Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11017/2903

Coastal ecosystem management case study: fish connectivity


View this entry

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, G.*
dc.contributor.authorMcGrath, C.*
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, J.*
dc.contributor.authorHockings, M.*
dc.contributor.authorMoss, P.*
dc.coverage.spatialFitzroy basinen
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-28T01:50:50Z-
dc.date.available2014-11-28T01:50:50Z-
dc.date.copyright2013en
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11017/2903-
dc.description.abstractThe Fitzroy River basin is the largest catchment of the Great Barrier Reef, and the ecosystem functions it provides are vital for maintaining the health of the Great Barrier Reef. The coastal ecosystems of the lower Fitzroy River region, incorporating the lower Fitzroy, Styx, Shoalwater and Waterpark basins, encompass an area of approximately 20,000 km2 and include varying levels of development. Much of the lower Fitzroy and Styx basins have been heavily modified for development (primarily for agriculture, dominated by grazing) while the Shoalwater and Waterpark basins remain relatively development free. In the case of the Shoalwater basin, this is predominantly due to the presence of the military training area which constrains development. Development within the Fitzroy region has led to extensive changes in water flow regimes resulting from the harvesting of water resources for industry, agriculture and domestic use. The associated infrastructure, including dams, weirs, tidal barrages and ponded pasture systems, as well as other infrastructure connected with development such as road and rail connections, have resulted in many obstructions in water courses that act as barriers to fish movement and connectivity between ecosystems. These impacts are representative of many other Great Barrier Reef catchments and the management of them provides lessons for management of the Great Barrier Reef catchment generally.en
dc.publisherGreat Barrier Reef Marine Park Authorityen
dc.rightsPrepared on 14 June 2013 for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority by: Glen Holmes, Chris McGrath, Josh Larsen, Marc Hockings and Patrick Moss - School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, The University of Queenslanden
dc.titleCoastal ecosystem management case study: fish connectivityen
dc.typeReport*
dc.subject.asfaRiver basinsen
dc.subject.asfaCatchment areaen
dc.subject.asfaCoastal environmenten
dc.format.pages61en
dc.subject.apaisRiversen
dc.subject.apaisCoastsen
dc.publisher.placeTownsvilleen
dc.relation.connectiontogbrmpaGBRMPA published this itemen
dc.subject.categoryAnimalsen
dc.subject.categoryEcosystemsen
dc.subject.categoryProcessesen
dc.subject.categoryGeographic featuresen
dc.subject.categoryWorld heritageen
dc.subject.categoryAgricultureen
dc.subject.categoryCoastal developmenten
dc.subject.categoryMiningen
dc.subject.categoryWater qualityen
dc.subject.categoryCoastal communitiesen
dc.subject.categoryCouncilsen
dc.subject.categoryFarmers and graziersen
dc.subject.categoryMinersen
dc.subject.locationMackay/Capricorn Management Areaen
dc.keywordsCoastal ecosystemsen
dc.keywordsCoastal ecosystem managementen
dc.keywordsLower Fitzroy River basinen
dc.keywordsFish connectivityen
dc.keywordsEcological functionen
Appears in Collections:Effects

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
Case_study_fish_connectivity_Fitzroy.docxMain report17.73 MBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Case_study_fish_connectivity_Fitzroy.pdfMain report7.3 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in the ELibrary are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing