Length (mm) Precision (mm) RMS (mm) Range_(mm) Type Tape Reader Family Genus Species CAABI Code Weight (g) E2 04/2020 Nearfield mG 2 G2L-1.MP4 14867 9.91 Before 307.24 2.67 11.33 1524.50 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 636.80 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mG 2 G2L-1.MP4 16715 11.14 Before 325.89 23.79 26.34 4061.15 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 756.90 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mG 2 G2L-1.MP4 14867 9.91 Before 333.46 3.32 9.58 1507.00 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 809.59 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mG 2 G2L-1.MP4 1858 1.24 Before 368.68 3.03 2.87 1926.06 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1521.10 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mG 2 G2L-1.MP4 1863 1.24 Before 415.63 5.84 3.30 2692.38 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2212.18 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mG 2 G2L-2.MP4 12208 25.84 Before 446.51 18.12 25.71 3624.47 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 238.83 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mG 2 G2L-1.MP4 20765 13.84 Before 494.47 7.32 19.06 2205.10 Fish CMJ Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 745.30 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mG 2 G2L-1.MP4 14842 9.89 Before 625.30 19.59 9.48 3739.38 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon schoenleinii 37 384010 4852.52 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mG 3 G3L-1.MP4 3124 2.08 Before 329.40 2.25 7.62 2024.41 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1069.70 E2 04/2020 Nearfield mG 3 G3L-1.MP4 5646 3.76 Before 384.89 8.27 19.47 4481.14 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 915.30 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 1 H1L-2.MP4 12044 25.73 Before 206.82 3.07 3.23 2139.38 Fish CMJ Mullidae Parupeneus multifasciatus 37 355026 209.59 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 1 H1L-1.MP4 20508 13.67 Before 226.03 2.84 1.31 1890.49 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 163.98 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 1 H1L-1.MP4 22532 15.02 Before 232.33 13.20 9.72 3139.04 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 37.51 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 1 H1L-1.MP4 12407 8.27 Before 259.38 4.28 2.71 2309.10 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 289.24 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 1 H1L-1.MP4 26181 17.45 Before 263.01 8.28 2.51 4062.25 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 529.41 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 1 H1L-1.MP4 22720 15.15 Before 272.07 8.89 7.37 3018.27 Fish CMJ Serranidae Plectropomus maculatus 37 311012 253.22 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 1 H1L-1.MP4 26146 17.43 Before 301.64 5.00 2.53 2499.23 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 812.39 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 1 H1L-1.MP4 14286 9.52 Before 323.08 3.49 1.57 2280.63 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 107.05 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 1 H1L-2.MP4 8709 23.50 Before 589.38 2.69 2.72 2701.04 Fish CMJ Carangidae Carangoides fulvoguttatus 37 337037 1675.73 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 1 H1L-1.MP4 2438 1.63 Before 773.20 4.32 5.05 2815.44 Fish CMJ Lutjanidae Symphorus nametophorus 37 346017 11372.63 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 2 H2L-1.MP4 7365 4.91 Before 201.18 13.43 13.82 2898.92 Fish CMJ Balistidae Sufflamen fraenatum 37 465014 215.16 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 2 H2L-1.MP4 14960 9.97 Before 204.18 1.74 2.88 1497.29 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 123.30 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 2 H2L-1.MP4 14871 9.91 Before 204.30 6.45 7.69 2399.88 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 123.51 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 2 H2L-1.MP4 18815 12.54 Before 205.60 14.79 7.93 3356.75 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 146.78 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 2 H2L-1.MP4 14730 9.82 Before 208.72 2.63 9.75 1466.55 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 131.16 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 2 H2L-1.MP4 14730 9.82 Before 258.30 2.15 3.71 1476.20 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 238.41 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 2 H2L-1.MP4 13829 9.22 Before 262.24 2.44 4.62 1980.79 Fish CMJ Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 478.96 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 2 H2L-1.MP4 18811 12.54 Before 266.28 2.39 13.49 2062.06 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 312.28 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 2 H2L-1.MP4 15256 10.17 Before 268.95 1.61 6.73 1428.15 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 567.68 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 2 H2L-1.MP4 15304 10.20 Before 313.25 3.58 10.48 1989.38 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 914.20 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 2 H2L-1.MP4 9144 6.10 Before 347.07 14.04 8.98 3242.37 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon schoenleinii 37 384010 897.85 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 2 H2L-1.MP4 15271 10.18 Before 354.06 5.64 10.81 2240.36 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1340.38 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 2 H2L-1.MP4 15236 10.16 Before 355.21 2.63 13.34 2505.94 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1354.01 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 2 H2L-2.MP4 8651 23.46 Before 2444.80 34.10 28.08 4987.58 Elasmobranch CMJ Ginglymostomatidae Nebrius ferrugineus 37 013010 113743.65 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 3 H3L-1.MP4 8417 5.61 Before 215.53 21.17 21.75 4477.05 Fish CMJ Balistidae Sufflamen chrysopterum 37 465079 151.51 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 3 H3L-1.MP4 14633 9.76 Before 218.41 2.18 14.58 1482.80 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 296.20 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 3 H3L-1.MP4 14640 9.76 Before 229.30 2.36 12.73 1425.79 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 344.86 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 3 H3L-1.MP4 5912 3.94 Before 232.65 7.82 31.00 3358.58 Fish CMJ Mullidae Parupeneus spilurus 37 355015 201.69 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 3 H3L-1.MP4 14189 9.46 Before 233.17 9.19 19.56 2836.53 Fish CMJ Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 62.84 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 3 H3L-1.MP4 8297 5.53 Before 245.79 6.88 18.55 2080.77 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 207.43 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 3 H3L-1.MP4 15333 10.22 Before 286.54 1.89 14.45 1645.35 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Lethrinus sp 296.86 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 3 H3L-1.MP4 8533 5.69 Before 292.31 6.56 23.42 2396.55 Fish CMJ Serranidae Epinephelus quoyanus 37 311040 332.26 Event Treat. Location Rep Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed. period Length (mm) Precision (mm) RMS (mm) Range_(mm) Type Tape Reader Family Genus Species CAABI Code Weight (g) E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 3 H3L-1.MP4 14633 9.76 Before 310.48 9.40 19.59 2621.32 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 889.11 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 3 H3L-1.MP4 14432 9.62 Before 313.74 1.17 9.30 1251.38 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 918.68 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 3 H3L-1.MP4 8297 5.53 Before 334.27 6.12 17.88 2102.53 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 491.32 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 3 H3L-1.MP4 14633 9.76 Before 350.74 2.18 10.41 1560.29 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1301.52 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 3 H3L-1.MP4 14090 9.39 Before 358.70 7.88 8.69 2502.27 Fish CMJ Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 259.22 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 3 H3L-1.MP4 19880 13.25 Before 367.93 1.75 11.42 1564.09 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Lethrinus rubrioperculatus 37 351012 625.36 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 3 H3L-1.MP4 15233 10.16 Before 370.43 1.45 6.88 1232.21 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Lethrinus sp 638.09 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 3 H3L-1.MP4 14189 9.46 Before 383.07 5.72 14.34 2992.23 Fish CMJ Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 321.80 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 3 H3L-1.MP4 14189 9.46 Before 395.92 9.33 37.36 2939.99 Fish CMJ Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 358.68 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 3 H3L-1.MP4 14090 9.39 Before 536.15 10.70 11.10 2797.30 Fish CMJ Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 972.62 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 3 H3L-1.MP4 14184 9.46 Before 2202.25 9.20 15.97 2393.73 Elasmobranch CMJ Ginglymostomatidae Nebrius ferrugineus 37 013010 82445.64 E2 04/2020 Ref. mH 3 H3L-1.MP4 14064 9.38 Before 2665.36 11.80 41.14 3320.35 Elasmobranch CMJ Ginglymostomatidae Nebrius ferrugineus 37 013010 148410.17 E2 04/2020 Ref. mI 1 I1L-2.MP4 4730 20.85 Before 204.99 2.31 2.72 1632.33 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 124.68 E2 04/2020 Ref. mI 1 I1L-2.MP4 4730 20.85 Before 232.17 1.63 1.98 1205.87 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 176.78 E2 04/2020 Ref. mI 1 I1L-2.MP4 4555 20.73 Before 244.09 3.47 10.78 1989.70 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 203.44 E2 04/2020 Ref. mI 1 I1L-2.MP4 5877 21.62 Before 284.02 4.22 1.34 2387.53 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 673.12 E2 04/2020 Ref. mI 1 I1L-2.MP4 5988 21.69 Before 302.58 3.49 4.49 2545.27 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 820.32 E2 04/2020 Ref. mI 2 I2L-2.MP4 2568 19.41 Before 374.37 2.80 22.62 2084.02 Fish CMJ Lethrinidae Lethrinus rubrioperculatus 37 351012 658.53 E2 04/2020 Ref. mI 2 I2L-2.MP4 2480 19.35 Before 636.26 13.74 38.15 3734.02 Fish CMJ Scombridae Scomberomorus commerson 37 441007 1505.63 E2 04/2020 Ref. mI 2 I2L-1.MP4 11154 7.44 Before 871.79 4.06 11.99 1813.07 Fish CMJ Carangidae Carangoides fulvoguttatus 37 337037 5214.95 E2 04/2020 Ref. mI 3 I3L-1.MP4 19314 12.88 Before 201.68 1.54 5.63 1409.33 Fish CMJ Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 119.13 E2 04/2020 Ref. mI 3 I3L-1.MP4 16347 10.90 Before 292.74 2.74 11.35 2004.07 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 739.79 E2 04/2020 Ref. mI 3 I3L-2.MP4 778 18.22 Before 327.69 2.31 3.34 1449.24 Fish CMJ Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1052.40 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_2_left.MP4 19223 28.4078 Before Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 3 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_2_left.MP4 18097 27.7816 Before Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 4 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_2_left.MP4 2136 18.9056 Before Balistidae Sufflamen chrysopterum 37 465079 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_1_left.MP4 9480 5.2719 Before Blennidae Ecsenius bicolor 37 408022 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_2_left.MP4 10711 23.6742 Before Carangidae Selaroides leptolepsis 37 337015 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_2_left.MP4 9315 22.8979 Before Carcharhinidae Galeocerdo cuvier 37 018022 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_2_left.MP4 10749 23.6953 Before Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_1_left.MP4 31124 17.3084 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 10 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_2_left.MP4 11296 23.9995 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_1_left.MP4 9555 5.3136 Before Labridae Coris sp 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_1_left.MP4 6064 3.3723 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384113 5 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_1_left.MP4 9437 5.248 Before Labridae Halichoeres sp 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_1_left.MP4 11881 6.6072 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_2_left.MP4 21554 29.7041 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 6 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_1_left.MP4 7762 4.3165 Before Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_1_left.MP4 12459 6.9286 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_1_left.MP4 5646 3.1398 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 24 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_2_left.MP4 6909 21.5599 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus coelestis 37 372111 5 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_1_left.MP4 23565 13.1048 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 3 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_2_left.MP4 12366 24.5946 Before Serranidae Epinephelus fasciatus 37 311014 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 1 A1_1_left.MP4 27150 15.0984 Before Serranidae Plectropomus maculatus 37 311012 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_1_left.MP4 6927 3.8522 Before Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_1_left.MP4 3717 2.0671 Before Apogonidae Apogon sp 24 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_2_left.MP4 20572 29.158 Before Blennidae Meiacanthus lineatus 37 408053 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_2_left.MP4 20136 28.9156 Before Caesionidae Pterocaesio marri 37 346068 62 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_2_left.MP4 7819 22.0659 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 17 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_1_left.MP4 12063 6.7084 Before Labridae sp 3 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_1_left.MP4 23059 12.8234 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_1_left.MP4 7542 4.1942 Before Labridae Cirrhilabrus punctatus 37 384083 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_1_left.MP4 5885 3.2727 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_1_left.MP4 3086 1.7162 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384113 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_1_left.MP4 2994 1.665 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_1_left.MP4 3861 2.1471 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 3 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_1_left.MP4 6187 3.4407 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 4 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_1_left.MP4 26786 14.896 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_1_left.MP4 17548 9.7586 Before Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 5 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_1_left.MP4 17931 9.9716 Before Nemipteridae Pentapodus sp 0 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_1_left.MP4 11182 6.2184 Before Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_1_left.MP4 6135 3.4117 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 3 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_1_left.MP4 3300 1.8352 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 31 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_1_left.MP4 2994 1.665 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 20 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_1_left.MP4 3212 1.7862 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 2 A2_1_left.MP4 3079 1.7123 Before Serranidae Diploprion bifasciatum 37 312002 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 3 A3_1_left.MP4 26219 14.5807 Before Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 3 A3_2_left.MP4 15378 26.2696 Before Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 3 A3_1_left.MP4 9681 5.3837 Before Apogonidae Ostorhinchus angustatus 37 327042 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 3 A3_1_left.MP4 8996 5.0028 Before Balistidae sp 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 3 A3_1_left.MP4 22558 12.5448 Before Blennidae Meiacanthus lineatus 37 408053 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 3 A3_3_left.MP4 21916 47.6231 Before Carcharhinidae Galeocerdo cuvier 37 018022 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 3 A3_1_left.MP4 23188 12.8951 Before Hemiscylliidae Chiloscyllium punctatum 37 013008 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 3 A3_1_left.MP4 4866 2.706 Before Labridae sp 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 3 A3_1_left.MP4 2738 1.5226 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 3 A3_1_left.MP4 5110 2.8417 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 3 A3_1_left.MP4 7243 4.0279 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 3 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 3 A3_1_left.MP4 7604 4.2287 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 5 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 3 A3_1_left.MP4 17629 9.8037 Before Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 3 A3_1_left.MP4 5022 2.7928 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 3 A3_1_left.MP4 28604 15.907 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 12 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_A 3 A3_1_left.MP4 28253 15.7118 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 9 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 1 B1_1_left.MP4 24058 13.3789 Before Apogonidae Apogon sp 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 1 B1_1_left.MP4 4529 2.5186 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 3 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 1 B1_2_left.MP4 2272 18.9812 Before Labridae Cirrhilabrus punctatus 37 384083 3 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 1 B1_2_left.MP4 9451 22.9735 Before Labridae Coris batuensis 37 384098 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 1 B1_1_left.MP4 26028 14.4745 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 1 B1_2_left.MP4 381 17.9296 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 3 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 1 B1_1_left.MP4 2689 1.4954 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 1 B1_1_left.MP4 4331 2.4085 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 6 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 1 B1_1_left.MP4 14957 8.3178 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 1 B1_1_left.MP4 6076 3.3789 Before Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 1 B1_1_left.MP4 21544 11.9809 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 1 B1_1_left.MP4 27672 15.3887 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 11 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 1 B1_1_left.MP4 29213 16.2457 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 1 B1_1_left.MP4 9218 5.1262 Before Serranidae Plectropomus sp 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7152 3.9773 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 12 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7192 3.9996 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus sp 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7865 4.3738 Before Acanthuridae Naso brevirostris 37 437026 18 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 14147 7.8673 Before Acanthuridae Naso lituratus 37 437029 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 6785 3.7732 Before Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 5 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 6805 3.7843 Before Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 5 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 3190 1.774 Before Balistidae Sufflamen chrysopterum 37 465079 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 17709 9.8482 Before Balistidae Sufflamen fraenatum 37 465014 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 17242 9.5885 Before Carangidae Pseudocaranx dentex 37 337082 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 14079 7.8295 Before Chaetodontidae Chaetodon melannotus 37 365043 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 4437 2.4675 Before Chaetodontidae Coradion chrysozonus 37 365004 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 17286 9.6129 Before Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 2308 1.2835 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 4174 2.3212 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_2_left.MP4 11516 24.1219 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384113 3 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 7883 4.3838 Before Labridae Scarus rubroviolaceus 37 386028 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 13933 7.7483 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 3 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 20950 11.6505 Before Lutjanidae Lutjanus adetii 37 346033 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 13006 7.2328 Before Lutjanidae Lutjanus fulviflamma 37 346034 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_2_left.MP4 15929 26.576 Before Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 8636 4.8026 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 12092 6.7245 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 2312 1.2857 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus coelestis 37 372111 4 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 3190 1.774 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus sp 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 6959 3.87 Before Serranidae Diploprion bifasciatum 37 312002 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 2 B2_1_left.MP4 11307 6.2879 Before Serranidae Plectropomus sp 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_1_left.MP4 14387 0.005556 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 3 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_2_left.MP4 10902 0.016514 Before Acanthuridae Naso annulatus 37 437024 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_1_left.MP4 17542 0.006775 Before Acanthuridae Naso brachycentron 37 437025 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_1_left.MP4 4600 0.001777 Before Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 13 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_1_left.MP4 14387 0.005556 Before Balistidae Sufflamen chrysopterum 37 465079 1 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_2_left.MP4 5097 0.014272 Before Chaetodontidae Chaetodon rainfordi 37 365053 4 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_1_left.MP4 3411 0.001317 Before Chaetodontidae Chaetodon trifascialis 37 365058 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_1_left.MP4 8467 0.00327 Before Haemulidae Plectorhinchus unicolor 37 350013 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_1_left.MP4 26775 0.01034 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_2_left.MP4 2337 0.013206 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384113 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_1_left.MP4 18572 0.007172 Before Labridae Hologymnosus doliatus 37 384127 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_1_left.MP4 8624 0.00333 Before Labridae Scarus niger 37 386021 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_1_left.MP4 19665 0.007594 Before Labridae Scarus sp 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_2_left.MP4 2608 0.013311 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 5 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_1_left.MP4 15470 0.005974 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 7 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_2_left.MP4 6664 0.014878 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis clathrata 37 390013 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_2_left.MP4 9435 0.015948 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_1_left.MP4 8467 0.00327 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 9 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_1_left.MP4 13508 0.005217 Before Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_2_left.MP4 22235 0.020891 Before Siganidae Siganus canaliculatus 37 438004 4 E1_10/2019 NearField m_B 3 B3_1_left.MP4 3414 0.001318 Before Zanclidae Zanclus cornutus 37 437001 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_1_left.MP4 16185 9.0007 Before Apogonidae Apogon sp 4 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_1_left.MP4 8464 4.7069 Before Apogonidae Ostorhinchus angustatus 37 327042 3 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_1_left.MP4 15478 8.6075 Before Caesionidae Pterocaesio tile 37 346063 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_2_left.MP4 5701 20.8881 Before Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_2_left.MP4 5701 20.8881 Before Ginglymostomatidae Nebrius ferrugineus 37 013010 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_1_left.MP4 23041 12.8134 Before Labridae sp 0 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_1_left.MP4 21477 11.9436 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_1_left.MP4 2577 1.4331 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_1_left.MP4 2052 1.1411 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384113 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_1_left.MP4 2853 1.5866 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 1 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_1_left.MP4 22826 12.6938 Before Labridae Leptojulis cyanopleura 37 384027 7 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_1_left.MP4 6007 3.3406 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 4 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_1_left.MP4 2305 1.2818 Before Labridae Scarus sp 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_2_left.MP4 11449 24.0846 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 4 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_1_left.MP4 26203 14.5718 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_1_left.MP4 2853 1.5866 Before Mullidae Parupeneus barberinoides 37 355021 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_1_left.MP4 9975 5.5472 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_2_left.MP4 6319 21.2318 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_1_left.MP4 9592 5.3342 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 17 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_2_left.MP4 11002 23.836 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 20 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 1 C1_1_left.MP4 15826 8.801 Before Siganidae Siganus canaliculatus 37 438004 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 2 C2_2_left.MP4 12653 24.7542 Before Blennidae Meiacanthus lineatus 37 408053 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 2 C2_2_left.MP4 23079 30.5522 Before Carcharhinidae Carcharhinus leucas 37018021 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 2 C2_1_left.MP4 14031 7.8028 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 3 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 2 C2_1_left.MP4 18376 10.2191 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 2 C2_1_left.MP4 3428 1.9063 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384113 3 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 2 C2_1_left.MP4 17272 9.6052 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 2 C2_1_left.MP4 2130 1.1845 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 2 C2_1_left.MP4 2130 1.1845 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 2 C2_1_left.MP4 17636 9.8076 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 2 C2_1_left.MP4 23317 12.9668 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 2 C2_1_left.MP4 5552 3.0875 Before Monacanthidae sp 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 2 C2_1_left.MP4 5326 2.9618 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 2 C2_1_left.MP4 14002 7.7867 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 2 C2_1_left.MP4 2130 1.1845 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 2 C2_2_left.MP4 9193 22.83 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus coelestis 37 372111 4 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 2 C2_1_left.MP4 17272 9.6052 Before Siganidae Siganus canaliculatus 37 438004 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 3 C3_1_Left.MP4 9446 0.003648 Before Dasyatidae Neotrygon kuhlii 37 035903 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 3 C3_2_Left.MP4 3948 0.013829 Before Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 3 C3_1_Left.MP4 23487 0.00907 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 3 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 3 C3_1_Left.MP4 12337 0.004764 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 3 C3_1_Left.MP4 15829 0.006113 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384113 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 3 C3_2_Left.MP4 5368 0.014377 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 3 C3_1_Left.MP4 12337 0.004764 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 3 C3_1_Left.MP4 20940 0.008087 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 3 C3_2_Left.MP4 3948 0.013829 Before Mobulidae Mobula sp 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 3 C3_1_Left.MP4 13572 0.005241 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 3 C3_1_Left.MP4 20940 0.008087 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 3 C3_1_Left.MP4 30767 0.011882 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 10 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_C 3 C3_2_Left.MP4 12318 0.017061 Before Sphyrnidae Sphyrna lewini 37 019001 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 1 D1_2_left.MP4 20275 28.9929 Before Dasyatidae sp 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 1 D1_1_left.MP4 2676 1.4882 Before Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 1 D1_2_left.MP4 7266 21.7584 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 4 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 1 D1_1_left.MP4 29278 16.2818 Before Labridae sp 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 1 D1_1_left.MP4 16095 8.9506 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 1 D1_2_left.MP4 12693 24.7764 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 1 D1_1_left.MP4 10215 5.6807 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384113 12 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 1 D1_2_left.MP4 6319 21.2318 Before Labridae Leptojulis cyanopleura 37 384027 12 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 1 D1_1_left.MP4 12787 7.111 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 6 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 1 D1_2_left.MP4 19551 28.5902 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 1 D1_1_left.MP4 4345 2.4163 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 2 D2_1_left.MP4 24183 13.4484 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus sp 1 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 2 D2_2_left.MP4 22419 30.1852 Before Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 14 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 2 D2_2_left.MP4 4036 19.9622 Before Balistidae Abalistes stellaris 37 465011 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 2 D2_2_left.MP4 10352 23.4746 Before Hemiscylliidae Chiloscyllium punctatum 37 013008 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 2 D2_1_left.MP4 29024 16.1406 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 2 D2_1_left.MP4 11787 6.5549 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384113 6 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 2 D2_1_left.MP4 24694 13.7326 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 2 D2_1_left.MP4 5008 2.785 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 2 D2_1_left.MP4 22802 12.6804 Before Serranidae Plectropomus maculatus 37 311012 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 2 D2_1_left.MP4 6055 3.3673 Before Serranidae Plectropomus sp 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 3 D3_2_left.MP4 9166 22.815 Before Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 3 D3_1_left.MP4 26340 14.648 Before Blennidae Meiacanthus lineatus 37 408053 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 3 D3_2_left.MP4 23102 30.565 Before Caesionidae Pterocaesio marri 37 346068 15 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 3 D3_2_left.MP4 21068 29.4338 Before Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 3 D3_2_left.MP4 21169 29.49 Before Ginglymostomatidae Nebrius ferrugineus 37 013010 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 3 D3_2_left.MP4 14650 25.8647 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 12 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 3 D3_2_left.MP4 23873 30.9937 Before Labridae sp 3 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 3 D3_2_left.MP4 23869 30.9915 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 5 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 3 D3_1_left.MP4 11189 6.2223 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 3 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 3 D3_1_left.MP4 3562 1.9809 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384113 3 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 3 D3_2_left.MP4 19308 28.4551 Before Labridae Leptojulis cyanopleura 37 384027 6 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 3 D3_1_left.MP4 6191 3.4429 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 5 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 3 D3_1_left.MP4 6010 3.3422 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 3 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 3 D3_2_left.MP4 19166 28.3761 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 7 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 3 D3_2_left.MP4 3461 19.6424 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 3 D3_2_left.MP4 21859 29.8737 Before Mullidae Parupeneus barberinoides 37 355021 3 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 3 D3_2_left.MP4 21859 29.8737 Before Mullidae Parupeneus spilurus 37 355015 1 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 3 D3_2_left.MP4 5442 20.7441 Before Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 3 D3_1_left.MP4 8519 4.7375 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_D 3 D3_2_left.MP4 23182 30.6095 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 13 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 1 E1_1_left.MP4 27765 15.4404 Before Balistidae Abalistes stellaris 37 465011 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 1 E1_2_left.MP4 19703 28.6748 Before Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 1 E1_1_left.MP4 22972 12.775 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 55 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 1 E1_1_left.MP4 16700 9.2871 Before Haemulidae Diagramma pictum 37 350003 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 1 E1_1_left.MP4 6588 3.6637 Before Labridae Choerodon schoenleinii 37 384010 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 1 E1_1_left.MP4 10650 5.9226 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 1 E1_2_left.MP4 25899 32.1204 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384113 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 1 E1_1_left.MP4 7937 4.4139 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 3 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 1 E1_2_left.MP4 27392 32.9507 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus nebulosus 37 351008 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 1 E1_1_left.MP4 25719 14.3026 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis clathrata 37 390013 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 1 E1_1_left.MP4 15156 8.4284 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 1 E1_2_left.MP4 25899 32.1204 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 6 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 1 E1_2_left.MP4 31396 35.1774 Before Scombridae Scomberomorus queenslandicus 37 441014 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 2 E2_2_left.MP4 655 18.082 Before Hemiscylliidae Chiloscyllium punctatum 37 013008 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 2 E2_1_Left.MP4 17373 9.6613 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 2 E2_2_left.MP4 16933 27.1343 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 2 E2_1_Left.MP4 4444 2.4714 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384113 7 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 2 E2_1_Left.MP4 4242 2.359 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 2 E2_1_Left.MP4 5749 3.1971 Before Labridae Leptojulis cyanopleura 37 384027 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 2 E2_1_Left.MP4 4242 2.359 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 9 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 2 E2_1_Left.MP4 21524 11.9697 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 2 E2_1_Left.MP4 6292 3.4991 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis clathrata 37 390013 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 2 E2_1_Left.MP4 11194 6.2251 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 2 E2_1_Left.MP4 23867 13.2727 Before Pomacentridae Amphiprion chrysopterus 37 372021 1 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 2 E2_1_Left.MP4 9523 5.2958 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 31 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 2 E2_2_left.MP4 3971 19.926 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 9 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 2 E2_1_Left.MP4 30909 17.1888 Before Pseudochromidae Ogilbyina novaehollandiae 37 313009 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 3 E3_1_left.MP4 23728 13.1954 Before Apogonidae Cheilodipterus quinquelineatus 37 327090 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 3 E3_1_left.MP4 29750 16.5443 Before Balistidae Sufflamen chrysopterum 37 465079 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 3 E3_2_left.MP4 12250 24.5301 Before Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 3 E3_1_left.MP4 4027 2.2395 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 4 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 3 E3_1_left.MP4 3443 1.9147 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 3 E3_1_left.MP4 5551 3.087 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 3 E3_1_left.MP4 3311 1.8413 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 6 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 3 E3_1_left.MP4 9630 5.3554 Before Labridae Stethojulis strigiventer 37 384156 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 3 E3_1_left.MP4 23263 12.9368 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 3 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 3 E3_2_left.MP4 22855 30.4276 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 3 E3_2_left.MP4 19971 28.8238 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus atkinsoni 37 351013 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 3 E3_2_left.MP4 23109 30.5689 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 3 E3_1_left.MP4 6987 3.8855 Before Lutjanidae Aprion virescens 37 346027 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 3 E3_1_left.MP4 3983 2.215 Before Mullidae Parupeneus barberinoides 37 355021 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 3 E3_1_left.MP4 21353 11.8746 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 3 E3_1_left.MP4 4027 2.2395 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 1 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 3 E3_2_left.MP4 23723 30.9103 Before Pomacentridae Dascyllus reticulatus 37 372074 4 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 3 E3_1_left.MP4 2202 1.2246 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 12 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 3 E3_1_left.MP4 14130 7.8579 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 2 E1_10/2019 Remediation m_E 3 E3_1_left.MP4 8991 5 Before Siganidae Siganus canaliculatus 37 438004 8 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 1 G1_2_left.MP4 13428 25.1852 Before Blennidae sp 0 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 1 G1_1_left.MP4 2589 1.4398 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 9 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 1 G1_1_left.MP4 12942 7.1972 Before Labridae sp0 0 1 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 1 G1_1_left.MP4 31510 17.5231 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 1 G1_1_left.MP4 20111 11.184 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 4 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 1 G1_1_left.MP4 3673 2.0426 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384113 6 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 1 G1_2_left.MP4 19833 28.7471 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 1 G1_1_left.MP4 4788 2.6627 Before Labridae Leptojulis cyanopleura 37 384027 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 1 G1_1_left.MP4 5403 3.0047 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 4 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 1 G1_1_left.MP4 30327 16.8652 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 1 G1_1_left.MP4 3140 1.7462 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 1 G1_1_left.MP4 23232 12.9196 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 9 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 2 G2_2_Left.MP4 7981 22.156 Before Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 2 G2_1_Left.MP4 20915 11.6311 Before Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 2 G2_1_Left.MP4 20118 11.1878 Before Blennidae Ecsenius bicolor 37 408022 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 2 G2_2_Left.MP4 24169 31.1583 Before Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 2 G2_1_Left.MP4 2436 1.3547 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 58 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 2 G2_1_Left.MP4 8237 4.5807 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 2 G2_1_Left.MP4 10457 5.8153 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 3 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 2 G2_1_Left.MP4 13192 7.3362 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384113 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 2 G2_1_Left.MP4 12542 6.9747 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 5 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 2 G2_2_Left.MP4 15742 26.472 Before Labridae Scarus sp 4 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 2 G2_1_Left.MP4 8237 4.5807 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 2 G2_1_Left.MP4 11916 6.6266 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 2 G2_2_Left.MP4 13057 24.9788 Before Lutjanidae Symphorus nametophorus 37 346017 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 2 G2_1_Left.MP4 14038 7.8067 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 2 G2_2_Left.MP4 10012 23.2855 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 2 G2_1_Left.MP4 8711 4.8443 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 14 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 2 G2_2_Left.MP4 21742 29.8087 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 1 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 2 G2_2_Left.MP4 14070 25.5422 Before Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 2 G2_1_Left.MP4 8491 4.7219 Before Siganidae Siganus sp 0 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 3 G3_1_left.MP4 7032 3.9106 Before Apogonidae Apogon sp 0 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 3 G3_2_left.MP4 259 17.8617 Before Balistidae Abalistes stellaris 37 465011 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 3 G3_1_left.MP4 24212 13.4646 Before Blennidae Meiacanthus lineatus 37 408053 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 3 G3_1_left.MP4 30107 16.7428 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 4 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 3 G3_2_left.MP4 15204 26.1728 Before Hemiscylliidae Chiloscyllium punctatum 37 013008 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 3 G3_1_left.MP4 5887 3.2738 Before Labridae sp 0 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 3 G3_1_left.MP4 2536 1.4103 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 3 G3_1_left.MP4 3729 2.0737 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 4 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 3 G3_1_left.MP4 3165 1.7601 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384113 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 3 G3_1_left.MP4 6439 3.5808 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 3 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 3 G3_2_left.MP4 19593 28.6136 Before Labridae Leptojulis cyanopleura 37 384027 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 3 G3_1_left.MP4 7201 4.0046 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 10 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 3 G3_2_left.MP4 2129 18.9017 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 4 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 3 G3_1_left.MP4 6910 3.8427 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 3 G3_1_left.MP4 24234 13.4768 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 3 G3_1_left.MP4 23527 13.0836 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 5 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 3 G3_2_left.MP4 10596 23.6103 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 9 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 3 G3_1_left.MP4 2361 1.313 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus coelestis 37 372111 2 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 3 G3_1_left.MP4 11581 6.4403 Before Pseudochromidae Ogilbyina sp 1 E1_10/2019 NearField m_G 3 G3_2_left.MP4 8747 22.582 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 3 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_1_left.MP4 6929 3.8533 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_1_left.MP4 11560 6.4286 Before Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 68 17.7555 Before Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 2889 19.3243 Before Balistidae Sufflamen chrysopterum 37 465079 1 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 9850 23.1954 Before Chaetodontidae Coradion chrysozonus 37 365004 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_1_left.MP4 9079 5.0489 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 20828 29.3004 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_1_left.MP4 6575 3.6564 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 934 18.2371 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 4 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_1_left.MP4 11427 6.3547 Before Labridae Scarus sp 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 1031 18.2911 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 6230 21.1823 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 10 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 25620 31.9653 Before Lutjanidae Symphorus nametophorus 37 346017 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_1_left.MP4 28409 15.7986 Before Mullidae Parupeneus barberinoides 37 355021 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 2623 19.1764 Before Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_1_left.MP4 7431 4.1325 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis clathrata 37 390013 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_1_left.MP4 12236 6.8046 Before Pomacanthidae Centropyge bicolor 37 365022 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 423 17.9529 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 4 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 1451 18.5246 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 1327 18.4557 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 21 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_1_left.MP4 11560 NA Before Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_1_left.MP4 6575 NA Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_1_left.MP4 11427 NA Before Labridae Scarus sp 0 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_1_left.MP4 28409 NA Before Mullidae Parupeneus barberinoides 37 355021 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_1_left.MP4 7431 NA Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis clathrata 37 390013 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_1_left.MP4 12236 NA Before Pomacanthidae Centropyge bicolor 37 365022 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 68 35.4732 Before Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 2889 37.042 Before Balistidae Sufflamen chrysopterum 37 465079 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 9850 40.9131 Before Chaetodontidae Coradion chrysozonus 37 365004 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 20828 47.0181 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 2 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 1031 36.0088 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 6230 38.9 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 10 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 25620 49.683 Before Lutjanidae Symphorus nametophorus 37 346017 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 423 35.6706 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 4 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 1451 36.2423 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 1 H1_2_left.MP4 1327 36.1734 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 21 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 2 H2_1_left.MP4 23489 13.0625 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 5 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 2 H2_1_left.MP4 21328 11.8607 Before Hemiscylliidae Chiloscyllium punctatum 37 013008 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 2 H2_1_left.MP4 18464 10.268 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 2 H2_1_left.MP4 8860 4.9271 Before Mullidae Parupeneus spilurus 37 355015 3 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 2 H2_1_left.MP4 18915 10.5188 Before Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 2 H2_1_left.MP4 27615 15.357 Before Siganidae Siganus canaliculatus 37 438004 6 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 2 H2_2_left.MP4 9172 22.8184 Before Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 2 H2_2_left.MP4 3808 19.8354 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 13 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 2 H2_2_left.MP4 4281 20.0984 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus coelestis 37 372111 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_2_left.MP4 12092 0.016974 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus dussumieri 37 437008 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_1_left.MP4 17186 0.006637 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 4 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_1_left.MP4 30341 0.011717 Before Acanthuridae Naso brachycentron 37 437025 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_1_left.MP4 20649 0.007974 Before Apogonidae Apogon sp 5 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_1_left.MP4 10964 0.004234 Before Balistidae Sufflamen chrysopterum 37 465079 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_2_left.MP4 15840 0.018421 Before Balistidae Sufflamen fraenatum 37 465014 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_1_left.MP4 6470 0.002499 Before Chaetodontidae Chaetodon kleinii 37 365040 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_1_left.MP4 26156 0.010101 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_1_left.MP4 6408 0.002475 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_1_left.MP4 6408 0.002475 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384113 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_1_left.MP4 16338 0.006309 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 2 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_1_left.MP4 6297 0.002432 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 11 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_1_left.MP4 8870 0.003425 Before Labridae Stethojulis bandanensis 37 384154 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_2_left.MP4 23449 0.02136 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_1_left.MP4 3982 0.001538 Before Mullidae Parupeneus barberinoides 37 355021 3 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_1_left.MP4 4092 0.00158 Before Mullidae Parupeneus spilurus 37 355015 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_2_left.MP4 23171 0.021252 Before Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 4 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_1_left.MP4 11122 0.004295 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis clathrata 37 390013 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_1_left.MP4 8767 0.003386 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 3 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_1_left.MP4 6408 0.002475 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_1_left.MP4 29206 0.011279 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 13 E1_10/2019 Control m_H 3 H3_2_left.MP4 16210 0.018564 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 1 I1_1_left.MP4 29603 16.4626 Before Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 1 I1_1_left.MP4 31094 17.2917 Before Balistidae Sufflamen chrysopterum 37 465079 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 1 I1_1_left.MP4 2321 1.2907 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 33 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 1 I1_1_left.MP4 14189 7.8907 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 1 I1_1_left.MP4 5318 2.9574 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 3 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 1 I1_1_left.MP4 4767 2.651 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384113 20 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 1 I1_1_left.MP4 19952 11.0955 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 1 I1_1_left.MP4 7852 4.3666 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 1 I1_1_left.MP4 28455 15.8241 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 1 I1_1_left.MP4 27620 15.3598 Before Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 3 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 1 I1_1_left.MP4 6718 3.736 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 1 I1_2_left.MP4 1534 18.5708 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus coelestis 37 372111 15 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 2 I2_1_left.MP4 7191 3.999 Before Balistidae Rhinecanthus rectangulus 37 465073 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 2 I2_1_left.MP4 5523 3.0714 Before Blennidae Meiacanthus lineatus 37 408053 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 2 I2_1_left.MP4 21954 12.2089 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 6 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 2 I2_1_left.MP4 8958 4.9816 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E1_10/2019 Control m_I 2 I2_1_left.MP4 10638 5.9159 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 5 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 2 I2_1_left.MP4 5982 3.3267 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384113 3 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 2 I2_1_left.MP4 5559 3.0914 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 8 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 2 I2_1_left.MP4 2773 1.5421 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 2 I2_2_left.MP4 13075 24.9889 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 4 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 2 I2_1_left.MP4 25340 14.0919 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus sp 0 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 2 I2_1_left.MP4 22796 12.6771 Before Mullidae Parupeneus barberinoides 37 355021 3 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 2 I2_1_left.MP4 3241 1.8024 Before Mullidae Parupeneus spilurus 37 355015 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 2 I2_2_left.MP4 5566 20.813 Before Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 6 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 2 I2_1_left.MP4 20948 11.6494 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 2 I2_2_left.MP4 5861 20.9771 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 7 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 2 I2_1_left.MP4 3342 1.8585 Before Siganidae Siganus canaliculatus 37 438004 43 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 3 I3_1_left.MP4 9716 5.4032 Before Balistidae Rhinecanthus rectangulus 37 465073 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 3 I3_1_left.MP4 24808 13.796 Before Hemiscylliidae Chiloscyllium punctatum 37 013008 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 3 I3_1_left.MP4 3657 2.0337 Before Labridae sp 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 3 I3_1_left.MP4 30068 16.7211 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 3 I3_1_left.MP4 2941 1.6355 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 3 I3_1_left.MP4 3718 2.0676 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384113 3 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 3 I3_1_left.MP4 5796 3.2232 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 3 I3_1_left.MP4 12607 7.0109 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 8 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 3 I3_2_left.MP4 10177 23.3772 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 3 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 3 I3_1_left.MP4 10833 6.0244 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 16 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 3 I3_1_left.MP4 3360 1.8685 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus sp 0 1 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 3 I3_1_left.MP4 3711 2.0637 Before Mullidae Parupeneus barberinoides 37 355021 7 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 3 I3_1_left.MP4 12123 6.7417 Before Mullidae Parupeneus spilurus 37 355015 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 3 I3_1_left.MP4 3660 2.0354 Before Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 2 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E1_10/2019 Control m_I 3 I3_1_left.MP4 8795 4.891 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 3 I3_1_left.MP4 4388 2.4402 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 3 I3_1_left.MP4 20365 11.3252 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 7 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 3 I3_1_left.MP4 13598 7.562 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus coelestis 37 372111 2 E1_10/2019 Control m_I 3 I3_1_left.MP4 28766 15.9971 Before Siganidae Siganus canaliculatus 37 438004 48 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 9887 37.9971 Before Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 7109 53.9971 Before Balistidae Sufflamen chrysopterum 37 465079 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 23687 63.9971 Before Blennidae Meiacanthus grammistes 37 408005 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-2.MP4 8221 77.9971 Before Blennidae Salarias sp 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 10223 87.9971 Before Carangidae Carangoides fulvoguttatus 37 337037 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 9339 96.9971 Before Carangidae Carangoides orthogrammus 37 337057 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 9339 97.9971 Before Carangidae Caranx melampygus 37 337050 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 2494 106.9971 Before Chaetodontidae Chaetodon rainfordi 37 365053 3 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 7485 109.9971 Before Chaetodontidae Coradion altivelis 37 365018 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 4445 120.9971 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 124 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 26447 139.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon schoenleinii 37 384010 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-2.MP4 1317 147.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 3597 191.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 5 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 3887 213.9971 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 6473 241.9971 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 3 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 3347 263.9971 Before Labridae Stethojulis strigiventer 37 384156 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 5486 283.9971 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 13261 344.9971 Before Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347028 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 6886 358.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis clathrata 37 390013 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 26330 362.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis cylindrica 37 390041 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-2.MP4 22711 391.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 48 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-2.MP4 21129 418.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 56 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-2.MP4 23392 442.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus coelestis 37 372111 5 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 3892 448.9971 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-2.MP4 18815 463.9971 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis sp 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 7732 471.9971 Before Serranidae Epinephelus merra 37 311063 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-2.MP4 5680 473.9971 Before Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-2.MP4 693 480.9971 Before Siganidae Siganus argenteus 37 438007 3 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 1 A1L-1.MP4 25826 490.9971 Before Tetraodontidae Canthigaster valentini 37 467043 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 2 A2L-1.MP4 7560 30.9971 Before Acanthuridae Naso brachycentron 37 437025 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 2 A2L-1.MP4 4590 121.9971 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 130 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 2 A2L-1.MP4 3778 171.9971 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 2 A2L-1.MP4 10893 192.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 3 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 2 A2L-1.MP4 4147 214.9971 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 3 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 2 A2L-2.MP4 19593 233.9971 Before Labridae Leptojulis cyanopleura 37 384027 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 2 A2L-1.MP4 3038 242.9971 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 2 A2L-1.MP4 2584 271.9971 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 2 A2L-1.MP4 4088 336.9971 Before Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 2 A2L-1.MP4 4144 359.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis clathrata 37 390013 3 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 2 A2L-2.MP4 12301 392.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 7 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 2 A2L-1.MP4 1603 419.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 12 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 2 A2L-1.MP4 12551 449.9971 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 3 A3L-2.MP4 13708 65.9971 Before Blennidae Meiacanthus lineatus 37 408053 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 3 A3L-1.MP4 4351 111.9971 Before Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 3 A3L-2.MP4 2512 122.9971 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 131 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 3 A3L-1.MP4 2366 148.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 3 A3L-1.MP4 4467 172.9971 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 1 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 3 A3L-1.MP4 6449 215.9971 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 3 A3L-1.MP4 5242 243.9971 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 3 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 3 A3L-1.MP4 11701 272.9971 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 3 A3L-1.MP4 5620 360.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis clathrata 37 390013 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 3 A3L-2.MP4 3300 393.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 36 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 3 A3L-1.MP4 19582 420.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 15 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_A 3 A3L-1.MP4 3514 450.9971 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 1 B1L_1.MP4 5912 54.9971 Before Balistidae Sufflamen chrysopterum 37 465079 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 1 B1L_2.MP4 11005 61.9971 Before Balistidae Sufflamen fraenatum 37 465014 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 1 B1L_1.MP4 20440 86.9971 Before Carangidae Alectis ciliaris 37 337018 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 1 B1L_1.MP4 13898 101.9971 Before Carangidae Pseudocaranx dentex 37 337082 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 1 B1L_1.MP4 22180 112.9971 Before Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 1 B1L_1.MP4 3476 123.9971 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 1 B1L_2.MP4 1593 149.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 1 B1L_1.MP4 4785 173.9971 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 1 B1L_1.MP4 7931 193.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 1 B1L_1.MP4 5142 234.9971 Before Labridae Leptojulis cyanopleura 37 384027 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 1 B1L_1.MP4 6139 244.9971 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 1 B1L_2.MP4 8341 284.9971 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 3 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 1 B1L_2.MP4 25131 319.9971 Before Monacanthidae Aluterus scriptus 37 465045 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 1 B1L_1.MP4 13935 345.9971 Before Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347028 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 1 B1L_1.MP4 11559 394.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 33 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 1 B1L_1.MP4 3298 415.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chrysiptera rollandi 37 372067 3 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 1 B1L_1.MP4 11254 421.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 18 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 1 B1L_1.MP4 4786 446.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus wardi 37 372127 5 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 1 B1L_1.MP4 3298 464.9971 Before Scombridae Scomberomorus commerson 37 441007 6 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 1 B1L_2.MP4 23201 474.9971 Before Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 2 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 4992 17.9971 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 19 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 2083 29.9971 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus xanthopterus 37 437020 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 25116 34.9971 Before Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 12 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 2145 38.9971 Before Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 6741 55.9971 Before Balistidae Sufflamen chrysopterum 37 465079 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 9975 78.9971 Before Blennidae Salarias sp 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 3784 108.9971 Before Chaetodontidae Chelmon rostratus 37 365017 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-2.MP4 9353 110.9971 Before Chaetodontidae Coradion altivelis 37 365018 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 20280 113.9971 Before Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 13935 124.9971 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 3 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 16402 140.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon schoenleinii 37 384010 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 2984 150.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 26157 169.9971 Before Labridae Coris gaimard 37 384094 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 5358 174.9971 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 2915 194.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 3 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 25732 216.9971 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 2937 245.9971 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 3292 346.9971 Before Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347028 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 18395 379.9971 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 20627 388.9971 Before Pomacanthidae Pomacanthus semicirculatus 37 365080 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 2449 395.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 24 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 2937 422.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 9 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-2.MP4 17104 475.9971 Before Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 5 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 2 B2L-1.MP4 6956 489.9971 Before Siganidae Siganus punctatus 37 438003 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 3 B3L_1.MP4 2517 18.9971 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 3 B3L_2.MP4 10779 79.9971 Before Blennidae Salarias sp 1 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 3 B3L_2.MP4 13554 95.9971 Before Carangidae Carangoides gymnostethus 37 337022 3 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 3 B3L_1.MP4 16703 135.9971 Before Haemulidae Diagramma pictum 37 350003 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 3 B3L_1.MP4 11256 151.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 3 B3L_1.MP4 11735 175.9971 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 3 B3L_2.MP4 7073 195.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 3 B3L_1.MP4 21269 264.9971 Before Labridae Stethojulis strigiventer 37 384156 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 3 B3L_1.MP4 9493 285.9971 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 3 B3L_2.MP4 15077 347.9971 Before Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347028 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 3 B3L_1.MP4 12417 423.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 8 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 3 B3L_2.MP4 4665 443.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus coelestis 37 372111 11 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 3 B3L_1.MP4 25216 447.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus wardi 37 372127 5 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 3 B3L_2.MP4 5095 451.9971 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 3 B3L_1.MP4 17424 465.9971 Before Scombridae Scomberomorus commerson 37 441007 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_B 3 B3L_2.MP4 8653 476.9971 Before Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 1 C1L-1.MP4 2758 26.9971 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus dussumieri 37 437008 3 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 1 C1L-1.MP4 10432 41.9971 Before Apogonidae Apogon sp 51 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 1 C1L-1.MP4 14376 66.9971 Before Blennidae Meiacanthus lineatus 37 408053 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 1 C1L-1.MP4 9619 85.9971 Before Caesionidae Pterocaesio sp 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 1 C1L-1.MP4 7803 88.9971 Before Carangidae Carangoides fulvoguttatus 37 337037 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 1 C1L-1.MP4 25539 103.9971 Before Chaetodontidae Chaetodon kleinii 37 365040 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 1 C1L-1.MP4 10757 125.9971 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 1 C1L-1.MP4 25429 152.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 5 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 1 C1L-1.MP4 2218 176.9971 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 1 C1L-1.MP4 5308 196.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 1 C1L-1.MP4 2218 217.9971 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 1 C1L-2.MP4 7973 246.9971 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 2 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 1 C1L-1.MP4 26255 261.9971 Before Labridae Stethojulis bandanensis 37 384154 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 1 C1L-1.MP4 5743 273.9971 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 3 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 1 C1L-2.MP4 7066 297.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 1 C1L-1.MP4 18729 321.9971 Before Mullidae Parupeneus barberinoides 37 355021 4 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 1 C1L-1.MP4 4792 361.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis clathrata 37 390013 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 1 C1L-1.MP4 7603 396.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 4 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 1 C1L-1.MP4 3073 424.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 7 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 1 C1L-1.MP4 26021 481.9971 Before Siganidae Siganus canaliculatus 37 438004 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 2 C2L-1.MP4 23517 89.9971 Before Carangidae Carangoides fulvoguttatus 37 337037 4 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 2 C2L-1.MP4 10106 153.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 2 C2L-2.MP4 8427 177.9971 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 2 C2L-1.MP4 1620 197.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 3 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 2 C2L-1.MP4 13675 218.9971 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 2 C2L-1.MP4 2973 235.9971 Before Labridae Leptojulis cyanopleura 37 384027 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 2 C2L-1.MP4 15353 262.9971 Before Labridae Stethojulis bandanensis 37 384154 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 2 C2L-1.MP4 1529 265.9971 Before Labridae Stethojulis strigiventer 37 384156 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 2 C2L-1.MP4 8968 298.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 2 C2L-1.MP4 7261 310.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus sp 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 2 C2L-1.MP4 1470 337.9971 Before Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 2 C2L-2.MP4 18311 348.9971 Before Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 4 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 2 C2L-1.MP4 6927 363.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 2 C2L-1.MP4 4207 397.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 5 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 2 C2L-1.MP4 5010 425.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 10 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 2 C2L-1.MP4 12071 452.9971 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 3 C3L-1.MP4 14271 64.9971 Before Blennidae Meiacanthus grammistes 37 408005 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 3 C3L-1.MP4 16504 90.9971 Before Carangidae Carangoides fulvoguttatus 37 337037 1 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 3 C3L-1.MP4 1857 138.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon jordani 37 384077 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 3 C3L-1.MP4 2179 154.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 6 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 3 C3L-1.MP4 3476 178.9971 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 3 C3L-1.MP4 19094 198.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 3 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 3 C3L-1.MP4 8259 219.9971 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 3 C3L-1.MP4 4434 236.9971 Before Labridae Leptojulis cyanopleura 37 384027 4 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 3 C3L-1.MP4 5608 286.9971 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 3 C3L-1.MP4 7746 295.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus lentjan 37 351007 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 3 C3L-1.MP4 6736 299.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 3 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 3 C3L-1.MP4 5789 322.9971 Before Mullidae Parupeneus barberinoides 37 355021 4 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 3 C3L-1.MP4 2810 349.9971 Before Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 3 C3L-1.MP4 23627 364.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 3 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 3 C3L-1.MP4 4434 398.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 3 C3L-1.MP4 4980 426.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_C 3 C3L-1.MP4 13128 466.9971 Before Scombridae Scomberomorus commerson 37 441007 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-1.MP4 1814 19.9971 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 4 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-1.MP4 16808 35.9971 Before Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-1.MP4 5651 39.9971 Before Acanthuridae Naso unicornis 37 437031 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-2.MP4 3774 56.9971 Before Balistidae Sufflamen chrysopterum 37 465079 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-2.MP4 15377 80.9971 Before Blennidae Salarias sp 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-1.MP4 5711 136.9971 Before Labridae Cheilinus fasciatus 37 384066 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-2.MP4 2294 155.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-2.MP4 4867 170.9971 Before Labridae Coris gaimard 37 384094 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-2.MP4 11639 199.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 3 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-1.MP4 10514 220.9971 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-2.MP4 17422 247.9971 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 2 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-1.MP4 1739 274.9971 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-1.MP4 21378 287.9971 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-1.MP4 18887 316.9971 Before Lutjanidae Symphorus nametophorus 37 346017 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-1.MP4 11789 350.9971 Before Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-1.MP4 13080 365.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-2.MP4 21417 389.9971 Before Pomacanthidae Pomacanthus semicirculatus 37 365080 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-1.MP4 23059 399.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 16 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-1.MP4 1663 413.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chrysiptera flavipinnis 37 372061 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-1.MP4 2424 427.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 12 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-2.MP4 1308 453.9971 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-2.MP4 21782 469.9971 Before Serranidae Epinephelus coioides 37 311007 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 1 D1L-1.MP4 16355 477.9971 Before Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 4 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-2.MP4 9451 20.9971 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-1.MP4 3231 27.9971 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus dussumieri 37 437008 3 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-1.MP4 4682 31.9971 Before Acanthuridae Naso fageni 37 437027 4 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-1.MP4 3997 40.9971 Before Acanthuridae Naso vlamingii 37 437032 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-1.MP4 2017 42.9971 Before Apogonidae Apogon sp 5 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-2.MP4 15600 57.9971 Before Balistidae Sufflamen chrysopterum 37 465079 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-2.MP4 5160 67.9971 Before Blennidae Meiacanthus lineatus 37 408053 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-2.MP4 19736 126.9971 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-1.MP4 3487 156.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 3 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-1.MP4 3360 179.9971 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-1.MP4 1387 200.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 3 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-1.MP4 4620 221.9971 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-1.MP4 1952 275.9971 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-1.MP4 2404 300.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 3 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-1.MP4 4401 323.9971 Before Mullidae Parupeneus barberinoides 37 355021 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-1.MP4 11948 351.9971 Before Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 3 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-1.MP4 2531 366.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-1.MP4 4401 380.9971 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-1.MP4 10350 400.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 7 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-1.MP4 2911 428.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 6 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 2 D2L-1.MP4 3681 482.9971 Before Siganidae Siganus canaliculatus 37 438004 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 3 D3L-1.MP4 1991 58.9971 Before Balistidae Sufflamen chrysopterum 37 465079 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 3 D3L-1.MP4 13917 91.9971 Before Carangidae Carangoides fulvoguttatus 37 337037 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 3 D3L-2.MP4 8729 127.9971 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 22 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 3 D3L-1.MP4 24210 137.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon anchorago 37 384071 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 3 D3L-2.MP4 19238 141.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon schoenleinii 37 384010 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 3 D3L-2.MP4 2080 157.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 3 D3L-1.MP4 4885 180.9971 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 3 D3L-1.MP4 1666 201.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 3 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 3 D3L-1.MP4 22658 222.9971 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 3 D3L-1.MP4 10541 248.9971 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 3 D3L-1.MP4 24210 288.9971 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 6 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 3 D3L-2.MP4 2785 315.9971 Before Lutjanidae Lutjanus adetii 37 346033 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 3 D3L-1.MP4 3516 352.9971 Before Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 3 D3L-1.MP4 5989 367.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 3 D3L-2.MP4 5606 401.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 3 D3L-1.MP4 23564 429.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 13 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 3 D3L-2.MP4 12015 454.9971 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 3 D3L-1.MP4 9576 470.9971 Before Serranidae Epinephelus coioides 37 311007 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_D 3 D3L-1.MP4 26510 478.9971 Before Serranidae Plectropomus leopardus 37 311078 1 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 1 E1L-1.MP4 23147 81.9971 Before Blennidae Salarias sp 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 1 E1L-1.MP4 14338 92.9971 Before Carangidae Carangoides fulvoguttatus 37 337037 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 1 E1L-1.MP4 16063 158.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 1 E1L-1.MP4 4026 181.9971 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 1 E1L-1.MP4 7458 202.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 1 E1L-1.MP4 14731 223.9971 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 1 E1L-1.MP4 19617 249.9971 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 4 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 1 E1L-1.MP4 5530 289.9971 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 1 E1L-1.MP4 25051 402.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 10 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 1 E1L-1.MP4 1915 430.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 8 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 1 E1L-1.MP4 18164 455.9971 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 1 E1L-1.MP4 7950 467.9971 Before Scombridae Scomberomorus commerson 37 441007 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 2 E2L-1.MP4 21904 68.9971 Before Blennidae Meiacanthus lineatus 37 408053 4 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 2 E2L-1.MP4 10575 128.9971 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 2 E2L-1.MP4 22058 145.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon sp 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 2 E2L-1.MP4 15590 159.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 2 E2L-1.MP4 1479 182.9971 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 2 E2L-1.MP4 2130 203.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 5 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 2 E2L-1.MP4 3959 212.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres sp 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 2 E2L-1.MP4 19139 224.9971 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 2 E2L-1.MP4 7493 237.9971 Before Labridae Leptojulis cyanopleura 37 384027 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 2 E2L-1.MP4 2299 250.9971 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 7 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 2 E2L-1.MP4 2025 266.9971 Before Labridae Stethojulis strigiventer 37 384156 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 2 E2L-2.MP4 13485 276.9971 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 2 E2L-2.MP4 19692 353.9971 Before Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 2 E2L-1.MP4 2323 368.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 1 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 2 E2L-1.MP4 1559 403.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 17 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 2 E2L-2.MP4 14616 431.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 14 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 2 E2L-1.MP4 3424 456.9971 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-1.MP4 1431 21.9971 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-1.MP4 2946 28.9971 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus dussumieri 37 437008 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-1.MP4 20005 43.9971 Before Apogonidae Apogon sp 5 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-2.MP4 6476 69.9971 Before Blennidae Meiacanthus lineatus 37 408053 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-1.MP4 5541 76.9971 Before Blennidae Petroscirtes sp 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-2.MP4 13671 98.9971 Before Carangidae Gnathanodon speciosus 37 337012 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-2.MP4 12920 102.9971 Before Carcharhinidae Galeocerdo cuvier 37 018022 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-2.MP4 13640 114.9971 Before Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 3 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-1.MP4 23356 129.9971 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 6 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-1.MP4 2253 146.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon sp 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-1.MP4 2516 160.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 5 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-1.MP4 1431 183.9971 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-1.MP4 4426 204.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-1.MP4 2424 225.9971 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-1.MP4 6976 238.9971 Before Labridae Leptojulis cyanopleura 37 384027 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-1.MP4 4426 251.9971 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 3 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-2.MP4 14174 277.9971 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 3 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-2.MP4 14950 301.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-1.MP4 1783 324.9971 Before Mullidae Parupeneus barberinoides 37 355021 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-2.MP4 17646 354.9971 Before Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 2 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-1.MP4 20950 369.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 1 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-1.MP4 1453 404.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 8 E2_04/2020 Remediation m_E 3 E3L-1.MP4 13876 432.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 16 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 1 G1L-1.MP4 8627 130.9971 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 8 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 1 G1L-1.MP4 8371 142.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon schoenleinii 37 384010 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 1 G1L-1.MP4 2327 161.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 1 G1L-1.MP4 2371 184.9971 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 3 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 1 G1L-1.MP4 1626 205.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 1 G1L-1.MP4 4619 226.9971 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 1 G1L-1.MP4 2257 239.9971 Before Labridae Leptojulis cyanopleura 37 384027 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 1 G1L-1.MP4 3251 252.9971 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 5 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 1 G1L-1.MP4 3095 267.9971 Before Labridae Stethojulis strigiventer 37 384156 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 1 G1L-1.MP4 20892 317.9971 Before Lutjanidae Symphorus nametophorus 37 346017 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 1 G1L-1.MP4 2371 355.9971 Before Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 1 G1L-1.MP4 1966 370.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 1 G1L-1.MP4 3532 405.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 4 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 1 G1L-1.MP4 2838 433.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 16 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 1 G1L-1.MP4 5799 457.9971 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-2.MP4 9973 44.9971 Before Apogonidae Apogon sp 7 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-1.MP4 4308 70.9971 Before Blennidae Meiacanthus lineatus 37 408053 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-1.MP4 9897 82.9971 Before Caesionidae Pterocaesio chrysozona 99 379085 110 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-1.MP4 20765 115.9971 Before Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-1.MP4 14338 131.9971 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 8 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-1.MP4 14842 143.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon schoenleinii 37 384010 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-1.MP4 1858 162.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-1.MP4 3835 185.9971 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-1.MP4 6048 227.9971 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-1.MP4 15877 253.9971 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 6 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-1.MP4 4556 268.9971 Before Labridae Stethojulis strigiventer 37 384156 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-1.MP4 3482 278.9971 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-1.MP4 16715 290.9971 Before Lethrinidae Gymnocranius audleyi 37 351018 3 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-2.MP4 13231 302.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-1.MP4 19032 356.9971 Before Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-1.MP4 5928 371.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-2.MP4 12806 381.9971 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-2.MP4 12752 406.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 65 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-2.MP4 11362 434.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 80 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-1.MP4 4256 458.9971 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 2 G2L-1.MP4 8041 462.9971 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis quinquedentatus 37 313001 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 3 G3L-1.MP4 1724 45.9971 Before Apogonidae Apogon sp 4 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 3 G3L-1.MP4 1711 71.9971 Before Blennidae Meiacanthus lineatus 37 408053 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 3 G3L-1.MP4 1864 83.9971 Before Caesionidae Pterocaesio chrysozona 99 379085 11 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 3 G3L-1.MP4 10152 116.9971 Before Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 3 G3L-2.MP4 12207 132.9971 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 22 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 3 G3L-1.MP4 3124 163.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 3 G3L-1.MP4 9714 186.9971 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 3 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 3 G3L-1.MP4 1905 206.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 4 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 3 G3L-1.MP4 16303 228.9971 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 3 G3L-1.MP4 2224 254.9971 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 4 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 3 G3L-1.MP4 2536 269.9971 Before Labridae Stethojulis strigiventer 37 384156 1 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 3 G3L-1.MP4 14797 279.9971 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 3 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 3 G3L-1.MP4 4137 303.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 2 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 3 G3L-1.MP4 22838 325.9971 Before Mullidae Parupeneus barberinoides 37 355021 4 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 3 G3L-1.MP4 4192 372.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 3 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 3 G3L-1.MP4 6982 407.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 25 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 3 G3L-1.MP4 2788 435.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 29 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 3 G3L-1.MP4 4531 459.9971 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 3 E2_04/2020 NearField m_G 3 G3L-1.MP4 5475 483.9971 Before Siganidae Siganus canaliculatus 37 438004 2 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-1.MP4 6409 16.9971 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus dussumieri 37 437008 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-1.MP4 22532 22.9971 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 3 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-1.MP4 4455 46.9971 Before Apogonidae Apogon sp 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-1.MP4 14006 59.9971 Before Balistidae Sufflamen chrysopterum 37 465079 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-2.MP4 2054 75.9971 Before Blennidae Meiacanthus luteus 37 408054 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-2.MP4 8709 93.9971 Before Carangidae Carangoides fulvoguttatus 37 337037 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-2.MP4 19117 104.9971 Before Chaetodontidae Chaetodon kleinii 37 365040 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-1.MP4 4977 133.9971 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 61 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-1.MP4 26146 164.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 4 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-2.MP4 14913 187.9971 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-1.MP4 2812 207.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-1.MP4 10563 229.9971 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-2.MP4 17397 255.9971 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 4 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-1.MP4 12407 304.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-1.MP4 1958 318.9971 Before Lutjanidae Symphorus nametophorus 37 346017 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-1.MP4 22391 326.9971 Before Mullidae Parupeneus barberinoides 37 355021 3 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-2.MP4 12044 332.9971 Before Mullidae Parupeneus multifasciatus 37 355026 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-2.MP4 12400 333.9971 Before Mullidae Parupeneus spilurus 37 355015 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-2.MP4 14086 335.9971 Before Nemipteridae Pentapodus nagasakiensis 37 347012 5 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-1.MP4 20499 338.9971 Before Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 4 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-1.MP4 14286 357.9971 Before Nemipteridae Scolopsis monogramma 37 347006 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-2.MP4 19880 373.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 3 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-1.MP4 4270 382.9971 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-1.MP4 18865 387.9971 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus personifer 37 365008 4 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-1.MP4 2812 408.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-1.MP4 4250 414.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chrysiptera flavipinnis 37 372061 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-1.MP4 21609 436.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 48 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-2.MP4 3804 460.9971 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 1 H1L-1.MP4 22720 479.9971 Before Serranidae Plectropomus maculatus 37 311012 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 12677 23.9971 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 4 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-2.MP4 13870 32.9971 Before Acanthuridae Naso fageni 37 437027 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 13829 36.9971 Before Acanthuridae Naso tonganus 37 437047 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 1684 47.9971 Before Apogonidae Apogon sp 92 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 7365 62.9971 Before Balistidae Sufflamen fraenatum 37 465014 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-2.MP4 8650 99.9971 Before Carangidae Gnathanodon speciosus 37 337012 4 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 3844 107.9971 Before Chaetodontidae Chaetodon rainfordi 37 365053 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-2.MP4 8650 118.9971 Before Ginglymostomatidae Nebrius ferrugineus 37 013010 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 9144 144.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon schoenleinii 37 384010 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 15271 165.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 4 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 10613 188.9971 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 23291 230.9971 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 6883 256.9971 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 7 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 5995 270.9971 Before Labridae Stethojulis strigiventer 37 384156 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-2.MP4 18326 280.9971 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 22115 291.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus rubrioperculatus 37 351012 5 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 18811 305.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 6 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 14440 320.9971 Before Monacanthidae Cantheschenia grandisquamis 37 465052 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 21794 327.9971 Before Mullidae Parupeneus barberinoides 37 355021 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 14730 339.9971 Before Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 5 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 21173 374.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 6685 383.9971 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 2242 409.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 36 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 7282 416.9971 Before Pomacentridae Dascyllus trimaculatus 37 372075 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-2.MP4 17323 437.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 42 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 23291 444.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus coelestis 37 372111 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 2 H2L-1.MP4 17793 484.9971 Before Siganidae Siganus canaliculatus 37 438004 8 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 2956 24.9971 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 7183 33.9971 Before Acanthuridae Naso fageni 37 437027 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 7805 60.9971 Before Balistidae Sufflamen chrysopterum 37 465079 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-2.MP4 10040 84.9971 Before Caesionidae Pterocaesio chrysozona 99 379085 13 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 13426 100.9971 Before Carangidae Gnathanodon speciosus 37 337012 4 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 5208 105.9971 Before Chaetodontidae Chaetodon kleinii 37 365040 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 14189 117.9971 Before Echeneidae Echeneis naucrates 37 336001 5 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 14052 119.9971 Before Ginglymostomatidae Nebrius ferrugineus 37 013010 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 14633 166.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 4 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 2466 208.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 2471 231.9971 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-2.MP4 1319 257.9971 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 4604 281.9971 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 14830 292.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus rubrioperculatus 37 351012 11 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 14830 296.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus lentjan 37 351007 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 9532 306.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 3 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 15290 311.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus sp 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 19880 313.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus rubrioperculatus 37 351012 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 2995 328.9971 Before Mullidae Parupeneus barberinoides 37 355021 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 5912 334.9971 Before Mullidae Parupeneus spilurus 37 355015 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 8297 340.9971 Before Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 15565 375.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 3309 384.9971 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 3 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-2.MP4 10040 410.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 74 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 17905 438.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 8 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 8434 472.9971 Before Serranidae Epinephelus quoyanus 37 311040 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_H 3 H3L-1.MP4 4867 485.9971 Before Siganidae Siganus canaliculatus 37 438004 8 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 1 I1L-1.MP4 5076 48.9971 Before Apogonidae Apogon sp 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 1 I1L-2.MP4 8142 50.9971 Before Balistidae Rhinecanthus rectangulus 37 465073 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 1 I1L-1.MP4 18166 72.9971 Before Blennidae Meiacanthus lineatus 37 408053 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 1 I1L-2.MP4 5877 167.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 1 I1L-1.MP4 18209 189.9971 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 1 I1L-1.MP4 2073 209.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 6 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 1 I1L-1.MP4 17175 232.9971 Before Labridae Labroides dimidiatus 37 384028 3 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 1 I1L-1.MP4 2470 258.9971 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 5 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 1 I1L-2.MP4 10847 282.9971 Before Labridae Thalassoma lunare 37 384167 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 1 I1L-2.MP4 20711 307.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 6 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 1 I1L-2.MP4 708 329.9971 Before Mullidae Parupeneus barberinoides 37 355021 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 1 I1L-2.MP4 4547 341.9971 Before Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 4 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 1 I1L-1.MP4 12571 376.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 3 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 1 I1L-1.MP4 20912 385.9971 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 3 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 1 I1L-2.MP4 17727 411.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 1 I1L-2.MP4 6742 439.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 23 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 1 I1L-1.MP4 5526 461.9971 Before Pseudochromidae Pseudochromis fuscus 37 313006 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 1 I1L-2.MP4 19140 486.9971 Before Siganidae Siganus canaliculatus 37 438004 12 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 2 I2L-1.MP4 9086 51.9971 Before Balistidae Rhinecanthus rectangulus 37 465073 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 2 I2L-1.MP4 1533 73.9971 Before Blennidae Meiacanthus lineatus 37 408053 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 2 I2L-1.MP4 11154 94.9971 Before Carangidae Carangoides fulvoguttatus 37 337037 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 2 I2L-1.MP4 6891 134.9971 Before Gobidae Ptereleotris microlepis 37 435019 12 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 2 I2L-1.MP4 26442 190.9971 Before Labridae Coris pictoides 37 384096 3 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 2 I2L-1.MP4 13002 210.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 4 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 2 I2L-2.MP4 3285 240.9971 Before Labridae Pseudojuloides elongatus 37 384148 1 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E2_04/2020 Control m_I 2 I2L-1.MP4 2838 259.9971 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 2 I2L-1.MP4 20153 293.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus rubrioperculatus 37 351012 4 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 2 I2L-2.MP4 14885 308.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 11 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 2 I2L-1.MP4 4605 312.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus sp 4 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 2 I2L-2.MP4 2568 314.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus rubrioperculatus 37 351012 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 2 I2L-2.MP4 9318 330.9971 Before Mullidae Parupeneus barberinoides 37 355021 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 2 I2L-1.MP4 1941 342.9971 Before Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 2 I2L-1.MP4 7647 377.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 2 I2L-1.MP4 21546 440.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 25 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 2 I2L-1.MP4 13734 445.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus coelestis 37 372111 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 2 I2L-2.MP4 2480 468.9971 Before Scombridae Scomberomorus commerson 37 441007 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 2 I2L-1.MP4 2305 487.9971 Before Siganidae Siganus canaliculatus 37 438004 13 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 3 I3L-1.MP4 2115 25.9971 Before Acanthuridae Acanthurus grammoptilus 37 437002 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 3 I3L-2.MP4 2217 49.9971 Before Apogonidae Apogon sp 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 3 I3L-1.MP4 9019 52.9971 Before Balistidae Rhinecanthus rectangulus 37 465073 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 3 I3L-1.MP4 12924 74.9971 Before Blennidae Meiacanthus lineatus 37 408053 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 3 I3L-1.MP4 16347 168.9971 Before Labridae Choerodon venustus 37 384042 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 3 I3L-1.MP4 2733 211.9971 Before Labridae Halichoeres nebulosus 37 384118 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 3 I3L-1.MP4 14065 260.9971 Before Labridae Pseudolabrus guentheri 37 384150 3 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 3 I3L-1.MP4 24540 294.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus rubrioperculatus 37 351012 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 3 I3L-2.MP4 91 309.9971 Before Lethrinidae Lethrinus miniatus 37 351009 8 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 3 I3L-1.MP4 19405 331.9971 Before Mullidae Parupeneus barberinoides 37 355021 3 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 3 I3L-1.MP4 19314 343.9971 Before Nemipteridae Pentapodus paradiseus 37 347028 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 3 I3L-2.MP4 12941 378.9971 Before Pinguipedidae Parapercis stricticeps 37 390019 2 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 3 I3L-1.MP4 2115 386.9971 Before Pomacanthidae Chaetodontoplus meredithi 37 365065 4 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 3 I3L-1.MP4 4438 390.9971 Before Pomacentridae Amphiprion ocellaris 37 372025 1 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 3 I3L-1.MP4 25859 412.9971 Before Pomacentridae Chromis nitida 37 372049 4 Event Treatment Location Replicate Filename Frame Time (mins) Remed Period Family Genus Species Code MaxN E2_04/2020 Control m_I 3 I3L-1.MP4 4648 417.9971 Before Pomacentridae Dascyllus trimaculatus 37 372075 3 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 3 I3L-1.MP4 23914 441.9971 Before Pomacentridae Pomacentrus australis 37 372107 17 E2_04/2020 Control m_I 3 I3L-1.MP4 16083 488.9971 Before Siganidae Siganus canaliculatus 37 438004 18 1 BMT has a proven record in addressing today’s engineering and environmental issues. Our dedication to developing innovative approaches and solutions enhances our ability to meet our client’s most challenging needs. www.bmt.org Brisbane Level 8, 200 Creek Street Brisbane Queensland 4000 PO Box 203 Spring Hill Queensland 4004 Australia Tel +61 7 3831 6744 Fax +61 7 3832 3627 Email brisbane@bmtglobal.com Melbourne Level 5, 99 King Street Melbourne Victoria 3000 Australia Tel +61 3 8620 6100 Fax +61 3 8620 6105 Email melbourne@bmtglobal.com Newcastle 126 Belford Street Broadmeadow New South Wales 2292 PO Box 266 Broadmeadow New South Wales 2292 Australia Tel +61 2 4940 8882 Fax +61 2 4940 8887 Email newcastle@bmtglobal.com Adelaide 5 Hackney Road Hackney Adelaide South Australia 5069 Australia Tel +61 8 8614 3400 Email info@bmtdt.com.au Northern Rivers Suite 5 20 Byron Street Bangalow New South Wales 2479 Australia Tel +61 2 6687 0466 Fax +61 2 6687 0422 Email northernrivers@bmtglobal.com Sydney Suite G2, 13-15 Smail Street Ultimo Sydney New South Wales 2007 Australia Tel +61 2 8960 7755 Fax +61 2 8960 7745 Email sydney@bmtglobal.com Perth Level 4 20 Parkland Road Osborne Park Western Australia 6017 PO Box 2305 Churchlands Western Australia 6018 Australia Tel +61 8 6163 4900 Email wa@bmtglobal.com London Zig Zag Building, 70 Victoria Street Westminster London, SW1E 6SQ UK Tel +44 (0) 20 8090 1566 Email london@bmtglobal.com Leeds Platform New Station Street Leeds, LS1 4JB UK Tel: +44 (0) 113 328 2366 Email environment.env@bmtglobal.com Aberdeen 11 Bon Accord Crescent Aberdeen, AB11 6DE UK Tel: +44 (0) 1224 414 200 Email aberdeen@bmtglobal.com Asia Pacic Indonesia Oce Perkantoran Hijau Arkadia Tower C, P Floor Jl: T.B. Simatupang Kav.88 Jakarta, 12520 Indonesia Tel: +62 21 782 7639 Email asiapacic@bmtglobal.com Alexandria 4401 Ford Avenue, Suite 1000 Alexandria, VA 22302 USA Tel: +1 703 920 7070 Email inquiries@dandp.com BMT in Environment Other BMT oces